Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Abduction of 5 Year old Girl April Jones (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33689993)

thenry 30-04-2013 12:23

Re: Abduction of 5 Year old Girl April Jones
 
we need a Guantanamo Bay type of place over here to deal with these sickos

Mr_love_monkey 30-04-2013 12:41

Re: Abduction of 5 Year old Girl April Jones
 
Awful. Just awful :(

Chris 30-04-2013 15:52

Re: Abduction of 5 Year old Girl April Jones
 
Posts removed.

Offering your opinion on the guilt or innocence of someone standing trial is a criminal offence ("contempt of court") that can result in you being jailed by the trial judge very quickly without you even having a full trial of your own. Ignorance of the Law is not an excuse and judges are increasingly looking for examples of this sort of thing on forums and social media in order to make an example of offenders.

PLEASE DO NOT DO IT HERE, none of the CF team is going to go to jail for you and we WILL remove your posts, issue infractions and, if requested, hand your IP details to the authorities.

You have been warned.

Dave42 30-04-2013 15:59

Re: Abduction of 5 Year old Girl April Jones
 
hope he in jail all his life if he proved guilty and no chance of ever getting out

---------- Post added at 16:59 ---------- Previous post was at 16:58 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kymmy (Post 35566655)
Blood and bone fragments matching poor April's DNA were found in his home :(

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-22353735

I feel sorry for the poor parents knowing that she's dead but not knowing where she is

yes that must be hard for them to deal with

spreadsheet 30-04-2013 18:08

Re: Abduction of 5 Year old Girl April Jones
 
they should 'water board' the information out of him

dilli-theclaw 30-04-2013 18:12

Re: Abduction of 5 Year old Girl April Jones
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spreadsheet (Post 35566781)
they should 'water board' the information out of him

Isn't evictee obtained using torture inadmissible?

martyh 30-04-2013 18:15

Re: Abduction of 5 Year old Girl April Jones
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spreadsheet (Post 35566781)
they should 'water board' the information out of him

Appears to be plenty of evidence against him without the need for torture ,he'll get that when he gets inside ,a few of the lags might gladly give their tv rights to sort him out

Mick Fisher 30-04-2013 18:19

Re: Abduction of 5 Year old Girl April Jones
 
Suspend him by his bits and he will spill the beans pretty sharpish.

Derek 30-05-2013 11:20

Re: Abduction of 5 Year old Girl April Jones
 
And in another rejection of the 'Huntley defence' Mark Bridger has been found guilty of the abduction and murder of April Jones. Also guilty of perverting the course of justice.

Hopefully now he will accept his guilt and tell the family what he did with her body.

Damien 30-05-2013 11:22

Re: Abduction of 5 Year old Girl April Jones
 
Surprised that it took that long. His defence seemed so stupid.

Derek 30-05-2013 11:23

Re: Abduction of 5 Year old Girl April Jones
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35577392)
Surprised that it took that long. His defence seemed so stupid.

The coffee must have been good in the jury room. :erm:

I can only think that they were considering the perverting the course of justice charge.

thenry 30-05-2013 11:51

Re: Abduction of 5 Year old Girl April Jones
 
disgusting ******* crackhead!

Damien 30-05-2013 13:57

Re: Abduction of 5 Year old Girl April Jones
 
Whole life tariff.

nomadking 30-05-2013 14:01

Re: Abduction of 5 Year old Girl April Jones
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35577392)
Surprised that it took that long. His defence seemed so stupid.

Don't the jury have to go over all the evidence, no matter how much of a foregone conclusion it seems?

Damien 30-05-2013 14:15

Re: Abduction of 5 Year old Girl April Jones
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35577456)
Don't the jury have to go over all the evidence, no matter how much of a foregone conclusion it seems?

I am not sure. I don't think they get given a instruction in how to proceed through the evidence just to consider it a reach a verdict on which they're all agreed.

Each member would have been considering the evidence during the trial and if it's so open and shut then I think you might be forgiven for thinking they would breeze through the the deliberations.


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:01.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum