Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Starmer’s chronicles (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33712992)

papa smurf 11-09-2025 13:00

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36202558)
Yet Trump takes the Teflon approach. He'll be a pixie and suggest Farage for ambassador!

Given Starmers record he'll probably go for Garry Glitter :)

nomadking 11-09-2025 13:22

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36202558)
Yet Trump takes the Teflon approach. He'll be a pixie and suggest Farage for ambassador!

With Mandelson it went beyond simply knowing him.
Link
Quote:

"The emails show that the depth and extent of Peter Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein is materially different from that known at the time of his appointment.
"In particular Peter Mandelson’s suggestion that Jeffrey Epstein’s first conviction was wrongful and should be challenged is new information. In light of that, and mindful of the victims of Epstein’s crimes he has been withdrawn as Ambassador with immediate effect."

1andrew1 11-09-2025 14:34

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 36202564)
That's usually the kiss of death.:D

Exactly, how many chairman at football clubs have said that before sacking the manager after the next game! :D

---------- Post added at 13:34 ---------- Previous post was at 12:59 ----------

An interesting point here on how the Conservatives could have made the situation worse by letting it drag on.
Quote:

Mandelson's sacking as US ambassador was announced by Foreign Office minister Stephen Doughty, after a Tory MP forced a debate on the situation in the Commons.

The former leader of the Scottish Conservatives said: "There's, I think, a mistake here from the Tories in the timing of this.

"We're talking at 10:50am on Thursday, and it just came out, just before that a Foreign Office minister had to stand up in the Commons because the Tories had table an urgent question about Peter Mandelson.

"Actually, if you're the Conservatives, you probably wanted this to drag on," she added.

Davidson also said that she though Mandelson's appointment was "mad" and that Starmer's full-throttled defence of the ambassador in the Commons yesterday was "absolutely mad".

"It was clear as day that there was more to come out here," she said.
https://news.sky.com/story/politics-...eform-12593360

Itshim 11-09-2025 18:17

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36202573)
Exactly, how many chairman at football clubs have said that before sacking the manager after the next game! :D

---------- Post added at 13:34 ---------- Previous post was at 12:59 ----------

An interesting point here on how the Conservatives could have made the situation worse by letting it drag on.

https://news.sky.com/story/politics-...eform-12593360

Noticed our brilliant PM , ignored security service concerns , Really think if it had been Boris he would having been screaming of his resignation . So two faced

papa smurf 15-09-2025 17:20

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Top Starmer aide quits amid row over messages sent about Diane Abbott
Paul Ovenden, who was the director of strategy at No 10, is understood to have left the role on Monday after a number of instant messages from 2017 became public.


it's a bad week for e mails and messages


https://news.sky.com/story/top-starm...bbott-13431740


A top Downing Street aide has resigned after sending sexually explicit messages about independent MP Diane Abbott, Sky News understands.

thenry 15-09-2025 17:23

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
:LOL: did he want to put her wig on his privates :D

Pierre 15-09-2025 18:46

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Starmer talking about Mandelson looked like a right muppet.

He’s toast, it’s only a matter of time now. Not if but when…..

papa smurf 16-09-2025 09:54

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
PM 'angry' over Mandelson scandal - as emergency debate set to ramp up pressure
The three-hour debate into the Labour peer's links to Jeffrey Epstein comes hours before US President Donald Trump, himself embroiled in questions surrounding the disgraced billionaire, lands in the UK for a pomp and ceremony-laden state visit.


https://news.sky.com/story/pm-angry-...ssure-13431950



Speaker Lindsay Hoyle has agreed to allot three hours for questions about what the government, and particular the prime minister, knew and didn't know about the depth of Lord Mandelson's relationship with billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

i bet starmers missing for this

Damien 16-09-2025 10:56

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Trump is arriving today isn't he? Might help Starmer have an excuse to get out of it.

Carth 16-09-2025 19:21

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
First legal challenge lodged against 'one in, one out' migrant return deal

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1dqe2443l1o

well that's unexpected . . said nobody :rolleyes:

who will come up with the next wacky idea to 'stop the boats' ?

thenry 16-09-2025 20:22

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
These guys :LOL:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...se-island.html

nomadking 16-09-2025 20:30

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36202835)

Un fortunately they still landed.
Quote:

Bathers then told the migrants not to disembark on the beach and redirected them to the port, according to local media.

Itshim 17-09-2025 15:16

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
What a surprise the courts run the country, not parliament. And sir keir bottles it. Nothing changes

1andrew1 17-09-2025 15:30

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36202853)
What a surprise the courts run the country, not parliament. And sir keir bottles it. Nothing changes

What exactly is bottling it? The UK is not a dictatorship so Government needs to adhere to the law.

Sephiroth 17-09-2025 16:00

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36202858)
What exactly is bottling it? The UK is not a dictatorship so Government needs to adhere to the law.

It wouldn’t half put you in a good light if you actually recognised that in respect of the boat migrants, it’s the lefty lawyers, looking for a lot of taxpayer money, that are running the country (in a manner of speaking). They are like ambulance chasers who look at the legal aid money tree with a vengeance. And Labour have been just as stupidly as the Tories in allowing this to happen.

“Adhere to the law”. - my ass.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:29.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum