Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   U.S Election 2020 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709208)

Carth 08-11-2020 21:03

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Has Putin stopped laughing made a comment yet?

Mad Max 08-11-2020 21:03

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser, has approached the President about conceding the election, two sources told CNN Saturday.

And first lady Melania Trump has advised the President the time has come for him to accept the election loss, a separate source familiar with the conversations told CNN on Sunday.
Got to be true then. :rolleyes:

downquark1 08-11-2020 21:06

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36057000)
Has Putin stopped laughing made a comment yet?

He and China have said it is too early to congratulate Biden. Make of that what you will.

Mr K 08-11-2020 21:06

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36057000)
Has Putin stopped laughing made a comment yet?

He's probably distraught, he's lost his best ally.

Mick 08-11-2020 21:07

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36056986)
Here is the same case reporting by the Associated Press: https://apnews.com/article/election-...43ebe66a29f7e8

You cannot go to court and assert something to be true without evidence. As the Judge in the same case says:



---------- Post added at 20:42 ---------- Previous post was at 20:40 ----------



Yes, exactly. By the courts.

Will you accept the election as legitimate if the courts find there isn't evidence of widespread voter fraud? That's the way these allegations should be handled. Get the evidence, go to court. I fully agree with that. No one (I hope) is against investigating fraud if it's there but it shouldn't be done via Trump's twitter feed or Twitter posts in general.

Nope because I do not like Creepy Joe or the Democrats. They cheat a lot. Gone far too much to the left, are not the same party it once was under JFK.

1andrew1 08-11-2020 21:07

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36056994)
No they did not Andrew, the very first thing their side bleated, right up to this election, was “Not my president.” - Trump’s side can now say the same about Biden.

Agreed they can.
But saying someone's "not my president" because they didn't vote for him is different from saying the election has ben rigged and refusing to accept they've lost and declaring they've won in the face of the facts is in another league.

papa smurf 08-11-2020 21:12

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36057000)
Has Putin stopped laughing made a comment yet?

Putin just became more powerful, joe will never remember where the red button is or what the hell it's for if he finds it:)

---------- Post added at 21:12 ---------- Previous post was at 21:08 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36057005)
Agreed they can.
But saying someone's "not my president" because they didn't vote for him is different from saying the election has ben rigged and refusing to accept they've lost and declaring they've won in the face of the facts is in another league.

sounds familiar a bit like remainers after the UK referendum in 2016.

Mr K 08-11-2020 21:14

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36057004)
Nope because I do not like Creepy Joe or the Democrats. They cheat a lot.

I feel much the same about Accrington Stanley.

Damien 08-11-2020 21:16

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36057004)
Nope because I do not like Creepy Joe or the Democrats. They cheat a lot. Gone far too much to the left, are not the same party it once was under JFK.

Alright but remember it's quite an extraordinary accusation to say that an election is outright rigged. It's not something we see often in proper Democracy. We've seen people say that a party lied to get into power, that there was foreign interference, that the media helped them, that they disenfranchised voter groups and so on. But we rarely hear of outright rigging by stuffing ballot boxes.

That is a coup.

1andrew1 08-11-2020 21:16

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36057003)
He's probably distraught, he's lost his best ally.

And having to make good on that promise to play all those rounds of golf with Trump if his troll farms in St Petersburgh didn't secure his second victory. :D

Pierre 08-11-2020 21:23

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36057008)
I feel much the same about Accrington Stanley.

Accrington Stanley !!................who are dey?

1andrew1 08-11-2020 21:27

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36057011)
Accrington Stanley !!................who are dey?

:D:D:D

BenMcr 08-11-2020 21:30

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Trump's Director of Campaign Communications has been sharing doctored photos about the 2000 election

https://twitter.com/politicalgates/s...117484035?s=21

jfman 08-11-2020 21:31

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
I actually hope all these court cases proceed. If just for the entertainment value of Trump consistently losing.

Nobody, anywhere, with any objectivity seriously believes that the Democrats rigged the election including in states with Republican Governors and Republican Secretaries of State. They could have at least rigged a couple of Senate races while they are at it.

More recounts and more scrutiny isn't going to get Trump the tens of thousands of votes he needs and no Supreme Court is seriously going to throw out legitimate votes to deny a President-elect who won the popular vote by 5 million votes his rightful place in the Oval Office.

Republican strategist Karl Rove of all people has said it's beyond all credibility, so let's see it play out. As papa smurf earlier stated if there's nothing to hide there's nothing to fear.

1andrew1 08-11-2020 21:35

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36057013)
Trump's Director of Campaign Communications has been sharing doctored photos about the 2000 election

https://twitter.com/politicalgates/s...117484035?s=21

A poor bit of fakery as the text in the article says Bush won!

papa smurf 08-11-2020 21:35

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36057014)
I actually hope all these court cases proceed. If just for the entertainment value of Trump consistently losing.

Nobody, anywhere, with any objectivity seriously believes that the Democrats rigged the election including in states with Republican Governors and Republican Secretaries of State. They could have at least rigged a couple of Senate races while they are at it.

More recounts and more scrutiny isn't going to get Trump the tens of thousands of votes he needs and no Supreme Court is seriously going to throw out legitimate votes to deny a President-elect who won the popular vote by 5 million votes his rightful place in the Oval Office.

Republican strategist Karl Rove of all people has said it's beyond all credibility, so let's see it play out. As papa smurf earlier stated if there's nothing to hide there's nothing to fear.

Has that kind of shit ever actually won an argument:shrug:

jfman 08-11-2020 22:11

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36057016)
Has that kind of shit ever actually won an argument:shrug:

Not on Cable Forum, no.

downquark1 08-11-2020 22:14

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36057016)
Has that kind of shit ever actually won an argument:shrug:

You can pull out Rudy Giuliani the man who led the prosecution of New York mafia bosses and was major of New York through 9/11. For some reason he is defending Trump, he doesn't need to, his place in history is assured.

In fact people may try to erase him for backing Trump.

1andrew1 08-11-2020 22:17

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1 (Post 36057020)
You can pull out Rudy Giuliani the man who led the prosecution of New York mafia bosses and was major of New York through 9/11. For some reason he is defending Trump, he doesn't need to, his place in history is assured.

In fact people may try to erase him for backing Trump.

Yes, unfortunately Giuliani's hitherto good reputation has been severely damaged by his close association with Trump and propensity to defend the indefensible.

Chris 08-11-2020 22:21

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36057021)
Yes, unfortunately Giuliani's hitherto good reputation has been severely damaged by his close association with Trump and propensity to defend the indefensible.

His performance outside that Philadelphia porn shop yesterday was worthy of the master himself.

TheDaddy 08-11-2020 22:56

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36057022)
His performance outside that Philadelphia porn shop yesterday was worthy of the master himself.

:rofl:

Oh yeah the four seasons fiasco where they couldn't book the hotel but made do with a garden centres car park with the same name, well I presume they couldn't book it? Maybe it was their intention all long to have it there :shrug: well it is close to the porn shop as you say.

Rudy was tweeting earlier pleading for people to send him their best guesses on how the election was stolen and he'll take them to court, well maybe not their guesses, he's got his own which might be better. I will miss these guys when they're gone, everything they do, even the most innocuous turns into a fiasco, it's almost as if they don't care as their "base" will lap it up regard less and call it fake news.

I wonder if it's occured to anyone that the democrats plan to pinch the presidency would've failed if donny could've stopped people voting for Jo Jorgensen in the swing states and how bad are the dems at cheating, Hilary lost, they've not won the Senate, hell they couldn't even get Mitch McConnell out but it's all rigged, even though they relied on libertarians getting votes., good plan Joe, no wonder they call you sleepy.

Damien 08-11-2020 22:59

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Giuliani has been on board the Trump train for years. He has been mocked on SNL and other things since before that. One time for bizarrely claiming that:

Quote:

"Under those eight years before Obama came along, we didn't have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attack in the United States. They all started when (Hillary) Clinton and Obama got into office," Giuliani said Monday in Ohio where Trump delivered a speech on radical Islamic terrorism.
https://edition.cnn.com/2016/08/15/p...ack/index.html

Which was...weird...

1andrew1 08-11-2020 22:59

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36057022)
His performance outside that Philadelphia porn shop yesterday was worthy of the master himself.

I thought he was auditioning for one of those US religious channels when he dramatically reacted to being told Biden had won!

Damien 08-11-2020 23:02

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
BTW There is another reason why Trump is fundraising for legal challenges: https://thehill.com/homenews/campaig...gn-debt-report

Quote:

The Trump campaign is requesting donations for an election legal defense fund, but according to the fine print, at least half of any contribution will go toward paying down debt from the president's reelection campaign.

Paul 09-11-2020 01:57

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
I think a few people on this forum need to calm down, we live in the UK, not the USA.

Damien 09-11-2020 07:36

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Overnight it appears some of the remaining votes in Arizona weren't enough for Trump. Likely to stay in Biden's column.

1andrew1 09-11-2020 09:04

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
"Sleepy Joe" winning is clearly a disappointment to some in the UK as well as the US.

To those disappointed Trump supporters in the UK, I urge you to consider the question: What has Donald Trump done for this great country of ours? For example, where is that Anglo-American trade deal to save us from the clutches of the "corrupt" and "perfidious" EU?

Grab yourselves a piece of paper, and make yourslf a list of all the things he's done for our country. Once you've read it, I'm sure you will feel better about Saturday's result.

Carth 09-11-2020 09:17

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
. . . and Sleepy Joe . . sorry, Slasher Harris . . is going to be the one person who will come riding to the rescue?

You need to stop watching all those American films that have happy endings, their addling your brain :p:

Mr K 09-11-2020 09:19

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Congratulatory messages from most places. But not from Russia. They are gutted their man didn't get in. They've not been able to fix this one.

Carth 09-11-2020 09:33

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Breaking News . . Putin reported to be furious that the USA have overtaken Russia in the table of Countries 'most likely to cheat at elections'

papa smurf 09-11-2020 09:46

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36057045)
Breaking News . . Putin reported to be furious that the USA have overtaken Russia in the table of Countries 'most likely to cheat at elections'

I thought Saddam was a dab hand at "winning" elections,but this is world class.

Mick 09-11-2020 10:32

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36057043)
Congratulatory messages from most places. But not from Russia. They are gutted their man didn't get in. They've not been able to fix this one.

They did not fix the last one either or Brexit. Stop peddling lies all the time Mr K!

BenMcr 09-11-2020 10:53

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36057051)
They did not fix the last one either

They certainly tried even if the result of that attempt is disputed:
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/...rt_Volume2.pdf
Quote:

(U), The Committee found, that the IRA sought to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election by harming Hillary Clinton's chances of success and supporting Donald Trump at the direction of the Kremlin.
IRA is the 'St. Petersburg-based Internet Research Agency' in the context of the report.

Mick 09-11-2020 11:00

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36057053)

Jesus, not this again. Then Trying and actually succeeding are two different things. Trump was legitimately elected in 2016, Democratically winning more States by Americans voting for him, not because of Russia.

jfman 09-11-2020 11:22

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Those aren't mutually exclusive things.

Mr K 09-11-2020 11:48

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36057055)
Jesus, not this again. Then Trying and actually succeeding are two different things. Trump was legitimately elected in 2016, Democratically winning more States by Americans voting for him, not because of Russia.

Why do think Russia wanted Trump as Presisent ?(whether they succeeded in influencing things is a separate issue)
Weak, maybe? He'd cause more division in the country?business interests? they had something on him? Its a mystery......

Mick 09-11-2020 12:10

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36057058)
Why do think Russia wanted Trump as Presisent ?(whether they succeeded in influencing things is a separate issue)
Weak, maybe? He'd cause more division in the country?business interests? they had something on him? Its a mystery......

Because Hillary was a warmonger. We definitely avoided WW 3 with her loss. But Russia Russia Russia-All bullshit as usual. I’m not arguing with you or others on this, I said all I said about 2016 election in 2017, 2018...., the result was legitimate and proper. Now back on topic, which is this 2020 election!

downquark1 09-11-2020 12:18

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
I would not even concede that Russia wanted Trump. Russia wants division in the US, whether Trump or Hillary won it wouldn't matter as long as the sides hate each other.

1andrew1 09-11-2020 12:27

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1 (Post 36057063)
I would not even concede that Russia wanted Trump.

The two are not mutually exclusive. As Ben posted earlier, Russia did want Trump to win
Quote:

(U), The Committee found, that the IRA [Internet Research Agency of St Petersburgh] sought to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election by harming Hillary Clinton's chances of success and supporting Donald Trump at the direction of the Kremlin.
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1 (Post 36057063)
Russia wants division in the US, whether Trump or Hillary won it wouldn't matter as long as the sides hate each other.

Russia wants division in the US but its focus indicates a preference for Trump.

papa smurf 09-11-2020 12:27

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1 (Post 36057063)
I would not even concede that Russia wanted Trump. Russia wants division in the US, whether Trump or Hillary won it wouldn't matter as long as the sides hate each other.






They seem to achieve that without any help:(

Mick 09-11-2020 12:55

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
I have given a directive. Follow it.

If we are going to start raising old skeletons on the 2016 election then I’m going to close this thread.

Damien 09-11-2020 13:40

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
I bet Trump wishes these results came out last week

1andrew1 09-11-2020 13:46

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36057082)
I bet Trump wishes these results came out last week

The Covid vaccine results? We need a court investigation as to why Pfizer only announced the results after the election!

Hugh 09-11-2020 13:58

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36057086)
The Covid vaccine results? We need a court investigation as to why Pfizer only announced the results after the election!

Pfizer is based in NY City - says it all...

jfman 09-11-2020 14:10

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36057086)
The Covid vaccine results? We need a court investigation as to why Pfizer only announced the results after the election!

They needed the weekend to buy shares in airlines. ;)

1andrew1 09-11-2020 15:23

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36057082)
I bet Trump wishes these results came out last week

Well, this is awkward!
Quote:

Pence breaks silence to take credit for Pfizer vaccine - and drugs company immediately denies Trump involved

Pfizer announced on Monday morning that their Covid-19 vaccine was 90 per cent effective, in early trials.

"HUGE NEWS: Thanks to the public-private partnership forged by President @realDonaldTrump, @pfizer announced its Coronavirus Vaccine trial is EFFECTIVE, preventing infection in 90% of its volunteers," tweeted Mr Pence

But the New York-based company was quick with a clarification. Dr Kathrin Jansen, Pfizer’s head of vaccine development, told the New York Times: “We were never part of the Warp Speed ... We have never taken any money from the U.S. government, or from anyone.”
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world...rtan-ntp-feeds

Hugh 09-11-2020 16:33

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36057086)
The Covid vaccine results? We need a court investigation as to why Pfizer only announced the results after the election!

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...0&d=1604939573

1andrew1 09-11-2020 17:48

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36057109)

Lol, the Trumps are clearly following this forum! ;)

Damien 09-11-2020 17:50

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
https://www.axios.com/trump-2024-pre...source=twitter

Quote:

President Trump has already told advisers he's thinking about running for president again in 2024, two sources familiar with the conversations tell Axios.
As I said before I can see him getting the nomination easily.

pip08456 09-11-2020 18:06

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36057122)
https://www.axios.com/trump-2024-pre...source=twitter



As I said before I can see him getting the nomination easily.

Does that mean he admits defeat this time?

Damien 09-11-2020 18:12

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36057126)
Does that mean he admits defeat this time?

No, because I think he wants to maximise grievance this time as a rallying cry for a 2024 bid.

Remember his e-mails for 'legal funding' have a stipulation that half of it will go to repaying campaign debts and it appears his main legal team consists of Giuliani holding press conferences.

How much of this is a serious legal effort compared to PR effort? A serious legal effort would be vetting their witnesses for court, not putting out convicted sex offenders for the media.

downquark1 09-11-2020 18:35

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
I'm not convinced of that. But it did work for Nixon.

Damien 09-11-2020 19:12

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1 (Post 36057131)
I'm not convinced of that. But it did work for Nixon.

How do you mean?

downquark1 09-11-2020 19:40

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36057139)
How do you mean?

Well I don't believe the "two sources" thing at all. I think that is fake news simply designed to get his followers to go "oh well, better luck next time".

Nixon famously lost to Kennedy in what many believed to be fraud in Iowa (I think it was Iowa). But 2 elections later Nixon won every state but one.

---------- Post added at 19:40 ---------- Previous post was at 19:39 ----------

But I don't believe the Republicans will let Trump near the nomination again. I could be wrong but that's what I think.

Sorry illinios not iowa

Hugh 09-11-2020 19:57

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36057121)
Lol, the Trumps are clearly following this forum! ;)

No Such Agency would do that... ;)

1andrew1 09-11-2020 20:05

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36057128)
How much of this is a serious legal effort compared to PR effort? A serious legal effort would be vetting their witnesses for court, not putting out convicted sex offenders for the media.

This is very sad. I had hoped Trump would leave graciously but trusting in a sex offender and holding a press conference in a garden centre car park bookended by a sex shop and cemetery - you couldn't pitch this script to Hollywood, they would call it unrealistic! :td:

---------- Post added at 20:05 ---------- Previous post was at 20:04 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36057146)
No Such Agency would do that... ;)

I see what you did there. :D

Hom3r 09-11-2020 20:06

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
The Trump irony is he started his Presidency, with "lock her up."


He will end it with "Lock him up" if you go by the pending court cases.

pip08456 09-11-2020 20:28

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36057148)
This is very sad. I had hoped Trump would leave graciously but trusting in a sex offender and holding a press conference in a garden centre car park bookended by a sex shop and cemetery - you couldn't pitch this script to Hollywood, they would call it unrealistic! :td:

---------- Post added at 20:05 ---------- Previous post was at 20:04 ----------


I see what you did there. :D

Why not buy one of these?;)

https://shopclass.threadless.com/des.../ringer-unisex

Damien 09-11-2020 20:33

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Trump has been tweeting again but from the sounds of it they're gonna try to overturn the results in Nevada, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Georga. Which would be enough to give him the election.

jfman 09-11-2020 20:45

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36057156)
Trump has been tweeting again but from the sounds of it they're gonna try to overturn the results in Nevada, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Georga. Which would be enough to give him the election.

Might as well do legal challenges in every state that voted Democrat just in the off chance they find a handful of improperly cast ballots.

Hugh 09-11-2020 20:48

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/09/covi...ronavirus.html

Quote:

David Bossie, who just days ago was tapped to handle President Donald Trump’s effort to challenge the results of the presidential election, has tested positive for the coronavirus.

Bossie’s diagnosis was disclosed hours after news broke that Trump Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson was positive with Covid-19, and days after White House chief of staff Mark Meadows was revealed to be positive with the virus.
It’s almost as if holding crowded events in an enclosed area with very few, if any, wearing masks, was a bad thing that spread infections...

Mick 09-11-2020 21:00

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36057158)
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/09/covi...ronavirus.html



It’s almost as if holding crowded events in an enclosed area with very few, if any, wearing masks, was a bad thing that spread infections...

You mean a bit like Biden supporters were on Saturday, in their thousands outside the White House and other Democrat cities, when the media unofficially declared him the winner. :rolleyes:


Hugh 09-11-2020 21:08

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
I thought the President and his closest advisors were supposed to lead by example, not act like a crowd?

(A lot of whom were wearing masks, unlike the White House event).

Mick 09-11-2020 21:22

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36057163)
I thought the President and his closest advisors were supposed to lead by example, not act like a crowd?

(A lot of whom were wearing masks, unlike the White House event).

Biden supporters should know better then shouldn't they?

But oh wow, you have super abilities now that you can see most if not all are wearing masks, here's the thing, it is irrelevant, only takes one not to wear one and there are several in that video of Biden supporters not wearing one, it only takes one to spread to several people Hugh.

Damien 09-11-2020 21:33

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Also tbh I doubt masks are that effective when you're in a huge mass of people.

They shouldn't have done it. America is hitting record levels of infection now so it's also a very dangerous time to do it.

Makes me wonder about the inauguration as well. Will it be a public event?

Mick 09-11-2020 21:40

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36057168)
Also tbh I doubt masks are that effective when you're in a huge mass of people.

They shouldn't have done it. America is hitting record levels of infection now so it's also a very dangerous time to do it.

Makes me wonder about the inauguration as well. Will it be a public event?

Thanks Damien, this is all I was after. You cannot attack one side and totally ignore the other side doing the same, regardless if more are wearing masks, not all were and it is still the same thing.

Chris 09-11-2020 21:50

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36057168)
Also tbh I doubt masks are that effective when you're in a huge mass of people.

They shouldn't have done it. America is hitting record levels of infection now so it's also a very dangerous time to do it.

Makes me wonder about the inauguration as well. Will it be a public event?

If they’re used properly masks are highly effective even in a crowd. The operative however is “properly”. If it is intercepting live virus particles on its outer surface (statistically quite likely in a crowd), then how the wearer removes and disposes of it is critical, as is how they wash and disinfect themselves afterwards. During the summer, Mrs had to go through a lengthy recommended decontamination process every evening when she came home from staffing the key workers kids’ school. I doubt many people of either political stripe will have done this when coming home from a crowd.

I have heard Biden’s comments about mask wearing repeatedly on the news. On the face of it it’s simple, common sense advice, but what he’s actually doing is sowing a narrative that democrats are sensible mask wearers and Trump supporters are reckless. He’s right, everyone should be wearing a mask, but for the sake of de-escalation he should be shying away from addressing it as a partisan issue at all IMO. The risk is that he entrenches behaviour from some people who decide to proudly adopt it as a symbol of their political independence. That wouldn’t help anyone.

Mick 09-11-2020 22:00

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
BREAKING: Current Senator Majority leader, Mitch McConnell has thrown his support behind President Trump, declining to recognise Joe Biden's victory. U.S Attorney General, Bill Barr was seen entering and leaving his office, ignoring media reporters questions.

Damien 09-11-2020 22:04

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
However, McConnell seems to be careful in his words though saying Trump can pursue all legal avenues rather than backing his claims.

jfman 09-11-2020 22:11

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36057175)
However, McConnell seems to be careful in his words though saying Trump can pursue all legal avenues rather than backing his claims.

Agreed. He's stating the facts.

Similarly people making statements about ensuring legal votes count and illegal votes do not is carefully crafted fence sitting.

Chris 09-11-2020 22:11

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Also, talk at this juncture is cheap. Trump ceases to be president at noon on 20 January 2021 regardless of any political declaration by anyone.

As things stand, the States will send their electors who will vote by a majority to make Biden the formal president-elect. The only thing that can possibly prevent that is an unprecedented intervention by the Supreme Court, which would have to set aside an enormous number of ballots to make any material difference to the outcome of the election.

As with so much in US politics, it’s all theatre for consumption by the faithful, and in the case of senior republicans half of them will now be wondering exactly what they have to do to get the party nomination in 2024, given Trump is now free to pursue it himself if he wishes.

downquark1 09-11-2020 22:16

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
The supreme court need not necessarily get involved. The states could audit the vote before certification and discrepancies trigger count changes.

Damien 09-11-2020 22:19

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36057177)
As things stand, the States will send their electors who will vote by a majority to make Biden the formal president-elect. The only thing that can possibly prevent that is an unprecedented intervention by the Supreme Court, which would have to set aside an enormous number of ballots to make any material difference to the outcome of the election.

Which they could only do in the unlikely event one of these cases manages to even reach them and, if it does, even a partisan court will only break for Trump in a tight decision. The Justices of either side wouldn't want to completely undermine the court for Trump by overturning a result - in multiple states - without very good reason to do so.

Chris 09-11-2020 22:20

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1 (Post 36057178)
The supreme court need not necessarily get involved. The states could audit the vote before certification and discrepancies trigger count changes.

Yes, the states also have their own supreme courts. That’s not my point - which is simply that it makes no difference who accepts the results or whether Trump concedes. His presidency will end regardless, as a matter of constitutional process.

Trump’s failure to make a concession speech will simply be consistent with the sort of graceless behaviour he is now well known for.

downquark1 09-11-2020 22:21

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36057180)
Yes, the states also have their own supreme courts. That’s not my point - which is simply that it makes no difference who accepts the results or whether Trump concedes. His presidency will end regardless as a matter of constitutional process.

---------- Post added at 22:20 ---------- Previous post was at 22:20 ----------


I don't think anyone disputes that.

Mick 09-11-2020 22:26

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36057179)
Which they could only do in the unlikely event one of these cases manages to even reach them and, if it does, even a partisan court will only break for Trump in a tight decision. The Justices of either side wouldn't want to completely undermine the court for Trump by overturning a result - in multiple states - without very good reason to do so.

Guess which two now Supreme Court Justices that were on President George W. Bush's legal team during the Al Gore fight in 2000?

Justice Brett Kavanaugh and Justice Amy Coney Barratt.

pip08456 09-11-2020 22:26

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36057174)
BREAKING: Current Senator Majority leader, Mitch McConnell has thrown his support behind President Trump, declining to recognise Joe Biden's victory. U.S Attorney General, Bill Barr was seen entering and leaving his office, ignoring media reporters questions.

They are quite entitled to do that, go to court and produce the evidence if it exists.

So far we have (not all but a couple) of accusations of "tremendous corruption and fraud” being perpetrated by Democratic officials in Georgia which has a Republican governor, Republican legislature and Republican officials who oversee voting.

Republican attorneys general across the US filing a joint brief to the US Supreme Court contesting vote counts in Pennsylvania.

The officials argue that the state's court "overstepped" when it allowed ballots post-marked by 3 November but received after the date to be counted. When Pennsylvania's mail voting law was approved last year by the state's Republican-majority legislature.

Mick 09-11-2020 22:30

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36057180)
Yes, the states also have their own supreme courts. That’s not my point - which is simply that it makes no difference who accepts the results or whether Trump concedes. His presidency will end regardless, as a matter of constitutional process.

Trump’s failure to make a concession speech will simply be consistent with the sort of graceless behaviour he is now well known for.

But it is totally graceless, the Democrats entering an election they intend to cheat in, with dead people voting, and I have seen today that somebody's dog was given voter registration and had apparently voted in this election.

It is a legal process to contest dodgy dealings and the Democrats do have form Chris, especially when the DNC and Hillary Clinton paid for the fake Russian dossier.

Damien 09-11-2020 22:32

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36057183)
Guess which two now Supreme Court Justices that were on President George W. Bush's legal team during the Al Gore fight in 2000?

Justice Brett Kavanaugh and Justice Amy Coney Barratt.

And that might help them in a close decision but these two justices are lifetime appointments now and I don't see them doing anything too outlandish.

The only way I see Trump overturning the election is via evidence of a wide-ranging and coordinated fraud at a federal level.

At the moment it seems like a pick and mix attempt to find problems with ballots in some of these close states to overturn enough until Trump can hit 270. He'll find problems, there always are, but coordinated fraud involving tens of thousands of ballots in multiple states is a harder task.

downquark1 09-11-2020 22:35

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36057186)
And that might help them in a close decision but these two justices are lifetime appointments now and I don't see them doing anything too outlandish.

The only way I see Trump overturning the election is via evidence of a wide-ranging and coordinated fraud at a federal level.

At the moment it seems like a pick and mix attempt to find problems with ballots in some of these close states to overturn enough until Trump can hit 270. He'll find problems, there always are, but coordinated fraud involving tens of thousands of ballots in multiple states is a harder task.

No, "wide-spread fraud" is a red herring, it is not done that way because it is pointless in a electoral college system. You need only discount enough votes to swing battleground states. The fraud need only be from certain officials or even just ground level workers.

Chris 09-11-2020 22:36

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36057183)
Guess which two now Supreme Court Justices that were on President George W. Bush's legal team during the Al Gore fight in 2000?

Justice Brett Kavanaugh and Justice Amy Coney Barratt.

Even senior British judges have political friends and former political activities in their pasts. The nature of the British media and our view of the judiciary is such that these considerations don’t really get an airing.

I think a lot of people misunderstand the significance of an individual US Supreme Court judge’s political sympathies. Whether they err to the conservative or the liberal/progressive side will come out in the way they interpret legal questions against the constitution. It doesn’t mean they’re going to make nakedly political judgments that result in overturning the prospective presidency of a man who secured five million more votes than his opponent. Yes, these people are conservative leaning, but they take the job because they believe in the stability of the USA’s constitutional democracy and they are well aware of the long-term damage they would cause by interfering in elections.

For them to set aside enough votes to materially affect the outcome will require far more than being friends with a former republican president. It will require massive evidence of systematic ballot rigging, of the sort that simply did not happen.

pip08456 09-11-2020 22:36

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36057185)
But it is totally graceless, the Democrats entering an election they intend to cheat in, with dead people voting, and I have seen today that somebody's dog was given voter registration and had apparently voted in this election.

It is a legal process to contest dodgy dealings and the Democrats do have form Chris, especially when the DNC and Hillary Clinton paid for the fake Russian dossier.

Mick, you are stating as fact nothing that has as yet been proven, if it does subsequently have the evidence rather than an allegation put forward then and only then can the result be called into question. It's like the dead voting if it did happen then it is up to Trump and his team to present the evidence at court.

I await with baited breath.

BTW nice to see you providing links to these accusations.

Damien 09-11-2020 22:40

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Anyway, we'll see. I don't care too much about the court cases because they'll work themselves out eventually either way.

There are more pressing questions though such as does Trump allow his White House to work with the transition team? At the moment that seems an open question. https://apnews.com/article/election-...747fde8e01319c

---------- Post added at 22:40 ---------- Previous post was at 22:38 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1 (Post 36057187)
No, "wide-spread fraud" is a red herring, it is not done that way because it is pointless in a electoral college system. You need only discount enough votes to swing battleground states. The fraud need only be from certain officials or even just ground level workers.

Has there ever been tens of thousands of ballots thrown out in US History? That would have to happen in multiple states and then the Democrats will be finding reasons to reject Republican votes too.

These cases would eventually end up in the Supreme Court.

Remember Flordia was less than 2,000 votes and look at the mess there. 10,000+ votes in multiple states. Don't see it.

Mick 10-11-2020 00:19

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36057189)
Mick, you are stating as fact nothing that has as yet been proven, if it does subsequently have the evidence rather than an allegation put forward then and only then can the result be called into question. It's like the dead voting if it did happen then it is up to Trump and his team to present the evidence at court.

I await with baited breath.

BTW nice to see you providing links to these accusations.

With that attitude you can go find them yourself.

---------- Post added 10-11-2020 at 00:19 ---------- Previous post was 09-11-2020 at 22:45 ----------

BREAKING: U.S Attorney General William Barr authorizes federal prosecutors to pursue “substantial allegations” of voting irregularities in the 2020 U.S Elections.

jfman 10-11-2020 00:40

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
If such allegations of substance exist.

1andrew1 10-11-2020 00:48

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36057199)
If such allegations of substance exist.

Indeed. The court's decision-making will make for cringe-worthy TV viewing. it will be like watching a box set of The Office.

pip08456 10-11-2020 01:12

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36057192)
With that attitude you can go find them yourself.

---------- Post added 10-11-2020 at 00:19 ---------- Previous post was 09-11-2020 at 22:45 ----------

BREAKING: U.S Attorney General William Barr authorizes federal prosecutors to pursue “substantial allegations” of voting irregularities in the 2020 U.S Elections.

I don't see the point in chasing fairy tales.

BTW you missed a bit from your breaking news.

Quote:

Attorney General William Barr has authorized federal prosecutors across the U.S. to pursue “substantial allegations” of voting irregularities, if they exist, before the 2020 presidential election is certified, despite little evidence of fraud.
Link

Damien 10-11-2020 07:27

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
This also is good news for not delaying certification:

Quote:

He said any allegations that would “clearly not impact the outcome of a federal election” should be delayed until after those elections are certified and prosecutors should likely open so-called preliminary inquiries, which would allow investigators and prosecutors to see if there is evidence that would allow them to take further investigative measures.
Means some of this smaller stuff can't be used to delay the process.

Mr K 10-11-2020 07:33

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
This maybe intended as showmanship to rally his base for the next election, but its going to end up causing him more damage. Putting personal pride before your country won't end well. It's already alienating mainstream Republucans.

Anyway in 4 years time he'll be too old and surely have dementia. There are signs he isn't being too rational already, don't know if anyone's noticed ? ;)

1andrew1 10-11-2020 09:22

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36057210)
This maybe intended as showmanship to rally his base for the next election, but its going to end up causing him more damage. Putting personal pride before your country won't end well. It's already alienating mainstream Republucans.

Anyway in 4 years time he'll be too old and surely have dementia. There are signs he isn't being too rational already, don't know if anyone's noticed ? ;)

I think He's being pretty rational. As Damien has previously linked to, half the funds for the election investigations go to pay off the debts for the 2020 re-election. There's evidently a pool of Trump supporters willing to believe his every word and not think more critically. More importantly, some can be convinced to dip into their pockets for him.

But I agree some of his speeches do give the impression of cognitive degeneration. Most recently that 17-minute rant. But has it got worse over the last four years? I couldn't say. I hope not

Pierre 10-11-2020 09:22

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
I don’t doubt that there was many fraudulent ballots, it happens here too.

But I don’t think they’ll be able to evidence that it was on a scale to overturn or nullify the election.

Maggy 10-11-2020 09:28

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36057215)
I don’t doubt that there was many fraudulent ballots, it happens here too.

But I don’t think they’ll be able to evidence that it was on a scale to overturn or nullify the election.

:tu:

Mr K 10-11-2020 09:32

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Any recount could increase President Joe's lead. Now that would be funny ... :D

Damien 10-11-2020 09:35

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36057215)
I don’t doubt that there was many fraudulent ballots, it happens here too.

But I don’t think they’ll be able to evidence that it was on a scale to overturn or nullify the election.

Same. There will certainly be dodgy ballots in a country with 160 million votes or whatever. The question is proving coordinated and mass-scale fraud sufficient to overturn the result, as Barr's statement says.

1andrew1 10-11-2020 10:07

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Fox News have chosen to cut off a rather desperate press conference from Kayleigh McEnancy which suggested electoral fraud.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/newsl...rtan-ntp-feeds

Mr K 10-11-2020 10:22

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36057227)
Fox News have chosen to cut off a rather desperate press conference from Kayleigh McEnancy which suggested electoral fraud.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/newsl...rtan-ntp-feeds

Real shame VM don't do Fox News, we're missing out on the entertainment! :)

papa smurf 10-11-2020 10:41

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36057227)
Fox News have chosen to cut off a rather desperate press conference from Kayleigh McEnancy which suggested electoral fraud.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/newsl...rtan-ntp-feeds





For those who aren't offended by free speech the full press conference


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtZHMTDDDec

mrmistoffelees 10-11-2020 10:59

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36057237)
For those who aren't offended by free speech the full press conference


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtZHMTDDDec

Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.

papa smurf 10-11-2020 11:04

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36057240)
Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.

Margarine is not butter.

Damien 10-11-2020 11:14

Re: U.S Election 2020
 
Amazing: https://order-order.com/2020/11/10/n...tulated-trump/

No 10 has two messages ready to go which itself isn't a surprise but it seems the graphic designers didn't have two images and simply editing the existing one by fading out the old text!


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:56.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum