![]() |
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Love Bovril myself.
|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Quote:
Those who don't like it do seem to have a taste for sour grapes . |
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
So North Korea are working on new ICBMs apparently.
North Korea 'working on new missiles', US officials say - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-45015343 |
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Stuff happening again with Mueller .
On Monday a new line of defence was taken up: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wire...point-56919853 Saying collusion is not a crime (in truth, at the article above states, it depends). Now Trump is telling Sessions to end the investigation 'right now'. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trum...ry?id=56962100 Not sure if this is a sign the investigation has taken a turn or anything. |
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...et-queen-says/
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1533298114 |
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
The BBC said he was on time. Cannot post link at the moment but it's on www.bbc.co.uk/news
|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Please be upstanding for the respected President of the United States of America:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...29583672307712 Quote:
|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
To be fair, Ormaroso is not even fit to be called a dog...
I have to admit, I don't like Tamara Holder's views on abortion much but the minute that she started talking about Tamara's boobs on air, I about gave up on the woman ever saying anything productive: Get to about 1 20 in the clip or so. (No nudity but it is probably not safe for work if your employer is leery of retards): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVfh_34YX_4 It does raise some very serious questions as to why Trump would hire someone for a 4th time, having fired her 3 times on a reality TV show, before. This job is actually serious. Then there is the security element which former DNI head James Clapper addressed: https://edition.cnn.com/2018/08/13/p...ngs/index.html https://hotair.com/headlines/archive...s-unthinkable/ Quote:
You just don't do what she did - which raises questions abiut the internal security set up at the WH. This even led to Michael Cohen saying that she was full of shit: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ivists-it.html Quote:
I have as many issues with Trump on certain issues as anyone but that piece of filth as never anyone I would use as an example of it. Almost everyone on the planet disapproves of her role in this, and the biggest criticism of Trump is that he hired her in the first place (so many times lol). |
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
I agree her actions are completely inappropriate, and probably illegal (taking a recording device into a SCIF), but the language by Trump is not appropriate, especially in an official statement (which the White House said his tweeted were).
|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
When has it ever been, though? In that sense, it is no different with her, just a lot more justified...
In regards to the recordings, a bunch of states have one party recording laws where they are violations unless both parties consent but that (I think) is just for phone calls not just a call spoken in person but I will have to double check / get back to you on that. After Watergate it did lead to the WPA and what not, but the biggest issue in communication came from within the issue of whether digitized communication differed from in person. Loads of states (20+) have remedied this but at the federal level it never will be as it requires altering / defining the 4th amendment, which will never be done. |
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Quote:
|
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Quote:
Quote:
If Trump is removed in a form that involves violence (assassination etc), then yes...there will be all kinds of hell to pay in the 48 contiguous states. If it is through more traditional methods (impeachment for example) it'll depend on the legitimacy of the (for example) trial in the senate. If it doesn't look like a total stitch up or a very partisan vote then it should keep the peace. If it looks like a dud vote, then yes a show trial will lead the WN's out and there could be riots in the streets. Same will never happen here though, and it is a given that in some way shape or form, we're either not going to leave the EU or totally mess up leaving. |
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Quote:
Her actions were very inappropriate. Apparently it wasn't illegal which itself is bizarre. Taping inside the situation room?! It's an egregious national security risk. Not to mention how is anyone meant to govern if they can't speak candidly just in case one of their co-workers is recording them? She was well out of line. Trump certainly deserves some blame too since it was never clear what on earth her credentials were to work in the White House other than she was on TV with him. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. The language of the Tweet won't be a problem for him, people are used to that. The hiring decision won't be a problem, people are used to that too. The real question is if any of these tapes exist. The racial one was rumoured in the run up to the election in 2016. However you always get these rumours during an election. In the run up to the 2012 election the internet had this big rumour of Michelle Obama using racist words which never came up. So we'll see. At the moment the bigger story to me is the national security issue. |
Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
Even I have to agree calling an ex-Aide a "dog" is highly inappropriate and far from presidential, although I am not surprised that Trump is more unhinged these days, after the constant attacks from every angle and plus, he is getting over confident attacking the Russia investigation, attacking Jeff Sessions at least twice in the last few week, he if he is not careful he will give Mueller the ammunition he needs to put a case forward for Obstruction of Justice by constantly attacking the DOJ and the people involved in the investigation.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:34. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum