Cable Forum - Madeleine McCann

At the risk of infractions, I have long had my view of who killed her. I am not the only one who thinks that. What upsets me is that nobody has investigated the parents (or if they were investigated it was kept quiet) for negligence and bad parenting. If they can leave children alone on holiday in a foreign country, they can do it in this country.

Quite right :tu:

Pierre

02-06-2014 14:08

re: Madeline McCann - New search

Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 35703422)

I said leave your property.

Makes no difference, the distance from my decking area to the house is about the same distance as the Tapas bar to the McCanns apartment.

So if I lived on a 1000 acre estate, as long as I stay on my property that's alright is it?

Quote:

Would you also do this in a foreign country and not in opinion of your safe surroundings of your home.

I'd weigh up the risks, same as anyone.

I live in a secluded area, many ways in and out, If I was to consider my home safe, am I not being as complacent as the McCanns?

---------- Post added at 13:04 ---------- Previous post was at 13:03 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pauls9 (Post 35703430)

Perhaps you should carry a baby alarm with you?

only works if the baby cries.

---------- Post added at 13:08 ---------- Previous post was at 13:04 ----------

Point I'm making is, as I did in the other thread on this topic:

Is that people do what the McCanns did, at home, across the country all the time. Especially in the summer.

Even if you only have a house with a small garden, if you're outside, and the kid is inside, it is no different.

And all those with conspiracy theories about the McCanns, evidence, evidence, evidence. You really think they haven't been investigated??? get real.

weenie

02-06-2014 14:09

re: Madeline McCann - New search

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35703427)

My BBQ had my child and two cousins staying, we are partied down the far end of the property, we went and checked on the kids peridoically

Just as the McCanns did.[COLOR="Silver"]

Did they? :shrug: We only have there word on that.

Pierre

02-06-2014 14:14

re: Madeline McCann - New search

Quote:

Originally Posted by weenie (Post 35703440)

Did they? :shrug: We only have there word on that.

I don't know them, do you?

What reason would you have to doubt their word?

They look like two sensible people to me.

peanut

02-06-2014 14:18

re: Madeline McCann - New search

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35703444)

I don't know them, do you?

What reason would you have to doubt their word?

They look like two sensible people to me.

That's the point isn't it. To you they are, to most others they aren't. No one would leave their kids whilst they go off their property for a meal in a foreign country. No matter what the distance is.

How would it look if they said they didn't check on the kids periodically? I'm sure they had to say that to make themselves look that little bit more responsible especially under the circumstances.

Arthurgray50@blu

02-06-2014 14:21

re: Madeline McCann - New search

Members are forgetting one small little thing.

Where the McCanns were having a meal with friends. The children were being checked every 30 minutes by BOTH family and friends.

I still say that NO parent is at fault. Every parent has there own way of looking after there OWN kids. I have done it many times. Itsthe way you do it.

weenie

02-06-2014 14:23

re: Madeline McCann - New search

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35703444)

I don't know them, do you?

What reason would you have to doubt their word?

They look like two sensible people to me.

No I don't, but I can not understand how just day's later they went out jogging, he went and played a game of tennis if nothing had happened. I can only speak for myself but I would have been searching for my child rather than going out for a game of tennis or for a run, and definitely not letting my other children out my sight.

Pierre

02-06-2014 14:24

re: Madeline McCann - New search

Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 35703446)

That's the point isn't it. To you they are, to most others they aren't.

Most others? got the numbers to back that up? or for "most" do you mean "you"

Quote:

No one would leave their kids whilst they go off their property for a meal in a foreign country. No matter what the distance is.

Really? again what have you got to back up that statement, or for "no one" do you mean "you"

Quote:

How would it look if they said they didn't check on the kids periodically? I'm sure they had to say that to make themselves look that little bit more responsible especially under the circumstances.

Idle speculation

peanut

02-06-2014 14:25

re: Madeline McCann - New search

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35703448)

And if they were being watched by the abductor, 30 mins is plenty of time to take the child. What if they had a baby sitter?

banjo

02-06-2014 14:28

re: Madeline McCann - New search

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35703444)

I don't know them, do you?

What reason would you have to doubt their word?

They look like two sensible people to me.

Harold Shipman looked like a nice and sensible person !!

Pierre

02-06-2014 14:30

re: Madeline McCann - New search

Quote:

Originally Posted by weenie (Post 35703450)

No I don't, but I can not understand how just day's later they went out jogging, he went and played a game of tennis if nothing had happened.

That has nothing to do with it, people deal with grief the best way they know how.

I was 17 when my dad died, after I was told, I went out and played football with my friends

Quote:

I can only speak for myself

good that's a start.

Quote:

I would have been searching for my child rather than going out for a game of tennis or for a run, and definitely not letting my other children out my sight.

Even if I believe the jogging/tennis bit. What's it to be? going out searching or looking after the other kids.

---------- Post added at 13:30 ---------- Previous post was at 13:29 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 35703453)

What if they had a baby sitter?

Now that is a sensible point.

weenie

02-06-2014 14:32

re: Madeline McCann - New search

Both one parent could search and the other look after the children.

peanut

02-06-2014 14:32

re: Madeline McCann - New search

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35703451)

Most others? got the numbers to back that up? or for "most" do you mean "you"

Really? again what have you got to back up that statement, or for "no one" do you mean "you"

Idle speculation

To be honest, I really hope you are a minority in your way of thinking and I will go as far as saying that you are. I would just put it down to common sense whether or not it is or isn't the right thing to do.

Pierre

02-06-2014 14:35

re: Madeline McCann - New search

Quote:

Originally Posted by banjo (Post 35703456)

Harold Shipman looked like a nice and sensible person !!

Yes, and he was caught. Evidence was found.

But until such evidence is found to build a case against the McCanns I have no reason to doubt them.

If the Portuguese and British police have failed to build a case against them, I doubt a load of discussion forum conspiracy trolls can.

---------- Post added at 13:35 ---------- Previous post was at 13:33 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 35703460)

Have you, never ever, left a child in the house sleeping whilst you've been outside, in the gaden or something?

If not, fair enough, but I would bet you are in the minority.

weenie

02-06-2014 14:39

re: Madeline McCann - New search

The McCanns why do so many people seem to dislike them.
http://patbrownprofiling.blogspot.co...hate-kate.html

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:51.

Page 121 of 127