Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Sport (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=88)
-   -   World Cup 2006 Thread (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=47636)

gazzae 13-06-2006 00:18

Re: World Cup 2006 Thread
 
If the ref deemed it dangerous play then he should have shown a card regardless of the whistle. But as the player was off-side there is no sending off for being the last man.

Nugget 13-06-2006 00:19

Re: World Cup 2006 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gazzae
If the ref deemed it dangerous play then he should have shown a card regardless of the whistle. But as the player was off-side there is no sending off for being the last man.

Actually, I can't remember - was he even booked?

danielf 13-06-2006 00:20

Re: World Cup 2006 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gazzae
If the ref deemed it dangerous play then he should have shown a card regardless of the whistle. But as the player was off-side there is no sending off for being the last man.

I don't think anyone is saying he should have been sent off for taking down the last man. We're saying the tackle itself was worth sending off.

---------- Post added at 23:20 ---------- Previous post was at 23:19 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nugget
Actually, I can't remember - was he even booked?

Nope...

TheDaddy 13-06-2006 00:20

Re: World Cup 2006 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nugget
Actually, I can't remember - was he even booked?

No he got away with it

Nugget 13-06-2006 00:23

Re: World Cup 2006 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf
I don't think anyone is saying he should have been sent off for taking down the last man. We're saying the tackle itself was worth sending off.

It was, but the rules are the rules :shrug:

Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf
Nope...

Ta muchly :)

---------- Post added at 23:23 ---------- Previous post was at 23:22 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy
No he got away with it

Again. it's not a case of 'getting away with it' - no rule was broken.

gazzae 13-06-2006 00:31

Re: World Cup 2006 Thread
 
I'm not so sure, the laws of the game, when discussing fouls and serious foul play, dont make any reference to the ball being in play.

TheDaddy 13-06-2006 00:34

Re: World Cup 2006 Thread
 
As John Motson said ' justice was served in the end' as it was the same two players involved in the second goal

Nugget 13-06-2006 00:43

Re: World Cup 2006 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gazzae
I'm not so sure, the laws of the game, when discussing fouls and serious foul play, dont make any reference to the ball being in play.

Well, as I understand it, it wasn't a case of the ball not being in play, it was more that play had actually stopped.

I could be wrong of course, but that's just how I see it :)

homealone 13-06-2006 00:58

Re: World Cup 2006 Thread
 
see, when you are my age, avoiding all this stress can only be good :)

gazzae 13-06-2006 12:20

Re: World Cup 2006 Thread
 
Commentators...you are supposed to be in Germany to work. Please, instead of sunbathing between games, try and learn how to pronounce the names of players.

It's PIRLO not PEARLO!
ROSICKY only has ONE S!

---------- Post added at 11:20 ---------- Previous post was at 11:08 ----------

Oh and another thing. We all know how you like to talk about the Africans and their "naive" defending. But I don't really think it applies to a player who now plays in Italy, after spending 10 years at Bayern Munich where he won the European Cup.

TheDaddy 13-06-2006 13:21

Re: World Cup 2006 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gazzae
Commentators...you are supposed to be in Germany to work. Please, instead of sunbathing between games, try and learn how to pronounce the names of players.

It's PIRLO not PEARLO!
ROSICKY only has ONE S!

---------- Post added at 11:20 ---------- Previous post was at 11:08 ----------

Oh and another thing. We all know how you like to talk about the Africans and their "naive" defending. But I don't really think it applies to a player who now plays in Italy, after spending 10 years at Bayern Munich where he won the European Cup.

It could be worse apparently the American commentators think we are Germany and spend a lot of their time discussing 'Martin Rooney' :confused:

Stuart 13-06-2006 13:29

Re: World Cup 2006 Thread
 
1 Attachment(s)
If you have the red and white face paint, and England get knocked out..

gazzae 13-06-2006 13:35

Re: World Cup 2006 Thread
 
Up there with whoever was doing the Czech Republic - USA game.

He said something along the lines of "USA have never beaten european opponents in the World Cup." Then the next thing he said was "they will be hoping to get off to a good start as they did in 2002 where they beat Portugal 3-2"

danielf 13-06-2006 13:37

Re: World Cup 2006 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart C
If you have the red and white face paint, and England get knocked out..

I see France are ready to surrender...

Legendary_PSR 13-06-2006 14:44

Re: World Cup 2006 Thread
 
well technically it was a "lunging tackle" from behind - a sending off offense, and happened after the whistle was blown - which is also a red card

the refs have been very poor so far

Quote:

Commentators...you are supposed to be in Germany to work. Please, instead of sunbathing between games, try and learn how to pronounce the names of players.

It's PIRLO not PEARLO!
ROSICKY only has ONE S!
not forgetting pearce constantly changing how he said mahdavikia's name.

to me, the worst one is how they say gabriel heinze's surname, especially considering it's a german name(his father is german)

we don't say "hainz' baked beans" do we?

but i agree, commentator's being unable to say a player's name winds me up far more than it should :D


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:58.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum