Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Government & Post Election Discussion (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33705028)

denphone 03-01-2018 05:16

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35930780)
It was a crass pledge as he can't control fare rises that are governed by National Railways.
Thanks to Brexit-induced inflation, fare rises this year are at their highest for many years and not going down too well with hard working commuters. https://news.sky.com/video/passenger...omach-11192982

l am not surprised it ain't going down well when you look what many have to pay for sadly as in many cases it is a third rate service with premium service prices and worst of all some have to stand up for their journey.

Damien 03-01-2018 09:08

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
To be honest I think the price freeze is a bad policy even before you consider part of it could never be delivered on anyway. TFL is a pretty decent provider and as much as I dislike paying more money I would rather the costs reflect the delivery of the service and the continued investment required in the network to avoid it collapsing. If you freeze prices which not only stops that from happening but is a real-terms cut in funding when you take into account inflation. TFL will have to find the money elsewhere or face budgets cuts somewhere else.

The tube is one of the oldest in the world and is dealing with constant increases in capacity. TFL have been continually improving the network from the trains to the signals to entirely new lines and still they have to fight this old network such as modern demands of it.

I am all for cheaper tickets but that should be done by reducing the cost of providing the service whilst protecting future investment rather than artificially freezing fares.

OLD BOY 05-01-2018 10:11

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35930768)
Very sadly things look as bleak as they can get for the NHS. I get that things take time but the Conservatives have been in charge for nearly a decade and recently gave the Civil Service an extra £3bn to pay for some Brexit bureaucrats.

And Labour were in charge for 13 years before that. This is a huge problem and it requires a lot of work to sort it out. Unfortunately, politicians on both sides have found this to be a problem so huge that they could only tinker around the edges or pour more money into it.

At least the government is working on some pratical solutions - training more doctors and nurses, increasing surgery hours, etc. However, this is not a problem you can solve with a click of your fingers. This'll take many years to sort out.

Osem 05-01-2018 11:32

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35930783)
Well I suspect, as you do, that he did and shouldn't have promised it.

So all the stuff about being more trustworthy and getting more done than Boris was a load of old guff and he knew it. These people will say almost anything to get elected and then worry about the consequences which all too often will be promotion, titles, Westminster gravy train... :rolleyes:

No wonder people are cynical.

---------- Post added at 11:32 ---------- Previous post was at 11:30 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35931102)
And Labour were in charge for 13 years before that. This is a huge problem and it requires a lot of work to sort it out. Unfortunately, politicians on both sides have found this to be a problem so huge that they could only tinker around the edges or pour more money into it.

At least the government is working on some pratical solutions - training more doctors and nurses, increasing surgery hours, etc. However, this is not a problem you can solve with a click of your fingers. This'll take many years to sort out.

With the sort of parliamentary majority which would have enabled them to do virtually anything had they wanted to. They didn't and after they left office the NHS was saddled with huge amounts of PFI debt to service. More NHS privatisation went on during that period than since.

OLD BOY 05-01-2018 16:32

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Yes, the Labour opposition have a very cynical approach to the NHS. They do very little while in power then complain about its poor service when they leave office, as if none of that had anything to do with them.

They may have created it, but they are not the best gang to run it.

denphone 05-01-2018 17:15

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35931133)
Yes, the Labour opposition have a very cynical approach to the NHS. They do very little while in power then complain about its poor service when they leave office, as if none of that had anything to do with them.

l don't doubt that but don't give us the old ******** that the Conservatives don't have the same cynical approach to a good many things including the NHS.

---------- Post added at 17:15 ---------- Previous post was at 17:13 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35931133)
They may have created it, but they are not the best gang to run it.

Given my experiences in the last few decades neither is very good at running it as they play politics with it to suit their own political ends sadly.

Mick 07-01-2018 20:42

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
What are Predictions for tomorrows Cabinet reshuffle.... ;)

Mr K 07-01-2018 20:45

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931469)
What are Predictions for tomorrows Cabinet reshuffle.... ;)

Jeremy Hunt for promotion. He's done brilliant job on the NHS....

Osem 07-01-2018 20:45

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931469)
What are Predictions for tomorrows Cabinet reshuffle.... ;)

Someone will blame Brexit... :D

1andrew1 07-01-2018 21:23

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Good question.
I'm hearing that DD, BoJo and the Fox will keep their positions. Education and Transport may see some changes.

The Sunday Times says Greg Clark (business) and Andrea Leadsom are seen as “dead wood” by Downing Street so could be on the way out.

The FT says Mr K's drinking buddy Jeremy Hunt is tipped for promotion.

Mick 07-01-2018 21:42

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
I think if Hunt is moved from the NHS role it will be a start. There are many in the NHS who will celebrate his departure.

Damien 07-01-2018 21:54

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
A lot of the Parliamentary Tory Party like Hunt because they feel he has taken all the flack from the NHS troubles instead of them or the leadership of the party and that he is loyal to both Cameron and May. So it wouldn't a surprise to see him promoted.

Mick 07-01-2018 22:17

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Position for Jacob Rees-Mogg perhaps ?

Damien 07-01-2018 22:25

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931494)
Position for Jacob Rees-Mogg perhaps ?

I would be surprised. Both that he'll be offered one or accept it. I don't think anyone too much on the Brexit or Remain side will be offered one for fear of kicking off a fight. Rees-Mogg is also a rather 'interesting' figure that might draw too much focus both positive and negative....

In terms of new members of the cabinet I think it will consist of fresh faces from the 2010-2015 intake. The next generation etc.

Mick 08-01-2018 00:32

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
This does not sound good....

Tory MP Anne Milton is tipped to replace Jeremy Hunt as Health Secretary.

Her husband, Dr Graham Henderson, has connections to Richard Branson’s Virgin Care. :erm:

denphone 08-01-2018 05:29

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931469)
What are Predictions for tomorrows Cabinet reshuffle.... ;)

You can rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic but the end result is still the same..;)

---------- Post added at 05:27 ---------- Previous post was at 05:25 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931494)
Position for Jacob Rees-Mogg perhaps ?

He is the darling amongst the Tory members so it would not surprise me if he was given a position.

---------- Post added at 05:29 ---------- Previous post was at 05:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931507)
This does not sound good....

Tory MP Anne Milton is tipped to replace Jeremy Hunt as Health Secretary.

Her husband, Dr Graham Henderson, has connections to Richard Branson’s Virgin Care. :erm:

If that is the case then that is cronyism at its very worse..

denphone 08-01-2018 11:46

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
James Brokenshire resigns as Northern Ireland secretary for health reasons.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-politics-live

Lets hope he makes a full recovery from his illness.

Damien 08-01-2018 12:07

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Looks like the Tories compertence has stuck again.

They sent out a WhatsApp message to all Tory MPs that Chris Grayling would be Party Chairman.
A Times Reporter also heard this this morning.
And the Conservative Twitter account tweeted this picture:

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...01/1.jpg:large

The problem? Chris Grayling has not been made Party Chairman :D (It's Brandon Lewis if anyone cares).

denphone 08-01-2018 12:12

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931532)
Looks like the Tories compertence has stuck again.

They sent out a WhatsApp message to all Tory MPs that Chris Grayling would be Party Chairman.
A Times Reporter also heard this this morning.
And the Conservative Twitter account tweeted this picture:

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...01/1.jpg:large

The problem? Chris Grayling has not been made Party Chairman :D (It's Brandon Lewis if anyone cares).

Good grief how can one make such a bungled incompetent mistake like that.:Yikes::eeek:

1andrew1 08-01-2018 12:25

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931532)
Looks like the Tories compertence has stuck again.

They sent out a WhatsApp message to all Tory MPs that Chris Grayling would be Party Chairman.
A Times Reporter also heard this this morning.
And the Conservative Twitter account tweeted this picture:

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...01/1.jpg:large

The problem? Chris Grayling has not been made Party Chairman :D (It's Brandon Lewis if anyone cares).

Their website was down too as the security certificate had not been renewed! http://www.independent.co.uk/life-st...-a8147676.html

denphone 08-01-2018 12:37

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
This Tweet from Rupert Harrison.:D

Quote:

Rupert Harrison
@rbrharrison

So far this reshuffle is both very stable and genius
12:27 PM - Jan 8, 2018

Damien 08-01-2018 17:11

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Hunt remains Health Minister (now renamed to include social care) after refusing a move to Business which in turn means Greg Clark stays. All the Brexit ministers stay in their roles including Johnson. Rudd Stays. Javid stays. Hammon stays. Williamson stays.

A new Party Chairman and NI Secretary.

Terrible reshuffle. Looks like Hunt and Johnson refusing to move scuppered it all.

Kursk 08-01-2018 19:58

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931573)
A new Party Chairman and NI Secretary.

And that's all that was needed; it's not musical chairs, it's primarily about continuity.

I also think Damian Green could have stayed and JB as we know is unwell.

denphone 08-01-2018 20:11

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931573)
Hunt remains Health Minister (now renamed to include social care) after refusing a move to Business which in turn means Greg Clark stays. All the Brexit ministers stay in their roles including Johnson. Rudd Stays. Javid stays. Hammon stays. Williamson stays.

A new Party Chairman and NI Secretary.

Terrible reshuffle. Looks like Hunt and Johnson refusing to move scuppered it all.

And Justine Greening quits government.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-42602570

Damien 08-01-2018 20:14

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Wouldn’t accept the welfare post. Been a bit of a disaster this.

Mick 08-01-2018 21:09

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931621)
Wouldn’t accept the welfare post. Been a bit of a disaster this.

I could not agree more.

Wow, there is something we 'politically' agree on. :D

---------- Post added at 21:09 ---------- Previous post was at 20:48 ----------

Jeremy Hunt seen 'liking a tweet', that mentions the resignation of Justine Greening...

Says he pressed 'like' by accident...

Can someone tell me if Benny Hill will appear from some where next in Downing Street... ?

https://twitter.com/Jeremy_Hunt/stat...61803997384704

Mr K 08-01-2018 21:16

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/stat...832943104?s=17
Quote:

Greening's departure could well be bad news for Govt's Brexit majority - an impassioned Remainer in a marginal seat that voted heavily to Remain. A new mutineer?
It's all part of Theresa masterplan, she's is a remainer after all ,;)

Keep up the good work on the NHS Jeremy, no one could do it like you..

Mick 08-01-2018 21:24

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Yvette Cooper, Labour MP always has a blunt response to incompetence...

Quote:

So 2 people she wanted to move stayed, 2 people she wanted to stay in Cabinet left, 2 people got appointed to the same job in ten minutes, & 2 people got extra words in their titles. Quite a reshuffle
Don't normally agree with the Labour benches but she is spot on.

This was by far the worst Cabinet reshuffle day, ever.

---------- Post added at 21:24 ---------- Previous post was at 21:17 ----------

I have seen enough to be frank...

Someone needs to do this... for real...


Mr K 08-01-2018 21:40

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931630)
Yvette Cooper, Labour MP always has a blunt response to incompetence...



Don't normally agree with the Labour benches but she is spot on.

This was by far the worst Cabinet reshuffle day, ever.

---------- Post added at 21:24 ---------- Previous post was at 21:17 ----------

I have seen enough to be frank...

Someone needs to do this... for real...


So which one of the many talents in the cabinet, will rescue us Mick? :erm:

Damien 08-01-2018 21:47

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931626)
I could not agree more.

Wow, there is something we 'politically' agree on. :D

Almost worrying ;)

I don't understand why they didn't plan better for this? Did no one sound out Hunt to see if he wanted to leave the Health department? Why allow weeks of speculation of a reshuffle without being sure you can pull if off.

Mick 08-01-2018 21:50

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35931633)
So which one of the many talents in the cabinet, will rescue us Mick? :erm:

It's not the cabinet I have issues with, it's the leadership, May is a walking disaster for the Tories. I was prepared to give her a chance but she's monumentally blown it for me. Time to step aside.

I mean that was not the only issue when she gave that speech when she was handed her P45. The set behind her fell apart and she lost her voice.

Nothing Strong and Stable about it....


Mr K 08-01-2018 21:55

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931635)
Nothing Strong and Stable about it....

Be fair, she's one of those 'Stable Genius' type of people ;)

Damien 08-01-2018 22:13

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Greening is probably the weirdest one. By all accounts she was liked in the sector, by her department and her cabinet colleagues. It seems she was doing fine at education yet May moves her anyway? Whilst keeping Hunt at health as he removes to move?

Mick 08-01-2018 22:20

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35931636)
Be fair, she's one of those 'Stable Genius' type of people ;)

Sorry Mr K, don't think Trump approves... :D

BREAKING: Trump disapproves sharing his Stable Genius title with Theresa May...

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/at...1&d=1515449837

1andrew1 08-01-2018 22:55

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931640)
Sorry Mr K, don't think Trump approves... :D

BREAKING: Trump disapproves sharing his Stable Genius title with Theresa May...

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/at...1&d=1515449837

lol :D:D:D

---------- Post added at 22:47 ---------- Previous post was at 22:42 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931638)
Greening is probably the weirdest one. By all accounts she was liked in the sector, by her department and her cabinet colleagues. It seems she was doing fine at education yet May moves her anyway? Whilst keeping Hunt at health as he removes to move?

Policy disagreement with Theresa May. Greening was not obsessed with new grammar schools preferring instead to improve all schools. May's pet interest apart is the establishment of more grammar schools.
Now Remainer Greening will be on the sidelines and keeping a watching brief on Brexit - so another problem Theresa May has created for herself.

---------- Post added at 22:55 ---------- Previous post was at 22:47 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931634)
Almost worrying ;)

I don't understand why they didn't plan better for this? Did no one sound out Hunt to see if he wanted to leave the Health department? Why allow weeks of speculation of a reshuffle without being sure you can pull if off.

Maybe that's what Damian Green's role would have been but surely as you say, someone from May's team would have done their homework and made discrete enquiries through third parties of Hunt, Greening etc.
The same incompetence arose with Toby Young when Theresa May was caught off guard in the Andrew Marr show and shown not to have commissioned research on his social media comments. Basic due diligence.
It seems evident that the accusations of the Government's machinery bowing under the weight of the Brexit negotiations have some validity.

Mr K 08-01-2018 23:01

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931640)
Sorry Mr K, don't think Trump approves... :D

BREAKING: Trump disapproves sharing his Stable Genius title with Theresa May...

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/at...1&d=1515449837

That is such FAKE NEWS ! :D

Mr K 09-01-2018 20:56

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018...plans-appoint/
Quote:

Brexit MPs 'dumbfounded' after Theresa May drops plans to appoint minister for no deal to Cabinet
Loving some of the readers comments in the Torygraph, this evening, never knew such hate and bile was possible ! It keeping me well amused (there's not much in the telly ;)).
Keep up the good work PM !

1andrew1 09-01-2018 21:29

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35931764)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018...plans-appoint/


Loving some of the readers comments in the Torygraph, this evening, never knew such hate and bile was possible ! It keeping me well amused (there's not much in the telly ;)).
Keep up the good work PM !

Lol, it's funny seeing all the Telegraph readers finally waking up to the long overdue realisation that Theresa Mayhem is indeed an apt nickname and that the Coalition of Chaos is an accurate description for her government.

Less funny according to the FT's legal correspondent David Allen Green is this

Quote:

David Allen Green
Losing Lidington and Raab from MoJ will have a serious knock-on effect for EU Withdrawal Bill.
They were the two most able ministers dealing the devil of the legalistic detail.
Now new ministers will have to master the detail, from scratch, while Bill is mid-passage

A mess.

The sensible move re Brexit would have been to have promoted Raab to Justice Secretary until Withdrawal Bill had been finally passed.
Bill already delayed and too complex. Getting yet more ministers up to legalistic speed will cause more problems against a strict timetable.
https://twitter.com/davidallengreen?...-politics-live

Maybe May is secretly sabotaging Brexit!

jonbxx 10-01-2018 08:57

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35931765)
Lol, it's funny seeing all the Telegraph readers finally waking up to the long overdue realisation that Theresa Mayhem is indeed an apt nickname and that the Coalition of Chaos is an accurate description for her government.

Less funny according to the FT's legal correspondent David Allen Green is this


https://twitter.com/davidallengreen?...-politics-live

Maybe May is secretly sabotaging Brexit!

The good news that the new Minister of Justice David Gauke (my MP) used to be a corporate lawyer, breaking a run of four previous minister who weren't legally qualified.

Osem 10-01-2018 10:57

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Typical Labour nastiness and hypocrisy...

https://order-order.com/2018/01/10/t...ynching-mcvey/

So much to say about nastiness, abuse, bullying, intimidation etc. except their own...

denphone 10-01-2018 12:24

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
How Britain thinks so please discuss..

http://britainthinks.com/pdfs/The-Ye...s_09.01.18.pdf

pip08456 10-01-2018 12:55

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Pointless discussing the results of a survey of a small representative sample.

c.2.500 people represent the feelings of over 60m???

Damien 10-01-2018 13:03

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35931812)
Pointless discussing the results of a survey of a small representative sample.

c.2.500 people represent the feelings of over 60m???

Well this is why we have elections rather than let polls decide everything but they don't just get a random sample of 2,500. They balance out the sample with different demographics and then weight it to reflect society. It's not like an internet poll or asking random people in the street.

It does tend to work. They are quite good at this kind of thing and it's in use everyday in all sorts of industries.

Even the polling errors people like to cite are still roughly correct, at least in terms of sheer numbers if not when they try to project seats.

OLD BOY 10-01-2018 13:13

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931815)
Well this is why we have elections rather than let polls decide everything but they don't just get a random sample of 2,500. They balance out the sample with different demographics and then weight it to reflect society. It's not like an internet poll or asking random people in the street.

It does tend to work. They are quite good at this kind of thing and it's in use everyday in all sorts of industries.

Even the polling errors people like to cite are still roughly correct, at least in terms of sheer numbers if not when they try to project seats.

Well, I don't think 2,500 is sufficient when you factor in the fact that elections are won by constituencies. You need to get a bigger sample in all like constituencies to get the accuracy required. It was the failure to do this adequately at the last election that led to the result being such a surprise.

Damien 10-01-2018 13:28

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35931817)
Well, I don't think 2,500 is sufficient when you factor in the fact that elections are won by constituencies. You need to get a bigger sample in all like constituencies to get the accuracy required. It was the failure to do this adequately at the last election that led to the result being such a surprise.

Yeah you have to distinguish between the popular vote and how it translates to seats. Incidentally YouGov tried to do this and got it right. They have a hung parliament with Labour winning Canterbury. But the latter is less exact that the raw numbers where pollsters continue to do ok.

Mr K 10-01-2018 13:34

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35931817)
It was the failure to do this adequately at the last election that led to the result being such a surprise.

They messed it up because they over-compensated for the shy Tory vote, which they under did at the election before. Maybe they should just believe what people are telling them, without having to fiddle it one way or another....

Anyway it won't be so much a shy Tory factor in future, it'll be a dead Tory factor, they are dying out, literally. Tory party membership is now so low they refuse to give out the figures any longer. They'll soon to became an endangered species only to be found ranting in archaic forums ;)

denphone 10-01-2018 13:42

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35931826)
They messed it up because they over-compensated for the shy Tory vote, which they under did at the election before. Maybe they should just believe what people are telling them, without having to fiddle it one way or another....

Anyway it won't be so much a shy Tory factor in future, it'll be a dead Tory factor, they are dying out, literally. Tory party membership is now so low they refuse to give out the figures any longer. They'll soon to became an endangered species only to be found ranting in archaic forums ;)

They have not given them out since 2013 but activists and academics believe they have fallen since then.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42565294

https://www.conservativehome.com/the...rassroots.html

OLD BOY 10-01-2018 18:16

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35931826)
They messed it up because they over-compensated for the shy Tory vote, which they under did at the election before. Maybe they should just believe what people are telling them, without having to fiddle it one way or another....

Anyway it won't be so much a shy Tory factor in future, it'll be a dead Tory factor, they are dying out, literally. Tory party membership is now so low they refuse to give out the figures any longer. They'll soon to became an endangered species only to be found ranting in archaic forums ;)

You are so cynical, Mr K! What you have failed to grasp is that an overwhelming number of people who tend to be left wing when young, turn out to be rabid Tories when they get to that certain age!

heero_yuy 10-01-2018 18:34

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35931867)
You are so cynical, Mr K! What you have failed to grasp is that an overwhelming number of people who tend to be left wing when young, turn out to be rabid Tories when they get to that certain age!

That age where they have to really start to pay money for the socialist agenda.

Mr K 10-01-2018 18:46

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35931867)
You are so cynical, Mr K! What you have failed to grasp is that an overwhelming number of people who tend to be left wing when young, turn out to be rabid Tories when they get to that certain age!

That'll account for the Tories increased 'strong and stable' majority at the last election ;)

Damien 10-01-2018 18:51

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35931867)
You are so cynical, Mr K! What you have failed to grasp is that an overwhelming number of people who tend to be left wing when young, turn out to be rabid Tories when they get to that certain age!

Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35931868)
That age where they have to really start to pay money for the socialist agenda.

Or the age where they benefit most from it.

People vote in their best interests. It's rarely about ideology.

OLD BOY 10-01-2018 19:16

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931873)
Or the age where they benefit most from it.

People vote in their best interests. It's rarely about ideology.

To some extent, but it's more about being older and wiser.

Many school leavers are very idealist and don't appreciate that things are not as straight forward as they first appear. Then, over the years, experience tells you that your original beliefs were just nieve.

That certainly happened to me, and I have heard many accounts of such transformation. It doesn't happen so much the other way around, however, although some experiences (eg a bad boss) can turn some Tory supporters into Labour supporters.

In my case, I still believe that those who are poor should be helped out of their dire situation rather than exploited, that people should be treated equally and paid in line with their skills and abilities rather than for reasons connected with irrelevant factors, such as gender or race. I believe that money should be distributed more fairly but that this should be achieved by increased take home pay rather than through taxation or benefits. The genuinely disabled should be able to get better financial assistance and help and the people who try to cheat the system should be punished severely. All the tax loopholes exploited by the wealthy should be closed down, made easier by simpler laws. And so on.

The change for me was seeing what was possible and what was not, and the realisation that socialism did not ultimately work for anyone, including the poor. My core beliefs remain the same. It's the knowledge of how best to achieve them that has changed.

Damien 10-01-2018 19:47

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35931876)
To some extent, but it's more about being older and wiser.

I think it's a bit convenient that the wise thing to do is triple-lock pensions whilst tripling tuition fees.

Another reason might be rather than more knowledge it's actually that as people accumulate wealth the policies which benefit them change. You might be all for a radical increase in home building until you face the prospect of it depressing the value of your newly purchased home. A cut to jobseekers allowance for the under-25s is less of a concern when you're over 25.

This would also explain why the same trend doesn't happen for people who work in the public sector.

This is obviously a simplification, exceptions exists, but in general older demographics vote Tory because it benefits them and younger voters vote Labour because they believe it will benefit them.

denphone 10-01-2018 19:51

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931879)
I think it's a bit convenient that the wise thing to do is triple-lock pensions whilst tripling tuition fees.


Its what you call electoral bribery nothing more nothing less...

Damien 10-01-2018 19:58

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35931880)
Its what you call electoral bribery nothing more nothing less.

Bribe or doing what your voters want. Labour do the same thing, vote for us and we'll spend more on 'x'.

To be fair this time around the Tories did try to say they won't offer much, might even spend less on pensions and even had the social care policy and got pilloried for it. They're not going to make that mistake again.

Maggy 10-01-2018 20:17

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931881)
Bribe or doing what your voters want. Labour do the same thing, vote for us and we'll spend more on 'x'.

To be fair this time around the Tories did try to say they won't offer much, might even spend less on pensions and even had the social care policy and got pilloried for it. They're not going to make that mistake again.

They got pilloried for offering something similar to what the opposition were offering after they had poured scorn on those same offerings.;)

denphone 10-01-2018 20:27

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931881)
Bribe or doing what your voters want. Labour do the same thing, vote for us and we'll spend more on 'x'.

To be fair this time around the Tories did try to say they won't offer much, might even spend less on pensions and even had the social care policy and got pilloried for it. They're not going to make that mistake again.

l don't disagree as both parties are as culpable as each other when it comes to electoral sweeteners.

Damien 10-01-2018 20:50

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35931882)
They got pilloried for offering something similar to what the opposition were offering after they had poured scorn on those same offerings.;)

It's not socialist if the Tories do it. ;)

That said I thought the social care policy wasn't too bad. Someone has to pay somewhere. At least this way you got to keep your home until you die, the flaw to me was that it became a lottery on if you got dementia or not.

And it also highlighted the other side of your example. The Tories took some Ed Miliband policies are suddenly they're decent policies to the right-wing press and they're barbaric to Labour. The Tories essentially proposed a bigger inheritance tax to pay for social care and suddenly Labour were outraged.

OLD BOY 10-01-2018 22:12

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35931871)
That'll account for the Tories increased 'strong and stable' majority at the last election ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931879)
I think it's a bit convenient that the wise thing to do is triple-lock pensions whilst tripling tuition fees.

Another reason might be rather than more knowledge it's actually that as people accumulate wealth the policies which benefit them change. You might be all for a radical increase in home building until you face the prospect of it depressing the value of your newly purchased home. A cut to jobseekers allowance for the under-25s is less of a concern when you're over 25.

This would also explain why the same trend doesn't happen for people who work in the public sector.

This is obviously a simplification, exceptions exists, but in general older demographics vote Tory because it benefits them and younger voters vote Labour because they believe it will benefit them.

That doesn’t represent how I think at all!

---------- Post added at 22:12 ---------- Previous post was at 22:10 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931892)
It's not socialist if the Tories do it. ;)

That said I thought the social care policy wasn't too bad. Someone has to pay somewhere. At least this way you got to keep your home until you die, the flaw to me was that it became a lottery on if you got dementia or not.

And it also highlighted the other side of your example. The Tories took some Ed Miliband policies are suddenly they're decent policies to the right-wing press and they're barbaric to Labour. The Tories essentially proposed a bigger inheritance tax to pay for social care and suddenly Labour were outraged.

They were simply taking account of public views.

Mick 11-01-2018 08:06

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Well well well, Corbynites of the hard left variety, will be a bit miffed at Jeremy’s stance on reversing the ban on Daily Mail, on Virgin Trains....

http://uk.businessinsider.com/jeremy...branson-2018-1

denphone 11-01-2018 08:30

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931942)
Well well well, Corbynites of the hard left variety, will be a bit miffed at Jeremy’s stance on reversing the ban on Daily Mail, on Virgin Trains....

http://uk.businessinsider.com/jeremy...branson-2018-1

Not many from the hard left on here Mick.;)

Damien 11-01-2018 08:32

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931942)
Well well well, Corbynites of the hard left variety, will be a bit miffed at Jeremy’s stance on reversing the ban on Daily Mail, on Virgin Trains....

http://uk.businessinsider.com/jeremy...branson-2018-1

They're trolling the Daily Mail. Both in suggesting this will happen after they privatise the rail networks but also referencing a Chairman Mao quote. An actually pretty dodgy quote at that. The 'a hundred flowers will bloom' is a reference to this campaign by Mao where he temporary allowed criticism of his regime only for many of those who did to later find themselves targetted.

The ban itself isn't so much but a commercial decision not to sell the Mail they're dressing up for PR purposes. Virgin are allowed to choose which papers they stock.

Mick 11-01-2018 08:50

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931946)
They're trolling the Daily Mail. Both in suggesting this will happen after they privatise the rail networks but also referencing a Chairman Mao quote. An actually pretty dodgy quote at that. The 'a hundred flowers will bloom' is a reference to this campaign by Mao where he temporary allowed criticism of his regime only for many of those who did to later find themselves targetted.

The ban itself isn't so much but a commercial decision not to sell the Mail they're dressing up for PR purposes. Virgin are allowed to choose which papers they stock.

But by doing so, they are being very political. I don’t read any newspaper, but I do not agree on censorship of this kind. We all have our different views on immigration, it does need tighter control, the U.K. cannot sustain hundreds of thousands of people coming here every year. People who claim this is xenophobia are talking nonsense. People who claim it’s racist, are equally doing the same.

This is Branson probably throwing a pathetic tantrum, because of Brexit, which he venomously opposed and he is likely using the Mail as a scapegoat.

Tim Farron had his views on gay sex, but I didn’t see anyone suggesting he should be banned from anywhere. It’s hypocrisy again, at it’s highest form from some liberals.

Damien 11-01-2018 09:09

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931947)
But by doing so, they are being very political. I don’t read any newspaper, but I do not agree on censorship of this kind. We all have our different views on immigration, it does need tighter control, the U.K. cannot sustain hundreds of thousands of people coming here every year. People who claim this is xenophobia are talking nonsense. People who claim it’s racist, are equally doing the same.

This is Branson probably throwing a pathetic tantrum, because of Brexit, which he venomously opposed and he is likely using the Mail as a scapegoat.

I wouldn't ban The Mail. I think it's more evidence of American-style culture wars entering British life which I don't like. The Mail itself is probably the biggest cheerleader for such a war, far more than The Sun, with it's tendency to label judges as enemies of the people and opposition as traitors. The Mail is keener than anyone to frame everything as us vs them.

Mr K 11-01-2018 09:16

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931948)
I wouldn't ban The Mail. I think it's more evidence of American-style culture wars entering British life which I don't like.

Ah, but Mick would love an American style culture ! tbh not sure why he doesn't emigrate, would Trump let him in ?? ;)

Passengers are always free to buy a Daily Hate before they board the train, you can never rely on their stocks of toilet paper.....

Mick 11-01-2018 09:34

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
American style culture is here already. We’re living it.

Just a few things we don’t want. A Price board that doesn’t display true price, with added tax when you get to the tills.

We don’t start calling the pavement a sidewalk.

We don’t adopt the ‘No Jaywalking’ law.

Things we do want.

Free refills in cafes and restaurants.

Greater tipping culture.

More Election Enthusiasm.

Mr K 11-01-2018 09:47

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931953)
American style culture is here already. We’re living it.

Just a few things we don’t want. A Price board that doesn’t display true price, with added tax when you get to the tills.

We don’t start calling the pavement a sidewalk.

We don’t adopt the ‘No Jaywalking’ law.

Things we do want.

Free refills in cafes and restaurants.

Greater tipping culture.

More Election Enthusiasm.

They maybe what you want Mick, but it's not for everyone !

Free refills, just makes the obesity epidemic worse. Greater tipping causes confusion all round, and even less wages for staff. Election enthusiasm ? Good luck with that !

We need to be British and proud, celebrate our own culture, not some country 5000 miles away. If anything the culture of our European neighbours is more relevant. Give me French wine and cheese rather than a Big Mac !

heero_yuy 11-01-2018 10:28

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

A LABOUR MP has called for council tax to be doubled on some UK homes to combat local authority cuts - with the average home seeing a £350 rise.

Chris Williamson, a close ally of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, proposed a 100 per cent hike for properties worth more than £320,000.

Band D homes valued between £68,000 and £88,000 would see a 20 per cent increase in their council tax under the plans, adding up to an average rise of £350 a year.

Those worth less, in Bands A-C, would have their contribution frozen.

The proposals were slammed as "reckless" by the Tories, who argued they would hit ordinary workers unfairly.
Source

£320,000 is the starting price for a very modest terraced house in our area.

Quote:

“They're not even in government but still Labour can't help themselves in wanting to put their hands in hardworking households' pockets to pay for their reckless plans.

“Chris Williamson is a key Corbyn ally so if ever they got into power taxpayers would certainly suffer badly.”

Osem 11-01-2018 10:29

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Andrew Neil exposing Labour hypocrisy:

https://order-order.com/2018/01/10/d...lent-misogyny/

Mr K 11-01-2018 10:56

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35931960)
Andrew Neil exposing Labour hypocrisy:

https://order-order.com/2018/01/10/d...lent-misogyny/

Do you ever get deja-vu ? I do. Maybe I read the same (hate)site all the time .... :erm: :zzz:

Maggy 11-01-2018 11:26

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35931960)
Andrew Neil exposing Labour hypocrisy:

https://order-order.com/2018/01/10/d...lent-misogyny/

https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...ncrease-Budget

He does it to everyone..

Damien 11-01-2018 11:32

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931953)
Things we do want.

Greater tipping culture.

BOOOOOOO!

The tipping culture is a result of the fact they pay peanuts for wages for many service-based jobs that they have to make it up in tips. It turns tips into a near-compulsory act otherwise you're undermining someone's ability to live and, in my opinion, allows companies to exploit their staff.

In the UK you're still free to tip as you please but with the staff getting compensated better anyway. A tip is generally for good service as opposed to average service but that waiter needs to eat too.

Maggy 11-01-2018 11:46

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931982)
BOOOOOOO!

The tipping culture is a result of the fact they pay peanuts for wages for many service-based jobs that they have to make it up in tips. It turns tips into a near-compulsory act otherwise you're undermining someone's ability to live and, in my opinion, allows companies to exploit their staff.

In the UK you're still free to tip as you please but with the staff getting compensated better anyway. A tip is generally for good service as opposed to average service but that waiter needs to eat too.

:clap:

heero_yuy 11-01-2018 11:47

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35931982)
In the UK you're still free to tip as you please but with the staff getting compensated better anyway. A tip is generally for good service as opposed to average service but that waiter needs to eat too.

Many places the tips all go in the tronc to be shared by all the serving staff rather than the individual that you give the tip to.

denphone 11-01-2018 11:53

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35931984)
Many places the tips all go in the tronc to be shared by all the serving staff rather than the individual that you give the tip to.

Which l don't agree with personally as we like to give a good tip for good waiting service by a individual rather then it going into a pot to be shared around when some of those waiters in that place might be a load of rubbish.

TheDaddy 11-01-2018 15:39

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35931947)
But by doing so, they are being very political. I don’t read any newspaper, but I do not agree on censorship of this kind. We all have our different views on immigration, it does need tighter control, the U.K. cannot sustain hundreds of thousands of people coming here every year. People who claim this is xenophobia are talking nonsense. People who claim it’s racist, are equally doing the same.

This is Branson probably throwing a pathetic tantrum, because of Brexit, which he venomously opposed and he is likely using the Mail as a scapegoat.

Tim Farron had his views on gay sex, but I didn’t see anyone suggesting he should be banned from anywhere. It’s hypocrisy again, at it’s highest form from some liberals.

It's not censorship, you can still read the Mail on the train you just can't buy it from Virgin, you can't buy The Sun, The Star, the Express, the Telegraph or the Guardian on them either which tells me it's a PR stunt designed to Virgin maximum publicity.

1andrew1 12-01-2018 00:24

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35932012)
It's not censorship, you can still read the Mail on the train you just can't buy it from Virgin, you can't buy The Sun, The Star, the Express, the Telegraph or the Guardian on them either which tells me it's a PR stunt designed to Virgin maximum publicity.

Exactly. Virgin only sell something like 70 copies of the Mail a day so not worth their bother, best to use the retail space for something else. People buy their copies at WH Smith or read online. Virgin also sold the sister paper Mail on Sunday which supported Remain so the Brexit conspiracy theory is wrong.
Maybe rather than let the press talk about the Virgin East Coast bail-out they're distracting people to this non-story whilst trying to win over progressive customers and staff who previously might have favoured nationalisation.

Chris 12-01-2018 14:42

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Newspapers are a waste of space in a Rail buffet car because you have to sell them at face value. It makes more sense for Rail companies to line the shelves with items they can sell at a ridiculous mark-up. There’s no story here, except perhaps the vainglorious posturing of Richard Branson. Anyone who wants to know what Paul Dacre thinks Immigrants are doing to the country or what Could Cause Cancer can buy the Daily Heil at a newsagent before they board the train, or else pay for Virgin’s ridiculously expensive Wi-Fi and access HeilOnline.

Hugh 12-01-2018 15:52

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
If you book Standard tickets with Virgin East Coast direct, the WiFi is free.

Chris 12-01-2018 20:57

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
It’s being made free as a condition of franchise renewals across the national rail network. For the time being, my local inter city route (west coast) is still charging for it, thanks to the civil service franchising debacle that has delayed the west coast franchise renewal for a number of years.

Mr K 12-01-2018 21:21

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35932211)
If you book Standard tickets with Virgin East Coast direct, the WiFi is free.

WiFi?! I'd be grateful for a train that isn't 40 years old, doesn't looks like a 1970s bus and has somewhere to sit down !

Hugh 12-01-2018 22:59

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35932275)
WiFi?! I'd be grateful for a train that isn't 40 years old, doesn't looks like a 1970s bus and has somewhere to sit down !

Well, none of the VEC trains I’ve been on are like that...

Mr Banana 12-01-2018 23:02

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35932291)
Well, none of the VEC trains I’ve been on are like that...

Neither are the Virgin West Coast trains

Maggy 13-01-2018 09:25

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
I think we have wandered away from a discussion about government and post election news

heero_yuy 15-01-2018 13:37

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Jeremy Corbyn today tightened his grip over Labour as three of his hard-left allies were elected to the party's ruling body.

Jon Lansman, the founder of Momentum, and two left-wing activists will join the Labour national executive committee, which sets the party's official rules.

Among the centrists who were beaten by a two-to-one margin was comedian Eddie Izzard - known for losing every election he's ever contested.

The three new NEC members - all backed by the Labour Marxists group - are Mr Lansman, Manchester councillor Yasmine Dar and campaigner Rachel Garnham.

They won nearly 200,000 votes between them after appealing to the grassroots Labour members who signed up to the party because of Mr Corbyn.

After his victory was confirmed today, Mr Lansman crowed that it was a step closer to taking Labour back to its far-left 1970s past.
Source

Be afraid. Be very afraid.

Mr K 15-01-2018 14:31

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
[QUOTE=heero_yuy;35932606] [url=https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5344154/corbyn-tightens-grip-on-labour-as-three-of-his-allies-are-elected-to-powerful-ruling-body-defeating-moderates-including-eddie-izzard/ [/QUOTE]

I love the 'Lansome crowed' bit. Very Sun :D

heero_yuy 15-01-2018 15:02

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35932613)
I love the 'Lansome crowed' bit. Very Sun :D

I suppose if you're hell-bent on cocking up the economy then you would be crowing.:D

Mr K 15-01-2018 15:07

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35932618)
I suppose if you're hell-bent on cocking up the economy then you would be crowing.:D

This Govt. don't appear to need any help with that.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/bu...-a8155296.html
Quote:

The UK economy grew at its weakest rate in five years in 2017, according to the latest forecast by PwC.

The accountancy and professional services firm said on Friday that its nowcasting model suggested GDP grew by 0.4 per cent in the final three months of the year.

This would take calendar year growth to 1.8 per cent, down from 1.9 per cent in 2016 and the weakest expansion since the 1.5 per cent growth seen in 2012, at the height of the eurozone crisis.

The UK economy has slowed over the past 12 months due to the increase in inflation stemming from the drop in the pound in the wake of the 2016 Brexit vote, which has squeezed household disposable incomes.

Business investment has also come in much weaker than expected, which surveys suggest is due to uncertainty among firms related to post-Brexit trade arrangements.

The UK slowdown comes as GDP growth in the eurozone and the US picks up strongly.

1andrew1 16-01-2018 23:20

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35932606)
Source

Be afraid. Be very afraid.

Don't be, Corbyn could be too old to be PM.
Quote:

Senior frontbenchers are concerned Mr Corbyn may have to commit to being in office at the age of almost 78.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a8162761.html

heero_yuy 17-01-2018 09:21

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35932814)
Don't be, Corbyn could be too old to be PM.

There's always Diane Abbott. :erm:

papa smurf 17-01-2018 11:31

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35932829)
There's always Diane Abbott. :erm:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKu7TYWNxqA


gulp.:shocked:

Kursk 17-01-2018 12:24

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
As long as they give Jeremy regular hot cocoa and ensure he has his string vest on and gets his over-65's free flu jab, he'll be ok. He could guarantee his legacy if he and Diane were to start a family.

denphone 18-01-2018 06:38

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Taxpayers face £199bn bill over PFI projects, watchdog says.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/t...-a3743011.html

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...s-audit-office
Quote:

The National Audit Office (NAO) found 716 deals are currently operational under PFI and its successor PF2, with annual charges amounting to £10.3 billion in 2016/17 and due to stretch into the 2040s.

Hugh 18-01-2018 11:19

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Basically Wonga writ large

heero_yuy 20-01-2018 10:51

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Dozens of Labour moderates MPs face the axe from their constituencies after Jeremy Corbyn refused to rule out deselections yesterday.

The Labour leader chose not to slap down suggestions from hard-left campaigners that Labour MPs should have the threat of deselection “hanging over them”.

He confirmed the party would “look at democracy within the party and look at the process of selections”.

He added that MPs “should all be accountable all the time.”

It comes in a week where the founder of the left wing pro-Corbyn group Momentum was elected to Labour’s National Executive Committee alongside two other left wingers.
Source

Looks like the far left is tightening its grip on the Labour party.

heero_yuy 23-01-2018 10:07

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Tone's not very happy:

Quote:

Tony Blair has blasted Labour branding it “much worse” than it was during the party’s wilderness years in the 1980s.

The former PM slammed Jeremy Corbyn saying he had allowed “extreme elements” to dominate the party.

Labour’s most successful leader lamented the state of the party he led to three election victories in an interview with the Evening Standard.

In his view the party is under worse stewardship now than it was under Michael Foot during his ill fated opposition to Margaret Thatcher.

He said: “Now is worse, much worse, because it’s happening with the support of the leadership.

"They are bringing back the more extreme elements that were either outside the party or marginalised.”
Source

Original source

OLD BOY 23-01-2018 16:31

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35933511)
Tone's not very happy:



Source

Original source

That's the first time I've agreed with Tony Blair in a while.

pip08456 23-01-2018 16:34

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35933577)
That's the first time I've agreed with Tony Blair in a while.

It's the only time EVER!

OLD BOY 23-01-2018 16:40

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35933207)
Source

Looks like the far left is tightening its grip on the Labour party.

Well they shouldn't just sit there like turkeys waiting for Christmas. The moderate Labour MPs need to form a new offshoot party while they still can, and show Joe Public how they are making a difference in the House of Commons.

If there are more of them than the hard Left who want to stick with Corbyn, they will immediately become the official opposition. That will also give them the opportunity to agree a new constitution for the new party, implementing sensible election rules and taking away the power of the unions.

If they do nothing, they deserve to get de-selected. Now is the time to be bold.

Damien 23-01-2018 17:59

Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
 
The voters haven’t shown much encouragement to anyone thinking of starting a moderate centrist party. Moderates seem to be losing across politics other than in France.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:49.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum