Cable Forum - Updated: Boris resigns as party leader

he watches and likes things that agree with his views, and doesn’t like things that don’t, and the things that don’t agree with his views, he believes are biased

Hmmmm. Hope that helps…………

Mick	29-04-2022 21:56

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36120536)

The question i have to ask is what was going on that prompted the denial that Rayner was there.

Labour say it was a mistake made in good faith to deny she was there. Sorry but, “faith” & “good” are incompatible in the same sentence as Labour.

papa smurf

29-04-2022 22:00

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36120544)

Labour say it was a mistake made in good faith to deny she was there. Sorry but, “faith” & “good” are incompatible in the same sentence as Labour.

The no 1 woman in the labour party and they forget she was there, smells like BS to me.

1andrew1

29-04-2022 22:28

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36120518)

Not an authentic news outlet, don’t trust the source. Try Googling harder. :rolleyes:

It's been going since 1870. What makes it not authentic? :confused:

---------- Post added at 22:21 ---------- Previous post was at 22:16 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36120518)

It is absolutely clear, but the Labour luvvies in this thread are blind to the facts that the rules were clear, Boris got caught out, only fair that when Labour’s rank hypocrisy stinks, when they’re clearly just as guilty of lying and breaking lockdown rules, they get called out as well.

If you're talking about Damien, Hugh and me then sorry to spoil your idealistic fantasy but none of us are Labour luvvies. We're just keen on combating disinformation, wherever that disinformation is coming from.

---------- Post added at 22:24 ---------- Previous post was at 22:21 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36120523)

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36120512)

How is that different from those at No 10 paying their fines?

exactly my point . Need to ask the Labour leader right load of bs was his answer . "She paid the fines end of the matter . " Or words to that effect but a lot more :dozey:

The only people who seemed to have resigned have been those having affairs - Matt Hancock and Neil Ferguson.

---------- Post added at 22:28 ---------- Previous post was at 22:24 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36120544)

Labour say it was a mistake made in good faith to deny she was there. Sorry but, “faith” & “good” are incompatible in the same sentence as Labour.

Do you not feel that sentence demonstrates a little prejudice when analysing the situation?

Hugh	30-04-2022 00:28

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36120540)

Absolutely loving Hugh doing cart wheels here.

What is the phrase?

Hmmmm. Hope that helps…………

Stating facts isn’t "turning cartwheels’ (well, not for most of us).

So quoting GBNews is confirming my "bias"? Surely the fact that diverse media outlets (including local media quoting Durham Police) are reporting the same thing reflects a lack of bias?

Mick	30-04-2022 00:55

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36120550)

It's been going since 1870. What makes it not authentic? :confused:

---------- Post added at 22:21 ---------- Previous post was at 22:16 ----------

If you're talking about Damien, Hugh and me then sorry to spoil your idealistic fantasy but none of us are Labour luvvies. We're just keen on combating disinformation, wherever that disinformation is coming from.

---------- Post added at 22:24 ---------- Previous post was at 22:21 ----------

The only people who seemed to have resigned have been those having affairs - Matt Hancock and Neil Ferguson.

---------- Post added at 22:28 ---------- Previous post was at 22:24 ----------

Do you not feel that sentence demonstrates a little prejudice when analysing the situation?

But you have not combated any disinformation, in fact your spreading it by spouting the Starmer lies that no rules were broken, when video evidence of him holding and swigging from a beer bottle, socialising indoors with people he isn’t household members with, half way up the country in Durham.

---------- Post added at 00:55 ---------- Previous post was at 00:33 ----------

I don’t normally credit BBC here but at the time, Sophie Raworth tears squirming Starmer, a new hole. This interview was back in January:

Maggy

30-04-2022 09:43

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36120571)

That's easy enough to do.I hate the man.

1andrew1

30-04-2022 11:34

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 3612051)

Then why the hell are they re-looking at Starmers lockdown beer Durham case again?

They're not. The police just confirmed receipt of the MP's letter. He claimed that meant they were opening up the case. I don't blame anyone for believing an MP but please prepare yourself for disappointment if you're hoping for the case to be re-opened.

---------- Post added at 11:32 ---------- Previous post was at 11:24 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36120571)

The matter was investigated and he was cleared. No lawyer has put their neck on the line and said otherwise. If it's as clear cut as you say it is, that would have happened. Unless you think all lawyers are Labour voters?

Mick	30-04-2022 11:35

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties

You don’t have to be a lawyer to say he’s broken the rules, which at face value, he has.

papa smurf

30-04-2022 11:57

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36120615)

You don’t have to be a lawyer to say he’s broken the rules, which at face value, he has.

I feel this should be re-investigated especially now that new evidence has been uncovered about who was in attendance despite their previous attempts at a cover up.

Carth

30-04-2022 12:19

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties

I'm not bothered about the rising costs of fuel & food, or the triple lock pension that isn't.

I'm just over the moon to see the effort put into all this tomfoolery about who lied about being where they weren't when there was or wasn't a meeting and if it was before or after a certain date, the importance of which is mind blowing in the grand scheme of things.

I'm off to mow the lawns :D

papa smurf

30-04-2022 14:42

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36120619)

If starmer is so sure no laws were broken he should encourage a thorough investigation with all the facts on the table , but atm is seems that no effort has been put in by the police to investigate this possible criminal breach of covid legislation .

Mick	30-04-2022 15:07

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties

There is no “possible” about it.

There was to be no in door mixing of with non-same household people, sharing of food was prohibited, it wasn’t his regular place of work and what makes this even more worse now, is the lies that Angela Rayner wasn’t there but then they admit she was.

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:46.

Page 124 of 285

124

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page