![]() |
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Well I thought Clegg won but I hear Cameron did from the polls...althought it depends on the poll
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Well after round one Clegg was the winner but i am still going to vote Conservative because i just cannot put the libs in charge of our defence. Cleggs indication that he would get rid of Trident ensured that..
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Quote:
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Quote:
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Very interesting real-time polling data on BBC news right now. Live stream:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/liveevent/ |
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Early poll from UKGOV says Glegg won. Sky Poll says Cameron won by clear margin.
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Quote:
[And going back to an earlier question, "What obvious sucking up to Labour"?] http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/35001355-post77.html http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/20...l#post34998633 Quote:
http://www.libdems.org.uk/defence.aspx http://www.libdems.org.uk/siteFiles/...%20Defence.pdf Quote:
http://network.libdems.org.uk/manife...festo_2010.pdf Quote:
Given the state of the economy, & given the kind of cuts needed, is it *really* worth spending that much money on a full like-for-like replacement of Trident? [Note that they haven't said "We will completely & utterly scrap the UK's nuclear deterrent".] And besides... Who would nuke us? Seriously? Surely the biggest nuclear threat against us at the moment is the threat of a terrorist nuclear attack, rather than an attack by a nation? You can't nuke terrorists in retaliation... But if we were nuked, and we did not have our own nuclear deterrent anymore whatsoever (which isn't what is actually being proposed), then as we are a member of NATO & an ally of the US, the US would retaliate for us, as an attack on one NATO member is an attack on all. |
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
For me, it's their views on Europe that make the Lib Dems unelectable. I really don't want to be on the receiving end of a massive PR campaign, sponsored by a Lib Dem Government, aimed at persuading the UK to vote for the Euro in a referendum.
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Well, I think that Clegg came across best of the three, Cameron second and Brown a sore last.
Whilst i do not agree with some of Cleggs policies he did have some good ones on immigration - based upon those of Canada / Austrailia etc. Cameron was full of good sound bytes but still came across well. Brown was just on the back foot in my opinion. But then again, they are all salesmen, make of that what you will, who will I vote for? Still undecided is my answer. |
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
ITV Poll says Clegg won by clear margin.
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
ITV Overall winner: 43% for Clegg, 26% for Cameron, 20% Brown, 11% undecided.
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
The Sun YouGov Poll:
Quote:
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Sky poll reckons Brown did, though it doesn't make a huge amount of sense. Brown 35%, Clegg 33%, Cameron 32%. Loads of contradicting data elsewhere in the polls so I would hazard a guess it's due to lack of weighting on the poll.
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
I just took the voting survey and I got a 4 way split of parties that I will not vote for in this election.
http://voteforpolicies.org.uk/survey.../4BC785654A8A4 |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:16. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum