![]() |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
As per the 14 day logs for research and debugging, I arent quite sure what to make of that. The AOL debacle last year showed that so called "anonymising" does not work and I guess it largely depends exactly how they define this "research." Personally I dont trust Phorm one iota. What I would like to say to the CEO of Phorm isnt polite enough for this forum. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
The feel good factor was growing services was being upgraded and some snooty idiot in some office had a brainwave to test the resolve of its customers by doing this. Have they thought about risk assesment management in VM. Did they honestly thought customers would go oh well we have cttv camera's every inch of the uk surely the wont mind us going to bed with some dodgy hackers who make rootkits for spyware. So we can snoop and profile there habits just to give us more junk, but oh wait it will be only adverts we would be interested in. I sometimes wonder if these educated people who are in positions to make decisions have any brains at all. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77 & 102]
Quote:
[EDIT: To be honest it's a bogus distinction anyway. Even if it's a postcard, are you seriously suggesting that it would be okay for the Post Office to read the contents of a postcard and sell the information that whoever was sending it had e.g. gone to Greece on holiday and liked the food, so that some junk mail company could send me "Win a holiday" promotions and adverts for feta? The people posting it might be able to read the info, but legally they're not allowed to do anything with it. Even if it's on a postcard - it's none of their damn business where I've been or what my friends and relatives think of their diving trip or whatever. You're right, a postcard you don't have any expectation that it won't be read - however, an expectation that that knowledge will not be exploited for commercial gain is perfectly reasonable.] I notice you ignored the major substance of my post, which is that the Home Office advice clearly states that this kind of action IS illegal under the RIPA unless it is a) with the explicit consent of both the communicating parties, or b) necessary to provide the contracted service of delivery of communications. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Reading on the BBC news technology section wed 12th that Talk Talk are considering making it "Opt In"
If VM do go ahead with the system I hope they don't make the "opt out" as obscure as some other opt out systems companies have used in the past. Yahoo a few years ago had an opt out for something but was placed so hidden away it was a miricle if you found it. Then only if you knew it was there in the first place by word of mouth. E-mailing every user with details would have to be a must, and a quick link to opting out. Not everyone goes to the company web page and reads through. Yep companies will put things up in small corners of their own company pages, and say well we have complied with the law, even though you need to have the eyesight of the "6 Million Dollar Man" to find it. Yes I am showing my ages with that quote hahaha I can only see this having a very big negative impact for users and companies involved. Especially for the users stuck or who can't end their contracts and move onto other isp's. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
By definition, if VM decide to go purely for an opt-out then it's not worth having as they'll still be hijacking your clickstream ("but honestly we're not peeking!").
Should that happen, I'll be joining the queue to dump cable and getting a BT phone line installed to enable ADSL2+. And BT (Wholesale) don't offer anything like VM's 30-day guarantee on new installs -- I'll be committed for 18 months (half-price installation) no matter how VM might adjust their position after they've brought it in. VM have had several weeks to consider the grassroots reaction to Phorm and have done (virtually) nothing. My guess is that either they don't value our privacy or the potential extra income from the targeted adverts is worth more than our subscriptions. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
:tu:
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
http://beta.bt.com/bta/forums/thread...=2612&tstart=0 |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
#1113
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/12/mobile_phom/ " Qualcomm buys into Phorm-alike firm Data gathering on the hoof ------------------------------------------------------- Quote:
you have to wonder why?, as theres far more mobile users out there than even BB users, is it that people just dont care if this 'Interception For Sale' expands to all mobile browsing and other related area's, id think not. it seems clear , the investors and markets are just hopeing this all goes away and gets forgotten. the question remains, other than 'the register', why havent the other news outlets covered any of this new mobile IFS. and perhaps even more worrying,why (other than here)havent the online messageboards and blogs also linked this into the current ISP/Phorm concerns? |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
This is a fundamental change to T&Cs and would need to be in writing anyway. I have not talked to my parents about this, they still use VM as their ISP, I am waiting to see if they ask me about changes to their T&Cs or whether the documents, like when your bank changes parts of their T&Cs just gets ignored and binned. This way I will see what the average user who just wants a broadband connection to send a few emails and book a vacation sees and understands of this change. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Yes we know BT are into phorm aswell I am off to Aquiss who are not going to be phorm(ed). :) |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Virgin Media cant use email for 'official notification' Now anyway, as they removed that option from their T&Cs ages ago.
probably as a way to make it harder for you to send them any 'official notice', but it works both ways and they seem to have forgotten that. OC, its possible they may re-include the Electronic Official Notice option into the T&C at some point, as they would have to do so for any popup 'do you agree' type options they and the other ISPs think constitutes getting 'explicit consent' (it doesnt AFAIC). |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Quote:
That's why I wrote: "I'll be ... getting a BT phone line installed to enable ADSL2+" Luckily for me, I have a choice of ADSL2+ providers (at ~7Mbps according to SamKnows Mapping) amongst Be Unlimited, O2, UK Online and Sky Max. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
If BT make this a non-optional service, is there any way I can get out of a contract with them?
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
(More relevantly as you're 'inside the machine', how can we lobby the plonkers upstairs to make sure they realise how pis^u^u^u disappointed we are with their handling of the Phorm/WebWise issue?) |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
A new short piece from the register regarding AVG, Trend Micro, Webroots classification of phorm etc:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03...lassification/ |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
hth |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Other UK sims don't work on orangeworld, certain services from abroad may have arranged roaming rights but not all
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
I found this article quite informative http://www.economist.com/printeditio...ry_id=10789393
Though the article talks about what is happening in the USA it does suggest that similar thing will be used in Europe. The way I see it, the only reason someone like Virgin Media have been talking to Phorm is due the requirement to tap all web use. With the deal the ISP doesn't have to pay to host the equipment and yet will be able comply with the law and monitor all use. Revenue raised from the advertising would be a 'bonus' It would also seem to imply that ALL ISPs would be required to have monitors so regardless of where people defect to, they are likely to be monitored. One thought springs to mind however. The article refers to Skype and how packets are encrypted. Would it be practical to use Skype as pseudo dial up, rather than send voice over it data. I don't know what performance would be like, but just a thought :dunce: |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Besides, Virgin won't be paying to host the equipment - Phorm will be paying them to do it, that's the whole point. Except for the (hopefully large) number of broadband subscribers they're going to lose, Virgin's costs will be minimal - unless one or more subscribers sue them as a result of data security leaks and subsequent financial or other damage to them. Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
That article is not worth the time and trouble of reading.
The UK telephone network changed to a packet switching digital network around a decade ago. The article is comparing the non existent long since redundant analogue network with packet switching internet networks which are highly comparable with modern telephony methods. There are legal requirements to intercept telephony communications and IMO the exact same requirements should apply to internet packets whatever the use. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Hi, I've been following the debate with interest on here and other forums and thought I would give my two penniesworth.
I (part time) develop bespoke Web applications and test these on several flavours of browsers IE, Opera, Firefox - and I certainly would want to opt-out. So then with the currently proposed opt-out approach I would have to opt-out in all browsers on all machines, sounds like fun. Also I do not see it being a big problem as a developer, to put a bit of script on a website that was using this 'Spyware' to marry up the 'Random (ish) number of the Phorm cookie and the IP address and header info of the browser requesting the page. So unless they have come up with a new way of communication over the Internet it does not seem too anonymous to me. Default opt out which bypasses the Phorm system is the only civilised thing for any ISP to do. I just hope they do that. Life is too short and there are far more interesting things to be doing. Fighting corperate EGO's and greed is not one of them. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
This thread has just been shown on the BBC's "Click!"
TradUK is famous lol. Anyway keep up the good work everyone. No Surrender! |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Will there be a repeat of it or a webshow of it anytime in the future as I would be really interested to watch / listen to it! This is what we need, more publicity on what is going on / intended to go on if PHORM get their way, and must be stopped dead! More people have to know & protest at this or we will wont win the war against PHORM! :):) |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
With any luck Phorm's ip addresses & all there severs will be added to the blocklists in peerguardian & protowall, then if everyone uses these ip blockers it will surely render Phorm's system entirely useless
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
the click! researchers should come in here and ask far more questions on our views and many subjects ;) http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programme...ne/4137816.stm click the 'watch now' link to start the java code that opens the player window. i cant be bothered to find the real link to the direct stream so you can play it in any stand alone OS app.... ;) i did it anyway mms://wm-acl.bbc.co.uk/wms/news/media_acl/mps/fix/news/uk/video/159000/bb/159204_16x9_bb.wmv works for me in VLC and MPC |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programme...ne/default.stm |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
...And now BT are having a rethink, too...
According to Adam Liversage, the hapless BT employee who has been tasked with answering questions on the Phorm system from the lucky trialists over on the BT network; "...BT can also confirm that in parallel with the trial, we are already developing an opt-out solution that would remove the need for opt-out cookies altogether." The full thread is over at http://www.beta.bt.com/bta/forums/th...t=165&tstart=0 So first TalkTalk listen to their customers, now BT appear to be doing the same...so the big question everyone here wants answered is: What are you going to do, Virgin Media? ~ * ~ Then again, maybe BT have done us all a favour and sunk Phorm before it can even get off the ground...at 10pm last night, the same BT spokesman posted the following: "SYSIP.NET ISSUE - UPDATE BT can confirm that we conducted a very small scale technical test of a prototype advertising platform on one exchange in June 2007. The test was specifically conducted to evaluate the functional and technical performance of the platform. Absolutely no personally identifiable information was processed, stored or disclosed during this trial. As with all Service Providers, it is important for BT to ensure that, before any potential new technologies are employed, they are robust and fit for purpose." Oh boy, now the crap is really going to hit the fan!!! Not least because BT have repeatedly denied having anything to do with the mysterious sysip.net server last year. Now it turns out they were running a secret trial using customers' data without informing them....I can't wait until The Register reads that one! :erm: |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Looks like the BT trials have begun:
Quote:
Opps, looks like I need to send BT my refusal of interception notice for my website ASAP. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Mick, use that direct mms i posted inside VLC and save it off that way
---------- Post added at 17:44 ---------- Previous post was at 17:11 ---------- its also on http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/search/?q=click if you just want to play it that way. ---------- Post added at 18:40 ---------- Previous post was at 17:44 ---------- Quote:
if any Phorm opted-in trialists were to visit your website(s) and your web data was processed by the profiler(s) then your notice in there covers it, and they may be in serious trouble. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Out of interest. On what type of webpages do phorm inject their ads into?
I mean, if I use google to search for Car Insurance, will half the ads I would normally see be replaced with their injected ads? or if I am visiting a forum that is paid by ads, for example overclocking cpu's, would they inject their ads there and replace the normal ads i would see? or if I have ads on my own website, do they replace those? various news portals that have ads on? or myspace/facebook *shrug* |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
I think the poo will hit the fan now.
Quote:
---------- Post added at 21:46 ---------- Previous post was at 21:29 ---------- Just found this on Skyuser Forum http://www.skyuser.co.uk/forum/polls...tml#post135285 Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
however, if you can get the ISPs to infact write you in response, then that too could be a very good stick to use later. i suspect their first thought would be to put you into a blacklist file of some sort, but that too perhaps opens many legal doors you can then use against them. how do they deal with an opted-in user wanting to visit an on notice website. and thats ignoring the fact they cant really know if the sites got a no profiling notice until they have potentially unlawfully parsed the site and processed it in some way, its all starting to sound real expensive if not impossible. ---------- Post added at 22:13 ---------- Previous post was at 21:56 ---------- Quote:
"we’ll only implement a solution when we can use customer data in a responsible way which safeguards privacy" they or indeed anyone never mentions anything about paying the users a licence fee for legal use of their data. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Have you read their "privacy" policy? http://www.nebuad.com/privacy/uk_servicesPrivacy.php :LOL: There are so many holes, obvious security concerns and legal grey areas in there that even I would be willing to stand up in court and present a case against them. These people actually make the Phorm guys seem competent, and that takes some doing! |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
For the record, I'm 100% against this system, but we need to get our facts straight if we're going to avoid being labelled as a "paranoid minority". |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Or even simply asking if we'd mind them making money out of it... |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Its a bit ridiculous.
We have to pay rent to use their technology, so why shouldnt we be able to charge then for using our property? (Our personal data) |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Here's a quick thought. My website URL itself is surely personally identifying info as I am the registered owner and a whois of my URL will bring up my name and address.
In refusing to allow Phorm/isp's to intercept my website for advertising purposes, I am also refusing to allow them to intercept my URL, or even put my URL on any form of opt-out list, as it's personally identifying data - and anyway, they say they don't collect any such data. So, hows they gonna block my website from being intercepted by their software? Gottcha! With BT now admitting they lied - and the fallout and legal headache they are now gonna face, I'm hoping that ISP's will drop Phorm, or any such similar interception software. Phorm will then hopefully die a quick death. Fingers crossed! |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
My guess is that ISP's will wait for the sting of initial reaction to fall away in the hope that people will lose interest. This post will now unashamedly become one of those horrible little chain mail thingies: Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
a small mention at the end of this "BT spin-off bans spyware"
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/ar...9&in_page_id=2 " BBC iPlayer fans face hidden costs "Simon Fluendy, Financial Mail 16 March 2008, 11:17am .... BT spin-off bans spyware PlusNet has broken ranks with its parent BT by banning spyware company Phorm from its network. ... " |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
I'm surprised that other ad companies are not either:
a: Trying to get a piece of this pie or b: Kicking up a stink over unfair competition If Phorm is the only ad company with their nose in our entire browsing experience at the invitation of our ISPs, then they have a significant advantage over ads that only target the site content or use spy cookies covering several sites in their network. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Surely this comes under data protection act and is illegal its bad enough with all the carp we get on tv about being security wise with normal mail and untrustworthy persons without isp's tying to do it under the noses of there customers.
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Your ISP has a legal duty to protect you as the data subject, the issue here is whether the information that is passed to Phorm is sufficiently anonymous to prevent breaches of the DPA. Other topics here suggest now that there are other companies coming into this so called "contectual advertising" business. I for one think that because of the tight profit margins in the BB industry in the UK, this kind of advertising is inevitable if many ISP's want to make a profit. I don't like it, but I think these are the issues facing ISPs. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Yet another phorm exploit as found by Mel on ispreview.
http://www.toobadcs.co.uk/phorm/Phor...in_exploit.htm Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Just shows how easy its going to be to be infected with this spyware from Virgin Media. And before you say Its Phorm not Virgin Media, Its Virgin Media as the servers are going to be in Virgin Media's pop sites so its Virgin Media that will be infecting us with this spyware. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Im sure it is on here somewere ,but what are you using to detect Phorm in simple terms .Please
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
http://www.dephormation.org.uk/ |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Did someone say Sky are buying into this? Oh, bleep! My sister's changing her TV/broadband package from cable to Sky this week (though not because of all this), and I mentioned it. Her first question, unsurprisingly, was 'isn't that illegal?'
- well, isn't it? But if Sky are doing it as well...much more of this and the smaller ISP fish aren't going to be so small any more. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
I'd suggest though that this will take months. Virgin are already waiting to see what happens to BT/CPW (in terms of whether they make this an opt-in system, or provide a stronger opt-out that isn't just cookie based), their talks with Phorm are nothing more than that. Your sister should be safe to move to Sky. ---------- Post added at 23:22 ---------- Previous post was at 23:21 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
The fact we are being told its not live. Like I found days back this thing is being intermittent. I found my phrom informer told me couple times there is phorm which bypassed there lump of rubbish opt out cookie. I had a thought on this so called poll maybe its businesses who been asked they are hadly going to ask us they know the answer. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
The link I posted earlier holds information plus the image( which soesnt work since it is the cookie info image) which places the cookie on you pc. Please search through your cookies and delete the webwise cookie. That is how easy it is to aquire a cookie for webwise visiting any website thwey have infected with their scripts.
Phorm Opt-in cookie details Name=uid Content=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX|| (where XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX is a 22 character "random" string) Host=a.webwise.net Path=/services/ Send for=Any type of connection Expiry date 1 year Phorm Opt-out cookie details Name=OPTED_OUT Content=YES Domain=.webwise.net Path=/ Send for=Any type of connection The info the cookies give. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Sir Tim says no to Phorm...
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
That's a heck of a slap in the face for Kent and the oily ad-men :) |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
I heard about this during the night on radio 5 Live, and there's just been a piece about it on BBC Breakfast.
Having a man like this on our side could be a huge boost :) Well done Sir Tim. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
It's heating up on the support forum for the BT version of this Spyware
http://www.beta.bt.com/bta/forums/th...t=210&tstart=0 Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
It an issue of trust, I bet Phorm did not inform Virgin Media an Co. about there past history before public found out about it. ---------- Post added at 09:19 ---------- Previous post was at 09:10 ---------- Quote:
He get this problem with Phorm and why it bad. If dont know who Sir Tim Berners-Lee is, put it simply he is one who start this HTML thing in first place. He father web, with out him there would not be a:- e-bay phorm etc Day by day the news for Phorm get worse, next Phorm PR outfit will say Sir Tim Berners-Lee dosn't know what he is talking about. :dunce: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7299875.stm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Tim_Berners-Lee |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
From scanning through the BT forum link Sirius posted.
http://beta.bt.com/bta/forums/thread...rt=45&tstart=0 Seems BadPhorm and Dephormation have been getting a lot of attention from Russia http://preview.tinyurl.com/3drxqa Maybe they're looking to protect their own browsing habits |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Until now I didnt really see what the issue was with Phorm on VM, and having read through many of the posts I do still think many are just nonsense bordering on conspiracy theory...
BUT sat watching TV I thought I wouldnt want anyone or anything to know what programmes I liked then making assumptions about what products interest me.. Nor would I want any system to know what food I eat every night, tailored advertising would limit my choice in some ways (Not sure if that makes sense) On the reverse Tesco hold more information on most f you than any direct marketing software ever will. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...17/nweb117.xml |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
The Register has added a new piece after the weekend revelation from BT admitting they were using it last year despite lying to customers
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/17/bt_phorm_lies/ |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Sorry, too many posts to read, but have virgin signed up to phorm yet or not?
Or is it still only BT and talktalk? |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Last we heard, they were considering their options. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Let's hope the national media make a big deal of this... |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
They could of use customers Credit/Debit card number do this, but Tesco decided against doing this from linking customers to C/D cards due to Data Protection Act. Now today we have Phorm. Yes Phorm people do not always tell the truth in polls. I would love to find out what Phorm asked/told people when ask people about Internet Add's. PS Clubcard is an Opt-In. Phorm is SPYCOMS. ---------- Post added at 12:54 ---------- Previous post was at 12:39 ---------- It might be worth editing wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phorm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Tim_Berners-Lee |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
If you have a tesco credit card that doubles up as a Club Card then they do know what you spend on the card as you get points for every £ spent on the card. And with a credit card you cant opt out.
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
If you have /wish to use the credit card, you can't opt out. However, you have the option of using cash.
If you don't want Phorm tracking your browsing then unless you wish to risk TOR, have access to a VPN or can change ISPs (usually a major hassle even assuming you can use another ISP), or are willing to trust them, then you have no option but to avoid using the internet. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Looks like BT are just as devious and untrustworthy as all the other ISP's that are in bed with Phorm.
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Clubcard - you allow Tesco to track your buying habits, in return they give you money and customised money off coupons. With clubcard rewards they then build in an escalator to the value of the money so ten quid of vouchers becomes forty quid of meal or cinema vouchers etc. Google - you acknowledge they know your search history (if you are logged into google when you search), in return their searches find what you are looking for, otherwise the adverts are customised to that search, as a search page is dynamically built this is not unreasonable. The Phorm approach means you might be searching for Cars and seing adverts about iPods because you searched or surfed for them last week. Sky multiroom - You allow the boxes to dial in to get the discount for having more than one box. You also allow them to monitor some of your viewing habits. Phorm - they put customised adverts in some of the advertising spaces that already exist on a website. They protect you from Phising (but so does IE7 out of the box, and Safari? and you can get plugins for other browsers to do the same for free). So where is the value add to the consumer. There is none. Or as TBL put it http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7299875.stm Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
What gets me I am VM user so my question WHY are they there. I dont think we are be told the truth and lot of porkies. An ultimate question concidering PHORM shady past. How easy would it to make the opt out cookie an opt in cookie instead. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Well only have till 28th March till BT phone line then BB will be a smaller ISP. One that is to small to be of any value to phorm also one that has already promised to not jump into bed with phorm.
I left BT over 15yrs ago I am now returning to them been through enough cable companies and stuck with them but this is the end, VM response to customers fears on Phorm and the links that are about that seem to prove they are still into the old ways is enough to make me move back. Good luck to those who stay but I pay for a service to use as I wish I dont use it for anything illegal so feel this is an intrusion into my privacy something I refuse to give up. All remeber if you visit webwise site for anything to search for the cookie and delete it as they are already active on the web. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
there's speculation that they may at least be in talks with them :/ |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
"When Webwise is on, you receive all benefits at no additional cost if you’re a customer of one of these leading ISPs:" then there are just two logo's https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2008/03/7.gif [img]Download Failed (1)[/img] If Virgin are signed up, why arn't they there? :erm: or have I got confused about your answer? |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
BT have disgusted me more than ever, I'm certainly changing for the better. By the looks of the BT community forum, BT are not even interested in replying to customer's concerns so what's the point in complaining, let them crash and burn. I encourage everyone to change ISP if BT do not stop stealing our personal information.
*RANT!!* |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Yes we have sky for TV will be BT for phone and Aquiss for internet since they are small good and have assured me they are not interested in introducing phorm.
If it is any use this link will help you get the phone line back at half price. http://www.serviceview.bt.com/list/p...Impl133605.htm |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Another legal problem for Phorm (SPYCOMS)
Copyright Law. Everything you do how ever trival, you automatical own the Copyright to. Everything you type etc. Now just by typing URL's you do not own the copyright to domain name but you own Copyright to it order it was entered (History). Sounds daft but that is IP law for you. You get DVD covermount on a computer magazine. Now there little chance that magazine ownes copyright to software upon that DVD, but they own Copyright to DVD disk. Now start charge ISP/Phorm for unauthorised reproduction and storage of you IP. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
For me, Phorms phishing protection is a value-subtracting proposition since I actively disable browser features I don't like; google safebrowsing, search suggestions, HTML5 ping, prefetching, HTTP referer. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Woke up to find that BT has admitted lying over testing with Phorm last summer: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/17/bt_phorm_lies/
It took long enough for Virgin Media to get a response to me but I have it here. I wrote to the Group Compliance Office, 160 Great Portland Street, London W1W 5QA. It reads: "14th March 2008 Dear CaptHunter I write in response to your letter received 5th March 2008. First I would like to clarify that whilst there has been a lot of press speculation regarding a tie up between Virgin Media and Phrom, nothing has yet been implemented and we are still carrying out our analysis of how we will deploy Phorm's product offering, together with any potential impact of this operationally and from a customer perspective. Further analysis and testing is anticipated prior to any deployment of the Phorm product offering by us. Before any new technology is implemented onto Virgin Media's network we always ensure that the technology is subject to rigorous due diligence and we will not roll out new technology until we are satisfied that it is compliant, as such we will ensure that all relevant legal and privacy compliance issues are appropriately addressed to our satisfaction before rollout. You may be interested to know that independently Phorm have been in discussion with Ofcom, Home Office, UK Information Commissioner and are talking to the European Commission regarding their product, to provide clarity on how their product offering works and to directly address and placate any concerns that are/have been raised by these bodies. I trust that this demonstrates that they are also ensuring that they are taking concerns of users on board and that they are seeking to ensure their product is compliant and meets the requirements of the various regulatory bodies that regulate this area. When Virgin Media does roll out this solution provided by Phorm, all customers who are due to receive the service will be notified of such and will not be forced to use the system, fully in accordance with Regulation 6 of the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003. However, to reiterate, no solution has yet been implemented and will not be until we are confident that it is compliant to do so. Yours sincerely Ian Woodham Virgin Media Group Data Protection Officer" No reference is made to my refusal to allow any data to be passed on to any other companies, nor is any detailed mention of the "due diligence" (a phrase I have utter contempt for as it's always covered up in my experience), the shadowy past and questionable ethics of Phorm or the point that I shouldn't have to accept a cookie to opt out. It's not quite a complete whitewash with all the bs about improved web experience but it could have been more detailed given the 12 day wait I've had before getting this response. I'll think for a while before putting a response together. Thoughts anyone? ---------- Post added at 16:31 ---------- Previous post was at 16:30 ---------- The Foundation for Information Policy Research argues that Phorm is illegal: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7301379.stm |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum