![]() |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Your argument smacks of the typical Remainer’s rhetoric: the leave voters didn’t know then what they know now; ignoring that the leavers would have taken into account the forecasts of calamity in the guvmin;s brochure. It would be better if you stuck to what you can substantiate. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
My reply is equally applicable to Ian! |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
For example your statements - "the leave voters didn’t know then what they know now" doesn't make sense as I'm not talking about leavers, I've referenced the voting intentions of constituencies where the MP voted for/against Brexit in a different way to the majority of the constituents. "You are rationalising without knowing anything about the constituency." I don't doubt your knowledge of the constituency as a resident, canvasser and friend of John Redwood's. However, I do think that sitting MPs in constituencies like his will be severely tested where their views on Brexit differ from that of their constituents if an election occurred soon. I've also made the point that this applies both ways, eg if there is a Remain MP in a Leave constituency. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
I’m being specific about Redwood; he was specifically mentioned as distinct from other Tories and balance needs tO be restored. Redwood is one of the Remainers’ targets and remember this part of the discussion started with an attack on his wealth in the context of being self serving. |
Re: Brexit
I was there on Saturday outside the house of [Mod Edit- derogatory term removed].
The TV studios had packed up and buggered off. The upside they taken that [Mod Edit- derogatory term removed] Steve with them. There was zero TV coverage and the crowd was relatively behaved. There was one incident near me when a few [Mod Edit- derogatory term removed] tried to start trouble but the police told them to leave. There was also some Orangemen who marched up to the Cenotaph. Followed by a load of cops. Perhaps if there had been trouble the Brexit Biased Corporation might have covered it. There are now plans to do another protest on the 28th April, same day as the marathon. |
Re: Brexit
Reminder of the opening post by Mick on the previous Brexit thread
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...ghlight=Brexit Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Seriously, the point you make is the one that matters and is where the denial is. The current system, with the entrenched tribal loyalties on both sides delivers people like Redwood who feel at liberty to push their personal, skewed ideology in opposition to the best interests & wishes of their constituency, party and country. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
He was elected in 1987 - are you certain he wanted to push a skewed ideology? He wants a sovereign UK - hardly a skewed ideology. eign that rubbish in, please. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Redwood: "So, you are flogging a dead horse with this agreement and the public is well ahead of you and the public accept, by a majority now that the best option is just to leave and offer them a free trade deal." Channel 4 "That is not true. That is not true. John Redwood thank you very much. What you've just said is not true but thank you very much for joining us." https://www.indy100.com/article/brex...murthy-8857691 |
Re: Brexit
One peccadillo does not make him a liar. He was mistaken. From the same interview, the unquestionable truth to the question as to why he did not support May's deal:
"Well, no we couldn't possibly do that because that isn't leaving. The deal is a massively expensive and long delay . Our manifesto promised that within two years the government would negotiate a future partnership as well as any withdrawal issues the EU wanted mentioned or leave without a deal. Now we must keep our promise and I and my colleagues stand fully behind the manifesto. We hoped our prime minister did and I would urge her tonight to join us in upholding the manifesto, taking us out proudly on April 12 and agreeing on any remaining things that need agreeing so we have a smooth exit. There is no cliff edge. There is no disaster and we would have lots of money to spend and we need to spend the money urgently to give our economy a boost at a time when the German and French economies are ailing and the Italian economy is in recession.Well, no we couldn't possibly do that because that isn't leaving. The deal is a massively expensive and long delay. Our manifesto promised that within two years the government would negotiate a future partnership as well as any withdrawal issues the EU wanted mentioned or leave without a deal. Now we must keep our promise and I and my colleagues stand fully behind the manifesto. We hoped our prime minister did and I would urge her tonight to join us in upholding the manifesto, taking us out proudly on April 12 and agreeing on any remaining things that need agreeing so we have a smooth exit. There is no cliff edge. There is no disaster and we would have lots of money to spend and we need to spend the money urgently to give our economy a boost at a time when the German and French economies are ailing and the Italian economy is in recession." |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:07. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum