Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Black Lives Matter (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709106)

Sephiroth 07-07-2020 10:03

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36042612)
Come on Seph, Old Bean. You're coming across as a tad defensive with your frequent wolfwhistles of "woke". The world's changing and we need to change with it to avoid going the way of the dinosaurs.

I can't even say "I resemble that remark". I'm on the attack.
Wokeism and PC combined are an affront to reasonability.

Many of the woke folk have no perspective on British history and are just jumping on a BLM bandwagon out of their ignorance. There's nothing wrong with British culture, pre-woke British attitudes and our sense of what's right or wrong.

I've only just started! BAME, LGBTQ+_ABC1 squared. Jeez, labelling so that the woke have something to latch onto.


Damien 07-07-2020 10:22

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36042627)
Many of the woke folk have no perspective on British history and are just jumping on a BLM bandwagon out of their ignorance. There's nothing wrong with British culture, pre-woke British attitudes and our sense of what's right or wrong.

[/COLOR]

What counts as pre-work British attitudes? Because homosexuality used to be illegal, women didn't get the vote and even child labour was varying degrees of legal (dependent on what they counted as 'child') within recent British history.

Maggy 07-07-2020 10:56

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36042629)
What counts as pre-work British attitudes? Because homosexuality used to be illegal, women didn't get the vote and even child labour was varying degrees of legal (dependent on what they counted as 'child') within recent British history.

Also abortion was illegal, making it legal cut the risks from back street abortionists.

In fact I'd hate to go back to pre-woke times. There were too many horrors associated with those times. Slums,no healthcare,poor water supply,sewage in the streets,rampant disease(oops,still got those) and all the ills that apparently made us the greatest nation in the world.

No thank you. I want us to be very woke and very much inclined to improve EVERYONE'S lot in life wherever they come from and what ever their ethnicity.

Hugh 07-07-2020 10:56

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36042612)
Come on Seph, Old Bean. You're coming across as a tad defensive with your frequent wolfwhistles of "woke". The world's changing and we need to change with it to avoid going the way of the dinosaurs.

The Telegraph have been using it in their headlines and opinion pieces, and so the Sir Bufton Tufton "groupthink" follow on - they think it's an insult... :D

ianch99 07-07-2020 11:44

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36042611)
How is that different from the opposite which seems to be the in thing atm, focus exclusively on the perceived negatives and ignore all of the positives ?

Why are the negatives "perceived"? I think these are pretty real negatives to those we colonised. Of course, there are benefits to imperial rule: nice new roads, the "British" way of running things, etc. but I doubt, the invaded view these as what they needed to "focus" on.

The bottom line is we have a recent* past that, in a modern context, can and should be viewed as containing many wrongs and as such, a recognition of these need to happen. It is the quiet admiration of our imperial past that drives a lot of today's English Nationalism. Until we recognise this past is flawed, we will never be able to make an objective assessment of our place in the world.


* recent meaning in the last 150 years

Sephiroth 07-07-2020 12:03

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36042629)
What counts as pre-work British attitudes? Because homosexuality used to be illegal, women didn't get the vote and even child labour was varying degrees of legal (dependent on what they counted as 'child') within recent British history.

You've made my point that behaviours and tolerances have evolved. Maybe even the woke-ism of the day.

But today's woke-ism goes too far. These idiots are looking for stuff to denigrate and ban. Scrabble (today's Torygraph p.20)? Manhole? Manpower? Cecil Rhodes?

The further evolution that is necessary is a more acceptable approach to policing so that the "B" in BAME are not picked on because it's their word against theirs. That sort of built in prejudice must be tackled - not a whole load of rabble woke people (and their anarchist add-ons) looking to take down our culture.



Paul 07-07-2020 14:59

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36042637)
Until we recognise this past is flawed, we will never be able to make an objective assessment of our place in the world.

Regongnizing your past is flawed (like everyone elses) does not mean you have to apologise for it.

figgyburn 07-07-2020 15:15

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebri...sking-22313762

Yet another Blatantly biased corporation own goal.These woman so despise their own race.

Carth 07-07-2020 16:01

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
I have to say that I'm not surprised in the least by the number of TV, Radio, Film, Music, Sports 'personalities' (with the personality equivalent to a bucket of well used cat litter) that are spouting absolute garbage in search of their 15 minutes seconds of fame.

I deliberately left Journalists off the list because they've been at it for years :D

Paul 07-07-2020 21:02

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

I think a lot of the time when women are Karens, it is because they are completely unwilling to accept that their whiteness is a privilege.
"Their whiteness is a privilege" ? WTF ? Yet another complete moron.


(and what's a Karen ? is that an insult ?)

downquark1 07-07-2020 21:08

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
A karen is a newish internet slang for a busybody woman who loudly complains and asks to see the manager.

Jimmy-J 07-07-2020 22:20

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
From the article...
Quote:

The name has become synonymous with a stereotype of a racist white woman, having evolved from US slang regarding women who are entitled, selfish and eager to complain.
Wonder what they call the male equivalent?

1andrew1 07-07-2020 22:34

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmy-J (Post 36042709)
From the article...

Wonder what they call the male equivalent?

Gammon?

Paul 07-07-2020 22:41

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmy-J (Post 36042709)
From the article...


Wonder what they call the male equivalent?

Kevin ?

Damien 07-07-2020 23:25

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
There isn't really a male equivelent. It only really gets applied to women.

It's usually where someone uploads a video of a angry women yelling at someone. I don't especially like the trend because it usually involves a video that was taken without that person's consent (although you don't need it to record publically but still), often without the full context and without knowing what the person was going through. Then it goes viral, some woman is completely publically shamed without due process and we don't know if they deserve it.

Chris 08-07-2020 11:40

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
I’d say gammon is the obvious equivalent, it’s obviously meant to convey the blotchy red face of an angry man aged 50 plus. But because it doesn’t actually use a male name, feminists like to conveniently overlook it so they can complain that Karen is a sexist concept.

ianch99 08-07-2020 11:51

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmy-J (Post 36042709)
From the article...


Wonder what they call the male equivalent?

It's Ken ..

Carth 08-07-2020 11:52

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Can a black . . . ok BAME . . person be a 'Karen' or a 'Gammon'?

Just wondering . . . you know . . equality and all that :D

1andrew1 08-07-2020 13:28

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Metropolitan Police Commissioner apologises to sprinter Bianca Williams after stop and search
Quote:

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick has apologised to Bianca Williams after the Great Britain sprinter and her partner were handcuffed during a stop and search.
Dame Cressida told MPs that two officers had spoken to Williams and Ricardo dos Santos on Tuesday evening to say sorry for the "distress" caused by the incident...
Speaking to the Home Affairs Select Committee on Wednesday, Dame Cressida said: "My senior officer did say I'm sorry, and I say that too, and if there are lessons to be learnt from it we will learn them.
"I am looking at handcuffing as a specific issue. I think the Met has come an enormous way, I say to other people, if you want to call us institutionally racist then that's a matter for you. It's not a label I find helpful."
https://news.sky.com/story/bianca-wi...earch-12023936

ianch99 08-07-2020 13:35

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36042780)
Metropolitan Police Commissioner apologises to sprinter Bianca Williams after stop and search

https://news.sky.com/story/bianca-wi...earch-12023936

Ignore the BLM extremists, this is an example of why so many people in this country are supporting the principles of the movement.

Maybe some would pop up and say that it was their own fault for driving a Mercedes, wouldn't surprise me at all ..

Carth 08-07-2020 13:42

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Just for ianch99 :D

An erratically driven Mercedes with blacked out windows - apparently.

Until this stuff hit the news I'd never heard of the 'complainants' and certainly wouldn't recognise them. All I'd see are two people in a car (sadly associated) with crimes . . and in London I'd have been tempted to shoot the shit out of it first :p:

nomadking 08-07-2020 13:51

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36042780)
Metropolitan Police Commissioner apologises to sprinter Bianca Williams after stop and search

https://news.sky.com/story/bianca-wi...earch-12023936

But ONLY about the handcuffing. They don't seem to have been handcuffed initially, as is it her seen holding the child? They DIDN'T simply, quietly and calmly get out of the car, as normal people would do. She had to be almost dragged out. If that you're awkward, then you're acting suspiciously. What's so complicated about that?

---------- Post added at 12:51 ---------- Previous post was at 12:45 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36042788)
Just for ianch99 :D

An erratically driven Mercedes with blacked out windows - apparently.

Until this stuff hit the news I'd never heard of the 'complainants' and certainly wouldn't recognise them. All I'd see are two people in a car (sadly associated) with crimes . . and in London I'd have been tempted to shoot the shit out of it first :p:

As happened at a BLM protest barrier in Atlanta.
Link

Quote:

An eight-year-old girl has been shot dead in Atlanta after at least two people opened fire on the car she was in.
...
According to officials, Secoriea was in the car with her mother and another adult when the driver attempted to pass through illegally placed barricades. They were trying to get into a car park, but the entrance was blocked by armed individuals.

Sephiroth 08-07-2020 13:52

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36042783)
Ignore the BLM extremists, this is an example of why so many people in this country are supporting the principles of the movement.

Maybe some would pop up and say that it was their own fault for driving a Mercedes, wouldn't surprise me at all ..

Why on earth would you say something as stupid as your last sentence?

Hugh 08-07-2020 15:02

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36042792)
Why on earth would you say something as stupid as your last sentence?

Because he was waiting for someone to post something like
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36042788)
Just for ianch99 :D

An erratically driven Mercedes with blacked out windows - apparently.

Until this stuff hit the news I'd never heard of the 'complainants' and certainly wouldn't recognise them. All I'd see are two people in a car (sadly associated) with crimes . . and in London I'd have been tempted to shoot the shit out of it first :p:


Carth 08-07-2020 15:33

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36042818)
Because he was waiting for someone to post something like


I thought I'd oblige, no point keeping the man waiting :D

ianch99 09-07-2020 09:26

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36042792)
Why on earth would you say something as stupid as your last sentence?

Do you have to be so rude?

Hate to break it to you but in the real world, there are actually people who get triggered by this sort of laughable "reporting":

Shocking moment raging Mercedes driver tries to mow down police officer after he was stopped for driving while disqualified as he is jailed for 12 months

Police officer tries to smash window of stolen Mercedes with his baton before car speeds off into a dead end and suspected thieves try to escape but are caught

Mercedes driver flees scene of crash on foot leaving an unbuckled BABY in the vehicle after smashing into police car during a two-mile pursuit

---------- Post added at 08:26 ---------- Previous post was at 08:25 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36042828)
I thought I'd oblige, no point keeping the man waiting :D

The really sad part is that you probably meant it ;)

Carth 09-07-2020 12:11

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36042920)


oooohh that hurts ooohh I'm triggered now ooooh I'm going to . . .
:scratch: oh hang on a minute, you probably own a Mercedes don't you, come on admit it . . does it cause you issues? . . . is it a black one? :D ;) :Peaceman:

Maggy 09-07-2020 12:22

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Seems we have veered right away from discussing anything sensible.

Carth 09-07-2020 12:36

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36042935)
Seems we have veered right away from discussing anything sensible.

True I'm afraid, however I think that's the way the whole BLM thing has decended into ridiculous and petty arguements about statues, street names, pub names, stop & search, and the need to employ more BAME people whatever the cost :dozey:

Sephiroth 09-07-2020 12:40

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36042942)
True I'm afraid, however I think that's the way the whole BLM thing has decended into ridiculous and petty arguements about statues, street names, pub names, stop & search, and the need to employ more BAME people whatever the cost :dozey:

+++1.

Hugh 09-07-2020 12:51

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36042942)
True I'm afraid, however I think that's the way the whole BLM thing has decended into ridiculous and petty arguements about statues, street names, pub names, stop & search, and the need to employ more BAME people whatever the cost :dozey:

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...7&d=1594291835

nomadking 09-07-2020 13:06

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36042942)
True I'm afraid, however I think that's the way the whole BLM thing has decended into ridiculous and petty arguements about statues, street names, pub names, stop & search, and the need to employ more BAME people whatever the cost :dozey:

It is and always has been, about having total power and control over everybody and everything.

Just look at the number of people that have been forced out for having the "wrong" opinions, or simply not expressing support. They turn violent when certain words are allegedly used by White people, but mysteriously Black people use them each and every day without incident. It's a case of "you can only do and say what we allow you to". Try watching a few TV series or Films that are set in a Black environment.

Just one example
Quote:

Flint — An 18-year-old Mount Morris Township man has been charged and is being sought in the assault of a manager at the Macy’s department store in the Genesee Valley Center.
...
In surveillance video obtained from Macy’s by Flint Township Police, Palmer is allegedly seen walking around the store. He then approaches and sucker-punches the manager in the head from behind, knocking him to the floor, according to authorities.
The video allegedly shows Palmer continuing to strike the manager while the employee is on the floor. Palmer then exits the store with another man.
Leyton indicated that despite public comments on social media, the police investigation did not uncover any evidence of provocation by the store manager.
“This was an unprovoked attack on a Macy’s employee,” Leyton said Friday. “This behavior, as seen on the video, is unacceptable, it is criminal and it cannot be allowed.
“We don’t believe any racial slur was made by the store manager, and even if there had been, it does not condone nor justify the assault by Mr. Palmer,” he said.
Quote:

Leyton also said he and his senior staff reviewed the case for possibly charging Palmer with a hate crime, called ethnic intimidation by statute, but he said there is insufficient probable cause evidence that would support it.
The store manager is white and the suspect is African American.
“I know a lot of people are calling this a hate crime but, under the laws of Michigan, the evidence simply does not support that charge,” he said.
:shocked: How? What other motive was there meant to be?

Strange that the attackers friend, was filming the attack from the beginning.

Maggy 09-07-2020 13:09

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Can we get away from relentless point scoring at all? Can we actually come up with some sort of way forward? Can we actually become a diverse society for real?Also can we really relate what happens in the US with the situation here?

RichardCoulter 09-07-2020 13:15

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36042952)
It is and always has been, about having total power and control over everybody and everything.

Just look at the number of people that have been forced out for having the "wrong" opinions, or simply not expressing support. They turn violent when certain words are allegedly used by White people, but mysteriously Black people use them each and every day without incident. It's a case of "you can only do and say what we allow you to". Try watching a few TV series of Films that are set in a Black environment.


Just one example




:shocked: How? What other motive was there meant to be?



Strange that the attackers friend, was filming the attack from the beginning.

Use of the N word is a prime example of this. Routinely used by black youths to each other, but deemed extremely offensive if others use the term.

It is either offensive, or it isn't, regardless of who uses the term.

Maggy 09-07-2020 13:32

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36042954)
Use of the N word is a prime example of this. Routinely used by black youths to each other, but deemed extremely offensive if others use the term.

It is either offensive, or it isn't, regardless of who uses the term.

Think of the word queer.The word that the gay fraternity took for their own and used..How is it different for black youths to use the N word in the same way?

nomadking 09-07-2020 13:44

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36042959)
Think of the word queer.The word that the gay fraternity took for their own and used..How is it different for black youths to use the N word in the same way?

You can't claim to be traumatised by somebody saying it, if you and your mates regularly say it. Common sense. As I said, it's all about having power and control over people.
Link

Quote:

The City of Seattle held a racially segregated employee training session aimed at White staffers and instructing them on "undoing your own whiteness" in order to be held accountable by people of color, according to documents obtained by a public records request.
The session took place on June 12, as protesters took part in the so-called "Capitol Hill Organized Protest" in the Capitol Hill district.
One handout distributed in the session reportedly declared how “racism is not our fault but we are responsible." Another said White staffers must give up “the land” and their “guaranteed physical safety” in order to be an “accomplice” for racial justice.

...
In order to be considered “accomplices,” White employees must give up “comfort,” “guaranteed physical safety,” “expectations or presumptions of emotional safety,” “control over other people and over the land,” and “relationships with some other white people.”
White employees were also urged to give up “niceties from neighbors and colleagues,” “the certainty of your job,” and “accepting jobs and promotions when we are not qualified, including racial equity jobs.”
:shocked:
If giving up "guaranteed physical safety" means mixing more with Black people, isn't that implying that Black people are the actual problem?

1andrew1 09-07-2020 13:52

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36042954)
Use of the N word is a prime example of this. Routinely used by black youths to each other, but deemed extremely offensive if others use the term.

It is either offensive, or it isn't, regardless of who uses the term.

Context is everything. Much as we might crave simplicity, it's not a binary yes it is, no it isn't here.

Carth 09-07-2020 13:57

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36042963)
Context is everything. Much as we might crave simplicity, it's not a binary yes it is, no it isn't here.

Got it

so . . . an Irishman can tell jokes about the Irish, a Jew can tell jokes about Jews, a black person can tell jokes about black people . . . and a white person can't laugh if he hears them

1andrew1 09-07-2020 14:16

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36042964)
Got it

so . . . an Irishman can tell jokes about the Irish, a Jew can tell jokes about Jews, a black person can tell jokes about black people . . . and a white person can't laugh if he hears them

The first two people could well be white and laughing at the jokes.
If you wanted to simplify it, it's more in the person telling the joke than the person laughing at it.

nomadking 09-07-2020 14:23

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36042963)
Context is everything. Much as we might crave simplicity, it's not a binary yes it is, no it isn't here.

What about when it's in the SAME context? Eg Singing a song written by a Black person? Black people do use the N word in a derogatory way. If it's about context, then the word used is irrelevant. It is just a label. If it's used in a derogatory context, then whatever words are used are still derogatory. If the word was replaced with the word "Apple", would it make whatever was said, less derogatory? Remember it's derived from a scientific anthropological term.


The very definition of not being "racist", means that you have to treat all races in the same manner, in the same circumstances. Different treatment = racist?

Hugh 09-07-2020 14:25

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36042964)
Got it

so . . . an Irishman can tell jokes about the Irish, a Jew can tell jokes about Jews, a black person can tell jokes about black people . . . and a white person can't laugh if he hears them

Context is all...

as Charles M. Blow wrote
Quote:

MY father’s name is William Paul Coates. I, like my six brothers and sisters, have always addressed him as Dad. Strangers often call him Mr. Coates. His friends call him Paul. If a stranger or one of my father’s friends called him Dad, my father might have a conversation. When I was a child, relatives of my paternal grandmother would call my father Billy. Were I to ever call my father Billy, we would probably have a different conversation.

I have never called my father Billy. I understand, like most people, that words take on meaning within a context. It might be true that you refer to your spouse as Baby. But were I to take this as license to do the same, you would most likely protest. Right names depend on right relationships, a fact so basic to human speech that without it, human language might well collapse...

...A few summers ago one of my best friends invited me up to what he affectionately called his “white-trash cabin” in the Adirondacks. This was not how I described the outing to my family. Two of my Jewish acquaintances once joked that I’d “make a good Jew.” My retort was not, “Yeah, I certainly am good with money.” Gay men sometimes laughingly refer to one another as “******s.” My wife and her friends sometimes, when having a good time, will refer to one another with the word “bitch.” I am certain that should I decide to join in, I would invite the same hard conversation that would greet me, should I ever call my father Billy.
You seem to imply either a word is acceptable or it isn't, but that's a very simplistic view - you would never have been called the N word or Queer as an insult (or probably in any way) as you are neither, so who are you to tell someone who has had it used against them how they should use it - I know lots of Yorkshiremen who call each their Yorkshire friends "you tight barsteward", but if someone who they didn't know from London said it, they might take offence.

As I said, context is all, and like life, not black and white - ymmv.

nomadking 09-07-2020 14:26

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36042967)
The first two people could well be white and laughing at the jokes.
If you wanted to simplify it, it's more in the person telling the joke than the person laughing at it.

It's also about who else is around to overhear. Eg " Irishmen telling an "Irish" joke to each other, and somebody else who is not Irish overhears, then that person is allowed to take "offence". Just a perverted mechanism for allowing the maximum number of people to make a bogus complaint.

1andrew1 09-07-2020 14:37

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36042969)
Eg Singing a song written by a Black person?

I've explained that it's not binary and you would have to examine the context. For example, if a record producer sang it the singer to emphasise a different way of singing a verse, then that would not be offensive. However, if a known white racist sang it then that would likely be offensive. It's about empathy and putting yourself in another's shoes - not looking for a binary answer to nuanced issues.

nomadking 09-07-2020 14:37

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36042970)
Context is all...

as Charles M. Blow wrote

You seem to imply either a word is acceptable or it isn't, but that's a very simplistic view - you would never have been called the N word or Queer as an insult (or probably in any way) as you are neither, so who are you to tell someone who has had it used against them how they should use it - I know lots of Yorkshiremen who call each their Yorkshire friends "you tight barsteward", but if someone who they didn't know from London said it, they might take offence.

As I said, context is all, and like life, not black and white - ymmv.

Nothing to do with context, but how much control of others, you're trying to impose. The offending words ARE used by the groups, to and about, complete strangers. People can easily choose to brush things off.
Eg A recent TV programme about Liverpool FC, had Black footballer Howard Gayle commenting on abuse from the opposing fans(Bayern Munich). He said that it "inspired him". The aim of the chants was to try and put him off. White players have also been taunted, but they are just expected to put up with it.

1andrew1 09-07-2020 14:41

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36042971)
It's also about who else is around to overhear. Eg " Irishmen telling an "Irish" joke to each other, and somebody else who is not Irish overhears, then that person is allowed to take "offence". Just a perverted mechanism for allowing the maximum number of people to make a bogus complaint.

That sounds like an urban myth to me.

nomadking 09-07-2020 14:46

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36042975)
I've explained that it's not binary and you would have to examine the context. For example, if a record producer sang it the singer to emphasise a different way of singing a verse, then that would not be offensive. However, if a known white racist sang it then that would likely be offensive. It's about empathy and putting yourself in another's shoes - not looking for a binary answer to nuanced issues.

Still nothing to do with context. Repeating the words DOESN'T make it racist.:rolleyes: If anything, quite the opposite as they have listened to the song and know the words. So the only people that have been criticised, sacked, forced to resign, etc. for repeating certain song lyrics have all been racist?:rolleyes:
There was a case where it was a discussion/meeting/lecture about use of offensive words, which common sense means that those words are likely to be used. Can't remember what happened to the guy, whether he was sacked or merely heavily criticised, but the context was valid, and not aimed at anybody in particular or in general. It's just that somebody else at the meeting wanted to impose control. What else could it be? The context was valid, so according to you, that would make it ok.

1andrew1 09-07-2020 14:46

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36042976)
Nothing to do with context, but how much control of others, you're trying to impose. The offending words ARE used by the groups, to and about, complete strangers. People can easily choose to brush things off.
Eg A recent TV programme about Liverpool FC, had Black footballer Howard Gayle commenting on abuse from the opposing fans(Bayern Munich). He said that it "inspired him". The aim of the chants was to try and put him off. White players have also been taunted, but they are just expected to put up with it.

Football's a tough environment with coin-throwing, abusive shouting and previously, banana-throwing. And racist chants are rife in some countries still.
But I'm sure you're not suggesting that black players get an easy ride but white players are expected to just grin and bear it?

Carth 09-07-2020 14:58

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
I see we're all still going round in those wonderful circles that make discussions so amusing . . . isn't it great how one single post can cause so much angst and general whataboutery :LOL:


*checks the latest from Yellowstone & NASA

Sephiroth 09-07-2020 15:12

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36042975)
I've explained that it's not binary and you would have to examine the context. For example, if a record producer sang it the singer to emphasise a different way of singing a verse, then that would not be offensive. However, if a known white racist sang it then that would likely be offensive. It's about empathy and putting yourself in another's shoes - not looking for a binary answer to nuanced issues.

Quote:

Originally posted by Carth:
so . . . an Irishman can tell jokes about the Irish, a Jew can tell jokes about Jews, a black person can tell jokes about black people . . . and a white person can't laugh if he hears them
Quote:

Response by Andrew:
The first two people could well be white and laughing at the jokes.
If you wanted to simplify it, it's more in the person telling the joke than the person laughing at it.
Carth gave a spot on example of what's so absurd about PC and woke-ism. So, what about the empathy of the listener (second higlights sentence)? It don't think you're being consistent.

Exactly what are you advocating? No queer jokes? No ethnic jokes? No emulating foreign accents (of which I'm expert)?


---------- Post added at 14:12 ---------- Previous post was at 14:10 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36042982)
I see we're all still going round in those wonderful circles that make discussions so amusing . . . isn't it great how one single post can cause so much angst and general whataboutery :LOL:


*checks the latest from Yellowstone & NASA

I wrote in this thread yonks ago that it had run its course and was heading nowhere. I was told, basically, that this viewpoint is the prerogative of those running the forum.

nomadking 09-07-2020 15:14

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36042977)
That sounds like an urban myth to me.

Urban myth or Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986?
Again, people have actually been sacked, forced to resign, heavily criticised, etc for having a private conversation that was overheard by a uninvolved third party. Are you really saying that there have been no examples of that happening? Can't remember specific details.

Link

Quote:

Evidence of the hate element is not a requirement. You do not need to personally perceive the incident to be hate related. It would be enough if another person, a witness or even a police officer thought that the incident was hate related.
"Thought" as in imagined or falsely claimed. It means certain groups can bully people, if they choose to.

Carth 09-07-2020 15:22

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36042988)

"Thought" as in imagined or falsely claimed. It means certain groups can bully people, if they choose to.

+1

It's usually the 'allegation' that causes the problem, even if you're totally innocent you end up guilty by proxy . . . no smoke without fire etc

nomadking 09-07-2020 15:27

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36042979)
Football's a tough environment with coin-throwing, abusive shouting and previously, banana-throwing. And racist chants are rife in some countries still.
But I'm sure you're not suggesting that black players get an easy ride but white players are expected to just grin and bear it?

Their complaints are taken on board, but White players have to put up with the taunts, and don't really have any avenue to pursue. The reason for the taunts is the SAME. That being so, then both sets should be treated the SAME. That is equality. Do the White players try to get fans or even whole clubs banned? Of course not. In my example, did Howard Gayle try to get the fans banned? No, he recognised it for what it was, ie taunts to try and put him off. If there had been something that could've been aimed at a White player as a taunt, then it would've been.

pip08456 09-07-2020 15:59

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36042975)
I've explained that it's not binary and you would have to examine the context. For example, if a record producer sang it the singer to emphasise a different way of singing a verse, then that would not be offensive. However, if a known white racist sang it then that would likely be offensive. It's about empathy and putting yourself in another's shoes - not looking for a binary answer to nuanced issues.

How about this then? Apparently it was wrong because "No, it was made to be sung by Carmen Twillie and Lebo M. and an African choir."


1andrew1 09-07-2020 16:51

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36042995)
How about this then? Apparently it was wrong because "No, it was made to be sung by Carmen Twillie and Lebo M. and an African choir."


My answer remains - it's about empathy and putting yourself in another's shoes - not looking for a binary answer to nuanced issues.

nomadking 09-07-2020 17:24

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36043003)
My answer remains - it's about empathy and putting yourself in another's shoes - not looking for a binary answer to nuanced issues.

So we have to all bow or kneel down to their every whim and demand, no matter matter how frivolous or ridiculous? That is what it amounts to.
Do White people have to stop walking etc in the countryside, because BAME bullies claim they are somehow excluded?

1andrew1 09-07-2020 17:49

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36043006)
So we have to all bow or kneel down to their every whim and demand, no matter matter how frivolous or ridiculous? That is what it amounts to.
Do White people have to stop walking etc in the countryside, because BAME bullies claim they are somehow excluded?

You're going off-piste into the world of strawmen. I've not said this. I've given you the basic principles to apply as has Hugh.

Sephiroth 09-07-2020 17:55

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36043007)
You're going off-piste into the world of strawmen. I've not said this. I've given you the basic principles to apply as has Hugh.

You could do better than pray Hugh in aid. Nomad's logic is a reasonable since your call for empathy, if implemented, would lead to people thinking twice about doing anything in case the BAME feel inhibited.



1andrew1 09-07-2020 18:21

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36043008)
You could do better than pray Hugh in aid. Nomad's logic is a reasonable since your call for empathy, if implemented, would lead to people thinking twice about doing anything in case the BAME feel inhibited.

Citing previous posts is common sense and saves reinventing the wheel and boring the poor thread-followers.
Going to the countryside - if you can't see this as an out and out strawman then there's little I can realistically do to help.

Sephiroth 09-07-2020 18:37

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36043009)
Citing previous posts is common sense and saves reinventing the wheel and boring the poor thread-followers.
Going to the countryside - if you can't see this as an out and out strawman then there's little I can realistically do to help.

One could accuse nearly everyone for putting up a straw man, including you:

Quote:

I've explained that it's not binary and you would have to examine the context. For example, if a record producer sang it the singer to emphasise a different way of singing a verse, then that would not be offensive. However, if a known white racist sang it then that would likely be offensive. It's about empathy and putting yourself in another's shoes - not looking for a binary answer to nuanced issues.
There's no difference between "for example" and "straw man" when arguing.


Hugh 09-07-2020 18:41

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36042995)
How about this then? Apparently it was wrong because "No, it was made to be sung by Carmen Twillie and Lebo M. and an African choir."


A small number of idiots making extreme remarks about this do not reflect mainstream reality, is just like the EDL and the BNP do not reflect how we in the UK think - it’s just a straw man argument.

ianch99 09-07-2020 18:49

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36042934)
oooohh that hurts ooohh I'm triggered now ooooh I'm going to . . .
:scratch: oh hang on a minute, you probably own a Mercedes don't you, come on admit it . . does it cause you issues? . . . is it a black one? :D ;) :Peaceman:

Nah, I own a Skoda .. with tinted rear windows :)

Paul 09-07-2020 18:49

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36043013)
.... it’s just a straw man argument.

Ah, your standard answer to anything it seems.

Carth 09-07-2020 18:53

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36043014)
Nah, I own a Skoda .. with tinted rear windows :)

:D
I always wanted (still fancy) the Skoda Superb, could never find one I could afford :(

Maggy 09-07-2020 18:53

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
I give up trying to get any sense from anyone in this thread.

I'll be back if any moderating needs doing. Otherwise I'm out of here.

pip08456 09-07-2020 19:00

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36043015)
Ah, your standard answer to anything it seems.

You beat me to it Paul.;)

Paul 09-07-2020 19:04

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36042948)

Unfortunately, putting it on a poster doesn't make it true.

You know as well as everyone else that companies are setting such targets, I believe the BBC's are mentioned earlier in this very topic.

The majority of Black people are indeed reasonable, they dont take offence at everything with the word black in it, they dont want special treatment, they dont feel the need to pull down statues. Unfortunately, the minority do, and they are the ones shouting loudest atm, if it continues I dont think it will end well.

RichardCoulter 09-07-2020 19:04

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36042959)
Think of the word queer.The word that the gay fraternity took for their own and used..How is it different for black youths to use the N word in the same way?

I don't think that it is any different, I think it's exactly the same scenario.

1andrew1 09-07-2020 19:08

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36043015)
Ah, your standard answer to anything it seems.

Doesn't make him wrong though. ;)

Paul 09-07-2020 19:10

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36043026)
Doesn't make him wrong though. ;)

Doesnt make him right either. :sleep:

1andrew1 09-07-2020 19:20

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36043022)
Unfortunately, putting it on a poster doesn't make it true.

You know as well as everyone else that companies are setting such targets, I believe the BBC's are mentioned earlier in this very topic.

The majority of Black people are indeed reasonable, they dont take offence at everything with the word black in it, they dont want special treatment, they dont feel the need to pull down statues. Unfortunately, the minority do, and they are the ones shouting loudest atm, if it continues I dont think it will end well.

I think you're right - in the UK the conversation is less extreme. People aren't taking offence at words with black in, etc. There isn't widespread removal of statues.
In terms of targets I do see monitoring as useful. If 15% of the working population in an organisation's area is BAME and it only employs 5% BAME there is a potential issue, surely?
It's not about special treatment but it could be about having apprenticeships for entry as oppose to 100% graduates. It could be about advertising in places that everyone will see and not relying on the existing employees to recommend a friend.

nomadking 09-07-2020 19:53

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36043029)
I think you're right - in the UK the conversation is less extreme. People aren't taking offence at words with black in, etc. There isn't widespread removal of statues.
In terms of targets I do see monitoring as useful. If 15% of the working population in an organisation's area is BAME and it only employs 5% BAME there is a potential issue, surely?
It's not about special treatment but it could be about having apprenticeships for entry as oppose to 100% graduates. It could be about advertising in places that everyone will see and not relying on the existing employees to recommend a friend.

Statues are being removed or are under attack, Names are being erased from history.

Doesn't mean all of that 15% is available, qualified, or even suitable. Eg sections where women don't go to work, or they don't speak English will straight away reduce that 15%. Should any business/organisation that employs more BAME than in the area be forced to reduce that number? If not, you end up with a situation where they over-represented overall. Same argument goes for women. I should imagine if you looked at small non-white owned businesses, the diversity wouldn't be that great.

There is a huge gulf between entry-level apprenticeship and post-graduate. How is that not asking for special treatment? How many firms never advertise in any form? Fictitious argument, as usual.

---------- Post added at 18:53 ---------- Previous post was at 18:41 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36043007)
You're going off-piste into the world of strawmen. I've not said this. I've given you the basic principles to apply as has Hugh.

How is it "strawmen".
Link

Quote:

Countryfile has sparked a debate on racism with a story suggesting people from the BAME community feel unwelcome in the countryside.
Last night, the BBC show aired a piece fronted by Dwayne Fields in which he investigated a report by Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).
The report, published last year, focused on how people from black, Asian or minority ethnic communities as well as white people felt the UK's national parks are very much a "white environment".
During the segment, Dwayne explained: "When I talk to people from the BAME community, it's clear that they don't view the UK countryside as somewhere that's for them.
No FACTUAL basis for feeling anything like that. They just have to claim it is, and it magically that is proof. In non-white countries, how many people go rambling, camping etc, just for the enjoyment of it? The culture of doing those things, just isn't there in the first place. THEIR problem, not ours.

Carth 09-07-2020 20:13

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
I think many who have a nice safe & clean job in an office environment (no offence intended to those who do) have a slightly skewed view of some things.

The majority of BAME people looking for work will be nothing like the 'graduates' you're probably used to seeing in and around that sector.

Many probably come from the 'poorer' sectors and, like anyone from a 'working class' background, will be struggling to find anything above minimum wage employment in areas such as factories, hotel work, shops, etc . . in which they, and eastern Europeans, are usually well represented.

If the Gov't and other parties want a higher representation of BAME in roles requiring higher education, they need to make that education available at no cost to the families who can barely afford to live . . . but that then introduces a surge of non BAME into the system too - catch 22 yet again ;)

Sephiroth 09-07-2020 20:30

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36043036)
I think many who have a nice safe & clean job in an office environment (no offence intended to those who do) have a slightly skewed view of some things.

The majority of BAME people looking for work will be nothing like the 'graduates' you're probably used to seeing in and around that sector.

Many probably come from the 'poorer' sectors and, like anyone from a 'working class' background, will be struggling to find anything above minimum wage employment in areas such as factories, hotel work, shops, etc . . in which they, and eastern Europeans, are usually well represented.

If the Gov't and other parties want a higher representation of BAME in roles requiring higher education, they need to make that education available at no cost to the families who can barely afford to live . . . but that then introduces a surge of non BAME into the system too - catch 22 yet again ;)

Carth,

I think you're falling for it by discussing the lot or otherwise befalling the "BAME" category. I rather tend to use the word BAME in this thread to attack it and the concept behind it.

For example, Asians are split into different ethnicity as defined by HMG in https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures....loyment/latest

The "A" in BAME covers the following ethnicity definitions as regards % of economically active population who are unemployed:

ASIAN 6%
INDIAN 4%
Pakistani/Bangladeshi 8%
Asian other 6%

(Black 9%)

This distribution makes nonsense of pat arguments about 15% BAME population in an area but only 5% employed. Who are the particular "BAME". It's a very bad collective (contrived) noun.




nomadking 09-07-2020 20:34

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36043036)
I think many who have a nice safe & clean job in an office environment (no offence intended to those who do) have a slightly skewed view of some things.

The majority of BAME people looking for work will be nothing like the 'graduates' you're probably used to seeing in and around that sector.

Many probably come from the 'poorer' sectors and, like anyone from a 'working class' background, will be struggling to find anything above minimum wage employment in areas such as factories, hotel work, shops, etc . . in which they, and eastern Europeans, are usually well represented.

If the Gov't and other parties want a higher representation of BAME in roles requiring higher education, they need to make that education available at no cost to the families who can barely afford to live . . . but that then introduces a surge of non BAME into the system too - catch 22 yet again ;)

How many are achieving A level standard? Student loans cover the further education costs for them, and everybody else.
Link
Quote:

  • 13.0% of students got 3 A grades or better (including students whose ethnicity wasn’t known)
  • 25.7% of students from the Chinese ethnic group got 3 A grades or better – the highest percentage out of all ethnic groups
  • 5.5% of Black students got 3 A grades or better – the lowest percentage out of the 6 aggregated ethnic groups
  • 11.2% of students with Mixed ethnicity got 3 A grades or better – this was followed by White students (11.0%), students from the Asian ethnic group (11.0%), students from the Other ethnic group (10.2%)


Education to A level is free. Afro-Caribbean is even lower at 3.4%(only Roma/Traveller is lower). So Chinese have a 7.5 to 1 advantage, and White kids have a 3.2 to 1 advantage. Black Africans can manage 6.1%, so it can't be racism in any way.
That's before you get into numbers. 131,947 White is always going to outnumber 10,475 Black.

1andrew1 09-07-2020 20:52

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36043031)

There is a huge gulf between entry-level apprenticeship and post-graduate. How is that not asking for special treatment? How many firms never advertise in any form? Fictitious argument, as usual.

---------- Post added at 18:53 ---------- Previous post was at 18:41 ----------


How is it "strawmen".
Link

No FACTUAL basis for feeling anything like that. They just have to claim it is, and it magically that is proof. In non-white countries, how many people go rambling, camping etc, just for the enjoyment of it? The culture of doing those things, just isn't there in the first place. THEIR problem, not ours.

1. A Level 7 apprenticeship is equivalent to a Masters. You can get great qualifications on the job that don't cripple you financially but may reduce your ability to go out on mid-week pub crawls!
2. "Do White people have to stop walking etc in the countryside, because BAME bullies claim they are somehow excluded?"
- Why is someone a bully just because they say they feel uncomfortable in the countryside? Am I missing something? And the report doesn't say that anyone shouldn't go into the countryside.

Carth 09-07-2020 21:04

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Level 7 apprenticeship

Entry requirements can include at least five GCSEs grades A* – C (9 – 4 on the new grading system), including English and maths subjects, and Level 3 qualifications, including A levels, NVQs, or a BTEC. Some employers will expect or require applicants to have studied subjects relevant to the apprenticeship.


I refer you to this snippet
Quote:

5.5% of Black students got 3 A grades or better

and then, of course, you have to get the job (apprenticeship) to start with ;)

nomadking 09-07-2020 21:16

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36043045)
1. A Level 7 apprenticeship is equivalent to a Masters. You can get great qualifications on the job that don't cripple you financially but may reduce your ability to go out on mid-week pub crawls!
2. "Do White people have to stop walking etc in the countryside, because BAME bullies claim they are somehow excluded?"
- Why is someone a bully just because they say they feel uncomfortable in the countryside? Am I missing something? And the report doesn't say that anyone shouldn't go into the countryside.

Link
Quote:

Higher Level 7 Apprenticeships are the equivalent to a Masters level qualification. They’re very competitive and to be considered for one of these Apprenticeships, you should currently hold a degree, have completed a degree level Apprenticeship or have enough relevant experience in the industry the Level 7 Apprenticeship is in.
So where are level 7s excluded? Meaningless example. They are not the typical Apprenticeship level.
Quote:

If you choose to do an intermediate (level 2) Apprenticeship, you’ll get qualifications the equivalent of 5 GCSES. An advanced (level 3) Apprenticeship is the same as doing 2 A-Levels! There are longer programmes such as the higher Apprenticeships and degree Apprenticeships. Higher (Level 4) Apprenticeships would mean you get qualifications the equivalent to a foundation year of a degree but higher Apprenticeships are also at level 5 and level 6. A degree (level 6) Apprenticeship will give you a Bachelor’s Degree qualification and a Masters (level 7) Apprenticeship would be the equivalent of your getting a master’s degree! What’s not to love about gaining those qualifications, all without the debt?!
Only levels 6 and 7 are degree level and they've only been around 5 years. Not enough time to make that much of an impact.
Quote:

However, the real enhancement of the pathway came in 2015, when degree apprenticeships were launched. Through degree apprenticeship programmes, learners can now achieve a Level 6 or 7 qualification (gaining a full bachelor’s or master’s degree), while working and earning money at the same time.
If you can't (or can't be bothered to) reach A level standard, how likely are you to reach degree level?


So what else is meant to make BAME feel more comfortable, other than ethnic cleansing of the countryside? If the problem is meant to be the presence of White people, then the implied solution is removal of that presence. What else could it imply? It's actually just an excuse to make yet more BOGUS claims of racism.

1andrew1 09-07-2020 21:26

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36043052)
Link
So where are level 7s excluded? Meaningless example. They are not the typical Apprenticeship level.
Only levels 6 and 7 are degree level and they've only been around 5 years. Not enough time to make that much of an impact.
If you can't (or can't be bothered to) reach A level standard, how likely are you to reach degree level?

Apprenticeships are an example of one of the ways I explained that entry to organisations could be made fairer as oppose to your perception of special treatment. If a large organisation has the disparity I mentioned, it's likely due to far lower levels than Masters. I'm sure you can think of many other ways in which recruitment can be made fairer without giving special treatment to any particular groups.

nomadking 09-07-2020 21:46

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36043053)
Apprenticeships are an example of one of the ways I explained that entry to organisations could be made fairer as oppose to your perception of special treatment. I'm sure you can think of many other ways in which recruitment can be made fairer without giving special treatment to any particular groups.

But there hasn't been enough time to judge anything(it will take 2 or 3 extra years to reach that level), they're not achieving A level standard in the first place, and where is the evidence that employers are treating level 6 and 7 apprenticeships, adversely?:rolleyes: If anything the complaint from employers is that graduates don't have much actual real world, hands-on experience. In that sense Apprenticeships are superior in value, but there will currently only be a couple of years worth of degree level Apprentices.
Link
Quote:

Did you know that 3 in 4 apprentices are kept on by their employer upon completing their apprenticeship?

Paul 10-07-2020 01:30

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36043029)
If 15% of the working population in an organisation's area is BAME and it only employs 5% BAME there is a potential issue, surely?

Not really, numbers (as usual) mean nothing on their own.

If 1% of of the working population in an area is blind, does that mean there is a potential issue because no blind people are employed as drivers ?

figgyburn 10-07-2020 08:39

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
https://www.foxnews.com/us/seattle-c...hysical-safety

Words fail me................

nomadking 10-07-2020 09:26

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by figgyburn (Post 36043070)

Quote:

In order to be considered “accomplices,” [for racial justice] White employees must give up “comfort,” “guaranteed physical safety,” “expectations or presumptions of emotional safety,” “control over other people and over the land,” and “relationships with some other white people.”
White employees were also urged to give up “niceties from neighbors and colleagues,” “the certainty of your job,” and “accepting jobs and promotions when we are not qualified, including racial equity jobs.”
If giving up "guaranteed physical safety" means mixing more with Black people, isn't that implying that Black people are the actual problem?

Mr K 10-07-2020 09:49

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by figgyburn (Post 36043070)

Fox 'news' can have that effect, it's bad for your health...

nomadking 10-07-2020 10:28

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36043073)
Fox 'news' can have that effect, it's bad for your health...

Are you saying it's not true?:rolleyes:
I did a search for "Interrupting Internalized" to find other publications reporting the story. It's quite scary that the term has been used to imply White racism for several years. Even scarier when you read the articles.

The initial report came as a result of request from the Discovery Institute.
Quote:

Last month, the City of Seattle’s Office of Civil Rights sent an email inviting “white City employees” to attend a training session on “Interrupting Internalized Racial Superiority and Whiteness,” a program designed to help white workers examine their “complicity in the system of white supremacy” and “interrupt racism in ways that are accountable to Black, Indigenous and People of Color.”. Hoping to learn more, I submitted a public records request for all documentation related to the training. The results are disturbing.
NY Post
Washington Examiner

Carth 10-07-2020 11:35

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by figgyburn (Post 36043070)


Brilliant . . I wonder how many attended and are now confused about who they are, what they are, why they are and where they are :D


Imagine the reaction when (for example) a white police officer attends the scene of a Black gang fight and shouts to them "come on guys, give it a rest, I'm one of you now"

Only in America eh . . . for now :rolleyes:

nomadking 10-07-2020 12:05

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36043089)
Brilliant . . I wonder how many attended and are now confused about who they are, what they are, why they are and where they are :D


Imagine the reaction when (for example) a white police officer attends the scene of a Black gang fight and shouts to them "come on guys, give it a rest, I'm one of you now"

Only in America eh . . . for now :rolleyes:

Stop being so deluded. Tip of the iceberg stuff. The mindset has been in place in the US, Canada, and the UK for years. Difficult to nail down any search criteria.
Eg UK
Quote:

The Challenge of Racism in a Post Racism Society - Dr Isha Mckenzie-Mavinga
...

Tuckwell (2002) adds her thoughts on the silence, which occurs when the theme of racism is being discussed.
...
(P.138) White therapists need to get in touch with their deep-seated racist impulses. If we are to overcome the
internal racist within us, and find release from the guilt, fear and shame that bind us,
we need to meet the
‘shadow’ side of our psyche and begin to integrate the acceptable parts of ourselves. (P.209)
US Last year
Quote:

People of color participate in affinity caucus in order to:
Provide a safe space for people of color to talk about and address experiences of
racism
Talk about racism and how it affects people of color without having to explain it to
white people
Gain tools to talk about racism
Create an alternative power base for people of color
Build relationships
Provide a space to address how internalized racism and internalized inferiority
can hold people of color and racial justice work back


White people participate in affinity caucusing in order
to:
Work through guilt, shame & other barriers that hold white people back from
engaging in race conversations and doing racial justice work

Ask questions and explore ideas that help white people learn about racism
without having to learn at the expense of people of color
Hold each other accountable for actions and behaviors
Build relationships
Gain tools to talk about racism, white supremacy and privilege
Remind white people that work needs to be done to dismantle racism every day

Carth 10-07-2020 12:24

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36043092)
Stop being so deluded. Tip of the iceberg stuff. The mindset has been in place in the US, Canada, and the UK for years. Difficult to nail down any search criteria.


Really? That's news to me.

Maybe I've missed it all, possibly due to my propensity for ignoring stuff pushed out by deadheads in order to make my life 'have more meaning and be more rewarding' . . . like theirs seems to be :D

nomadking 10-07-2020 12:52

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36043093)
Really? That's news to me.

Maybe I've missed it all, possibly due to my propensity for ignoring stuff pushed out by deadheads in order to make my life 'have more meaning and be more rewarding' . . . like theirs seems to be :D

The racist anti-White rhetoric and mindset has been around for years.

Sephiroth 10-07-2020 13:31

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
What exactly is "the internal racist within us"?

Is it a person who does not want his/her culture replaced by another culture?

Is it a person who fears the birth rate of a particular large minority? Is it a person who believes there is a master plan for this being managed from another country?



nomadking 10-07-2020 13:42

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Who in their right mind wants give up...
Quote:

comfort,” “guaranteed physical safety,” “expectations or presumptions of emotional safety,” , “relationships with some other white people.”
White employees were also urged to give up “niceties from neighbors and colleagues,” “the certainty of your job,”
If being racist achieves your physical and emotional safety, isn't that a good idea?:confused:

Hugh 10-07-2020 15:17

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36043103)
What exactly is "the internal racist within us"?

Is it a person who does not want his/her culture replaced by another culture?

Is it a person who fears the birth rate of a particular large minority? Is it a person who believes there is a master plan for this being managed from another country?



As you are an avid advocate of the benefits of British Colonialism and our Imperial past, the irony of your statements is hilarious... :D

ianch99 10-07-2020 15:41

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36043117)
As you are an avid advocate of the benefits of British Colonialism and our Imperial past, the irony of your statements is hilarious... :D

:LOL: Priceless :)

Sephiroth 10-07-2020 18:23

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36043117)
As you are an avid advocate of the benefits of British Colonialism and our Imperial past, the irony of your statements is hilarious... :D

You are being extremely silly. Trust you Hugh to take my remarks on African corruption and dictatorship as being advocacy of colonialism and Imperialism. Everybody else understood my point. You just like going on the attack.


---------- Post added at 17:21 ---------- Previous post was at 17:20 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36043119)
:LOL: Priceless :)

... and I expected nothing less from you.

---------- Post added at 17:23 ---------- Previous post was at 17:21 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36043117)
As you are an avid advocate of the benefits of British Colonialism and our Imperial past, the irony of your statements is hilarious... :D

Quote:

What Hugh highlighted from my post:
Is it a person who believes there is a master plan for this being managed from another country?

Did you deliberately misunderstand me or need I make it clearer? Is there a foreign country with a long term plan for taking over the UK by a different culture?

Hugh 14-07-2020 12:05

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36043125)
You are being extremely silly. Trust you Hugh to take my remarks on African corruption and dictatorship as being advocacy of colonialism and Imperialism. Everybody else understood my point. You just like going on the attack.


---------- Post added at 17:21 ---------- Previous post was at 17:20 ----------



... and I expected nothing less from you.

---------- Post added at 17:23 ---------- Previous post was at 17:21 ----------





Did you deliberately misunderstand me or need I make it clearer? Is there a foreign country with a long term plan for taking over the UK by a different culture?

Not that I know of - unless you mean the USA, with it’s Coca-Colonisation of the world..

nomadking 14-07-2020 12:24

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36043125)
You are being extremely silly. Trust you Hugh to take my remarks on African corruption and dictatorship as being advocacy of colonialism and Imperialism. Everybody else understood my point. You just like going on the attack.


---------- Post added at 17:21 ---------- Previous post was at 17:20 ----------



... and I expected nothing less from you.

---------- Post added at 17:23 ---------- Previous post was at 17:21 ----------





Did you deliberately misunderstand me or need I make it clearer? Is there a foreign country with a long term plan for taking over the UK by a different culture?

Why does it have to a be a specific country or group. There is a thing called "Common Purpose". People and groups acting towards a common aim, without any interaction or coordination between them. Eg Are all the violent acts committed in the name of Islam or ISIS, only carried out at the specific request of a country or group? Or is there so much indoctrination churned out by certain countries and groups, that people act on that indoctrination all by themselves.

Sephiroth 14-07-2020 13:55

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36043413)
Not that I know of - unless you mean the USA, with it’s Coca-Colonisation of the world..

Yes - I do have a country in mind that''s playing the long game.
I shan't name it but a lot of non-woke people on this thread know what I'm talking about. The clue is in the letter "A".


---------- Post added at 12:55 ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36043417)
Why does it have to a be a specific country or group. There is a thing called "Common Purpose". People and groups acting towards a common aim, without any interaction or coordination between them. Eg Are all the violent acts committed in the name of Islam or ISIS, only carried out at the specific request of a country or group? Or is there so much indoctrination churned out by certain countries and groups, that people act on that indoctrination all by themselves.

Could be a conspiracy, Nomad. You know, the long game.

Hugh 14-07-2020 14:12

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
I was right - I thought you meant Australia. :D

First in the 80s and 90s, taking all the bar jobs in London, now they’re all in IT and Consulting...

1andrew1 14-07-2020 14:31

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36043423)
Yes - I do have a country in mind that''s playing the long game.
I shan't name it but a lot of non-woke people on this thread know what I'm talking about. The clue is in the letter "A".

The sooner the RussiA report is published, the better.

Hugh 14-07-2020 18:13

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36043423)
Yes - I do have a country in mind that''s playing the long game.
I shan't name it but a lot of non-woke people on this thread know what I'm talking about. The clue is in the letter "A".


---------- Post added at 12:55 ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 ----------



Could be a conspiracy, Nomad. You know, the long game.

Thank you for this handy phrase - it will save me typing out "paranoid tin-foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists".

Much appreciated... ;)

nomadking 14-07-2020 18:31

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36043447)
Thank you for this handy phrase - it will save me typing out "paranoid tin-foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists".

Much appreciated... ;)

Are you really trying to say that there isn't a massive anti-white agenda and hysteria out there?:rolleyes:
Just one example.

Quote:

Diversity trainers instructed White employees in “practicing self-talk that affirms our complicity in racism.”
“Racism is not our fault but we are responsible,” one bullet point declared.
In order to be considered “accomplices,” White employees must give up “comfort,” “guaranteed physical safety,” “expectations or presumptions of emotional safety,” “control over other people and over the land,” and “relationships with some other white people.”
White employees were also urged to give up “niceties from neighbors and colleagues,” “the certainty of your job,” and “accepting jobs and promotions when we are not qualified, including racial equity jobs.”


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:41.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum