![]() |
Re: Conservative Party's chronicles
Quote:
Make everyones vote count - under the current system your vote only really matters if youre in a 'swing' constituency. A safe seat and many dont see the point. Folks feel obliged to tactically vote for partys they dont really back. The bigger turnout the better, regardless of who you support.The Govt would have more legitimacy with a higher turnout/fairer voting system |
Re: Conservative Party's chronicles
The trade-off is a disconnect between voters and their representatives. It’s impossible to get rid of any of the utterly odious greens in the Scottish parliament, for example, because all of them are elected off a regional list where you vote for a party rather than an individual from that party. The top few names on the list will always get returned to Parliament as long as the party polls 7-10% overall, no matter how manifestly batsh** they’ve behaved over the course of a 5-year term.
When the Tories refused to do the decent thing and deselect Neil Hamilton ahead of the 1997 election, Martin Bell stood as an independent in Tatton and unseated him. Had there been a regional list for that part of England, Hamilton, as a safe-seat candidate, would also have been near the top of the regional list and almost certainly would still have been an MP from 1997-2001. |
Re: Conservative Party's chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Conservative Party's chronicles
Mr K carefully said "more legitimacy". He didn't question the government's legitimacy per se. Within the law, they are the legitimate government. Within emotion, more legitimacy would arise with greater turnout. Different nuance on the word "legitimacy".
|
Re: Conservative Party's chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Conservative Party's chronicles
Quote:
Not sure it’s a simple as that - the Conservatives have been steadily losing Council Seat in Wokingham Borough Council for the last seven years (they always used to have 40+ seats). Year Conservative—LD—Labour 2018 42——————8——-3 2019 31—————-16——-4 2021 31—————-18——-3 2022 26—————-23——-3 2023 22—————-26——-5 New ward boundaries (54 seats) 2024 19————-—27——-8 Could be a number of factors, including changing demographics… |
Re: Conservative Party's chronicles
I obviously know Wokingham as well as OB. OB is right - "anyone but the Tories". Demographics haven't changed in the past couple of years.
Reform UK has a higher profile now and they could well split the conservative vote, leaving the wretched Lib Dems in power. |
Re: Conservative Party's chronicles
How do you explain the changes in Local Election voting over the last 8 years?
|
Re: Conservative Party's chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Conservative Party's chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Conservative Party's chronicles
Quote:
---------- Post added at 03:14 ---------- Previous post was at 03:13 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Conservative Party's chronicles
Quote:
There could also be local factors at play too if the Liberal Democrat councillors are doing a better job on the ground. |
Re: Conservative Party's chronicles
In Wokingham, the Lib-Dems are not doing a “lousy job”. They have their woke moments, but, by and large, the Borough is not suffering.
The Tories have a mountain to climb to regain a majority and Reform UK an even greater mountain to even gain a seat. To my knowledge, Brexit is not a particular factor in the Tories’ decline. The economy and migration is/was the “anyone but the Tories” driver. I still voted Conservative. |
Re: Conservative Party's chronicles
|
Re: Conservative Party's chronicles
2 Attachment(s)
I see Liz is off her meds again…
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1770578276 https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...9&d=1770578939 |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 04:35. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum