Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Have stopped my standing order to the R N L I . not that it will make any difference but makes me feel better.if you help people break the law, perhaps they should be prosecuted , clearly they are helping the gangs ,starmer wants to stop. NOT

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2025/08/2.gif

You could always redirect your Standing Order to here….

https://www.gofundme.com/f/buy-a-new...-flying-farage

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Many people won’t say openly what they believe because it forces them to confront who they actually are.

An admission of guilt

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Ricky Jones: Suspended Labour councillor who called for protesters' throats to be cut at rally not guilty of encouraging violent disorder


WTF two tier justice or what :shrug:


https://news.sky.com/story/ricky-jon...order-13412060

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

or two years for this

that was seen by about 40 people before it was deleted

This type of thing promotes distrust between the government and the governed, and the public and the police.

I don't think Jones should be in prison, but neither do I think Connolly should be imprisoned either. She should be released immediately and compensated.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp3nn60wyr6o

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

it's been made clear that it's ok to insight a mob to murder people you don't like as long as they are far right

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

I think what he did was wrong, but he was acquitted by a jury, whilst Connolly plead guilty to the offences…

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Her and many others, were advised by their own counsel to plead guilty, and they all suffered for it and were given overly harsh sentences.

Whereas, ones that held out for a trial were acquitted by a jury in 17mins.

https://murrayhughman.co.uk/jamie-mi...-of-southport/

Do you think Lucy Connolly should be in prison Hugh?

---------- Post added at 12:36 ---------- Previous post was at 12:27 ----------

Sold down the river by her own counsel. Didn't do a very good job of representing her.

So it's illegal to have a dim view of illegal immigrants. I'm guilty then.

Again, what's wrong with those opinions and statements?

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

The UK's bioethanol industry faces collapse, after a government decision not to offer the sector a rescue package.

The US-UK trade pact, agreed in May, removed a 19% tariff on ethanol imported from the US up to a quota of 1.4bn litres. That is approximately equivalent to the current size of the UK market and the firms claim the trade agreement had made their businesses "commercially unviable".

Bioethanol, a fuel made from wheat, corn or sugar beet, is added to fuels such as E10 petrol in the UK.

The bioethanol industry buys thousands of tonnes of wheat from UK farms, and Ensus also produces 30% of the UK's commercial carbon dioxide – used in soft drinks, medical and nuclear industries.

The government said it would continue to work on measures to ensure the resilience of the CO2 supply chain.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c24zlel2y5yo

So whilst pushing us to higher-ethanol fuels, they effectively kill the UK ethanol industry. And whilst they scream at us to reduce CO2 production, they need to produce CO2 for other uses. I wonder what is going on in Miliband's empty head?

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

I don't think anyone in a position of power - Govt. or Business - are making decisions that benefit the Country.

Still, it's nice and sunny outside and there's lots of shite on the TV to look forward to later :rolleyes:

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Lucy Connelly was inciting violence and it could easily have led to some idiot actually setting fire to a building full of illegal immigrants. So sorry, nobody should be allowed to get away with that.

Ricky Jones should have been banged up, too. It’s completely unacceptable behaviour.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

"Inciting Violence" seems a bit of a catchall phrase, and open to how you personally work it into a situation.

for example, things that may incite violence:

Piss poor referees in football matches
Constant phone calls from energy advice companies (and others)
Boxing promoters (because sport is watching two people batter each other isn't it)
Weapon Manufacturers (go on, tell me it's just for defense)
Neighbours that have outside parties until 2am
Little scrotes that tell you to "F off Gramps" when you catch them looking a little too closely at your car interior

I could go on :D

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

And what ever you do don't wave cardboard with writing on it. Imagine the UK press reaction if it happen in the USA or even China.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Really?

Was she saying "let's all meet on the corner South Rd and West street at 18:00, bring some petrol and we'll go to the migrant hotel in the town centre and burn it down" ?

Now that is incitement to violence.

What she said didn't come anywhere near that, and to assume that she would be responsible if somebody did, is to take away any responsibility and agency of that individual.

it's a child's defence. "Tony told me to do it" and if Tony told you to jump off a cliff would you? It's how we educate children that they are responsible for their own actions.

Pathetic.