Cable Forum
Page 11 of 86 « First 78910 11 121314152161 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Superhub : Superhub 2 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33693243)

roughbeast 03-05-2013 16:24
Re: superhub 2
 
That's strange. Just had to reboot SH2 because network went all sluggish. I couldn't access files on NAS devices. Having rebooted through GUI all is OK again.

qasdfdsaq 03-05-2013 16:25
Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob (Post 35567561)
current Superhub, and many standalone routers all allow wall mounting.
Only if you're a business customer.

thenry 03-05-2013 16:27
Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35567858)
]One thing nobody seems to have mentioned is whether the SH2 can actually use the full range of 5Ghz channels and not just 4 (the same as you can get at 2.4Ghz) like the old one.
Auto Compatibility
Auto Performance
36+40
40+36
44+48
48+44
52+56
56+52
60+64
64+60
100+104
104+100
108+112
112+108
116+120
120+116
124+128
128+124
132+136
136+132

qasdfdsaq 03-05-2013 16:31
Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35567716)
That's a little misleading Ben, there's plenty of other things that can screw the wireless and sticking it out of view is not really one of them.
No, but blocking it with a giant 40" metal sheet designed specifically to block EM radiation is not going to help.

---------- Post added at 15:30 ---------- Previous post was at 15:29 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushan (Post 35567796)
Everyone knwos that the biggest cause of wireless interference comes from dogs wagging their tails and disrupting the signal.
I disagree.

http://consumerist.com/2012/03/02/ca...-cat-pictures/

---------- Post added at 15:31 ---------- Previous post was at 15:30 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35567871)
Auto Compatibility
Auto Performance
36+40
40+36
44+48
48+44
52+56
56+52
60+64
64+60
100+104
104+100
108+112
112+108
116+120
120+116
124+128
128+124
132+136
136+132
Nice.

That's a pretty decent improvement, though if those settings actually stick it's breaking regulations again.

thenry 03-05-2013 16:35
Re: superhub 2
 
:LOL:

karma mechanic 03-05-2013 17:17
Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35567873)

That's a pretty decent improvement, though if those settings actually stick it's breaking regulations again.
All the channels 100 and up use DFS - there's a message while it checks for radar installations. I'm just trying ch. 136+132 to see how it goes.

Chrysalis 03-05-2013 17:37
Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:
As far as wireless signal goes, standing up is superior to flat.
Qas any proof?

My 2 worse wifi routers happen to be VM superhub and BT homehub3, is it not coincidence they both stand up with lack of external antennaes?

A flat router with external antennaes is superior. But both BT and VM going for cosmetics. Although it seems VM have at least done some work on the superhub2 wifi performance.

GrimUpNorth 03-05-2013 18:53
Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35567901)
Qas any proof?

My 2 worse wifi routers happen to be VM superhub and BT homehub3, is it not coincidence they both stand up with lack of external antennaes?

A flat router with external antennaes is superior. But both BT and VM going for cosmetics. Although it seems VM have at least done some work on the superhub2 wifi performance.
My Asus RT-N56U stands upright, internal antennae and gives more than adequate performance.

Cheers

Grim

Skie 03-05-2013 21:03
Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35567873)

Nice.

That's a pretty decent improvement, though if those settings actually stick it's breaking regulations again.
When you first set it to anything but the auto modes it makes a song and dance about having to scan for nearby radar stations.

TAZMANUK 03-05-2013 21:27
Re: superhub 2
 
Yep according to my sam knows mines been brilliant better wifi as well

pip08456 03-05-2013 22:19
Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35567858)


You realise BT are doing it as well?
As are other ISP's their customer base is ignorant though and just plug and play so end up on the 2.4GHz band.

Of the 72 wireless connections I can pick up with a scan there's 1 on the 5GHz band.-ME!

Sephiroth 03-05-2013 22:51
Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 35567914)
My Asus RT-N56U stands upright, internal antennae and gives more than adequate performance.

Cheers

Grim
... exactly. And you don'ind peops demanding that the N56U should be stood horizontal.

pip08456 03-05-2013 23:06
Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35567980)
... exactly. And you don'ind peops demanding that the N56U should be stood horizontal.
?????????????????

Sephiroth 03-05-2013 23:14
Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35567984)
?????????????????
Dunno - but whatever it was it was right.

Eeeps 03-05-2013 23:41
Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35567970)
As are other ISP's their customer base is ignorant though and just plug and play so end up on the 2.4GHz band.

Of the 72 wireless connections I can pick up with a scan there's 1 on the 5GHz band.-ME!
All I know is that the wife doesn't complain anymore when trying to use the iPad in the kitchen with the microwave on.

The concurrent dual band works really well (worth £50?)


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:15.
Page 11 of 86 « First 78910 11 121314152161 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum