![]() |
Re: TV price rises
Have been staying at a house with SKY . OMG it was it bad. Rugby on at 1.30 `ish kept hanging. EPG very slow to respond kept thinking it simply was not working. Worst of all as we record & watch later normally ( if only 15mins or so) Adverts did not pick up that there were so MANY
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
The picture issue may have been interference, signal issue, transmission issue or a number of things. Im not sure what you mean about the adverts thing |
Re: TV price rises
Had a phone call just over an hour or so ago from VM asking for my feedback on why I cancelled and boy did I give her the answer!
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
Has anyone on Mates Rates any experience of them discounting down/cancelling the price rise please? Many thanks MrB |
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
2) The EPG was blue And sorry I found it very poor, chunky & slow 3) Interference, no doubt it was - HOW do you live with that - shocking in the 21st century. 4) Adverts as we can "record" all the shows we wish to see :) I had not taken in how many adverts are on these days. A plus for TiVo LOL:dozey: Always looking to save money by swapping but Sky would need to be 10`s of £`s cheaper to put up with that service. The next day a family member was using it and the EPG seemed the same to me, as he uses it all the time and made no comment what so ever I take it that that was the norm :shocked: |
Re: TV price rises
I'm assuming it wasn't a recordable box, Itshim, then? My understanding is the sky + hd epg is different. I haven't used it since it was recently updated, but always found it pretty good. In fact when I first got cable the v+ hd epg had me thinking I'd made an awful mistake. Fortunately TiVo arrived to save the day!
|
Re: TV price rises
I think you must have been using an old Sky box.
I moved back to Sky last month and the EPG is much quicker and easier to navigate than the Tivo and is dynamic! I rarely if ever viewed a "suggestion" despite spending several weeks training it with red and green thumbs! Also the On Demand service using my 60mgb Virgin broadband is equally as fast as my experience with the Tivo. The only downside I have found is the loss of one tuner but with the On Demand service that is manageable on the rare occasion I need three and for a saving of over £300 a year (including the saving from taking the Virgin 12 month line rental deal) is something I can live with. |
Re: TV price rises
Its obvious from this thread that, even when you take out the die hard sky/virgin fans, all the individuals experiences are significantly different. I had sky TV for six years as at that time there was no paytv alternative for me. Due to location (Heathrow Airport area) and especially when we had bad weather (remember we are in the UK) I had constant breaking up, freezing or complete loss of picture.
I too was not happy with latest advised VM price hike. So looked again at my package and talked to Sky about possible alternatives. Broaband with Sky was out of the question as only adsl was available and on past experience plus being 3 miles from the exchange if I got a stable 2.5 to 4 Meg I was lucky plus no Infinity upgrade was even planned for my exchange. So just discussed cost for retention of broadband and phone with VM and re-installing sky TV. However, no special return deal (left more than a year ago) was offered just a small introductory deal. End result was a saving of about £36 over the first year. Was tempted but then remembered the picture problems and decided it was not a worthwhile move. The cost after the first year would also have been possibly dearer especially when adding breakdown and support insurance cover. Maybe I am lucky in that in the last two years with VM I have had no problems with the TV side despite having to change out the first Tivo box on the day of installation. So to summarize for me I am better off to stick with VM mainly due to signal issues but maybe for someone ten miles further out from Heathrow Sky may be a worthwhile alternative, who knows and who cares - try both over a couple of years and then decide what is best for you. |
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
I've had my TiVo for just over a year now and I have to say I think suggestions are an excellent feature. It's like a extra on demand channel of stuff that I'm probably going to want to watch, and on more than one occasion it's saved us when we've forgotten to set something to record but TiVo hass been clever enough to think we'll like it. Suffice it to say it is slower, and perhaps less intuitive than Sky+hd, and as a result it can be significantly more frustrating at times, but on the plus side it's not so slow as to be unsuable, it has three tuners and it's capable of some very very clever things. |
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
I haven't found the Sky+HD box much better, and it froze for me for about two minutes last time I used one! |
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
My comment was as suggested just about the length & number of ads on TV in general. Do not think I could cope with the lack of not being able to record 3 channels if needed. Can be worked around but why bother :dozey: Sorry was so nearly temped to switch but the price difference if there is one at all. Says no not a hope . The wife was looking that night for something she fancied to watch. 10 minutes later ( it felt like hours) she said "what a load of rubbish channels are on Sky" Looks like I will be with Virgin for the present time. O Yes when we were looking Sky Atlantic was offering Star trek in one form or another :erm: |
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
Between Gatwick and Heathrow myself. Had no problems with picture quality at all since Sky was installed last week. Wondered if there would be any picture degradation during a storm but the one we did have had no effect. The distance from the exchange can often be a deciding factor. Personally I would have switched years ago if the exchange was closer. Infinity came along here recently and let me escape from the poorly performing broadband. In one of these threads is a post saying that old customers have been offered a 75% discount to return to Sky. ---------- Post added at 15:09 ---------- Previous post was at 14:57 ---------- Quote:
The 2TB HD sky box with the dark blue menu system is blazing fast. Takes a while to get used to where things are but once you do the layout makes a lot of sense. One thing that stands out for me in normal use is how fast and fluid the fast forward and rewinding is on the Sky box compared to the Virgin one I had. It makes sense due to the fact Sky has a local copy of what is playing compared to the VM box I had which has to stream it from a network source. With the Tivo having local recordings too, does it work much better on those than the standard boxes? Not had any of the problems Ishtim mentioned. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:07. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum