Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

Incorrect. No one can accurately state that the investigations into the Russian connections have found nothing unless they have inside knowledge. No running commentary is being published so we have to wait until the results of the investigation are published.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

When the investigation has been running for nearly a year and yet nothing has been found. This is a fact.

So no, you are wrong. There has been open and closed hearings. Senators, both Democrat and Republican have seen no evidence....

Think I will just leave this here..... Republican Tom Cotton, sums up entire investigation and tells of the real crimes being committed i.e the leaks.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

They have found a stuff around Mike Flynn, it's why he had to resign.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

No he had to resign, because he was less than honest with Vice President, Mike Pence regarding meetings and conversations he had with the Russians.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

Well yes but he also broke protocol with those discussions with the Russians, and it was during the investigation that came out (or leaks from it).

As for the rest of it we don't know. There are three investigations on-going at the moment as far as I can see. The FBI's one, the Special Counsel, and the Senate Intelligence committee.

And whilst people might dismiss that they also dismissed the idea of Russian involvement in the election at all.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

By your own argument you cannot say the investigations have found anything unless you have inside knowledge.

So, until the results of the investigation are published then no evidence of Russian connections has publically been found.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

I've not claimed the investigations have found anything. Although you will see in this thread some convincing arguments to the contrary.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

Arguments be they convincing or not can only lead to unfounded conclusions. Your initial argument is dead in the water.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

So what is your cryptic point? That the investigations have found something? Mine is to wait for the results to be unveiled but you now believe this approach to be "dead in the water".

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

If you were waiting for the results to be unveiled you wouldn't be prattling on about convincing arguments from people not involved in the investigation.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

U.S Supreme Court lifts injunction on key parts of Trump Travel Ban Executive Order, to hear case in full in the fall.

http://news.sky.com/story/trumps-tra...ahead-10928036

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

It's a rare thing - a result for Trump.

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

And whilst Andrew is waiting patiently for the Trump outcome (passing no judgement in the meantime ;)), it will be good practice for when, (if there is any justice), the investigation starts to include the Obama administration, who were informed by the CIA of Russian involvement in August 2016 and appeared to do nothing.


First 17 minutes of the liberals favourite news show :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtktEfdIptg&t=1030s

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

So, just to check I've got this right, Trump tweeted stuff based on the Washington Post (fake news*), which was reporting based on a un-named source (which is bad/can't be trusted*).

OK, then...

(*source of statement - Donald J Trump)

Re: U.S President: Donald Trump
 

Never mind about Washington Post BS.

CNN is having a bad day.....

'Fake news': Trump tweets glee as three CNN journalists resign over FAKE Russia story

https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...p-russia-story