![]() |
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
I was replying to Hugh, not the Daily Caller. I haven't read that article but I had read the one Hugh quoted and knew he was "cherry picking".
|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
The pathetic corrupted Democrats in California suggested to boycott “In out” burger restaurants in protest at them donating to the GOP. $25,000. (They have also donated to the DNC, I guess no longer though).
Backfired massively after queues of people were seen trying to eat at the restaurant yesterday. This is all the pathetic Democrats Stand for, only no one is listening! http://uk.businessinsider.com/in-n-o...18-8?r=US&IR=T |
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Quote:
Not sure you and Mick will inherit the earth together as you are both likely to be on opposing sides with sticks and stones at your disposal.;) |
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Quote:
Anyway it's Trump not burger eating that's the topic..;) |
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Both Woodward's book and a anonymous article are suggesting that senior members of Trump's staff work to frustrate his agenda but ignoring orders and hiding documents. Pretty amazing stuff.
|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Quote:
I think this can only add to the Democrat vote in the upcoming mid-term elections .. |
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Trump's denials are to be expected, although his twitter feed was entertaining this morning.
Why expected? First, Trump needs to discredit the book and other report, so of course he is going to deny everything and say it's all lies. Second, if there is a resistance in the White House, then the members are going to deny to Trump (and anyone else not in the resistance) that they are members. They aren't likely to pipe up and say "Yes, it was me. I told everyone we were resisting Trump's orders" because even in a normal job, that is likely gross misconduct, and a sackable offence. It could possibly attract legal action if you ignore the orders of a president. Possibly even treason, as Trump said. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:09. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum