![]() |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
Tautogy is An empty or vacuous statement composed of simpler statements in a fashion that makes it logically true whether the simpler statements are factually true or false; for example, the statement Either it will rain tomorrow or it will not rain tomorrow. Not sure what your point is , guess when l look tomorrow you will have explained |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
In English Language, tautology is the needless repetition of an idea, statement, or word - so my meaning was that being a parent one is responsible for one’s children…
You appear to be confusing linguistic tautology with logical tautology. You stated "Isn't parents and responsibilities an oxymoron" - oxymoron is a a figure of speech combining two contradictory or opposing words, which implies you meant parenting doesn’t involve responsibility… So not sure what your point is… |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
You probably accidentally left out the word "some", as the all-encompassing "parents" is obviously not true, as you provide an example that you yourself (as I am sure lots of other parents do) took responsibility…
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Gosh all this 'parental responsibility' stuff is interesting isn't it.
I'm sure the decline in standards had nothing at all to do with Governments deciding to severely restrict the ways that parents (and teachers) could punish kids for being unruly tearaways. People of my age (ha) grew up with a clip round the earhole from parents (and the local bobby), and got the cane at school for being naughty. This taught two valuable lessons: 1) you didn't do it again 2) if you did it again, you adapted so you didn't get caught. nowadays kids don't care . . |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
You’re not wrong, Carth. This country needs a major reset.
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
I can see their point, but we now have the benefit of hindsight after ceasing physical punishment for children and look where it's got us? ---------- Post added at 15:04 ---------- Previous post was at 15:02 ---------- Quote:
Would it be possible to use a non blocked VPN to across another preferred, but blocked, VPN? |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Why should websites - that have already followed the rules and regulations - now be tasked with the further responsibility of trying to sort out a 'knock-on' problem that any fool but the Government could see coming a mile off.
The 'experts' screwed up, let them come up with a solution :Yes: |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
I'm interested to know how those that comply could technically do it. |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
You cannot force websites to block VPNs since they can be used by anyone in the world. Sites are not going to block visitors from the rest of the world because the UK tells them to. |
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
the problem we have in this country is the government don't like people to have any expectation of privacy
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
I thought it was simply they don't like people
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Instagram U turn on end to end encryption. It appears they don't like it any more as private messages can't be read by AI:
About 1/3 way through: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002wcyp |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 15:00. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum