Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Britain outside the EU (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709659)

jonbxx 10-06-2021 10:00

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36082435)
Talking of the Irish, any news snippets on this subject from the First Minister or Deputy?

I guess they have more important issues this week, and sausages can play a back role

I was having a look myself. Of course, the negotiation from the Irish side of things is being done by Maroš Šefčovič of the EU Commission but this is what I am seeing;

Biden intervention in NI Protocol row 'significant' - Taoiseach
EU frustration at lack of protocol progress - Coveney
Northern Ireland faces ‘turbulent few months’ over Brexit, says Varadkar (OK deputy leader)

Sephiroth 10-06-2021 10:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
It's very disappointing to see Andrew and Jon explaining things from the enemy's perspective. Johnson signed a bum deal and here we are - in difficulty.

But coming at the results of Johnson's folly from a defensive EU perspective is downright unpatriotic.

The Referendum authorised the Guvmin to leave the EU; the Remainers bemoaned this and now are in total "we told you so" mode.

It is bad that Biden sides with Ireland. He is equally of English and Irish descent (so far as I have ascertained) but he openly declares himself as Irish-American. That immediately places him with the perfidious Varadkar and Coveney. So, Biden is no friend of ours.

Then there's Coveny, the tail wagging the EU dog. I hope this all comes back to bite him when he finds his country's exports screwed because of EU intransigence. There is very little now that can stop the Unionist backlash on both Johnson and Ireland. The Marching Season (a stupidity in itself) will likely bring violence and Biden will not have protected the Belfast Agreement; the violence can't be stopped, imo, and Johnson is going to face the music for this.

But we must not give in to the EU, whose only true aim is to punish the UK for daring to leave its poxy hegemony.


Carth 10-06-2021 10:57

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Cheers jonbxx, some good reads there, most of which seems to be concerned with a possible breakdown of the 'peace process' . . and a return to the bad old days I guess, although that, like the Palestine/Israel thing, won't go away.

No mention of sausages anywhere, either because the articles are slightly dated or it's only the English press that reduce a top story to the base ingredient of 'sausages' :D

I was hoping I'd find . . anywhere . . a quote from a NI butcher, along the lines of "my customers will only purchase the finest products from local farmers, why would I cut my throat trying to sell them English meat?" ;)

Anyway, sausages are old news now that 'Biden the Bold' has arrived to make everything perfect (like in the USA) :rolleyes:

papa smurf 10-06-2021 11:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36082451)
Cheers jonbxx, some good reads there, most of which seems to be concerned with a possible breakdown of the 'peace process' . . and a return to the bad old days I guess, although that, like the Palestine/Israel thing, won't go away.

No mention of sausages anywhere, either because the articles are slightly dated or it's only the English press that reduce a top story to the base ingredient of 'sausages' :D

I was hoping I'd find . . anywhere . . a quote from a NI butcher, along the lines of "my customers will only purchase the finest products from local farmers, why would I cut my throat trying to sell them English meat?" ;)

Anyway, sausages are old news now that 'Biden the Bold' has arrived to make everything perfect (like in the USA) :rolleyes:

what's wrong with a real meat n gut's story:shrug:

Carth 10-06-2021 11:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36082452)
what's wrong with a real meat n gut's story:shrug:

Nothing I guess, but I think 99% of the English population don't give a skinless one about who's sausages the Irish eat :D

papa smurf 10-06-2021 11:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36082454)
Nothing I guess, but I think 99% of the English population don't give a skinless one about who's sausages the Irish eat :D

But if the Irish eat the wrong sausage or eat mince n taties the European union will collapse, their whole existence relies on sausage control, that's why they're not mincing words over this issue.

Carth 10-06-2021 11:34

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Maybe we could add a sticker to English sausage skins?

'Danger: Do Not Eat If In EU'

We could have 34 different languages on them, just to be on the safe side, and also a disclaimer for those Countries that are IN and OUT at the same side :D

Sephiroth 10-06-2021 11:36

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36082457)
But if the Irish eat the wrong sausage or eat mince n taties the European union will collapse, their whole existence relies on sausage control, that's why they're not mincing words over this issue.

The Irish guzzle the same sausage ingredients at we do.
The reason why the "Irish Sausage" is not heralded as the solution should be obvious to everyone.




Carth 10-06-2021 11:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082460)
The Irish guzzle the same sausage ingredients at we do.
The reason why the "Irish Sausage" is not heralded as the solution should be obvious to everyone.

Is it because the Irish sausage has the skin on the inside?

mrmistoffelees 10-06-2021 11:47

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082448)
It's very disappointing to see Andrew and Jon explaining things from the enemy's perspective. Johnson signed a bum deal and here we are - in difficulty.

But coming at the results of Johnson's folly from a defensive EU perspective is downright unpatriotic.

The Referendum authorised the Guvmin to leave the EU; the Remainers bemoaned this and now are in total "we told you so" mode.

It is bad that Biden sides with Ireland. He is equally of English and Irish descent (so far as I have ascertained) but he openly declares himself as Irish-American. That immediately places him with the perfidious Varadkar and Coveney. So, Biden is no friend of ours.

Then there's Coveny, the tail wagging the EU dog. I hope this all comes back to bite him when he finds his country's exports screwed because of EU intransigence. There is very little now that can stop the Unionist backlash on both Johnson and Ireland. The Marching Season (a stupidity in itself) will likely bring violence and Biden will not have protected the Belfast Agreement; the violence can't be stopped, imo, and Johnson is going to face the music for this.

But we must not give in to the EU, whose only true aim is to punish the UK for daring to leave its poxy hegemony.


Not sure if serious....

If you are serious then your anger/upset or whatever it is needs to be directed at the UK Government not the EU. The UK Gov signed the deal, I don't recall ever the EU placing a gun to the governments head. Do you?

There is nothing unpatriotic about what others are saying

People are saying 'told you so' because guess what, in some aspects they're correct.

If we had you in charge then the UK would not be friends with any other countries, not a great way to try and make your way in the world.

You didn't get the Brexit you wanted. Oh well, diddums. guess what in a few years time you can vote to kick them out :)

You voted for Brexit, I'm assuming that you voted for the Tories, The government accepted the deal from the EU.

Play your part in accepting the outcome that you're responsible for and stop bleating.

Hugh 10-06-2021 12:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082448)
It's very disappointing to see Andrew and Jon explaining things from the enemy's perspective. Johnson signed a bum deal and here we are - in difficulty.

But coming at the results of Johnson's folly from a defensive EU perspective is downright unpatriotic.

The Referendum authorised the Guvmin to leave the EU; the Remainers bemoaned this and now are in total "we told you so" mode.

It is bad that Biden sides with Ireland. He is equally of English and Irish descent (so far as I have ascertained) but he openly declares himself as Irish-American. That immediately places him with the perfidious Varadkar and Coveney. So, Biden is no friend of ours.

Then there's Coveny, the tail wagging the EU dog. I hope this all comes back to bite him when he finds his country's exports screwed because of EU intransigence. There is very little now that can stop the Unionist backlash on both Johnson and Ireland. The Marching Season (a stupidity in itself) will likely bring violence and Biden will not have protected the Belfast Agreement; the violence can't be stopped, imo, and Johnson is going to face the music for this.

But we must not give in to the EU, whose only true aim is to punish the UK for daring to leave its poxy hegemony.


Wiki states he is 5/8th’s Irish.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_of_Joe_Biden

1andrew1 10-06-2021 12:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082448)
It's very disappointing to see Andrew and Jon explaining things from the enemy's perspective. Johnson signed a bum deal and here we are - in difficulty.

But coming at the results of Johnson's folly from a defensive EU perspective is downright unpatriotic.

The Referendum authorised the Guvmin to leave the EU; the Remainers bemoaned this and now are in total "we told you so" mode.

It is bad that Biden sides with Ireland. He is equally of English and Irish descent (so far as I have ascertained) but he openly declares himself as Irish-American. That immediately places him with the perfidious Varadkar and Coveney. So, Biden is no friend of ours.

Then there's Coveny, the tail wagging the EU dog. I hope this all comes back to bite him when he finds his country's exports screwed because of EU intransigence. There is very little now that can stop the Unionist backlash on both Johnson and Ireland. The Marching Season (a stupidity in itself) will likely bring violence and Biden will not have protected the Belfast Agreement; the violence can't be stopped, imo, and Johnson is going to face the music for this.

But we must not give in to the EU, whose only true aim is to punish the UK for daring to leave its poxy hegemony.


If you want to sort things out, you need an honest assessment of the situation. Pretending we're playing cowboys and indians with an enemy is a tad simplistic.

I would also highlight that it's not pro-anyone to point out that Biden values the Irish vote back home. It's also not pro-anyone that the Democrats see the Good Friday Agreement as one of their strongest diplomatic achievements, to be strongly defended.

And it's not Jon, me or the EU who issued the UK with a démarche, a formal diplomatic reprimand, for inflaming the rhetoric in Northern Ireland. That was the USA.

There seem to be four options:
1) Kick the tin can down the road and agree a postponement
2) As you have suggested, we can go for veterinary equivalence and sign up to EU rules. But as Jon has warned, we then risk being described as a vassal state
3) We don't supply chilled meats, etc to Northern Ireland
4) We break an international treaty and carry on supplying NI with chilled meat products, etc past the deadline of 30th June.

If you're David Frost, which one would you choose? Or is there another option?

Carth 10-06-2021 12:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Number 3 . . all the way . . final answer etc etc.

Kills the problem stone dead, frees everyone up to go searching for the next sticking point that this will undoubtedly create :D

jonbxx 10-06-2021 12:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082448)
It's very disappointing to see Andrew and Jon explaining things from the enemy's perspective. Johnson signed a bum deal and here we are - in difficulty.

But coming at the results of Johnson's folly from a defensive EU perspective is downright unpatriotic.

The Referendum authorised the Guvmin to leave the EU; the Remainers bemoaned this and now are in total "we told you so" mode.

It is bad that Biden sides with Ireland. He is equally of English and Irish descent (so far as I have ascertained) but he openly declares himself as Irish-American. That immediately places him with the perfidious Varadkar and Coveney. So, Biden is no friend of ours.

Then there's Coveny, the tail wagging the EU dog. I hope this all comes back to bite him when he finds his country's exports screwed because of EU intransigence. There is very little now that can stop the Unionist backlash on both Johnson and Ireland. The Marching Season (a stupidity in itself) will likely bring violence and Biden will not have protected the Belfast Agreement; the violence can't be stopped, imo, and Johnson is going to face the music for this.

But we must not give in to the EU, whose only true aim is to punish the UK for daring to leave its poxy hegemony.


Well hello!!!

I have just completed a sales straining course and have been reviewing the notes. Loud and clear throughout is the absolute need to understand the customers needs and expectations and also potential objections. This lets you pitch your sales in the correct way for that specific customer. We are a customer of the EU and the EU is a customer of the UK. Each party has their own needs, expectations and objections and understanding and appreciating them allows you to understand what you can get and what you can't.

If I called my customers the enemy if they said 'no' to me, I wouldn't be in a job very long. 'No' is as an important signal as 'yes' because the next question is 'why' and from there, there is potential for movement or compromise.

I want what is best for the UK. Now the details of what I consider the best and what you consider the best might be different but the overarching sentiment is the same. To be called unpatriotic because my views are different from yours is not fair unless you and you alone are in the position of what is best and can prove that all other positions are not as good as yours.

1andrew1 10-06-2021 13:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36082470)
Well hello!!!

I have just completed a sales straining course and have been reviewing the notes. Loud and clear throughout is the absolute need to understand the customers needs and expectations and also potential objections. This lets you pitch your sales in the correct way for that specific customer. We are a customer of the EU and the EU is a customer of the UK. Each party has their own needs, expectations and objections and understanding and appreciating them allows you to understand what you can get and what you can't.

If I called my customers the enemy if they said 'no' to me, I wouldn't be in a job very long. 'No' is as an important signal as 'yes' because the next question is 'why' and from there, there is potential for movement or compromise.

I want what is best for the UK. Now the details of what I consider the best and what you consider the best might be different but the overarching sentiment is the same. To be called unpatriotic because my views are different from yours is not fair unless you and you alone are in the position of what is best and can prove that all other positions are not as good as yours.

Exactly. Explaining the EU's needs (eg to maintain the integrity of Single Market) is not being unpatriotic. It is intelligence that helps you to decide how best to approach negotiations. I dread to imagine how Seph's approach would play out around some of the board rooms I've sat in. Let's just say, I would ensure my mortgage was paid off before I took such an approach!

Sephiroth 10-06-2021 13:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36082467)
If you want to sort things out, you need an honest assessment of the situation. Pretending we're playing cowboys and indians with an enemy is a tad simplistic.

I would also highlight that it's not pro-anyone to point out that Biden values the Irish vote back home. It's also not pro-anyone that the Democrats see the Good Friday Agreement as one of their strongest diplomatic achievements, to be strongly defended.

And it's not Jon, me or the EU who issued the UK with a démarche, a formal diplomatic reprimand, for inflaming the rhetoric in Northern Ireland. That was the USA.

There seem to be four options:
1) Kick the tin can down the road and agree a postponement
2) As you have suggested, we can go for veterinary equivalence and sign up to EU rules. But as Jon has warned, we then risk being described as a vassal state
3) We don't supply chilled meats, etc to Northern Ireland
4) We break an international treaty and carry on supplying NI with chilled meat products, etc past the deadline of 30th June.

If you're David Frost, which one would you choose? Or is there another option?

Well there you have it. Another hegemony at work.

The UK is an independent nation. That the USA should butt in as they have done is a very bad omen. Whilst Ireland is the running dog of the EU (and France the running dog of Germany), now the EU will be the running dog of the USA.

Royally stiffed - by Ireland - are we. All because of Johnson's folly.


1andrew1 10-06-2021 13:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082473)
Well there you have it. Another hegemony at work.

The UK is an independent nation. That the USA should butt in as they have done is a very bad omen. Whilst Ireland is the running dog of the EU (and France the running dog of Germany), now the EU will be the running dog of the USA.

Royally stiffed - by Ireland - are we. All because of Johnson's folly.


We are where we are. Complaining about the PM, the US or the EU may make for jolly banter down the Constitution Club but it doesn't work for trade negotiations.

Which of the four options should we go for? Or do you have a fifth up your sleeve?

Sephiroth 10-06-2021 13:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36082474)
We are where we are. Complaining about the PM, the US or the EU may make for jolly banter down the Constitution Club but it doesn't work for trade negotiations.

Which of the four options should we go for? Or do you have a fifth up your sleeve?

The difference between you and me is that I am a Leaver who is no Johnson fan and deplore the mess he's created. You are a Remainer whom I perceive is lapping up Johnson's difficulties as in "I told you so".

So, we should not give in and we should put peace in priority by not giving way to the EU's intransigence - notwithstanding the trap agreement that Boris signed. Peace there depends on friction free trade between NI and GB and signing up to EU rules and EU law is not what the UK needs.

1andrew1 10-06-2021 13:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082475)
The difference between you and me is that I am a Leaver who is no Johnson fan and deplore the mess he's created. You are a Remainer whom I perceive is lapping up Johnson's difficulties as in "I told you so".

So, we should not give in and we should put peace in priority by not giving way to the EU's intransigence - notwithstanding the trap agreement that Boris signed. Peace there depends on friction free trade between NI and GB and signing up to EU rules and EU law is not what the UK needs.

It's not about which box we ticked in 2016, it's about how we solve the current situation which we should try and face objectively.

It sounds like you are in fact suggesting Option 4. We have signed an agreement with the EU and we can't travel back in time and unsign it.
Quote:

We break an international treaty and carry on supplying NI with chilled meat products, etc past the deadline of 30th June.

Sephiroth 10-06-2021 14:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36082476)
It's not about which box we ticked in 2016, it's about how we solve the current situation which we should try and face objectively.

It sounds like you are in fact suggesting Option 4. We have signed an agreement with the EU and we can't travel back in time and unsign it.

We would be breaking said treaty because the EU is being intransigent. The consequences of the EU's intransigence is unrest in NI. And yes - also the consequence of Johnson's folly.

The public will soon see this and I hope that Boris' days are numbered.


Carth 10-06-2021 14:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082478)
We would be breaking said treaty because the EU is being intransigent. The consequences of the EU's intransigence is unrest in NI. And yes - also the consequence of Johnson's folly.

The public will soon see this and I hope that Boris' days are numbered.


and his successor (whoever you want that to be) will do better because . . . ?

Hugh 10-06-2021 14:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082478)
We would be breaking said treaty because the EU is being intransigent. The consequences of the EU's intransigence is unrest in NI. And yes - also the consequence of Johnson's folly.

The public will soon see this and I hope that Boris' days are numbered.


We will be breaking the treaty because the EU is sticking to the agreement that both sides signed up to?

It wasn't just Boris - the Conservatives in Parliament agreed to it too.

Is that the grown up equivalent of "a big boy made me do it?"

Sephiroth 10-06-2021 14:51

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36082471)
Exactly. Explaining the EU's needs (eg to maintain the integrity of Single Market) is not being unpatriotic. It is intelligence that helps you to decide how best to approach negotiations. I dread to imagine how Seph's approach would play out around some of the board rooms I've sat in. Let's just say, I would ensure my mortgage was paid off before I took such an approach!

It is unpatriotic in so far as you use it to guide "how best to approach negotiations".

You appear to want us to subscribe to EU agriculture Law and the ECJ. (Bad enough that the NI Protocol binds us to the ECJ). Brexit is about sovereignty not subservience.

On your final point, we seem to have done OK with something far worse than Brexit: the Pandemic. We'll survive and thrive by facing the EU down.

Btw, Irish pork sausages are delicious - pity about the perfidious politicians, still stuck in 1916.


1andrew1 10-06-2021 15:34

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36082479)
and his successor (whoever you want that to be) will do better because . . . ?

That's a fair call.

If you changed some of the key players be it the Prime Minister or the Chief Negotiator then you could probably get the EU to extend the deadline by a few months. But you would still be left with the same three remaining choices. On the other hand, you may have more leeway with the British public as a new PM. You could blame the current situation on your predecessor and state you had a difficult to choice to make and go for option 2 or 3.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082483)
It is unpatriotic in so far as you use it to guide "how best to approach negotiations".

You appear to want us to subscribe to EU agriculture Law and the ECJ. (Bad enough that the NI Protocol binds us to the ECJ). Brexit is about sovereignty not subservience.

On your final point, we seem to have done OK with something far worse than Brexit: the Pandemic. We'll survive and thrive by facing the EU down.

Btw, Irish pork sausages are delicious - pity about the perfidious politicians, still stuck in 1916.


As jonbxx has explained, understanding your negotiating party's position is not unpatriotic it's common sense. Doesn't mean you have to agree with their position.

By typing out the four options doesn't mean I am suggesting one of them above the others. As someone who seemed genuinely upset about the situation that the UK is in, I was trying to understand which route you wished us to take. I understand it to be:
Quote:

4) We break an international treaty and carry on supplying NI with chilled meat products, etc past the deadline of 30th June.
I'm not a great sausage person I'm afraid. Too much experience of gristle and bones as a child.

Sephiroth 10-06-2021 16:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36082481)
We will be breaking the treaty because the EU is sticking to the agreement that both sides signed up to?

It wasn't just Boris - the Conservatives in Parliament agreed to it too.


Is that the grown up equivalent of "a big boy made me do it?"

Doesn't make it right. It needs putting right.

papa smurf 10-06-2021 17:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36082466)
Wiki states he is 5/8th’s Irish.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_of_Joe_Biden

At least he's 3/8 perfect ;)

Hugh 10-06-2021 17:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36082498)
At least he's 3/8 perfect ;)

His ancestors were from the South...

Sephiroth 10-06-2021 18:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36082499)
His ancestors were from the South...

... and England. Goes back some way. Indeed, the name "Biden" comes from the English leg.

For example: https://www.chichester.co.uk/news/pe...cestry-3034906

1andrew1 10-06-2021 18:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36082499)
His ancestors were from the South...

Must be a good sort then. :)

Sephiroth 10-06-2021 18:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36082501)
Must be a good sort then. :)

... if not biased. A man to beware.

Hugh 10-06-2021 20:36

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36082499)
His ancestors were from the South...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082500)
... and England. Goes back some way. Indeed, the name "Biden" comes from the English leg.

For example: https://www.chichester.co.uk/news/pe...cestry-3034906

I meant England…

(replying to the 3/8ths comment…)

---------- Post added at 19:36 ---------- Previous post was at 17:43 ----------

I'm beginning to suspect the Daily Telegraph isn't that keen on the EU (difficult to believe, I know...).

Quote:

The imperial EU is blind to the folly of its unequal Northern Ireland Brexit treaty

The protocol isn’t a just law. It was imposed on the UK by Brussels at the moment of our greatest weakness

Why don’t the European elites ever learn lessons from history? It should be obvious that the Northern Ireland Protocol, signed under duress by the UK
The "moment of our greatest weakness" and "imposed"?

Do they mean "the moment" when a Conservative Government rushed through a Withdrawal Bill with 14 hours debate time, the one where BoJo urged Conservative Eurosceptics to back the deal, saying it made good “on every one of our manifesto commitments

Even David Davis said
Quote:

the agreement left “issues to deal with” including Northern Ireland, fishing and Gibraltar. He told the Commons: “It’s not over. All will lead to uncomfortable decisions in the near future.”

Davis said one day was not enough time to deal with a 1,200-page treaty and further time must be given to it to enable the UK to develop its strategy.

“The EU will use the treaty to its own advantage … We have to come back to this treaty and look at it in detail at all 1,200 pages so we don’t get into conflict, don’t fall into traps, don’t get into acrimonious disputes with them [the EU],”

Sephiroth 10-06-2021 20:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36082503)
I meant England…

(replying to the 3/8ths comment…)

---------- Post added at 19:36 ---------- Previous post was at 17:43 ----------

I'm beginning to suspect the Daily Telegraph isn't that keen on the EU (difficult to believe, I know...).



The "moment of our greatest weakness" and "imposed"?

Do they mean "the moment" when a Conservative Government rushed through a Withdrawal Bill with 14 hours debate time, the one where BoJo urged Conservative Eurosceptics to back the deal, saying it made good “on every one of our manifesto commitments

<SNIP>

To provide some balance, the Torygraph article includes this:

Quote:

The EU should have enough self-awareness to understand that the deal it obtained was too good to be true, and that the only way the protocol can survive is if it chooses to exercise maximum flexibility. The UK had no real choice but to sign it: it could either agree to a treaty that essentially handed away parts of Britain’s sovereignty over Northern Ireland, or accept a no-deal Brexit that would have created unnecessary economic damage while still not resolving the Irish situation. The EU wasn’t acting rationally: it was set on kamikaze mode, committed to punishing Britain at any cost.

1andrew1 10-06-2021 21:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082529)
To provide some balance, the Torygraph article includes this:

That additional quote also includes the words "The EU wasn’t acting rationally: it was set on kamikaze mode, committed to punishing Britain at any cost." Not the conventional idea of balance, more like pandering to those Conservatives who think the current government has left us up the creek and equipped us with a butter knife instead of a paddle.

The Telegraph article also omits the fact that the EU offered the UK an extension. As I and others said at the time, this would have given us more chance to strike a better deal.

Sephiroth 10-06-2021 22:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36082530)
That additional quote also includes the words "The EU wasn’t acting rationally: it was set on kamikaze mode, committed to punishing Britain at any cost." Not the conventional idea of balance, more like pandering to those Conservatives who think the current government has left us up the creek and equipped us with a butter knife instead of a paddle.

The Telegraph article also omits the fact that the EU offered the UK an extension. As I and others said at the time, this would have given us more chance to strike a better deal.

You don't know the Telegraph, imo. The article isn't a pander - it is written by one of the wing (to which I belong) that bel;ieves that the EU is out to get us.

On the bit I've highlighted, the extension offer would only have prolonged the agony, and we'd have been paying into the EU, which is what they wanted. They are not a reasonable institution.

It is beyond me why Johnson signed up to the Deal.



1andrew1 10-06-2021 23:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082533)
You don't know the Telegraph, imo. The article isn't a pander - it is written by one of the wing (to which I belong) that bel;ieves that the EU is out to get us.

On the bit I've highlighted, the extension offer would only have prolonged the agony, and we'd have been paying into the EU, which is what they wanted. They are not a reasonable institution.

It is beyond me why Johnson signed up to the Deal.


BoJo signed up to the deal as he'd run out of time, making the UK a weaker party in negotiations. Hence it was that deal or break the Good Friday Agreement with no deal which no British Prime Minister would contemplate.

I'm sure the EU's negotiators were more than happy with BoJo's and indeed your own approach in not wanting an extension as it handed them a great deal on a plate. And we're still paying the EU handsomely too.

Sephiroth 10-06-2021 23:28

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36082534)
BoJo signed up to the deal as he'd run out of time, making the UK a weaker party in negotiations. Hence it was that deal or break the Good Friday Agreement with no deal which no British Prime Minister would contemplate.

I'm sure the EU's negotiators were more than happy with BoJo's and indeed your own approach in not wanting an extension as it handed them a great deal on a plate. And we're still paying the EU handsomely too.

An extension would have pushed the current problems down the road. NI would have kicked off anyway because of the simple fact that the British link is diluted, playing into the hands of the perfidious Irish government.

Johnson was stiffed by May and then didn't just walk away from the EU. They are the enemy.



1andrew1 10-06-2021 23:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082535)
An extension would have pushed the current problems down the road. NI would have kicked off anyway because of the simple fact that the British link is diluted, playing into the hands of the perfidious Irish government.

Johnson was stiffed by May and then didn't just walk away from the EU. They are the enemy.


How was BoJo stiffed by May over Ireland?

Unlike countries cited as our enemy* (eg Iran, North Korea, Russia), the EU is our major trading partner and we share a common border with one of their members, Ireland, with regard to ensuring peace in Northern Ireland and many alliances. So whatever you may feel, we need to have a healthy relationship with the EU for the good of the UK.

An extension would have allowed us time to negotiate veterinary equivalence with the EU and we could have made them look unreasonable if they didn't agree to one. Now our PM just looks weak and acts perfidiously. I hope the situation can be salvaged over a few Cornish beers and some great British seafood.

* although I find such descriptions of little value.

Sephiroth 11-06-2021 00:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36082539)
How was BoJo stiffed by May over Ireland?

Unlike countries cited as our enemy* (eg Iran, North Korea, Russia), the EU is our major trading partner and we share a common border with one of their members, Ireland, with regard to ensuring peace in Northern Ireland and many alliances. So whatever you may feel, we need to have a healthy relationship with the EU for the good of the UK.

An extension would have allowed us time to negotiate veterinary equivalence with the EU and we could have made them look unreasonable if they didn't agree to one. Now our PM just looks weak and acts perfidiously. I hope the situation can be salvaged over a few Cornish beers and some great British seafood.

* although I find such descriptions of little value.



Quote:

How was BoJo stiffed by May over Ireland?
May allowed the EU to dictate the process. Thus the Withdrawal Agreement, with one change to the NI protocol negotiated by Johnson, tied our hands.

Indeed, we should just have walked away at that point with no WA and none of the other shackles associated with it.

Quote:

Unlike countries cited as our enemy* (eg Iran, North Korea, Russia), the EU is our major trading partner and we share a common border with one of their members, Ireland, with regard to ensuring peace in Northern Ireland and many alliances. So whatever you may feel, we need to have a healthy relationship with the EU for the good of the UK.
The EU is currently acting like an enemy. Their negative effect on the UK is far worse than the other countries you cited. I suspect that the EU is not going to be our major trading partner much longer. If we stand up to those bullies, we'll be better off and Ireland will have problems that the EU will have to solve.

Quote:

An extension would have allowed us time to negotiate veterinary equivalence with the EU and we could have made them look unreasonable if they didn't agree to one. Now our PM just looks weak and acts perfidiously. I hope the situation can be salvaged over a few Cornish beers and some great British seafood.
An extension would not have changed the negotiating position unless the EU believed that we would walk away if we didn't get the right concessions. Our PM looks weak because he is not a person of substance and he's to blame for the EU's nastiness.

1andrew1 11-06-2021 10:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082540)


May allowed the EU to dictate the process. Thus the Withdrawal Agreement, with one change to the NI protocol negotiated by Johnson, tied our hands.

Indeed, we should just have walked away at that point with no WA and none of the other shackles associated with it.

The EU is currently acting like an enemy. Their negative effect on the UK is far worse than the other countries you cited. I suspect that the EU is not going to be our major trading partner much longer. If we stand up to those bullies, we'll be better off and Ireland will have problems that the EU will have to solve.

An extension would not have changed the negotiating position unless the EU believed that we would walk away if we didn't get the right concessions. Our PM looks weak because he is not a person of substance and he's to blame for the EU's nastiness.

Invoking Article 50 before we had sorted out our negotiating objectives was a clear error on Theresa May's part.

It's a pure fantasy to pretend we could have left without a deal. It would have driven a coach and horses through the Good Friday Agreement and no politician would countenance such a thing.

I think if you spoke to Dawn Sturgess's family (she was poisoned to death by Novichok) and the family of Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe (languishing in an Iranian jail) you would soon find out the reality of your beliefs on which countries are closer to being our enemies than the EU.

With the clock counting down and your reluctance to re-start it, I fear you would have taken us up the same creek as BoJo has, had you been in his shoes.

Pierre 11-06-2021 23:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Can anyone advise why Von der Leyen is at the G7? She’s not a leader, or a head of state of any nation in the G7?

papa smurf 11-06-2021 23:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36082619)
Can anyone advise why Von der Leyen is at the G7? She’s not a leader, or a head of state of any nation in the G7?

no idea but i spent 20 mins swearing at the telly when i saw her:mad:

Sephiroth 11-06-2021 23:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I hope that the British Sausage is on the breakfast menu.

Hugh 12-06-2021 00:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36082619)
Can anyone advise why Von der Leyen is at the G7? She’s not a leader, or a head of state of any nation in the G7?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_and_the_G7

Quote:

The European Union (EU) is a member of the G7 (the G8, until Russia was uninvited in 2014). It has been dubbed its "8th member",[1] holding all the privileges and obligations of membership but without the right to host or chair a summit.[2] As the full name of the G7 is the "Group of Seven Nations", the EU has not been included in the number, hence there being eight members in the G7.

The President of the European Commission has attended since he was first invited to the third G7 summit in 1977, Roy Jenkins was the then-President.[2] Since 1981 the President has attended all sessions of the G7.[3] The EU is currently represented by the Commission President and the President of the European Council.[2] The latter used to be the rotating chair of the council of EU state leaders, with irregular attendance since 1982.[4] The Council Presidency sometimes coincided with one of the G8 members, in which case that leader attended with their national and European mandate.[2] Since 2009, the President of the European Council is a permanent position, who always attends the summits. As the EU is a member, what the Presidents endorse at the G8 is politically binding on them.

The EU attends due to its role in the world economy, and its relevancy increased with the establishment of a single market, common currency and foreign policy. The Paris Summit of 1989 was a landmark year for the EU's participation in the G7, when the G7 asked the EU to assume responsibility for Phare.


https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farmi...isations/g7_en

Quote:

The European Union is a unique supranational organisation – not a sovereign Member State – hence the name G7 “Group of Seven”. The EU is therefore a ‘non-enumerated’ member and does not assume the rotating G7 presidency.

In 1977, representatives of the then European Community began participating in the London summit. The role has expanded over time, with the EU gradually included in all political discussions on the summit agenda and, from the Ottawa summit (1981) onwards, has taken part in all working sessions.
---------- Post added at 23:46 ---------- Previous post was at 23:44 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36082621)
no idea but i spent 20 mins swearing at the telly when i saw her:mad:

That’s probably why she went… ;)

Carth 12-06-2021 10:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36082619)
Can anyone advise why Von der Leyen is at the G7? She’s not a leader, or a head of state of any nation in the G7?


Probably the only foreign holiday she'll get ;)

Hugh 12-06-2021 11:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Interesting (imho) commentary in the Times today.

Basically, foreign leaders don't trust Boris to keep his word, because
Quote:

A compromise with Brussels on the Irish protocol is entirely achievable. There is right on both sides and (as James Forsyth set out in yesterday’s Times) London and Brussels — if they tried — could steer this problem towards a workable fudge. Strict legality favours the EU case, but the EU has long experience of bending the rules when it wants to. The problem is that it doesn’t want to because the EU doesn’t trust this prime minister. And that lack of belief in Boris Johnson’s good faith is shared, I suspect, by the US president. Respect and trust are missing. The Irish protocol kerfuffle is only one example of a wider problem facing a country in whose leader’s integrity our allies have lost confidence.
Quote:

he says things entirely for the effect they produce at the time and on his immediate audience.
Quote:

For now, British voters don’t seem to care. I get that. Domestically he has taken to new heights the art of being forgivable. So does it matter that in Cornwall he’s in the company of a handful of foreign leaders whose votes he doesn’t need? Yes, because Britain needs their trust and, for now, Boris is Britain. He does not inspire that trust. Northern Ireland is perhaps the first example of why this matters. It will not be the last.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/o...nson-zgmffxtk2

Carth 12-06-2021 12:04

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
*Respect and trust are missing

*The EU has long experience of bending the rules when it wants to

*Nobody trusts Boris

1andrew1 12-06-2021 12:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36082648)
Interesting (imho) commentary in the Times today.

Basically, foreign leaders don't trust Boris to keep his word, because

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/o...nson-zgmffxtk2

Good analysis. What goes around comes around. Maybe Seph is right that another leader could sort this out more effectively with the EU.

Sephiroth 12-06-2021 12:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
A rather good analysis

Hugh 12-06-2021 12:39

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082622)
I hope that the British Sausage is on the breakfast menu.

From yesterday's Metro

https://metro.co.uk/2021/06/10/joe-b...JyqPjZ6bGsEvUM

Quote:

Joe Biden to give Boris a hand in sausage war as he tries to beat off EU
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1623494324

OLD BOY 12-06-2021 16:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36082654)
Good analysis. What goes around comes around. Maybe Seph is right that another leader could sort this out more effectively with the EU.

I have a gut feeling that what Boris actually wants is to pull out of this deal. And he is rather cleverly pulling the public around to that point of view.

It’s what he would have preferred to happen, let’s face it, but the political risk was too high at the time the deal was done.

This won’t change the situation in respect of the NI/Ireland border but it will enable trade from Britain to resume unencumbered. Faced with that threat, the EU might just start to take the need to negotiate on the protocol more seriously and we resolve the matter that way.

A win-win for Boris, whichever way it goes.

mrmistoffelees 12-06-2021 19:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36082674)
I have a gut feeling that what Boris actually wants is to pull out of this deal. And he is rather cleverly pulling the public around to that point of view.

It’s what he would have preferred to happen, let’s face it, but the political risk was too high at the time the deal was done.

This won’t change the situation in respect of the NI/Ireland border but it will enable trade from Britain to resume unencumbered. Faced with that threat, the EU might just start to take the need to negotiate on the protocol more seriously and we resolve the matter that way.

A win-win for Boris, whichever way it goes.

You’ve hit new heights of idiocy if you think the above will happen.

As has already been said withdrawing/no deal will cause the collapse of the Good Friday agreement and the return of a hard border on the island or Ireland. It will NEVER happen.

Carth 12-06-2021 19:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I remember a heck of a lot of people saying Brexit would never happen, you were possibly one of them :p:

mrmistoffelees 12-06-2021 19:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36082690)
I remember a heck of a lot of people saying Brexit would never happen, you were possibly one of them :p:


If you can’t see the difference in severity between the two I might suggest you go and join old boy i

Sephiroth 12-06-2021 19:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082688)
You’ve hit new heights of idiocy if you think the above will happen.

As has already been said withdrawing/no deal will cause the collapse of the Good Friday agreement and the return of a hard border on the island or Ireland. It will NEVER happen.

I think more likely than your scenario is that Johnson will continue unilaterally with the grace period. The EU will retaliate as they've threatened; Johnson might invoke Article 16 but that will only prolong the agony. It is possible that the EU/UK agreements will fall through entirely. leaving the EU with the hard birder problem.

I don't see the GFA collapsing; the only way that would collapse if sectarian violence takes hold and a military border becomes necessary. That will be the EU's fault.



1andrew1 12-06-2021 21:51

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082693)
I think more likely than your scenario is that Johnson will continue unilaterally with the grace period. The EU will retaliate as they've threatened; Johnson might invoke Article 16 but that will only prolong the agony. It is possible that the EU/UK agreements will fall through entirely. leaving the EU with the hard birder problem.

I don't see the GFA collapsing; the only way that would collapse if sectarian violence takes hold and a military border becomes necessary. That will be the EU's fault.

Old Boy's scenario is unrealistic. A hard border would breach the Good Friday Agreement so that's not on the cards, as mrmistoffelees has explained.
To help unblock the impasse, it would do no harm for BoJo to replace David Frost with someone with a less confrontational approach.

Sephiroth 12-06-2021 22:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36082709)
Old Boy's scenario is unrealistic. A hard border would breach the Good Friday Agreement so that's not on the cards, as mrmistoffelees has explained.
To help unblock the impasse, it would do no harm for BoJo to replace David Frost with someone with a less confrontational approach.

Mrmistofelees referred to the collapse of the GFA, not a breach; quite a difference. But in the circumstances I've mooted, it would be the EU that would cause the GFA breach.

As regards David Frost, we need to stand firm - be it he or someone else. There needs to be a pragmatic solution that allows us to to supply goods to NI supermarkets unfettered by customs formalities. I regard the EU as being confrontationalist, threatening to bring all hell down on us as we protect sending the British Sausage to NI without any EU controls.

Pierre 12-06-2021 22:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
As I understand it, and believe me I am not interested in it very much. By the the letter of the agreement checks can be can be enforced. However, for domestic products for domestic consumption the U.K. did not expect checks to be done, they understood they could be, but they did not expect them to be done.

As Chris has pointed out, the EU are just a rules based bureaucracy that is who they are. It’s petty and unnecessary. But the U.K. should have expected this from the EU.

Either way, a solution would be very easy to reach for rational people............do you know any.

GrimUpNorth 12-06-2021 22:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I wonder if opening a sausage factory in NI would be a good business move at the moment?

papa smurf 12-06-2021 22:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36082714)
I wonder if opening a sausage factory in NI would be a good business move at the moment?

Where would the meat come from

GrimUpNorth 12-06-2021 22:39

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Last time I was in NI I noticed they had the odd farm here and there, granted it was a few years ago but I doubt it's changed that much!

papa smurf 12-06-2021 22:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36082716)
Last time I was in NI I noticed they had the odd farm here and there, granted it was a few years ago but I doubt it's changed that much!

If they produced enough i doubt they would transport it from the mother land

Paddy1 12-06-2021 23:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36082717)
If they produced enough i doubt they would transport it from the mother land

https://www.ufuni.org/farming

There are thousands of local butchers, each making their own sausages. The imports from GB will be things like Cumberland sausages that presumably have to come from a specific region. The big supermarkets will also source produce from GB, such as chilled mince but there's really no need.

The argument is really over standards. GB food standards currently exceed EU requirements. The problem is that Bojo/Frostie refuse to commit to keeping things that way. A commitment to maintain standards would do away with 90% of the checks at a stroke.

Sephiroth 12-06-2021 23:28

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36082716)
Last time I was in NI I noticed they had the odd farm here and there, granted it was a few years ago but I doubt it's changed that much!

Ni has plenty of sausage producers as my breakfast earlier in 2020 testified. Here's one example: https://www.mccartneysofmoira.com/butchery-sausages/

Another, Finnebrogue recently declared the best year ever.

EDIT: Btw, Moira sports one of the best Indian restaurants in the UK, imo - the Masala Hut. For reasons beyond me, curry night in Moira is Tuesday - get there before 18:00 to get a table.


Paddy1 13-06-2021 00:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082722)
Ni has plenty of sausage producers as my breakfast earlier in 2020 testified. Here's one example: https://www.mccartneysofmoira.com/butchery-sausages/


An excellent and renowned butcher. I've dropped in many times when passing through.

mrmistoffelees 13-06-2021 11:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082693)
I think more likely than your scenario is that Johnson will continue unilaterally with the grace period. The EU will retaliate as they've threatened; Johnson might invoke Article 16 but that will only prolong the agony. It is possible that the EU/UK agreements will fall through entirely. leaving the EU with the hard birder problem.

I don't see the GFA collapsing; the only way that would collapse if sectarian violence takes hold and a military border becomes necessary. That will be the EU's fault.



Let’s follow this logically

As per chris’s post we all know (yes, even us staunch remainers) that the EU is incredibly bureaucratic.

BUT

We accepted the deal that was offered by the EU because if we didn’t a hard border would have been created which would have broken the GFA agreement

If we break the agreement with the EU and a hard border is implemented that breaks the GFA that’s on the U.K. for failing to adhere not the EU

The EU have no legal requirement to move from their position and if they choose not to adjust then this is only resolved in one of two ways

1. The U.K. implements and obides by the treaty it agreed too (which it becomes
clearer by the day they didn’t have the full picture of what they were agreeing to)

2. The EU softens it’s stance (which is possible but unlikely as what message does that send to other non eu countries)


Any sort of border in Ireland highly increases the chances of a trade deal with the US not occurring

papa smurf 13-06-2021 11:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082744)
Let’s follow this logically

As per chris’s post we all know (yes, even us staunch remainers) that the EU is incredibly bureaucratic.

BUT

We accepted the deal that was offered by the EU because if we didn’t a hard border would have been created which would have broken the GFA agreement

If we break the agreement with the EU and a hard border is implemented that breaks the GFA that’s on the U.K. for failing to adhere not the EU

The EU have no legal requirement to move from their position and if they choose not to adjust then this is only resolved in one of two ways

1. The U.K. implements and obides by the treaty it agreed too (which it becomes
clearer by the day they didn’t have the full picture of what they were agreeing to)

2. The EU softens it’s stance (which is possible but unlikely as what message does that send to other non eu countries)


Any sort of border in Ireland highly increases the chances of a trade deal with the US not occurring

Who exactly would erect this hard border?

1andrew1 13-06-2021 11:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082744)
Let’s follow this logically

As per chris’s post we all know (yes, even us staunch remainers) that the EU is incredibly bureaucratic.

BUT

We accepted the deal that was offered by the EU because if we didn’t a hard border would have been created which would have broken the GFA agreement

If we break the agreement with the EU and a hard border is implemented that breaks the GFA that’s on the U.K. for failing to adhere not the EU

The EU have no legal requirement to move from their position and if they choose not to adjust then this is only resolved in one of two ways

1. The U.K. implements and obides by the treaty it agreed too (which it becomes
clearer by the day they didn’t have the full picture of what they were agreeing to)

2. The EU softens it’s stance (which is possible but unlikely as what message does that send to other non eu countries)


Any sort of border in Ireland highly increases the chances of a trade deal with the US not occurring

No. 3 must be per paddy1's post - the UK commits to maintain veterinary standards and the EU grants us equivalence.

Sephiroth 13-06-2021 12:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36082746)
Who exactly would erect this hard border?

That. ^^

mrmistoffelees 13-06-2021 12:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082748)
That. ^^

who erects the border is insignificant compared to why the border was erected.

If both of you think that if the U.K government ignores/withdraws from the treaty and the EU then erect a border that the U.K. won’t be held accountable then you need to think again.

The country was sold a a pig in a poke by the government, yet brexiteers are desperate to blame someone or somebody else for the U.K. governments failings

Whatever happened to oven ready?

---------- Post added at 11:23 ---------- Previous post was at 11:21 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36082747)
No. 3 must be per paddy1's post - the UK commits to maintain veterinary standards and the EU grants us equivalence.

That would fall under option 2. But then how does that play out with other non EU countries ?

1andrew1 13-06-2021 12:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082751)
That would fall under option 2. But then how does that play out with other non EU countries ?

I'm not knowledgeable enough in this area to know authoritatively if it would be an issue for the EU and other non-EU countries or not. But the uniqueness of the situation is probably sufficient not to set a precedent. After all, although we talk about being in the European Single Market, for things like medicines it is following UK rules; the EU is not insisting that medicines sold in NI have be approved by the European Medicines Agency.

papa smurf 13-06-2021 12:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082751)
who erects the border is insignificant compared to why the border was erected.

If both of you think that if the U.K government ignores/withdraws from the treaty and the EU then erect a border that the U.K. won’t be held accountable then you need to think again.

The country was sold a a pig in a poke by the government, yet brexiteers are desperate to blame someone or somebody else for the U.K. governments failings

Whatever happened to oven ready?

---------- Post added at 11:23 ---------- Previous post was at 11:21 ----------



That would fall under option 2. But then how does that play out with other non EU countries ?

You could go out there and plant a row of sour grape vines along the border, it might help you with getting over losing the referendum :rolleyes:

mrmistoffelees 13-06-2021 12:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36082756)
You could go out there and plant a row of sour grape vines along the border, it might help you with getting over losing the referendum :rolleyes:

Wanting to hold the government accountable for its actions isn’t sour grapes

Those vines may be best gifted to Sephi and his perceived EU ‘nastiness’ ;)

1andrew1 13-06-2021 12:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082751)
who erects the border is insignificant compared to why the border was erected.

If both of you think that if the U.K government ignores/withdraws from the treaty and the EU then erect a border that the U.K. won’t be held accountable then you need to think again.

Presumably the UK or EU erecting a wall in NI would be the final remedy. I'm sure the EU scale of escalation is:
- Diplomatic pressure including getting the US on board
- Economic pressure - putting the pressure on big investors like Siemens and AkzoNoble to warn the UK that their investment is threatened by possible sanctions
- Targeted sanctions on British goods and services, introduction of visas etc.

mrmistoffelees 13-06-2021 12:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36082760)
Presumably the UK or EU erecting a wall in NI would be the final remedy. I'm sure the EU scale of escalation is:
- Diplomatic pressure including getting the US on board
- Economic pressure - putting the pressure on big investors like Siemens and AkzoNoble to warn the UK that their investment is threatened by possible sanctions
- Targeted sanctions on British goods and services, introduction of visas etc.

Agreed, it would be last resort.

OLD BOY 13-06-2021 12:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I don't believe that the UK is wanting to pull out of the Protocol, we are just asking for some common sense on its interpretation.

If this is the kind of inflexibility we can expect from the EU, maybe we should think seriously whether this deal with the EU is actually worth it. Many of us saw this coming but we hoped that the EU would demonstrate some intelligence in dealing with the practical issues arising from the new arrangements.

mrmistoffelees 13-06-2021 13:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36082762)
I don't believe that the UK is wanting to pull out of the Protocol, we are just asking for some common sense on its interpretation.

If this is the kind of inflexibility we can expect from the EU, maybe we should think seriously whether this deal with the EU is actually worth it. Many of us saw this coming but we hoped that the EU would demonstrate some intelligence in dealing with the practical issues arising from the new arrangements.

So the U.K. agreed to a legally binding treaty but now we want them to make concessions to us because we’re finding it a bit difficult?

I don’t think it’s the EU that needs to demonstrate its intelligence

1andrew1 13-06-2021 13:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082765)
So the U.K. agreed to a legally binding treaty but now we want them to make concessions to us because we’re finding it a bit difficult?

I don’t think it’s the EU that needs to demonstrate its intelligence

I think BoJo only wants to implement the protocol he signed in a limited and specific way. :D

Brexit negotiations will never end. Boris Johnson needs to establish trust with the EU. Hic current boud-mouthing and the threats perpetuated by him and David Frost are proving ineffective. They might work inside the priviliged walls of Eton or the House of Commons but not outside it.

Building strong relationships and trust is key. Unfortunately for BoJo, the G7 summit which could have been a great British triumph and advert for the country has shone a spotlight upon its weaknesses. A change is needed in the UK's approach.

Carth 13-06-2021 14:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082765)
So the U.K. agreed to a legally binding treaty but now we want them to make concessions to us because we’re finding it a bit difficult?

I don’t think it’s the EU that needs to demonstrate its intelligence

I rather think it's the EU that are finding it difficult, it does sound 'off' when a trade bloc are trying to prevent a UK product from being sold in the UK.

Throw as much legal jargon as you like at it, but the bottom line is the UK should be able to sell it's own products within it's borders :p:

Sephiroth 13-06-2021 14:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I wish the Remainers would agree with Carth - namely that there should be no impediment to selling UK goods within the UK under our agreement with the EU.

Even if it is careless that Johnson et al thought the EU would implement the agreement in the way I've just mentioned, the Remainers should wish for this rather than go on about following the agreement to the letter while the EU tries to break up the Union.

The Remainers won't admit that this is an unsaid goal of the EU - to punish the UK as best they can. "Oh", I hear the Remainers say, "where is the link to a stated EU goal to that effect?". The realms of the bleedin' obvious need no published statement.

If you need evidence, read today's papers and watch the BBC (yes BBC), reporting that Macron does not consider NI to be part of the UK. What do the Remainers say about that? Paywall link: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics...aign=DM1441753

Quote:

Boris Johnson was left infuriated on Saturday when Emmanuel Macron suggested in head-to-head G7 summit talks that Northern Ireland was not part of the UK.

The Prime Minister attempted to explain his frustration with the Northern Ireland Protocol by asking Mr Macron what he would do if sausages from Toulouse could not be moved to Paris, according to a UK government source.

The French president was said to have retorted by arguing that the comparison did not work because Paris and Toulouse were both part of the same country, incorrectly suggesting Northern Ireland is not within the UK.

Mr Johnson expressed bemusement at the remark to aides straight after the meeting and later hinted at the comment when telling Sky News that some leaders needed to get it “into their heads” that the UK was a “single country”.

1andrew1 13-06-2021 15:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082782)
I wish the Remainers would agree with Carth..

You mean with this?
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36082379)
I'm all for owning it, it's easy . . just don't send any chilled meat to anyone in the EU . . and if that includes Northern Ireland (who are NOT in the EU) then I'm fine with that.



---------- Post added at 14:14 ---------- Previous post was at 14:04 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082782)

Even if it is careless that Johnson et al thought the EU would implement the agreement in the way I've just mentioned, the Remainers should wish for this rather than go on about following the agreement to the letter while the EU tries to break up the Union.

Obviously, no one is happy about the situation. I think that you're now realising what others have known for some time - that your Party's Prime Minister signed an imperfect deal. Dreaming about fantasy solutions or slagging off the other side won't solve it. Trust and talk will.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082782)

Even if it is careless that Johnson et al thought the EU would implement the agreement in the way I've just mentioned, the Remainers should wish for this rather than go on about following the agreement to the letter while the EU tries to break up the Union.

The Remainers won't admit that this is an unsaid goal of the EU - to punish the UK as best they can. "Oh", I hear the Remainers say, "where is the link to a stated EU goal to that effect?". The realms of the bleedin' obvious need no published statement.

There's no evidence of punishing the UK, that's just playing the victim mode and not an approach a country like the UK historically takes. It's disappointing you want to pull the UK down to such a level.

mrmistoffelees 13-06-2021 15:31

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36082780)
I rather think it's the EU that are finding it difficult, it does sound 'off' when a trade bloc are trying to prevent a UK product from being sold in the UK.

Throw as much legal jargon as you like at it, but the bottom line is the UK should be able to sell it's own products within it's borders :p:


They can, but it changes when one of those countries in effect in the EU for trade

You know, the changes we agreed to???

Carth 13-06-2021 15:47

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36082783)
You mean with this?

Originally Posted by Carth
I'm all for owning it, it's easy . . just don't send any chilled meat to anyone in the EU . . and if that includes Northern Ireland (who are NOT in the EU) then I'm fine with that.

Heck yeah, see how long it takes for N.I. to kick off . . . especially when they suddenly can't 'export' to us (as part of the solution) ;)

Taf 13-06-2021 15:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36082530)
As I and others said at the time, this would have given us more chance to strike a better deal.

The EU was not in negotiating mode from the start. They expected the UK to capitulate to all the EU demands. This was highlighted many, many times by politicians of all flavours from within the EU. Remember that the EU is a Legal Body not a Federal Union as yet. Lawyers in the background run it most of the time, supported by translators who have to be meticulous at all times.

mrmistoffelees 13-06-2021 16:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 36082790)
The EU was not in negotiating mode from the start. They expected the UK to capitulate to all the EU demands. This was highlighted many, many times by politicians of all flavours from within the EU. Remember that the EU is a Legal Body not a Federal Union as yet. Lawyers in the background run it most of the time, supported by translators who have to be meticulous at all times.


Indeed if only we as a country could of somehow been aware of such behaviour at the time. If only we could of had some insider knowledge as to how the EU can operate.

So is it ignorance or stupidity the U.K. government is culpable of ?

Carth 13-06-2021 17:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082793)
Indeed if only we as a country could of somehow been aware of such behaviour at the time. If only we could of had some insider knowledge as to how the EU can operate.

So is it ignorance or stupidity the U.K. government is culpable of ?

Many of us were aware of their behaviour and voted accordingly, the ignorance and/or stupidity are possibly confined to those who weren't . . and didn't ;) :p:

OLD BOY 13-06-2021 17:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082765)
So the U.K. agreed to a legally binding treaty but now we want them to make concessions to us because we’re finding it a bit difficult?

I don’t think it’s the EU that needs to demonstrate its intelligence

No, that’s not what I’m saying. As with everything, the devil is in the detail and we have been attempting to get the EU to understand the practical problems that have been thrown up by the way in which the EU is interpreting the Protocol. We have put forward many ideas, including trusted trader schemes, which have been shown to work effectively, but the EU is having none of it.

They are being awkward, plain and simple.

mrmistoffelees 13-06-2021 17:21

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36082797)
No, that’s not what I’m saying. As with everything, the devil is in the detail and we have been attempting to get the EU to understand the practical problems that have been thrown up by the way in which the EU is interpreting the Protocol. We have put forward many ideas, including trusted trader schemes, which have been shown to work effectively, but the EU is having none of it.

They are being awkward, plain and simple.

So we agreed to something we didn’t fully understand? Else surely the government would have known that this would occur?

The EU are playing to the letter of the law, nothing more, nothing less.

Sephiroth 13-06-2021 17:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082800)
So we agreed to something we didn’t fully understand? Else surely the government would have known that this would occur?

The EU are playing to the letter of the law, nothing more, nothing less.

And you are defending that - Jeez. They should be more reasonable given the difficulties the "letter" is causing in NI.

OLD BOY 13-06-2021 18:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082800)
So we agreed to something we didn’t fully understand? Else surely the government would have known that this would occur?

The EU are playing to the letter of the law, nothing more, nothing less.

No, I didn’t say that. I said that the problem was with the way the EU was interpreting the Protocol, not the Protocol itself.

Trust you to keep batting for the other side. Macron has said: “Nothing is negotiable. Everything is applicable.”

In other words, his mind is made up and if the Northern Irish people (whom he does not regard as U.K. citizens!) suffer food shortages as a result of the EU interpretation of the Protocol, he doesn’t give two hoots.

pip08456 13-06-2021 18:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082800)
So we agreed to something we didn’t fully understand? Else surely the government would have known that this would occur?

The EU are playing to the letter of the law, nothing more, nothing less.

The problem is it is not the letter of the law.

Quote:

It is common for trade agreements to contain provisions enabling either party to take unilateral action if the implementation of the agreement gives rise to negative consequences. In the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland, these measures are set out under Article 16.

Such ‘safeguards’ as those in the Protocol are not commonly used, but are included as a protective measure to give both parties a formal recourse of action should the agreement entail any unintended outcomes that present significant challenges in either place.

Article 16 provides both the UK and the EU with a unilateral power to take action should the application of the Protocol give rise to ‘serious economic, societal or environmental difficulties that are liable to persist, or to diversion of trade.’

Both parties are restricted in the action they can take to address any such issues. It must be limited to the scope of where the problems exist (i.e. a response cannot be taken that will alter the application of the Protocol in any unrelated respect) and there is a process in place which means action cannot happen on a whim or go unchecked.

Article 16 does not provide any detail on what constitutes a ‘serious’ impact or what is meant by ‘diversion of trade’. What causes a serious impact in one place might not in another, so this ambiguity allows for interpretation at a later point.
Link

There cannot be "letter of the law" where ambiguity exists.

mrmistoffelees 13-06-2021 18:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36082802)
And you are defending that - Jeez. They should be more reasonable given the difficulties the "letter" is causing in NI.


Yes, I am defending this.


They agreed to this
We agreed to this

The country wanted out, this is out

---------- Post added at 17:41 ---------- Previous post was at 17:38 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36082805)
No, I didn’t say that. I said that the problem was with the way the EU was interpreting the Protocol, not the Protocol itself.

Trust you to keep batting for the other side. Macron has said: “Nothing is negotiable. Everything is applicable.”

In other words, his mind is made up and if the Northern Irish people (whom he does not regard as U.K. citizens!) suffer food shortages as a result of the EU interpretation of the Protocol, he doesn’t give two hoots.


Is Macron speaking from a position of authority? Or is he being a lone voice ?

I’m not batting for any side. If the people of Northern Ireland suffer food shortages ultimately it’s us who agreed the terms with the EU.

---------- Post added at 17:43 ---------- Previous post was at 17:41 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36082806)
The problem is it is not the letter of the law.



Link

There cannot be "letter of the law" where ambiguity exists.

Where is the ambiguity that states chilled meat products cannot be imported into the EU market from non EU countries ? Seems pretty unambiguous ?

---------- Post added at 17:45 ---------- Previous post was at 17:43 ----------

Sephi/OB

Why hasn’t Boris walked or threatened to walk away from the treaty ?

He threatened to walk away enough times during the negotiations

---------- Post added at 17:49 ---------- Previous post was at 17:45 ----------

To add,

sephi/ob (amongst many others) clearly stated that we could manage just fine without the EU. Yet here we are a little over six months in and they’re demanding the EU’s assistance in solving a problem of our own creation.

How deliciously ironic.

OLD BOY 13-06-2021 19:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082808)
Yes, I am defending this.


They agreed to this
We agreed to this

The country wanted out, this is out

---------- Post added at 17:41 ---------- Previous post was at 17:38 ----------




Is Macron speaking from a position of authority? Or is he being a lone voice ?

I’m not batting for any side. If the people of Northern Ireland suffer food shortages ultimately it’s us who agreed the terms with the EU.

You are just not getting it, are you? It was with reluctance that we signed up to the protocol, but, yes, we signed it. As with any new process, documents have to be interpreted.

The problem is that the EU will only interpret this in a way that maximises our problems and takes no account of the problems this causes in NI.

There are straight forward ways that the document as written can be made to work, but the EU is being its normal inflexible and spiteful self.

And you wonder why Brexiteers wanted out.

How can you defend this? That’s why I say you are batting for the other side. As ever.

---------- Post added at 18:25 ---------- Previous post was at 18:19 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082808)

Where is the ambiguity that states chilled meat products cannot be imported into the EU market from non EU countries ? Seems pretty unambiguous ?.

Er - except that we are not complaining that we cannot export chilled meat products to the EU. Are you trying to divert the argument or misrepresent what those who disagree with you have said?

mrmistoffelees 13-06-2021 19:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Sorry, why did we have to sign it ? That’s a complete u turn OB for you from your earlier comments.

Perhaps you could advise why these documents weren’t ‘interpreted’ before they were signed ? Otherwise you’ve basically admitted that the U.K. government didn’t fully understand what they were agreeing too

This is not an us vs them situation.

---------- Post added at 18:30 ---------- Previous post was at 18:29 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36082813)
You are just not getting it, are you? It was with reluctance that we signed up to the protocol, but, yes, we signed it. As with any new process, documents have to be interpreted.

The problem is that the EU will only interpret this in a way that maximises our problems and takes no account of the problems this causes in NI.

There are straight forward ways that the document as written can be made to work, but the EU is being its normal inflexible and spiteful self.

And you wonder why Brexiteers wanted out.

How can you defend this? That’s why I say you are batting for the other side. As ever.

---------- Post added at 18:25 ---------- Previous post was at 18:19 ----------



Er - except that we are not complaining that we cannot export chilled meat products to the EU. Are you trying to divert the argument or misrepresent what those who disagree with you have said?


You really are a loon, I hope you get the help you need

OLD BOY 13-06-2021 19:34

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082808)

Sephi/OB

Why hasn’t Boris walked or threatened to walk away from the treaty ?

He threatened to walk away enough times during the negotiations

To add,

sephi/ob (amongst many others) clearly stated that we could manage just fine without the EU. Yet here we are a little over six months in and they’re demanding the EU’s assistance in solving a problem of our own creation.

How deliciously ironic.

As I said, the problem is the interpretation and the inflexibility of the EU.

The PM went with the deal because that’s what he was being pressured to do, but as the EU continue to demonstrate how unreasonable they can be, they will be making the case for us that we should give notice to terminate the Brexit deal.

It’s not the end of the world, and at least it will enable us to make more effective use of our time. In the meantime, we will look elsewhere for as many of our imports as is practical, and this will not be good news for the EU. But you know what, tough!

---------- Post added at 18:34 ---------- Previous post was at 18:31 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082815)
Sorry, why did we have to sign it ? That’s a complete u turn OB for you from your earlier comments.

Perhaps you could advise why these documents weren’t ‘interpreted’ before they were signed ? Otherwise you’ve basically admitted that the U.K. government didn’t fully understand what they were agreeing too

This is not an us vs them situation.

---------- Post added at 18:30 ---------- Previous post was at 18:29 ----------




You really are a loon, I hope you get the help you need

Sorry, mate but it’s not me that’s the loon. As I have said more than once now, the problem is not so much the document as its interpretation. You may want to look that word up if you don’t understand what it means.

Hugh 13-06-2021 19:34

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
"Pressured"?

He rushed the Agreement through the HoC in 16 hours - he’s the one who put the pressure on.

The EU offered an Extension -BoJo said "no".

https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-f...iod-extension/

pip08456 13-06-2021 19:36

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Which chilled meat products are being imported into the EU Market?

Quote:

Northern Ireland remains legally in the UK Customs Territory and part of any future UK trade deals. This results in a de jure customs border on the island of Ireland, between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

Sephiroth 13-06-2021 19:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082808)
<SNIP>

I’m not batting for any side. If the people of Northern Ireland suffer food shortages ultimately it’s us who agreed the terms with the EU.

You can blame the Guvmin for agreeing to the deal - and you'd be right to. Except that you won't say the Guvmin should not have signed that deal. Should they, in your view?

NI is struggling with food imports and that should be your first concern, not Johnson's past stupidity (no deal would have been better).

You Remainers are revelling (you'll deny that) in "I told you so" mode but you're not honest enough to come out and say that the deal was so bad for the UK that we should just have left.


TheDaddy 13-06-2021 20:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36082744)
Let’s follow this logically



1. The U.K. implements and obides by the treaty it agreed too (which it becomes
clearer by the day they didn’t have the full picture of what they were agreeing to)

You trying to say they didn't know what they were voting for

Carth 13-06-2021 20:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36082828)
You trying to say they didn't know what they were voting for

They were trying to sit on the fence, and we all know that just leads to splinters in the cheeks.

OLD BOY 13-06-2021 20:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36082820)
"Pressured"?

He rushed the Agreement through the HoC in 16 hours - he’s the one who put the pressure on.

The EU offered an Extension -BoJo said "no".

https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-f...iod-extension/

Yes, pressured. Have you forgotten all the angst expressed by the opposition about getting a deal? ‘No deal’ was presented as being nothing short of apocalyptic.

Most Brexiteers wanted a ‘no deal’ and now everyone knows why.

You know very well why there was no appetite for an extension. I’m a little surprised that you have forgotten already (which, of course, you haven’t).

---------- Post added at 19:45 ---------- Previous post was at 19:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36082828)
You trying to say they didn't know what they were voting for

Have you missed the point that the issue is not what we have signed up for, but a reasonable interpretation of the Protocol’s provisions?


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:09.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum