![]() |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
Operation Chalice in Telford. From 2013 Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
I love when people post that 2 year old article without realising he’s back in jail...
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Update from Telford
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Another group found, and there's one of them who is not like the others.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-offences.html |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
One offence out of more than 150 in this case. Not a huge proportion is it?:rolleyes: I want to know how these gangs can so easily form and get together, when it is portrayed as being much more difficult for a non-Muslims to form such a group. Looks like a connection with a case of 4 years ago. One of them is meant to be currently serving a 13 year sentence. Link Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
Hang him. |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
I saw a discussion on Twitter about this yesterday where someone pointed out that 80% of these gangs are made up of Asian men, somebody else’s replied saying “No, the common denominator is it always seem to be based in Yorkshire. It’s nothing to do with race”.
Absolute madness. |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
And whereabouts in Yorkshire are these places? Rochdale, Heywood, Carlisle, Preston, Oldham, Oxford, High Wycombe, Blackpool, Telford, Burnley, Leicester, Newcastle, Peterborough, Derby, Aylesbury, Banbury, Middlesbrough,etc? Plus areas they were trafficked to, eg Birmingham. These gangs can't really be considered paedophile gangs. The age of the girls is more to do with being able to entice them into the situation and control them with alcohol, drugs, and violence. |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
It’s 84%
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
Also (deliberately?) muddying the waters is putting 2 distinct groups together. Quote:
The Muslim gangs simply seem to be able to ask the person next to them. How is that not scary beyond belief? |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Yep whatever.
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Telford (town of 170,000)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Police were touring the takeaways at night to warn young girls. It isn't just White girls they targeted. Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-office-report
Nazir Afzal, the former chief crown prosecutor in the north-west, who brought prosecutions over the Rochdale grooming gangs, welcomed the report. “It confirms that white men remain the most common offenders, which is something rarely mentioned by rightwing commentators,” he said. “However, it is not shy in reflecting that south Asian and British Pakistani men are disproportionately found in high-profile cases. |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
What else could be expected when you redefine terms.
Quote:
The "Asian gangs" come under that "group" heading and are very distinct from that definition of "gang". Again, using "Two or more people" as a measure widens the criteria, that is well outside these "Asian gangs". Don't see how you can equate 2 paedophiles that perhaps met in prison, having just one victim, with a "gang" of 8 people with dozens of victims that are trafficked out to dozens of men. The two are not remotely similar. The nearest non-"Asian" connection seems to be:- Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
So in effect you're saying that Nazir & Pritti are wrong? Is that correct?
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
I think what he's saying is that the 'definitions' of certain criteria are so widespread that you could interpret it any way you want in order to 'prove' what you're saying . . as is usually the case :p: |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
Not long ago another report on gun crime came out. Yet again it was misused. The term "gun crime" covers an awful lot, ranging from marginally unsafe storage of validly registered shotguns to ownership and use to kill, in connection with several fully automatic weapons. Hardly the same are they? Yet they were conveniently lumped together to dilute the number of those responsible for the more serious gun crimes. This misuse of reports and studies has been happening for some time. They widen the scope of definitions to include as many people as possible when there actually distinct groups. A classic example is use of the term BAME, to avoid separating out the distinct parts of that group. Use in this context of the term "Asian" is also misleading, not many Sikhs, Hindus, Chinese, Japanese etc, involved. |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
You would expect the majority of offenders to be white in a country that is 90% white.
If you read the report (or skim it) they don't make any real other insights into if one group is overrepresented due to poor data collection. Still, I think this is better than basing your impression on media reports. |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
http://news.sky.com/story/calderdale...ictim-12304695
I don’t know if this is a new one or a re-reporting of an existing one. I live in Calderdale so think I would have known about it. Anyway, same old same old. I wonder if those gentlemen that demonstrated outside Batley Grammar schools so passionately about the effect of their children being exposed to pictures of Mohammed will do so for a child raped by the worshippers of Mohammed?* * that is an assumption on my part, but I expect to be accurate. |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
IT CONTINUES :(
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
:clap::clap: |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
You're kind of left with 2 possible scenarios: that Google is involved in a wide-scale conspiracy to ensure only Asian-based gangs show highest in the rankings, or that the overwhelming number of these grooming gangs involve Asian-heritage men. |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
As the somebody in a documentary a while back said, "If you haven't found a similar gang in a town, you haven't looked". |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
It’s because I find it easier to type “Asian” than “Indian/Pakistani/Bangladeshi” etc.
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
Whereabouts in Asia, is Somalia? Link Quote:
Quote:
Couple of months ago. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
When I used to live in Leicester there were a lot of rumoured grooming gangs. These gangs were made up of Indian men as well as Bangladeshi and Pakistani. Now call me lazy if you wish but I find it easier to just say "Asian" that say all those nationalities in one sentence. |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
Link Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Amusing that you quote the Catholic Herald when commenting on child grooming
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
More of the same, best guess names involved will be more Khan than Smith?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-58030849 |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
Do you fancy a wager? |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
The fullfact report, and possibly Mr K have conflated child sex offences in
general with the specific child grooming gangs. That is misleading and prolly driven by wokeism. |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
However the full fact report is an 'inconvenient truth' about sex offences. |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
Yet again I have to point out that in these sort of cases the girls are trafficked around to others around the country, who don't end up in the convicted column, because they are not full identified. So even if you include individuals, then the gang figures multiply up and will even be higher than the lone White individuals. Eg Nine convictions, but several times that involved and NOT in any figures. Link Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
Can you please confirm? |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Mr Khan? Mr K? Nah.
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Your immediate stance of defence and whataboutism on this is appalling. |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Birds of a feather flock together..and race may play a part but not the only part.
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
Not sure it has too much to do with the age of the girls(ie paedophilia), but more to do with availability and controlling with alcohol and drugs, along with threats and use of violence. Using them for sex is one thing, but the other aspects of trafficking, use of alcohol and drugs, and threats and use of violence, take things to another level completely. To be able to easily find other "birds" who were prepared to treat the girls in that way(outside of having sex with them), suggests something innate in that breed of "birds". In general people would likely to be unable to find acquaintances that they could risk asking to join them in illegal activities. The risk of being reported to police would be very high. Perhaps it's being withheld to assist investigators, but I haven't seen any indication of how the separate groups in separate parts of the country found each other. These cases tend to have happened a long time ago, before the level of social media it is today, and in some cases before the internet. |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
“Lone wolf” sex attackers can rightly be any race or colour. But grooming gangs are almost always exclusively Asian. Only those who chose to be blind can deny that. |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
I think that Pierre has it right. |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
They might be Indian, Pakistani, Sri Lanken, Bangladeshi etc. I’m not PC but what I am is lazy, and I find it easier to type “Asian” than all those nationalities. |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
Gangs with origins such as Albania, China, Cambodia, Ukraine, etc tend to be money-making exercises, and the gangs have formed beforehand. |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leeds-58084134
I wonder if the names will be Jones, Smith, Williams etc |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
It surprised me too! https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co....mmon-surnames/ Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Who said I was surprised? I think you’ll find it was quite the opposite.
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Just been said on the BBC One O'clock news that a further 19 men from Bradford have been arrested for historic child sex abuse offences between 2000 and 2005 against one girl. They are aged between 36 and 55.
Looks like they passed her around. No details of their race/religion were given. From 0:25: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000yhwx |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Quote:
No it's the same one people have been ignoring for years for fear of upsetting community relations |
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
Hanging would be too good for them.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:07. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum