Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

tbf, it’s probably just you… ;)

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

sign removed from road after constant honking
The dual carriageway became "the loudest in Britain" after motorists joined a chorus of dissent against the Prime Minister's migration policies.

Sir kier seems popular :)

https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...ageway-honking

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

A miracle if he's still PM, by this time next year.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

but he'll still be a .......

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

This reminds me of this https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...ghlight=Cherry

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

I don't know. She was inciting people to commit a murderous act of burning down a building full of migrants. Do you not consider that serious enough to warrant a jail sentence?

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Who was she inciting exactly?

I refer you to a previous post, to you.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...postcount=1695

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

She pleaded guilty to the offence of distributing material with the intention of stirring up racial hatred.

I think the judge summed it up quite well.
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/...lysentence.pdf

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

There's that vague word 'inciting' again.

Up there near the top of the list of deliberately anomalous and obfuscating words and phrases such as:

Potentially
Up To
As Little As
May Possibly
Could Eventually

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

No - she appealed under those grounds, and lost…

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

She was badly advised.

She appealed, in front of a judge not a jury.

Other similar cases indicate, in front a jury of people that believe hurty words are not something to be jailed for, and not a politicised judge.

She would have got off. I wouldn't have found her guilty over a tweet she deleted written in a fit of emotion, a woman that had experienced losing her own child, after 3 children brutely stabbed to death and several more injured.

Would you have found her guilty? Don't worry you don't have to answer and side step another question.

We're going over old ground anyway.

But to believe, there were several people sitting looking at twitter, who read that tweet and then thought, "She has spoken, she has given me a direct order, I must go and make a few molotov's"

laughable and would remove any agency from such individual.

Anyway, like I say, we've done this, we know where we all stand and it's the lovely lefties that seem to be all "authoritarian"...funny that.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

She was inciting violent racists in our society. Do you expect me to name them?

Would you take a different view if she was egging the crowd to do the same thing in the street?

---------- Post added at 15:20 ---------- Previous post was at 15:17 ----------

‘Hurty words’ are one thing. Her post went well beyond that.

---------- Post added at 15:23 ---------- Previous post was at 15:20 ----------

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dic...glish/inciting

The meaning is very clear.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

It would help yes.

If I was to send out a tweet that said, I think the UK should nuke Pakistan. Am I inciting violence and just becuase i send out that tweet do you think a general somewhere will think, my god yes...we should nuke Pakistan, I'll get right on it.

Here you make a great point. If she was on the street in front of a crowd with a loudspeaker, whipping them up and saying lets go burn down a hotel.

Yes, that is different, (which is actually not too different from what Ricky Jones did, and he was cleared by a jury)


How so?