Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Finally arrives here ! (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33675871)

qasdfdsaq 19-03-2011 22:39

Re: Finally arrives here !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by vmfriend (Post 35195821)
Your wireless will only use the 5ghz range if it's 'n' so if it does not work it's because your wireless card is not 'n' but probably 'g'

Wrong again. I can't believe how many times this same misinformation has been posted here.

'n' has nothing to do with 5Ghz capability and vice versa.

jtaylor06 19-03-2011 22:41

Re: Finally arrives here !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35195950)
Wrong again. I can't believe how many times this same misinformation has been posted here.

'n' has nothing to do with 5Ghz capability and vice versa.

I can back that up as my HP laptop has a N wireless card and it could not pick up the wireless on 5 Ghz mode.

BenMcr 19-03-2011 22:44

Re: Finally arrives here !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35195950)
Wrong again. I can't believe how many times this same misinformation has been posted here.

'n' has nothing to do with 5Ghz capability and vice versa.

Eh? B and G can't use the 5Ghz band, that was introduced in Wireless N, so what do you mean by that?

---------- Post added at 23:44 ---------- Previous post was at 23:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jtaylor06 (Post 35195952)
I can back that up as my HP laptop has a N wireless card and it could not pick up the wireless on 5 Ghz mode.

Doesn't mean that 5Ghz has nothing to do with 'N' though

Just means not all 'N' kit is dual band

qasdfdsaq 19-03-2011 23:33

Re: Finally arrives here !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 35195953)
Eh? B and G can't use the 5Ghz band, that was introduced in Wireless N, so what do you mean by that?

---------- Post added at 23:44 ---------- Previous post was at 23:43 ----------

Doesn't mean that 5Ghz has nothing to do with 'N' though

Just means not all 'N' kit is dual band

5Ghz was not introduced with N. The 5Ghz band was introduced before G even existed.

5Ghz has nothing to do with N.

There's nothing preventing the older standards (legacy, a, b, g) from using 5Ghz, though only 'a' does it as standard. In fact, given 'a' comes before 'b' I'd postulate the 5Ghz band was introduced at the same time or before 'b'

BenMcr 19-03-2011 23:40

Re: Finally arrives here !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35195967)
5Ghz was not introduced with N. The 5Ghz band was introduced before G even existed.

5Ghz has nothing to do with N.

There's nothing preventing the older standards (legacy, a, b, g) from using 5Ghz, though only 'a' does it by default. In fact, given 'a' comes before 'b' I'd postulate the 5Ghz band was introduced at the same time or before 'b'

As far as I can see both B and G are 2.4Ghz only, there is nothing in the spec that would allow them to use 5GHz

Didn't realise that 'a' was 5Ghz as have never come across any 'a' kit

So, I agree that 5Ghz doesn't technically have anything to do with 'n' but as 'n' was the first widely used standard to have the ability to use 5Ghz, it's understandable why it's associated with it

qasdfdsaq 19-03-2011 23:46

Re: Finally arrives here !
 
A mistaken association in my opinion. Dualband 'N' gear is no more widespread than dualband 'AG' gear in the consumer space. Almost all consumer 'N' gear is 2.4Ghz only, and anyone expecting 5Ghz capability to be largely associated with 'N' will be sorely disappointed.

As far as 'B' and 'G' go, while they are normally considered 2.4 Ghz only, they can just as easily be converted into a 5Ghz 'A' device with a frequency doubler/shifter. In fact both A and G are practically the same standard, a 22Mhz signal is modulated into either a 2.4 or 5Ghz carrier, in fact no different from the two variants of 'N'.

Dual-band 'AG' gear was actually pretty widespread in the enterprise space, at the time of 'N' draft 2's publication there were at least one thousand 'A' routers/access points within 1 mile of my flat, though almost all of these were operated by my work. Additionally, dual-band 'A/B/G' cards were very common in consumer laptops but not routers/APs.

Back to my original point, there's no logical reason to associate 'N' with 5Ghz any more than the older 'AG' standards, as it is just as rare to see a dual-band 'N' router as it is to see a dual-band 'AG' router. All 'N' equipment supplied by VM (except the Superhub), BT, and O2 so far have been 2.4Ghz only. I don't know of any other UK ISPs supplying 11n kit at all, but if any do I suspect most are 2.4Ghz only as well.

That's why I'm still rather excited about getting my hands on discarded Superhub hardware as it is the first mass-produced consumer kit to support dual-band 'N'.

roughbeast 20-03-2011 00:07

Re: Finally arrives here !
 
Telford is at it again. That WiFi result is unreal. Nobody gets WiFi that good.

Why do we give him so much attention?

qasdfdsaq 20-03-2011 00:20

Re: Finally arrives here !
 
I get wifi that good.

I'm just posting for fun because there are no other active threads this evening :-/

roughbeast 20-03-2011 00:32

Re: Finally arrives here !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35195974)
I get wifi that good.

I'm just posting for fun because there are no other active threads this evening :-/

Well I bet Telford doesn't. :rolleyes:

I got dual band on my WNDR3700, (Isn't that mass produced?), and it can run simultaneous 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz. Even running WiFi on my quadcore I have never achieved anything above 55Mb right next to the router, on either frequency, not even when I was on the Coventry proof of concept trial.

Chrysalis 20-03-2011 01:17

Re: Finally arrives here !
 
transferring a file from here to my laptop earlier I got about 15meg/sec, 12meg/sec is 100mbit so approx 125mbit/sec. The reported connection speed is 300mbit/sec.

zekeisaszekedoes 20-03-2011 18:05

Re: Finally arrives here !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 35195953)
Eh? B and G can't use the 5Ghz band, that was introduced in Wireless N, so what do you mean by that?

Wrong. Using the 5Ghz band was introduced with 802.11a standard, it's not "new for N" just because B/G don't typically use it.

That's the brief version of what qas posted anyway. And like him, I get wifi that good.

P.S. Are we to assume the mods are defending Telford's behaviour at this point?

Hugh 20-03-2011 18:08

Re: Finally arrives here !
 
What does assume do?

Makes an ass of u and me....

BenMcr 20-03-2011 18:13

Re: Finally arrives here !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by zekeisaszekedoes (Post 35196363)
Wrong. Using the 5Ghz band was introduced with 802.11a standard, it's not "new for N" just because B/G don't typically use it.

Yes, thanks for that. Already admitted I was wrong quite a few posts ago

Kymmy 20-03-2011 18:24

Re: Finally arrives here !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by zekeisaszekedoes (Post 35196363)
P.S. Are we to assume the mods are defending Telford's behaviour at this point?

Please read the rules, if you or anyone else breaks them then we are bound to react, until then you can assume that no-one has broken them

:rolleyes:

bopdude 20-03-2011 18:50

Re: Finally arrives here !
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35196368)
What does assume do?

Makes an ass of u and me....

Is that a mod decision, seeing as it's in bold ;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:48.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum