![]() |
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
I see VM have spent approx $15.6 million(£9.5 million) buying back there own shares in the last week.
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix....556&highlight= http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix....577&highlight= |
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Quote:
The channels that have been shut down on all platforms are the Bravo channels and Channel One and its timeshift. They were closed by the channel's new owners. Altogether around ten channels have disappeared from VM and just one - ITV1's timeshift channel - has been added. Yes I know that the Sky Arts HD channels have also appeared but they had been waiting to be laucnhed for many months and they are just a HD simulcast of a channel already on the platform rather than a new channel. I know that True Entertainment has appeared fairly recently but another channel was removed at the same time. |
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Quote:
---------- Post added at 06:11 ---------- Previous post was at 06:09 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Once again, you are mistaken - the only discounts I get are the standard XL bundle discount, and a £6 per month discount for a year because when I upgraded to 30Mb, they put on a charge they shouldn't have, and this balances that.
But I am sure you will caveat your smear/innuendo with "I was only joking". FYI, I have no contacts with VM (formal or informal), and I receive no discounts for being a mod (as there is no connection between VM and CF, besides an informal one for escalating CF'ers problems). |
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
:mad:
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
I would invest in broadband instead of tv also. I think its more future proof as tv on schedule is a dying trend. VOD is taking over slowly as well as IPTV. Also do VM still make a loss on various tv services? if so it would make sense to not invest in that.
|
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
The whole 'prices have gone up so I should get more channels' really annoys me.
I'm not a VM tv customer anymore but if I had been I presume my price would have gone up from 24.50 to 25.50. That is around 4% which is also around the inflation rate. I doubt VM actually make any increases in margin through the increase. So why people keep on expecting more channels is beyond me when the price increase wasn't actually to increase its margins. This thread is full of some members that are just arguing for the sake of arguing. |
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Quote:
---------- Post added at 11:22 ---------- Previous post was at 11:16 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Quote:
If, e.g., VM tv faces inflation of 3% a year on the selling price of a sub and let's say at a price of 24.50 VM do not raise their price for 5 years then in year 5 as per VM's inflation rate they should have received 28.40 but only receive 24.50 meaning they lose 3.90 on each sub that year. That 3.90 is an actual loss of revenue per sub to VM as they pay 3.90 more to deliver that sub. |
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Yet they also expect prices to fall when channels, most of which are not under VM's control, close, even though they also don't rise when channels are added :confused:
|
Re: Virgin Media lack of tv investment
Its about time vm got rid of the packs and charge for each channel individually, at least then you are getting what you pay for and removing 50% of the rubbish you dont watch or need thats buddled into each pack to look like your getting a large amount of channels.
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:25. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum