Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33663010)

punky 11-05-2010 01:52

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35018819)
You make it sound like it's an unfair request. Let me say it once more. Nearly one in four people voted Lib Dems, yet they got less than 10% of the seats. How the hell do you justify that?


It's not for me to justify it but its not my fault the Lib Dem voters are clustered into disparate constinuency areas. That's a fact of life. Labour dominate the inner cities, Conservatives dominate suburbs and rural areas. Lib Dems have bits in between. Its not my fault, its not the country's fault. The Tories suffered from Labour's gerrymandering you know. Surely its up to the Lib Dems to appeal to the most seats around the country than dominating small pockets of voters.

I have said before I have no issue with the Lib Dems trying bring in a system that suits them. Its self preservation. I'd have no problem if they built a coalition, got the country out of the hole it's in and then a year or two down the line start to pose the question to the public. However they are currently holding our country to ransom over the issue. And the fact they'd rather pal up with Labour if they will guarantee to bring in AV (and they have said, they will) than who would be better at stimulating the economy and protecting rights (clue: its not Labour), adds insult to injury.

Mick 11-05-2010 01:54

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35018813)
Are you not concerned about the fact that a party that nearly 1 in 4 (voting) people in the UK voted for got less than 10% of the seats in the Commons? I think sorting the finances can wait a couple of days in the light of that democratic absurdity.

I think the Traders and Investors out there on the markets would disagree with you and rightly so.

I am sorry but I did not vote at this election so non-important issues were dealt with first - Economics should be the top priority, right now we got the Lib Dems truly showing their true colours - that is them thinking of themselves at the next election which could be months/years off* Delete as appropriate depending on who or what entity becomes in power.

punky 11-05-2010 02:03

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
BTW I suffer from a similar problem as the Lib Dems. My constituency in London is solidly Tory. The majority vote for them because we want them. However my council district covers a small part of my constituency but mostly a large part of inner-city London which is heavily populated with ethnic-minorities. The result: my council is solidly Labour. So me, as well as a lot of other people where I live are ruled by people we didn't vote for despite our majority.

The Lib Dems aren't without my sympathies. However now is not the time to force AV, STV, ITV or BBC or anything else though.

Tezcatlipoca 11-05-2010 02:07

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul M (Post 35018821)
No one needs to justify it - its been the same for 100+ years has it not ? So why the sudden need to change it other than selfish gain on their part.

If electoral tradition means why bother changing anything, perhaps the UK should never have bothered with any of the Reform Acts or the various Representation of the People Acts...

It needs to change because it no longer works properly. It is not representative of the desires of the voters. It disenfranchises voters. It means there are safe seats where your vote is utterly pointless unless you want to vote for the incumbent MP. It means that a party can gain only 9% of the seats on 23% of the vote. It means that a party can gain a majority of seats in the House of Commons while losing the popular vote.

STV is fair & proportional, reduces vote wastage, cuts down on safe seats, & keeps a constituency link.

FPTP

STV



If the Lib Dems were so selfish, they would be in favour of one of the other PR systems, rather than STV, which is determined by the Electoral Reform Society to be the best possible system.

And it is not a sudden need to change it: They have been in favour of Electoral Reform for *years*.

punky 11-05-2010 02:11

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt D (Post 35018824)
I don't believe the Lib Dems have really been saying much. They've pretty much been keeping quiet while negotiations are ongoing.

I do not believe that Mr Hague was being misleading, but perhaps he was unintentionally not 100% accurate in his phrasing.

Come on Matt, if Hague was wrong in what he was saying even though the Lib Dems are furiously negotiating, i'm sure they could muster up at least one person to go on camera and say he's wrong. So come on, conceed that Hague is being accurate.

Quote:

The Lib Dems goal is STV (fair for all parties & for *voters*, other PR systems would favour the LDs more than STV, but STV is the best option according to the ERS), not AV. The Tories would never offer STV though, so they have offered the same as Labour: AV. And I hope Clegg & co. consider it to be enough, as I do.
I don't think from what I have heard the Tories have offered AV, I think Lib Dems offered it concession to STV.

However it comes back to the point that its just not the time and place to be arguing over election reform.

frogstamper 11-05-2010 02:23

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 35018820)
Is Adam Boulton cracking up? The election is over and he still wants to scrap like a street fighter. :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NWAkxKQLQs

He sure is, I thought you were going to post the argument he had with Alasdair Campbell today, this one is even worse.
For somebody who is supposed to be neutral he certainly is lacking a lot of professionalism, maybe he and Sky have been told by their master to follow Fox.

http://www.wordmagazine.co.uk/conten...stair-campbell

Chris 11-05-2010 10:36

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Excellent comment under that video:

Quote:

Boulton really is becoming Murdoch's bitch
:D

---------- Post added at 09:36 ---------- Previous post was at 09:19 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 35018785)
But Labour also offered a referendum, didn't they?

Prior to the election they did offer a referendum on AV. Now they're offering a bill, sans referendum, with a referendum to follow later on other options.

However, they will never get a bill on AV through the commons. The Tories will oppose it because they will be able to say the furthest they are prepared to go is to back a referendum on it, not simply introduce it immediately, and there are plenty of Labour backbenchers, especially in Scotland, who will not back it because they fear the beginning of a slippery slope towards PR that would just about cut Scotland's Labour seats in half and give them to the Tories and the SNP. Labour needs FPTP in Scotland in order to perpetuate the myth that nobody supports the Tories north of the border.

A bill on AV is a promise Labour simply can't deliver, and the Lib Dem negotiating team, if it has any political nous whatsoever, should have seen straight through it immediately. I still think a deal with the Conservatives is the only deal in town and I still think Clegg knows this, but he has been playing chicken with the Tory negotiators to see how many concessions he can get.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 35018817)
Apparently "Dave" wants to bring back Ian Duncan Smith, David Davis and Michael Howard. What happened to "change?" Along with "Willie" Hague, this is more like "Back To The Future." The public had no interest in them the first time round, why bring them back from the dead now? Is it because he has realised he hasn't got a clue what he is doing?

No, it's because in order to get his right-wing backbenchers not to come out in open revolt at the suggestion of a referendum on AV, he has been forced to throw them some concessions of his own.

If you took a serious interest in British party politics instead of just being a Labour fanboy, you would know and understand that Cameron would never choose to offer any sort of job to David Davis (who, incidentally, never ran an election as party leader. And neither did IDS. So I'm wondering what you meant by 'the public had no interest in them'. Was there some secret general election only you were privy to?)

punky 11-05-2010 11:11

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Bit worried: Can Mandleson run for PM? You have to be an elected member of the house of commons for that don't you?

Derek 11-05-2010 11:13

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 35018924)
Bit worried: Can Mandleson run for PM? You have to be an elected member of the house of commons for that don't you?

I don't think he'd let something like rules stop him giving it a go...

Chris 11-05-2010 11:16

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
There's no rule that says you have to be in the commons. However, the last peer of the realm to be PM vacated the office in 1902, so I'd say there is by now an established convention that you do need to be in the Commons rather than the Lords.

Had Mandy had long-term designs on high office in the party, he would have had himself parachuted into a safe seat last week. I reckon you can rest easily in your bed.

Osem 11-05-2010 11:59

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35018931)
In theory Mandelscum can resign and run for election as an MP as did Tony Benn though I wonder who'd vote for him.



Tony benn. Wiki.

I can think of one or two 'contenders' for that honour from these forums....

Derek 11-05-2010 12:05

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35018931)
In theory Mandelscum can resign and run for election as an MP as did Tony Benn though I wonder who'd vote for him.

Big chunks of the West of Scotland for a start. They'd vote for a freshly laid pile of steaming dog turds as long as it had a labour rosette on it. In fact in some cases last week I think they did.

Angua 11-05-2010 12:22

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Just a small point regarding negotiation with both sides. Is it not sensible to have a solution ready to go as an when agreed (by either side), rather than waiting until one fails & then having to start from that point with the others for the next round of horse trading, delaying things still further.

May be worth remembering the "Moral Majority" is actually those who did not vote at all. A larger percentage than voted Tory.

The Tory press in the UK should take a huge amount of blame for the result. Panicking voters with untrue claims about a balanced government. A clearer & more honest result may have been delivered without the press bias.

Maggy 11-05-2010 12:25

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 35018960)
Just a small point regarding negotiation with both sides. Is it not sensible to have a solution ready to go as an when agreed (by either side), rather than waiting until one fails & then having to start from that point with the others for the next round of horse trading, delaying things still further.

May be worth remembering the "Moral Majority" is actually those who did not vote at all. A larger percentage than voted Tory.

The Tory press in the UK should take a huge amount of blame for the result. Panicking voters with untrue claims about a balanced government. A clearer & more honest result may have been delivered without the press bias.

I think the same restrictions that apply to TV programming during an election should apply to the papers..

Saaf_laandon_mo 11-05-2010 12:25

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 35018960)
Just a small point regarding negotiation with both sides. Is it not sensible to have a solution ready to go as an when agreed (by either side), rather than waiting until one fails & then having to start from that point with the others for the next round of horse trading, delaying things still further.

May be worth remembering the "Moral Majority" is actually those who did not vote at all. A larger percentage than voted Tory.

The Tory press in the UK should take a huge amount of blame for the result. Panicking voters with untrue claims about a balanced government. A clearer & more honest result may have been delivered without the press bias.

I think most of those who didn't vote are not Moral at all. I'd describe them as bloody lazy, or at best, suffering from Icantgiveatossatitis, as opposed to not voting out of some principle.

Damien 11-05-2010 12:33

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Saaf_laandon_mo (Post 35018965)
I think most of those who didn't vote are not Moral at all. I'd describe them as bloody lazy, or at best, suffering from Icantgiveatossatitis, as opposed to not voting out of some principle.

Or full time complainers. The decide that it is a travesty there is no party that agrees with them on everything and then spend the next 5 years bleating on about how disenfranchised with politics they are and somehow think we should give a toss. Like that stupid 'Sod the lot' poster with UKIP, just playing on the hyper-cynical members of our country

Maggy 11-05-2010 12:34

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Saaf_laandon_mo (Post 35018965)
I think most of those who didn't vote are not Moral at all. I'd describe them as bloody lazy, or at best, suffering from Icantgiveatossatitis, as opposed to not voting out of some principle.

Some of them have been made promise after promise from all parties and have still seen no change in their circumstances,some of them after years of supporting one side or the other.If I lived on one of the really terrible estates in an inner city where nothing seems to improve, I think I might also wonder what the point was in voting.

Chris 11-05-2010 12:34

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 35018960)
May be worth remembering the "Moral Majority" is actually those who did not vote at all. A larger percentage than voted Tory.

That won't wash. Those who didn't vote (the vast majority of them, anyway), have demonstrated that they don't care. Protestations about 'they're all the bleedin' same, innit?' are just a fig-leaf for plain laziness, both intellectual and bone-idle.

There is nothing remotely moral about refusing to participate in the government of our country for half an hour, once every five years. They didn't want their voice heard last Thursday so they have no business moaning about the outcome now.

Saaf_laandon_mo 11-05-2010 12:38

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35018970)
That won't wash. Those who didn't vote (the vast majority of them, anyway), have demonstrated that they don't care. Protestations about 'they're all the bleedin' same, innit?' are just a fig-leaf for plain laziness, both intellectual and bone-idle.

There is nothing remotely moral about refusing to participate in the government of our country for half an hour, once every five years. They didn't want their voice heard last Thursday so they have no business moaning about the outcome now.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35018968)
Or full time complainers. The decide that it is a travesty there is no party that agrees with them on everything and then spend the next 5 years bleating on about how disenfranchised with politics they are and somehow think we should give a toss. Like that stupid 'Sod the lot' poster with UKIP, just playing on the hyper-cynical members of our country


Well said those men.

Angua 11-05-2010 12:47

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
However claiming a "Moral Majority" with only 23% of the populations vote (carefully said vote & not support as these are two different things) is not honest either. As far as I am concerned the only winners this time were the interfering press.

Agree with Maggy - there should be TOTAL press neutrality once an election is called. Even including local radio & newspapers.

Chris 11-05-2010 12:52

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Local radio stations are already under enforced neutrality due to the terms of their broadcasting licences, same as TV. As for the Press - how would you legislate for that? Would the political parties be prevented from printing their own in-house magazines? What about independent, but politically partisan pamphleteers?

Mick 11-05-2010 12:56

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Interesting today that it is being branded about that Labour, the losing party are desperately trying to cling on to power is the 'Robert Mugabe' style of politics, scrambling around to trying to remain in power, even though they lost the election. Bloody hypocrites.

Stuart 11-05-2010 13:06

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SB_07 (Post 35018411)
Do people forget the Conservatives ruined this country before Labour.

No, but in the case of Gordon Brown's government, the country was ruined by Tony Blair's government.

Angua 11-05-2010 13:07

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35018986)
Local radio stations are already under enforced neutrality due to the terms of their broadcasting licences, same as TV. As for the Press - how would you legislate for that? Would the political parties be prevented from printing their own in-house magazines? What about independent, but politically partisan pamphleteers?

Printed material from the parties is reasonable. However free and biased publicity from the press is not. I only read the local Cameron Gazette (Witney Gazette) and avoid all national papers. Whilst I can appreciate a local MP is a newsworthy item for the local paper, during the election this should stop.
Our local press put a huge interview with DC in the paper (nicely timed with the postal votes) with nothing similar for any of the other candidates in subsequent weeks. I am fully aware I live in blue balloon on a string territory (both hubby & I work here so no silly suggestions of moving to be able to have my vote count) so no matter what we will get a Tory, however just for that short period a bit of neutrality would be wonderful.

nomadking 11-05-2010 13:21

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Bias can take the form of censorship(ie not reporting a story in the first place) or just the use of certain words to change the emphasis of a story(BBC are major offenders).

Damien 11-05-2010 13:42

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35018988)
Interesting today that it is being branded about that Labour, the losing party are desperately trying to cling on to power is the 'Robert Mugabe' style of politics, scrambling around to trying to remain in power, even though they lost the election. Bloody hypocrites.

Oh Jeez. It is not comparable Robert Mugabe. Some of the hyperbole people use in this country is ridiculous, I heard people on Radio 4/5 comparing the trouble people had voting to a 3rd world country where we would send UN Inspectors in :rolleyes: Such comparisons do us a disservice because all it does it further enrage people on an already sensitive topic as well as being a vast exaggeration.

The Tories should from the next government. However there is nothing legally wrong with what Labour are doing, this is the result of our electoral system.

I think it helps if we accept that people didn't win or lose the election but that one party won more seats than another. It feels like a game rather than a democracy the way people seem to behave, that it's winner take all if they got the highest score.

Hugh 11-05-2010 14:01

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 35018739)
Although the question was not directed at you, I presume you are happy having your pay frozen then?

Yes, hysterically so, as I feel I am vastly overpaid and need to be brought down to earth.;)

Or, in the real world, where really dumb questions like that don't get asked, but someone feels the need to do so anyway, I would state that I don't believe anyone would be happy to have outgoings rising (utilities, council tax, food, fuel, etc) due to things without my control, whilst income remains static. However, I understand that money has to be created to be distributed, and if that money isn't there, it can't be distributed.

Therefore, I accept that my pay will be frozen, that my outgoings will have to reduce (apart from those I have no control over) - anyone who thinks otherwise is living in a fool's paradise (imho). One (or the country) can't spend what it doesn't have (well, it can, but then Mr Default comes to visit, which is not a good thing).

hth

Alan Johnson (via the BBC) has just said
Quote:

What the voters have said is, 'We're not giving anyone an overall majority'," says Home Secretary Alan Johnson.
I don't remember anyone saying that - does anyone else?

injuneer 11-05-2010 14:14

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35018969)
Some of them have been made promise after promise from all parties and have still seen no change in their circumstances,some of them after years of supporting one side or the other.If I lived on one of the really terrible estates in an inner city where nothing seems to improve, I think I might also wonder what the point was in voting.

Maybe if we had a fairer system more people would vote? In my constituency my vote was worth 0.03, so hardly worth voting at all!

Lord Nikon 11-05-2010 14:31

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Perhaps more people would have voted had there been an option on the ballot paper to say "I have no confidence in any of the above to represent the views of the electorate or to run this country as it should be run' - however, a lack of confidence in any of the electorate available on the ballot paper can only be represented by a refusal to vote for them, an action which currently is only interpreted as abstaining / disinterest.
To determine who is abstaining and who does not have confidence in the parties / representatives available that option must be added to the ballot paper in order to gain a more accurate representation of people's motivations.
Realistically what were the options?

Labour - who have consistently driven the country into the ground and are led by a man so arrogant he refuses his own party's calls to resign?
Conservatives who haven't got the best track record in the past and don't seem to have a strong enough leadership at the moment
Lib Dems - Who would take us full throttle into Europe despite overwhelming public opposition
Fringe parties such as UKIP / BNP who have some very objectionable views

There should be a vote for 'none of the above' whereby if 'none of the above' gains the majority vote there is to be a new election and none of the current candidates are able to stand again, and the parties must re-evaluate their election campaigns. Furthermore, elective promises which are made MUST become publicly accountable with an annual review - what steps are being taken to fulfill those promises, how much progress has been made, etc, It is supposed to be a government of the people, by the people, for the people and it's now the 21st century, time to make them act like it.

Mick 11-05-2010 14:42

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35019016)
Oh Jeez. It is not comparable Robert Mugabe. .

Oh Jeez nothing - It most certainly is.

Losers clinging to power and trying to cling to it even more by stitching up the electorate is very much Robert Mugabe style politics.

punky 11-05-2010 14:45

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
The idiots are back, this time protesting the Murdoch-owned Tory mouthpiece that is the...err... BBC.

Some old banshee was going on about something during the Prescott interview instead of doing some housework.

Derek 11-05-2010 14:45

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/s...re/8674891.stm

Quote:

Sheffield City Council's boss has given up his £20,000 returning officer fee after long queues stopped people voting at the general election.
20 grand fee? Not a bad earner for some people.

Tuftus 11-05-2010 15:01

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 35019049)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/s...re/8674891.stm



20 grand fee? Not a bad earner for some people.

Could that not be said for most politicians? :p:

punky 11-05-2010 15:03

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Now someone's calling Hague and Letwin liars and murderers?

*sigh*

Ignitionnet 11-05-2010 15:18

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by punky (Post 35019054)
Now someone's calling Hague and Letwin liars and murderers?

*sigh*

That Scottish dude who ended up arguing with some English nationalist?

Lovely isn't it? Crazy season is in full swing.

danielf 11-05-2010 15:39

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Lib-Con is looking more likely by the minute.

Hugh 11-05-2010 15:44

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
New Scientist - Electoral dysfunction: Why democracy is always unfair

Quote:

Such imperfections led the American economist Kenneth Arrow to list in 1963 the general attributes of an idealised fair voting system. He suggested that voters should be able to express a complete set of their preferences; no single voter should be allowed to dictate the outcome of the election; if every voter prefers one candidate to another, the final ranking should reflect that; and if a voter prefers one candidate to a second, introducing a third candidate should not reverse that preference.
All very sensible. There's just one problem: Arrow and others went on to prove that no conceivable voting system could satisfy all four conditions. In particular, there will always be the possibility that one voter, simply by changing their vote, can change the overall preference of the whole electorate.

Lord Nikon 11-05-2010 15:56

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
All that basically says is that if there are 3 candidates and 181 voters, the first 180 vote 60 each for the 3 candidates, then voter 181 gets to decide the outcome of the election...

Stuart 11-05-2010 15:57

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35018986)
Local radio stations are already under enforced neutrality due to the terms of their broadcasting licences, same as TV. As for the Press - how would you legislate for that? Would the political parties be prevented from printing their own in-house magazines? What about independent, but politically partisan pamphleteers?

Not sure they'd be covered. After all, I don't believe in-house radio and TV stations are. Admittedly, in-house TV and Radio stations are not normally broadcast to everyone.

Osem 11-05-2010 15:57

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Andy Burnham has apparently added his name to the list of New Labour heavyweights who're claiming that a 'coalition of losers' is unacceptable and that the Tories ought to be given the chance to try to govern in the interests of national stability. I've heard John Reid, David Plunkett and others saying similar and sounding remarkably magnanimous but is their stance based on a sense of altruism and fair play or something else I wonder??.... Possibly the realisation that the next government is going to inherit a poisoned chalice and carry the can for what was allowed to happen to UK PLC on New Labour's watch. Many people have very short memories and tough decisions are needed but if they're made, the flak will start to fly so being in opposition and getting shot of Brown at the same time might seem a relatively nice, safe, place to be. Just a thought..... :erm:

Lord Nikon 11-05-2010 15:59

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
you mean repeating the last time labour handed the reins to the conservatives?

Osem 11-05-2010 16:02

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Yes - letting the next government pick up the pieces, make the tough choices and get all the stick from that proportion of the electorate who can't see beyond the end of their noses.

RizzyKing 11-05-2010 16:14

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
There is no such thing as a perfect voting system never has been never will be there will always be someone that feels they havn't been represented and for us to be taking all this time to get a government by one party holding others to ransom on an issue that benefits them massively is wrong and no one in this country voted for that. Our economy is in trouble we need to get it sorted quickly or at the very least have a good plan to get it sorted none of which can happen till all this stops. It is funny that the biggest shouts for this come from lib dem supporters who clearly feel rather then their party actually appeal enough to get the votes that the system should be changed.

Also loving how so many people are saying what i voted for on my behalf and all of them are completely wrong. I voted to get this country moving and for it's problems to start getting sorted out so that my children are not paying anymore then they have too for the mess labour created. Not for one millisecond did electoral reform play any part in my vote and having spoken to a few other people it played no part in theirs either. This is an issue to address if it really needs to be addressed when we have sorted out the economy and are no longer at risk of having our credit rating as a country lowered thus costing us even more in interest costs.

As for the lib dems i havn't had many good thoughts about them for a while all through the election we heard that rubbish about them being the party of honesty and then like labour telling complete lies about the opposition and now they have the country by the privates and are squeezing for all they are worth and lets not kid ourselves they are not doing it for any high and mighty principle they are doing for themselves in future elections and if any party is stupid enough to give in to them now they will wreck whatever coalition they form once their preferred voting system is in and take us to another election.

Getting sick of the whole damn thing I WANT the really important national issues to be sorted out not the voting system and that frustration i think is spreading and the longer this goes on the more the lib dems will be viewed as the selfish want it alls they are.

Peter_ 11-05-2010 16:17

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 35019105)
i think is spreading and the longer this goes on the more the lib dems will be viewed as the selfish want it alls they are.

I thought that was actually a perfect description of the tories especially the old etonian brigade.;)

danielf 11-05-2010 16:27

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by times
A senior Liberal Democrat (anonymous) has spoken to PA and produced a real cauldron of mixed metaphors.

"'We are on an island with the Tories, but some people hope a lifeboat driven by Ed Balls is going to come along,' he said.

"'What they don’t realise is that lifeboat is going in the wrong direction and it’s sinking."

"He said talks had now reached the 'endgame' and 'overtime', but it was important for the Lib Dems 'to have been seen to explore all the options'."

:rofl: :rofl:

Damien 11-05-2010 16:37

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 35019105)
As for the lib dems i havn't had many good thoughts about them for a while all through the election we heard that rubbish about them being the party of honesty and then like labour telling complete lies about the opposition and now they have the country by the privates and are squeezing for all they are worth and lets not kid ourselves they are not doing it for any high and mighty principle they are doing for themselves in future elections and if any party is stupid enough to give in to them now they will wreck whatever coalition they form once their preferred voting system is in and take us to another election.

Their preferred system is only to accurately reflect the electorate.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 35019105)
Getting sick of the whole damn thing I WANT the really important national issues to be sorted out not the voting system and that frustration i think is spreading and the longer this goes on the more the lib dems will be viewed as the selfish want it alls they are.

Yes but it's not just about what you want. The Lib Dems are representing the people who voted for them, people like me, and good on them.

Maggy 11-05-2010 16:37

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Whatever happens we are going to be having another election within a short space of time because whomever the Lib Dems hook up with, eventually they will cease to see eye to eye snd withdraw their support.

To think that we will have to go through the whole process again and there are no guarantees that this won't happen again..

Osem 11-05-2010 16:41

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35019122)
Whatever happens we are going to be having another election within a short space of time because whomever the Lib Dems hook up with, eventually they will cease to see eye to eye snd withdraw their support.

To think that we will have to go through the whole process again and there are no guarantees that this won't happen again..

I think that, amongst other things, the financial state of both New Labour and the Lib Dems means that they won't be wanting another enormously costly election too soon.

Damien 11-05-2010 16:42

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35019127)
I think that, amongst other things, the financial state of both New Labour and the Lib Dems means that they won't be wanting another enormously costly election too soon.

Indeed.

Derek 11-05-2010 16:57

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBC
Number 10 recognises that talks with the Lib Dems have not and will reach not any positive conclusion

GB gets another finger prised off the top job. :tu:

danielf 11-05-2010 16:59

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
According to the Beeb large bags are being loaded into cars at the back of Dowing Street.

Damien 11-05-2010 16:59

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Tory/Lib Dem alliance it is. Cameron becomes PM tomorrow I guess.

Derek 11-05-2010 17:01

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35019145)
According to the Beeb large bags are being loaded into cars at the back of Dowing Street.

:woot:

The shredders will have been on overdrive all day, just in case anything needed 'accidentally' disposed of.

Ignitionnet 11-05-2010 17:13

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35019145)
According to the Beeb large bags are being loaded into cars at the back of Dowing Street.

:wavey:

:woot:

papa smurf 11-05-2010 17:32

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35019145)
According to the Beeb large bags are being loaded into cars at the back of Dowing Street.

thats no way to describe Harriet harperson.;)

Ignitionnet 11-05-2010 17:38

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 35019145)
According to the Beeb large bags are being loaded into cars at the back of Dowing Street.

Actually it sounds like those weren't the Browns' stuff. Probably the weekend's Nokias off for recycling.

Mick 11-05-2010 17:53

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Mandelson's smug grin appears to have wiped off his face as he was getting in to a car in Downing street a few moments ago.

danielf 11-05-2010 18:00

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Interesting comments by a German journalist (don't know his name) on the Beeb. Coalition talks in Germany after the last election lasted 40 days. People in the UK are not used to these talks, but the way it looks now, it'll be over in super-quick time.

He also remarked that there is no reason to get nervous over it. In effect, civil servants run the country and make sure everything keeps ticking over.

Osem 11-05-2010 18:11

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
The reports of Brown's long overdue and gratifying resignation today bring a whole new meaning to his the term which unintentionally revealed his true face to the electorate - 'bigot'

Brown Is Gone On Tuesday

:woot: :woot: :cleader: :cleader:

Goodbye Gordon, how on earth will the 'world' cope without your leadership and prudence??.... :rolleyes:

Ramrod 11-05-2010 18:11

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Yep, apparently Belgum went without a government for over 200 days and the world didn't stop spinning :)

Osem 11-05-2010 18:18

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 35019149)
:woot:

The shredders will have been on overdrive all day, just in case anything needed 'accidentally' disposed of.

Too true :mad:

---------- Post added at 17:18 ---------- Previous post was at 17:12 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35019212)
Mandelson's smug grin appears to have wiped off his face as he was getting in to a car in Downing street a few moments ago.

Yes after what it seems was he and Campbell's desperate unilateral attempt to cobble together a wholly unedifying deal with the Lib Dems he's looking just a tad gutted.... :D :D


Some people do like to smear the Tories (and some deserve it) but honesty Mandelson, Campbell and so many other New Labour henchmen are just slime personified....

v0id 11-05-2010 18:19

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Where's this 'Breaking News' then?
All I hear is some commentary leading up to something that might happen at 6pm,. Couldn't the news teams have waited for an hour.

Osem 11-05-2010 18:21

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...or-lib-dems.do

Quote:

Gordon Brown quits as PM as Lib-Dem deal falls apart

Neil22 11-05-2010 18:26

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
It's started already, 500,000 public sector jobs are to go.

danielf 11-05-2010 18:29

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil22 (Post 35019234)
It's started already, 500,000 public sector jobs are to go.

That's not what I heard. What I heard was fixed 4 year parliaments, no income tax on wages under 10k, no increase in inheritance tax threshold, and Nick Clegg as deputy PM.

Julian 11-05-2010 18:34

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil22 (Post 35019234)
It's started already, 500,000 public sector jobs are to go.

They'll be gordon brown's assistants - so nothing to worry about. :D

Sirius 11-05-2010 18:37

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil22 (Post 35019234)
It's started already, 500,000 public sector jobs are to go.

Look you can drop the spin

Read my lips

LABOUR LOST because they have messed this country up and now someone else will have to fix it. No amount of ******** being spouted by you will change that.

Its interesting that you continue what Labour are good at and that's lies.

Thankfully we don't have to put up with brown or his lying rabble any more.

By the way care to show some evidence for you bull excreta that shows it was the Tory's that decided to get rid of those people. ???????

Ignitionnet 11-05-2010 18:40

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil22 (Post 35019234)
It's started already, 500,000 public sector jobs are to go.

At least some have to. Contrary to the pre-election rhetoric whichever party was in some had to go, just the timing and to a more limited extent the scale which would have been different. It very simply isn't an option to hike up the tax burden sufficiently to cover the total expense, it'd cripple the economy.

I'm sorry to say you can thank Labour for that - they shouldn't have hired them to the public sector in the first place and a perfect demonstration that they went too far with the public sector expansion. Even wiping out the exceptional items from the deficit there's still a structural one of nearly 100bn.

For all the wittering on about how much the public sector are better off thanks to Labour the very simple fact is the public sector don't pay the bills, the private sector do. Taxation is harmful to the private sector so a balance has to be struck and adding an extra 8% or more to our tax burden would be too much.

The thing that is noteworthy about posts talking about how much better off the public sector is and jobs coming and going ignores that the private sector is the section of the economy that pays the bills. The private sector has taken the brunt of the recession, jobs lost and pay frozen, why should the public sector be immune to this and have the private sector pay for them to be immune?

That said I am unfortunately speaking logically, which won't really wash when it hits the ideology that's blinding you to it.

In one paragraph, 2 sentences: The public sector is too large for the private sector to support it. The cost of the public sector must be reduced as it's not possible to raise taxation enough to support it, which will necessarily involve public sector job losses.

Hom3r 11-05-2010 18:41

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
BREAKING NEWS: (so no link yet)

Brown to quit as PM tonight ot early tomorrow

According to sky news

Neil22 11-05-2010 18:43

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35019244)
Look you can drop the spin

Read my lips

LABOUR LOST because they have messed this country up and now someone else will have to fix it. No amount of ******** being spouted by you will change that.

Its interesting that you continue what Labour are good at and that's lies.

Thankfully we don't have to put up with brown or his lying rabble any more.

By the way care to show some evidence for you bull excreta ???????


My wife has just had her contract cancelled along with 50 others by the Education Department. They have been told there are massive cuts coming up in the Public Sector within the next few weeks.

danielf 11-05-2010 18:45

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
The Guardian has an interesting photo of Nick Clegg's notes

Sirius 11-05-2010 18:50

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil22 (Post 35019250)
My wife has just had her contract cancelled along with 50 others by the Education Department. They have been told there are massive cuts coming up in the Public Sector within the next few weeks.

How can the tories have done this or passed this if there not in power, Labour lies again.
BTW keep taking the medicine for your over worked imagination

papa smurf 11-05-2010 18:53

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
better make sure that your ornaments etc are stored safely ,as i expect the Earth to wobble when Brown announces he's off, millions of people jumping into the air and shouting YES will have a large impact on the planets orbit .

Sirius 11-05-2010 18:55

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35019256)
better make sure that your ornaments etc are stored safely ,as i expect the Earth to wobble when Brown announces he's off, millions of people jumping into the air and shouting YES will have a large impact on the planets orbit .

I will be one of them trust me.

Hom3r 11-05-2010 19:00

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35019244)
Look you can drop the spin

Read my lips

LABOUR LOST because they have messed this country up and now someone else will have to fix it. No amount of ******** being spouted by you will change that.

Its interesting that you continue what Labour are good at and that's lies.

Thankfully we don't have to put up with brown or his lying rabble any more.

By the way care to show some evidence for you bull excreta that shows it was the Tory's that decided to get rid of those people. ???????


So the Tories did a perfect job did they?

They sold off loads of industries, which are now having to be bought back under the govenment/public contrrol

Some of these industries have been cannibalised and moved overseas.

etc etc

---------- Post added at 18:00 ---------- Previous post was at 17:57 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35019256)
better make sure that your ornaments etc are stored safely ,as i expect the Earth to wobble when Brown announces he's off, millions of people jumping into the air and shouting YES will have a large impact on the planets orbit .


Or because of the fact the TOries are going to screw us all, and its from people jumping of buildings, to escape the nightmare of the tories running the country, and giving money to the rich at the expense of the lower classes.

Ignitionnet 11-05-2010 19:02

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35019258)
So the Tories did a perfect job did they?

They sold off loads of industries, which are now having to be bought back under the govenment/public contrrol

Some of these industries have been cannibalised and moved overseas.

etc etc

I must've missed the bit of his post that claims the Tories did a perfect job. He just stated, quite accurately, that Labour did a bad one.

At least that's what having to fire a large proportion of the public sector workers they hired due to the budget deficit they presided over would imply. No-one can claim everything they did was bad, doesn't change that they simply poured our money down the toilet pursuing the wrong agenda and we'll all have to pay for in different ways.

Sirius 11-05-2010 19:03

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35019258)
So the Tories did a perfect job did they?

They sold off loads of industries, which are now having to be bought back under the govenment/public contrrol

Some of these industries have been cannibalised and moved overseas.

etc etc

---------- Post added at 18:00 ---------- Previous post was at 17:57 ----------




Or because of the fact the TOries are going to screw us all, and its from people jumping of buildings, to escape the nightmare of the tories running the country, and giving money to the rich at the expense of the lower classes.

So what has Labour been doing these last 3 terms of office other than destroying the economy, Sending soldiers to war on a lie, increasing taxes Etc Etc

oh btw Jumping off building my arse

I have a nice bottle of wine here ready to toast the end of Labour. :clap:

Hom3r 11-05-2010 19:03

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35019248)
BREAKING NEWS: (so no link yet)

Brown to quit as PM tonight ot early tomorrow

According to sky news


http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Pol...nister_To_Quit

Ignitionnet 11-05-2010 19:04

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35019258)
Or because of the fact the TOries are going to screw us all, and its from people jumping of buildings, to escape the nightmare of the tories running the country, and giving money to the rich at the expense of the lower classes.

You are blinded by ideology. When you can wake up and look calmly and sanely at things we'll all be better off in this discussion. If you think the Lib Dems would be on board for that you're mad but I suspect you'd be giving the same rhetoric if anyone bar Labour had won.

papa smurf 11-05-2010 19:05

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35019258)
So the Tories did a perfect job did they?

They sold off loads of industries, which are now having to be bought back under the govenment/public contrrol

Some of these industries have been cannibalised and moved overseas.

etc etc

---------- Post added at 18:00 ---------- Previous post was at 17:57 ----------




Or because of the fact the TOries are going to screw us all, and its from people jumping of buildings, to escape the nightmare of the tories running the country, and giving money to the rich at the expense of the lower classes.



i'm as working class as the next man and i vote tory ,i no longer live on a council estate i own my own house it not a grand place by any means but i worked for it ,and on a humble wage .

Ignitionnet 11-05-2010 19:07

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35019276)
i'm as working class as the next man and i vote tory ,i no longer live on a council estate i own my own house it not a grand place by any means but i worked for it ,and on a humble wage .

You elitist. You're a traitor to the working class.

As am I actually. Brought up by a truck driver and a barmaid I've had the nerve to work my way up to where I can live in one of the most affluent areas of the country.

I even pay top rate tax. I feel so guilty.

Reverse snobbery is just so lame.

Maggy 11-05-2010 19:09

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35019127)
I think that, amongst other things, the financial state of both New Labour and the Lib Dems means that they won't be wanting another enormously costly election too soon.

Well let's hope that both bedmates can see eye to eye for the next 4-5 years then..;)

Neil22 11-05-2010 19:10

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35019253)
How can the tories have done this or passed this if there not in power, Labour lies again.
BTW keep taking the medicine for your over worked imagination


Jesus you really are a Mod Edit of the highest order aren't you?

Maggy 11-05-2010 19:12

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Please don't try bypassing the swear filter.

Sirius 11-05-2010 19:15

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil22 (Post 35019280)
Jesus you really are a Mod Edit of the highest order aren't you?

Its Bigot, Remember thats the labour way :LOL:

Neil22 11-05-2010 19:17

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
[ADMIN EDIT: Offensive comments removed - Well done you just earned an account suspension]

Sirius 11-05-2010 19:19

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil22 (Post 35019296)
People have lost their jobs you +++++. Typical Tory dead head.

You can always tell when the plot has been lost. People start swearing.

Maggy 11-05-2010 19:19

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
You are lucky I had already edited that post.

Please note everyone that it is not a good idea to quote abusive posts or ones with swearing in them..it irritates the Mods who have to clean up.

Osem 11-05-2010 19:49

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35019279)
Well let's hope that both bedmates can see eye to eye for the next 4-5 years then..;)

Well who wants more of this... ;) Having said that, the Tories are in a far healthier position financially to mount another campaign so it wouldn't necessarily be the end of the world for them.

---------- Post added at 18:41 ---------- Previous post was at 18:39 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35019253)
How can the tories have done this or passed this if there not in power, Labour lies again.
BTW keep taking the medicine for your over worked imagination

But you're forgetting what Thatcher did FGS!!! Let's face it these job cuts are all her fault and nothing whatsoever to do with the profiligacy and ineptitude of the government we've been so fortunate to have for the last 13 years.. :rollyeyes:

---------- Post added at 18:49 ---------- Previous post was at 18:41 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35019247)
At least some have to. Contrary to the pre-election rhetoric whichever party was in some had to go, just the timing and to a more limited extent the scale which would have been different. It very simply isn't an option to hike up the tax burden sufficiently to cover the total expense, it'd cripple the economy.

I'm sorry to say you can thank Labour for that - they shouldn't have hired them to the public sector in the first place and a perfect demonstration that they went too far with the public sector expansion. Even wiping out the exceptional items from the deficit there's still a structural one of nearly 100bn.

For all the wittering on about how much the public sector are better off thanks to Labour the very simple fact is the public sector don't pay the bills, the private sector do. Taxation is harmful to the private sector so a balance has to be struck and adding an extra 8% or more to our tax burden would be too much.

The thing that is noteworthy about posts talking about how much better off the public sector is and jobs coming and going ignores that the private sector is the section of the economy that pays the bills. The private sector has taken the brunt of the recession, jobs lost and pay frozen, why should the public sector be immune to this and have the private sector pay for them to be immune?

That said I am unfortunately speaking logically, which won't really wash when it hits the ideology that's blinding you to it.

In one paragraph, 2 sentences: The public sector is too large for the private sector to support it. The cost of the public sector must be reduced as it's not possible to raise taxation enough to support it, which will necessarily involve public sector job losses.

Correct but of course some people live in that alternative universe known as Myopius Deludus where state spending is virtually uncontrolled, money can be printed, revenue doesn't have to be earned and debts don't have to be repaid. They're natural bedfellows of New Labour here in the real world...

Sirius 11-05-2010 19:50

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35019330)
Well who wants more of this... ;) Having said that, the Tories are in a far healthier position financially to mount another campaign so it wouldn't necessarily be the end of the world for them.

---------- Post added at 18:41 ---------- Previous post was at 18:39 ----------



But you're forgetting what Thatcher did FGS!!! Let's face it these job cuts are all her fault and nothing whatsoever to do with the profiligacy and ineptitude of the government we've been so fortunate to have for the last 13 years.. :rollyeyes:

:doh:

I forgot its all Maggy Thatchers fault, what was i thinking.


Sorry everyone :doh:

Lord Nikon 11-05-2010 19:52

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil22 (Post 35019280)
Jesus you really are a Mod Edit of the highest order aren't you?

Is it just me who thinks the edit was probably more amusing than the original post? :D

Damien 11-05-2010 19:55

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord Nikon (Post 35019346)
Is it just me who thinks the edit was probably more amusing than the original post? :D

Nope! :D

Sirius 11-05-2010 20:12

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
They have just placed a podium outside No 10, Looks like its time for Brown to fall on his sword. :clap:

Have i so been waiting for this day :LOL:

Chris 11-05-2010 20:15

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
The car that will take him to get his P45 has arrived in Downing Street.

Oh, the sweet, sweet joy.

Sirius 11-05-2010 20:16

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35019362)
The car that will take him to get his P45 has arrived in Downing Street.

Oh, the sweet, sweet joy.

Indeed my day has been made :)

Chris 11-05-2010 20:18

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Staff spilling out of the No. 11 front door to watch. Stuff this, I'm off to watch the telly. See you later, once we have a true blue in the PM's chair.

---------- Post added at 19:18 ---------- Previous post was at 19:17 ----------

Here he is ...

Sirius 11-05-2010 20:19

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35019366)
Staff spilling out of the No. 11 front door to watch. Stuff this, I'm off to watch the telly. See you later, once we have a true blue in the PM's chair.

---------- Post added at 19:18 ---------- Previous post was at 19:17 ----------

Here he is ...

I am recording this for history or should that be infamy

punky 11-05-2010 20:21

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
GB just said goodbye! YEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!

:woot: :woot:

papa smurf 11-05-2010 20:22

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
i'm going to puke
he's brought the kids with him .

Ignitionnet 11-05-2010 20:24

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
That's that.

Much as I dislike his judgement and think he failed in the job he has still been a PM so deserves grudging respect. His resignation speech was dignified and honest, it was good to hear something more human from the man and immediately brought him up in my judgement.

Next victim *ahem* Prime Minister please!


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:12.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum