![]() |
Re: Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg
can somebody tell where i can check my cable modem configuration
i knows it 192 or something but cannot remeber the rest |
Re: Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg
Quote:
|
Re: Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg
Yay!!!!!!!! Cambridge has been upgraded. Thank you NTL. :drunk: :nworthy:
|
Re: Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg
192.168.100.1 and in both boxes user name & password type, root
|
Re: Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg
Quote:
Sunil |
Re: Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg
Better late than Never but no complaints. :D
|
Re: Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg
Nice one my speeds have improved
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:49:07 GMT 1st 512K took 1203 ms = 425.6 KB/sec, approx 3507 Kbps, 3.42 Mbps 2nd 512K took 1234 ms = 414.9 KB/sec, approx 3419 Kbps, 3.34 Mbps 3rd 512K took 1266 ms = 404.4 KB/sec, approx 3332 Kbps, 3.25 Mbps 4th 512K took 1234 ms = 414.9 KB/sec, approx 3419 Kbps, 3.34 Mbps Overall Average Speed = approx 3419 Kbps, 3.34 Mbps |
Re: Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg
Just signed up (again, after a six month break due to a house not being ntl enabled), got the 4meg package, was pleasently suprised to see upload @ 400k, and speeds appear to be positive :)
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:05:57 GMT 1st 512K took 1125 ms = 455.1 KB/sec, approx 3750 Kbps, 3.66 Mbps 2nd 512K took 1125 ms = 455.1 KB/sec, approx 3750 Kbps, 3.66 Mbps 3rd 512K took 1109 ms = 461.7 KB/sec, approx 3804 Kbps, 3.71 Mbps 4th 512K took 1141 ms = 448.7 KB/sec, approx 3697 Kbps, 3.61 Mbps Overall Average Speed = approx 3750 Kbps, 3.66 Mbps |
Re: Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg
Just been following the thread, carried out a speed check and still only 2 meg. Rebooted the modem and voila! 3.5 meg. Nice one ntl!!:)
|
Re: Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg
Am only managing around 2.4M (rather than 4M) since the upgrade. Spoke to NTL Tech 'Support' who were very patronising, refused to accept any of the speed test data, the only speed test they would accept was to download a file off Tucows!!. Quoted http and nntp results to them but not interested. Then they tried to suggest I must have spyware or that my poor bandwidth was due to evil peer to peer programs. I mentioned the Zone Alarm reports from on here and was told that if ZA wasn't running then it was irrelevant (they don't accept that True Vector service has any effect). So basically I am left with the following:
Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:43:11 GMT 1st 512K took 1750 ms = 292.6 KB/sec, approx 2411 Kbps, 2.35 Mbps 2nd 512K took 1656 ms = 309.2 KB/sec, approx 2548 Kbps, 2.49 Mbps 3rd 512K took 1797 ms = 284.9 KB/sec, approx 2348 Kbps, 2.29 Mbps 4th 512K took 1687 ms = 303.5 KB/sec, approx 2501 Kbps, 2.44 Mbps Overall Average Speed = approx 2452 Kbps, 2.39 Mbps Anything else I could try to get better performance or gather data that NTL 'Support' might actually pay attention to? |
Re: Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg
just the usual download, burn and boot a linux livecd and see if you get near your expected rates to help rule out windows installed sw or a bad stack setting etc.
just search for linux livecd |
Re: Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg
thanks Poolking and Raqunboneman
|
Re: Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg
Anyone who has speed problems with zone alarm firewall & is looking for a free firewall that doesn't cause slow down should try the sygate one. I use it & get an average 3.8 mb download speed
Sygate firewall can still be found here as a free download http://www.tucows.com/preview/213160 |
Re: Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg
Using Kerio 4 here with no problems with speed and keeping nosey blighters out. I did use Sygate on my old Win98 system and it was very good, but on my XP SP2 system Sygate kept disappearing from the tray. It was still running, but it was a bit freaky.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 01:10. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum