![]() |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Indeed lets hope this is the case Marty.
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
If those assessors that are freed up can concentrate on the skivers then it gets my vote, apart from being a relief for those with long term health issues.
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
It will be interesting in what they class as chronic in the new criteria that is going to be drawn up.
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
My son's conditon was classed as "chronic" i.e. lifelong, by one assessor. The next assessor said he would "grow out of it".
Ditto my daughter's condition. The second (same) assessor said she would "learn to cope". |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
So, when does a chronic illness stop being chronic?
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
:dozey: |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Oh what glorious generalising stereotyping....
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
All these benefit cuts have caused untold misery to the sick & disabled, yet cost more in administration than what they save. I fear that Osem won't be happy, he supports the repeated testing of everybody, even those with severe, lifelong and incurable learning difficulties! |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
They are "entitled to the help" because "they have paid into the system" and "are genuinely ill" (usually said in a tone of voice that suggests that nobody else has or is). Quote:
Don't you ever say this again, you piece of work. Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
This announcement is a good first step and the concern over what constitutes chronic will also be explained soon and despite what some think it won't be the government deciding the criteria. Basically what will start to happen regarding disability benefits will be the recommendations the advisory board Cameron wanted during the 2010 election but binned after the election when there was nothing in it for his image anymore made. There is a big change in attitude in government and a desire to not only move away from osbournes attitude and approach but to be clearly seen to move away from it one of many reason's i suspect why there was no place for him after May took leadership.
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:50. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum