![]() |
Re: President Trump 2.0
I think Trump's a berk ( just saying), and its embarassing how we're toadying. It's a mark of how a small and vulnerable Country we've become.
|
Re: President Trump 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump 2.0
1 Attachment(s)
|
Re: President Trump 2.0
:confused:
|
Re: President Trump 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump 2.0
Quote:
probably similar to Farage over here |
Re: President Trump 2.0
Thing is, Trump IS President and we have to deal sensibly with him in a manner that best suits our needs. When he's gone, we'll have to deal with another awkward sod.
|
Re: President Trump 2.0
Quote:
Diplomacy has to be pragmatic. We shouldn’t have to massage his fragile ego just to get him to do what any normally-adjusted individual in the highest public office should instinctively understand, but we don’t act according to what we feel should be, we act according to the way things actually are. Trump is a lot of very hard work for comparatively little gain (because he’s only onside until the next person gets their chance to whisper in his ear), but he is what he is. |
Re: President Trump 2.0
I'm sad :( come back Trump :LOL:
|
Re: President Trump 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump 2.0
Now the orange git is advising Starmer to 'call out the military'. Again, who does he think he is?
Harriet Jones had it right: BLAKE: I'm getting demands from Washington, ma'am. The President's insisting that he take control of the situation. HARRIET: You can tell the President, and please use these exact words, he's not my boss, and he's certainly not turning this into a war. Quite right too. We didn't let Hitler, Stalin or Mussolini tell us what to do. Despite what he apparently thinks, this is our country. Nor should Starmer let him, useless nonentity that Starmer is. (Not that I think Farage would be any better - he's clueless in a different way.) |
Re: President Trump 2.0
Whatever you may think of Trump as a person, from my perspective, he's not wrong.
In this forum, you'll get the likes of Andrew saying that we must abide by the law. So the law needs adjusting to permit the use of military assets to prevent the boats from crossing into our waters. I've said before that this would create an international incident with France - but that's long overdue in this case. What's happening at taxpayer expense is beyond unacceptable; also, there will be terrorist plants among those landing in the UK. Then from Anonymouse: Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:39. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum