![]() |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
cache9-mant.server.ntli.net (62.252.192.12) 62.252.192.0 - 62.252.223.255 NTL Internet Manchester site |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
I am also getting DOS attacks from my my proxy according to the modem as its sent me emails saying I was under attack from the ip that is cache1.. The only one I have ever been on..... :shrug: |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Well what a revelation this thread is ;), I thought the proxies had been buried for ever, at least now I know why browsing has been hit and miss the last couple of days.
BBKing. To help in your request for backing when you say there are problems I have just spoken to BB tech support to advise that I am having problems with intermittent outages. Unfortunately I didn't get the guys name but 5 starts to him, very pleasant and helpful and none of the usual c**p about resetting the STB and PC. If the top managers were forced to spend a month on front line support maybe NTL would fix things properly, or maybe they would just give up. I feel sorry for TeleWest customers when the long standing rumours come to fruition. Hope the proxies get fixed, or switched off again real soon. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
AllNettools did show it at first but for some reason it now cannot detect it. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
I think i should be upset :) I have not had any of the problems you all say your having. Why have i been left out its not fair :pp
I am on the south manchester cache here in warrington |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
LMFAO sorry had to laugh but seriously you dont pay for a 1mbit connection for sub 56k performance :( |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
pem you are saying these proxies have been on for last few months, this is simply not true for me, I maybe using the proxy servers in nottingham but I am not in nottingham so its quite easy my area was turned off, also I can repeat the proxy problems again and again and again. One click to turn of my proxy problem exists, another click to bypass ntl poroxy problem gone, its quite simple really one common factor in my problems and its the ntl trapserent proxy.
Tell me what you make of my report in the speedtest thread next to this, I posted the results. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Tracing route to cache9-nott.server.ntli.net [62.254.0.38]
over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 15 ms 15 ms 19 ms 10.146.151.254 2 70 ms 19 ms 19 ms leic-t2cam1-b-ge96.inet.ntl.com [80.7.30.145] 3 20 ms 19 ms 39 ms nott-t2core-b-ge-wan63.inet.ntl.com [80.1.79.197 ] 4 110 ms 128 ms 130 ms cache9-nott.server.ntli.net [62.254.0.38] Trace complete |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
It would seem the problem is with your UBR/gateway - is that a Shepshed area connection? Certainly my routeing seems cleaner:
Tracing route to cache9-nott.server.ntli.net [62.254.0.38] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.2.1 2 9 ms 13 ms 9 ms 10.145.***.*** 3 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms nott-t2cam1-b-ge-wan53-137.inet.ntl.com [80.4.46 .193] 4 11 ms 9 ms 10 ms nott-t2core-b-ge-wan72.inet.ntl.com [80.1.79.189 ] 5 10 ms 10 ms 11 ms cache9-nott.server.ntli.net [62.254.0.38] Trace complete. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:31. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum