Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media TV Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   General : ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33688944)

Itshim 01-05-2021 17:34

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36078497)
Yes. I'm not disputing that (I did the same).

Richard is extrapolating this to imply Virgin pay BT £9.25 per Maxit TV subscriber. This isn't the case.

---------- Post added at 10:39 ---------- Previous post was at 10:37 ----------



If streaming operated at a fixed "lag" yes.

If you stream the same event across different devices and different internet providers you get different outcomes on the length of delay depending on how long it takes to build a buffer before proceeding to play.

Didn't read that in to his comment ,should have looked more closely. After all was Richard :D

Mad Max 01-05-2021 19:05

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36078497)
Yes. I'm not disputing that (I did the same).

Richard is extrapolating this to imply Virgin pay BT £9.25 per Maxit TV subscriber. This isn't the case.

---------- Post added at 10:39 ---------- Previous post was at 10:37 ----------



If streaming operated at a fixed "lag" yes.

If you stream the same event across different devices and different internet providers you get different outcomes on the length of delay depending on how long it takes to build a buffer before proceeding to play.

Yep, totally agree with that.

Mr K 03-05-2021 11:43

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
BT Sports free to all today ( VM Channel 100) for the FA Vase, and FA Trophy finals.
https://www.thenonleaguefootballpape...port-decision/

Itshim 03-05-2021 11:49

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36078662)
BT Sports free to all today ( VM Channel 100) for the FA Vase, and FA Trophy finals.
https://www.thenonleaguefootballpape...port-decision/

One more thing to avoid:rolleyes:

Mr K 03-05-2021 12:02

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36078664)
One more thing to avoid:rolleyes:

What else are you doing? darning some socks ? ;)

ozsat 03-05-2021 13:18

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Not on 100 here - but is free on Sky. Also seen a comment that it was not made free on BTtv.

Already release said free to all platforms - https://www.bt.com/sport/football/fe...ch-on-bt-sport

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36078662)
BT Sports free to all today ( VM Channel 100) for the FA Vase, and FA Trophy finals.
https://www.thenonleaguefootballpape...port-decision/


telegramsam 03-05-2021 15:35

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Just watched the match on BT,a good match. They said before the match it was free to watch accross all platforms so one would assume it included BT TV platform too.

Itshim 03-05-2021 16:43

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
I'm
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36078670)
What else are you doing? darning some socks ? ;)

Paint drying would be more entertaining for me .fgs a nil nil draw can be a great game ,come on:erm:

OLD BOY 03-05-2021 19:27

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DVD Cinema (Post 36078410)
I thought the BBC, maybe, had developed a way of there being no lag in the live streaming of sport?

They have figured out a way and are working on it. That’s my understanding from reports I have read.

jfman 03-05-2021 19:47

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36078707)
They have figured out a way and are working on it. That’s my understanding from reports I have read.

Source?

Hugh 03-05-2021 20:34

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36078707)
They have figured out a way and are working on it. That’s my understanding from reports I have read.

Here we go again…

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36047474)
The latency issue certainly is a problem, but they are 'working on it' as they say.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36047479)
From a "related" thread...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
Something magic will happen...
https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2020/08/1.gif

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36047483)
(sigh...)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-45499784

The BBC says it has worked out how to eliminate "streaming lag", which causes live TV to be delayed by several seconds when watched online.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36047507)
<even longer sigh...>

As I explained in that thread on the 1st of this month...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
Easily - it wasn’t scalable, and wasn’t cost-effective to implement.

From the BBC at the time

Quote:

Quote:
The final latency improvement we have made comes from optimising and streamlining the various processes that our media goes through before it emerges as segments available on the Internet. By doing this, we can show what is possible in terms of low latency distribution, though it’s fair to say that some additional delay is likely to return here if we were to take our prototype and scale it up for full production use.

And as I also said in that thread, when you previously said "they’re working on it"...
Quote:

OB, really? I didn’t know that...

(Except for the fact, as mentioned before, that one of my best friends is a Lead Technical Architect at the BBC, working specifically on the Telecomms area, who speaks at International conferences on the impact of 5G on broadcasting, and who is a member of a National 5G Working Group advising the UK Government, and my comments are informed by discussions with him - which highly experienced technical resource at the BBC are your comments informed by?).

btw, the original article was from September 2018 - doesn’t appear to have been much visible progress since then.

OLD BOY 03-05-2021 22:58

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36078710)
Here we go again…









btw, the original article was from September 2018 - doesn’t appear to have been much visible progress since then.

Ok, sorry, I misremembered. No need to rub it in. :td:

Hugh 04-05-2021 12:44

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36078720)
Ok, sorry, I misremembered. No need to rub it in. :td:

The post I quoted was in reply to a previous "misremembering"… ;)

OLD BOY 04-05-2021 13:33

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36078748)
The post I quoted was in reply to a previous "misremembering"… ;)

One up to you then Hugh. :rolleyes:

Hugh 04-05-2021 13:59

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36078756)
One up to you then Hugh. :rolleyes:

Not really - it’s just that I think it’s relevant to point out you keep reposting the same misinformation in support of your proposition, even when it’s been previously debunked.

denphone 12-05-2021 16:04

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Premier League clubs set to agree new £5billion “rollover” TV deal.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/footb...ee-24094612?1=


Quote:

Clubs have agreed in principle to extend the existing terms of the current contract with Sky, BT Sport and Amazon to show live games.

But it is also likely to include an extra £100m for EFL clubs on top of the existing £140m in solidarity payments for teams in the Championship, League One and Two.

Premier League bosses and clubs have been left in limbo on the next TV contract because the pandemic has meant negotiations have been put on hold when normally the next deal would have been announced months ago.

Dave42 12-05-2021 16:12

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36079292)
Premier League clubs set to agree new £5billion “rollover” TV deal.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/footb...ee-24094612?1=

well it good it didn't cost more Den

jfman 12-05-2021 17:02

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
A shame given the deep pockets streamers out there desperate for the rights.

telegramsam 12-05-2021 17:15

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079295)
A shame given the deep pockets streamers out there desperate for the rights.

Yeah but would the streamers get the viewing figures Sky and BT get? And picture quality is awful,going by Amazon Primes efforts that I've seen.

jfman 12-05-2021 17:21

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by telegramsam (Post 36079296)
Yeah but would the streamers get the viewing figures Sky and BT get? And picture quality is awful,going by Amazon Primes efforts that I've seen.

:D

Apologies I should have included an emoji with my previous post. I totally agree with you.

Others on the forum think there’s some benevolent capitalists out there ready to spend billions on the rights to “blow Sky/BT out the water” and sell it to everyone for a tenner a month.

Raider999 12-05-2021 17:22

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079295)
A shame given the deep pockets streamers out there desperate for the rights.


Don't wind OB up.

---------- Post added at 17:22 ---------- Previous post was at 17:21 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by telegramsam (Post 36079296)
Yeah but would the streamers get the viewing figures Sky and BT get? And picture quality is awful,going by Amazon Primes efforts that I've seen.


Have to agree

Chad 12-05-2021 18:13

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36079292)
Premier League clubs set to agree new £5billion “rollover” TV deal.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/footb...ee-24094612?1=

The Financial Times are reporting clubs have voted and agreed to the proposed new deal which includes the EFL receiving more funds, a requirement set out by the government. Sorry this might be a paid link:

https://www.ft.com/content/3d7d49e1-...7-1df5be0a0aa0

New TV deal could be announced as early as tomorrow!

Mad Max 12-05-2021 20:24

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079298)
:D

Apologies I should have included an emoji with my previous post. I totally agree with you.

Others on the forum think there’s some benevolent capitalists out there ready to spend billions on the rights to “blow Sky/BT out the water” and sell it to everyone for a tenner a month.

Very true, not only that, streaming is abysmal, time-wise, as it can be up to a minute behind real-time.

denphone 12-05-2021 20:27

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079295)
A shame given the deep pockets streamers out there desperate for the rights.

You were saying....:D

Hugh 12-05-2021 20:32

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Play nicely, everyone - back on topic, please.

vincerooney 13-05-2021 00:12

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
So if BT Sport sell up i wonder if amazon will snatch it up or disney considering disney already have worked with BT sport over licensing ESPN

1andrew1 13-05-2021 00:30

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by vincerooney (Post 36079325)
So if BT Sport sell up i wonder if amazon will snatch it up or disney considering disney already have worked with BT sport over licensing ESPN

These were my thoughts on seven potential buyers: https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...ostcount=10380

If a deal is done, I reckon DAZN or Disney are most likely.

Others felt Sky should not be ruled out as it would be keen to take out a competitor. Hoever, I think the Premier League could prevent this by making sure Sky was aware that it would re-auction BT's rights if that situation arose, which rights owners are able to do if the ownership of the broadcaster changes. (Change of control clause.)

jfman 13-05-2021 17:58

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36079328)
These were my thoughts on seven potential buyers: https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...ostcount=10380

If a deal is done, I reckon DAZN or Disney are most likely.

Others felt Sky should not be ruled out as it would be keen to take out a competitor. Hoever, I think the Premier League could prevent this by making sure Sky was aware that it would re-auction BT's rights if that situation arose, which rights owners are able to do if the ownership of the broadcaster changes. (Change of control clause.)

Not sure they’d be keen to anger their best customer with the deepest pockets. ;)

OLD BOY 13-05-2021 19:03

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36079328)
These were my thoughts on seven potential buyers: https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...ostcount=10380

If a deal is done, I reckon DAZN or Disney are most likely.

I’m glad you said that and not me! You seem to have avoided the hostile response I would have received for coming even close to such a suggestion!

vincerooney 14-05-2021 00:37

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36079328)
These were my thoughts on seven potential buyers: https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...ostcount=10380

If a deal is done, I reckon DAZN or Disney are most likely.

Others felt Sky should not be ruled out as it would be keen to take out a competitor. Hoever, I think the Premier League could prevent this by making sure Sky was aware that it would re-auction BT's rights if that situation arose, which rights owners are able to do if the ownership of the broadcaster changes. (Change of control clause.)

Do we really think a streaming only channel will be keen to take on football rights in the UK without a standard channel on Sky/Virgin/BT? Even for a tenner that streaming channel with spanish/italian football completely collapsed within 6 months or so?

Amazon works because its on most smart tvs, firesticks, tv boxes, is a well known brand etc.

"Oh btw the new EPL stuff is on DAZN"
"DAZN....what the heck is DAZN"
"its streaming service for football?"
"how do i get it....i just want to watch the football?"
"well on your laptop you can cast from your pc/laptop or smartphone to a google chromebox for example!"
"what?"
"or a ps4/x box app which has just been released"
"what....."
"its on apple tv"
"oh forget it!!"

OLD BOY 14-05-2021 07:46

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by vincerooney (Post 36079387)
Do we really think a streaming only channel will be keen to take on football rights in the UK without a standard channel on Sky/Virgin/BT? Even for a tenner that streaming channel with spanish/italian football completely collapsed within 6 months or so?

Amazon works because its on most smart tvs, firesticks, tv boxes, is a well known brand etc.

"Oh btw the new EPL stuff is on DAZN"
"DAZN....what the heck is DAZN"
"its streaming service for football?"
"how do i get it....i just want to watch the football?"
"well on your laptop you can cast from your pc/laptop or smartphone to a google chromebox for example!"
"what?"
"or a ps4/x box app which has just been released"
"what....."
"its on apple tv"
"oh forget it!!"

If I were making these decisions at DAZN, and given where we are at the moment with the transition to IPTV, I would stream it as well as having at least a 'pop up' pay-tv channel to maximise revenue.

It's different for Amazon because having the footie on Prime only helps to increase revenue for their retail operation as well.

johnasimmons 14-05-2021 08:16

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
It was all done via rollover so staying the same

jfman 14-05-2021 08:47

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079369)
I’m glad you said that and not me! You seem to have avoided the hostile response I would have received for coming even close to such a suggestion!

Nobody is hostile on the basis of who said it.

1andrew1 14-05-2021 09:01

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079391)
If I were making these decisions at DAZN, and given where we are at the moment with the transition to IPTV, I would stream it as well as having at least a 'pop up' pay-tv channel to maximise revenue.

It's different for Amazon because having the footie on Prime only helps to increase revenue for their retail operation as well.

I think Amazon have a satellite channel for showing matches in pubs don't they?

Agreed that a broadcaster with EPL rights needs a linear channel or two. DAZN has done this in other countries but next auction now in a couple of years' time.

With DAZN acquiring UK rights to Matchrrom Boxing, it will be interesting to see how they will grow their footprint across devices and platforms.

OLD BOY 14-05-2021 14:02

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079396)
Nobody is hostile on the basis of who said it.

That’s not my experience on this forum.

As the Premiership bids are being rolled over this time around due to Covid, I guess we can only speculate on what might have been.

1andrew1 14-05-2021 14:30

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079430)
That’s not my experience on this forum.

As the Premiership bids are being rolled over this time around due to Covid, I guess we can only speculate on what might have been.

We can also speculate on the future direction of BT Sport too. ;)

jfman 15-05-2021 10:40

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079430)
That’s not my experience on this forum.

As the Premiership bids are being rolled over this time around due to Covid, I guess we can only speculate on what might have been.

They’re only rolled over by consent - not “because of Covid”.

If the EPL felt they could extract better value for their shareholders (clubs) by running an auction then they would have done so.

ozsat 15-05-2021 10:52

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
No - they do a deal with Premier Sport (I think) for capacity.

Satellite viewers loose access to Premier Sports at such times.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36079397)
I think Amazon have a satellite channel for showing matches in pubs don't they?


OLD BOY 15-05-2021 12:16

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079493)
They’re only rolled over by consent - not “because of Covid”.

If the EPL felt they could extract better value for their shareholders (clubs) by running an auction then they would have done so.

You are mistaken.

https://www.espn.co.uk/football/engl...oiding-auction

[EXTRACT]

The league said it had received government approval to renew its broadcast rights with existing partners instead of holding a competitive auction due to the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

jfman 15-05-2021 14:14

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079501)
You are mistaken.

https://www.espn.co.uk/football/engl...oiding-auction

[EXTRACT]

The league said it had received government approval to renew its broadcast rights with existing partners instead of holding a competitive auction due to the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

You are, as ever, selectively quoting.

They obviously need Government permission to award the rights without putting them out to tender due to competition concerns.

That is not to say that they could not have run an auction if they sincerely believed that was the best way to maximise revenue.

Clearly they did not believe this would have extracted greatest value for their shareholders.

telegramsam 15-05-2021 14:50

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Personally I'm more than happy they're staying with BT and Sky with Amazon getting a handful of games.

OLD BOY 15-05-2021 18:28

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079506)
You are, as ever, selectively quoting.

They obviously need Government permission to award the rights without putting them out to tender due to competition concerns.

That is not to say that they could not have run an auction if they sincerely believed that was the best way to maximise revenue.

Clearly they did not believe this would have extracted greatest value for their shareholders.

Why do you keep arguing about nothing? It was the result of the pandemic. End of.

Hugh 15-05-2021 19:07

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079506)
You are, as ever, selectively quoting.

They obviously need Government permission to award the rights without putting them out to tender due to competition concerns.

That is not to say that they could not have run an auction if they sincerely believed that was the best way to maximise revenue.

Clearly they did not believe this would have extracted greatest value for their shareholders.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079523)
Why do you keep arguing about nothing? It was the result of the pandemic. End of.

It appears to have been both...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/57098432
Quote:

The current £4.7bn deal, agreed in 2018, represented a 10% drop in value.

The Government has approved the deal "in principle" with an "exclusion order" under the competition act, which allows the league to renew without its normal tender process.

"In light of the damaging impact of the Covid-19 pandemic throughout the English football pyramid, the Premier League was able to demonstrate to Government exceptional and compelling reasons for the Exclusion Order," the league said.

As part of the new deal, BT Sport say that to help with the fixture congestion, they will change their Saturday lunchtime game to an evening slot when teams involved have played in Europe on the previous Wednesday.

Clubs had been concerned that there could be another fall in value if the usual open-market auction started as planned next month.

The value of rights for domestic leagues in Europe also appears to have peaked
.

jfman 15-05-2021 19:27

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079523)
Why do you keep arguing about nothing? It was the result of the pandemic. End of.

Far from the end of Old Boy.

They believe the rights have peaked. Rational capitalists have chosen to not conduct a blind auction and instead have negotiated with the existing parties to continue on the existing terms.

They’d be failing in their duties to the member clubs to not seek to maximise the value of the rights. If there was a “deep pockets” streamer out there of any credible standing we would have seen an auction. We have not.

For competition reasons they could not have done this without Covid. But that is not to say Covid forced their hand - it offered them a convenient out.

Huxie 15-05-2021 23:22

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Does the following not suggest that Covid did indeed force their hand?

Letter to A Conant, DCMS, 18 March 2021.
Letter to A Conant, DCMS, 28 March 2021.
Letter to Richard Masters, Premier League, 12 May 2021.

OLD BOY 16-05-2021 00:54

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079526)
Far from the end of Old Boy.

They believe the rights have peaked. Rational capitalists have chosen to not conduct a blind auction and instead have negotiated with the existing parties to continue on the existing terms.

They’d be failing in their duties to the member clubs to not seek to maximise the value of the rights. If there was a “deep pockets” streamer out there of any credible standing we would have seen an auction. We have not.

For competition reasons they could not have done this without Covid. But that is not to say Covid forced their hand - it offered them a convenient out.

jfman, you are convincing no-one. The measures that have been taken to avoid the competitive bids would not have happened without the COVID crisis.

Just stop arguing, for God’s sake. You are convincing no-one.

jfman 16-05-2021 09:00

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Huxie (Post 36079542)

It clearly says they want certainty over the value of the rights. That implies there is considerable uncertainty.

At no point does it say that, owing to the pandemic, it would not be possible to conduct a blind auction.

Which brings us back to the last round where Sky correctly determined the value of the rights had fallen - and there was no deep pockets streamer waiting in the wings. A position that cost Richard Scudamore his job.

The fact they made this application indicates they, as rational capitalists, would rather stick rather than twist. The fluff about the security of the pyramid is a red herring - we already know how six of the twenty clubs feel about the pyramid.

OLD BOY 16-05-2021 10:28

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079526)
Far from the end of Old Boy.

They believe the rights have peaked. Rational capitalists have chosen to not conduct a blind auction and instead have negotiated with the existing parties to continue on the existing terms.

They’d be failing in their duties to the member clubs to not seek to maximise the value of the rights. If there was a “deep pockets” streamer out there of any credible standing we would have seen an auction. We have not.

For competition reasons they could not have done this without Covid. But that is not to say Covid forced their hand - it offered them a convenient out.

Extract from the letter dated 18 March in Huxie’s links:

The football pyramid has suffered significant financial losses at every level as a result of COVID 19 with existential challenges faced by many clubs and stakeholders. Government has recognised this and sought to address these losses as far as possible, through for example, support for the National League System and women’s football. Government also has a major role to play in facilitating the return of supporters, the absolute foundation for a strong return for all next season. However, you have asked, and we have agreed, that professional football should, where possible, finance its own survival [/B]and recovery. In line with the Government’s request, the Premier League has taken significant steps to support the wider football family, fulfilling our commitment made to the Secretary of State last summer.
We have already provided up to £65 million in rescue funding to English Football League (EFL) clubs during the 2020/21 season, alongside additional amount funding for the National League system and the women’s game. Our solidarity and good causes programmes are without financial equal in sport, and to my knowledge, our levels of commitment to the rest of the football pyramid are not matched by any equivalent action taken in any other sector.

All clubs and leagues have suffered from the absence of supporters and matchday revenue, and those at the top end of the pyramid, including the Premier League, have also had to deal with very significant reductions in broadcast and commercial revenue. By the end of the current 2020/21 season, the Premier League and its member Clubs will have incurred revenue losses in the region of £2 billion, [redacted]. Given the trajectory of the pandemic, those losses will continue at least until the end of the 2021/22 season. Furthermore, the course of the virus remains uncertain and we can expect the global economic climate to remain unstable for the foreseeable future.


To be clear, I am not arguing that the value of the rights has not fallen - I think the value has fallen, largely due to a change of strategy by Sky. However, that is not the reason for the proposal to avoid a rights auction on this occasion.

jfman 16-05-2021 10:31

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Yes, Old Boy. They have less money - this isn't in dispute.

What is in dispute is whether the pandemic would prevent a competitive tender. At no stage in any of the correspondence do they claim they could not run a tender.

They would prefer not to - because they know as we both do that there's no "deep pockets" streamer waiting to blow Sky/BT out the water.

OLD BOY 16-05-2021 10:41

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079576)
Yes, Old Boy. They have less money - this isn't in dispute.

What is in dispute is whether the pandemic would prevent a competitive tender. At no stage in any of the correspondence do they claim they could not run a tender.

They would prefer not to - because they know as we both do that there's no "deep pockets" streamer waiting to blow Sky/BT out the water.

Well, I’m certainly not disputing that. Of course a pandemic would not prevent a competitive tender. The pandemic has increased the risk factor, and bids would inevitably affect that, which is the reason for the proposal.

I don’t believe that you have any links to show that the request was for any other reason.

1andrew1 16-05-2021 11:02

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079579)
Well, I’m certainly not disputing that. Of course a pandemic would not prevent a competitive tender. The pandemic has increased the risk factor, and bids would inevitably affect that, which is the reason for the proposal.

I don’t believe that you have any links to show that the request was for any other reason.

So, if a tender is not prevented by the pandemic, why would the profit-maximising Premier League decide not to run one?

OLD BOY 16-05-2021 11:15

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36079584)
So, if a tender is not prevented by the pandemic, why would the profit-maximising Premier League decide not to run one?

Because there is greater risk to revenues in the short term, which would skew the bids in a downward spiral. This is clearly a temporary situation, and any degree of certainty will not return until all restrictions are eased and things settle down again.

I am unaware of any suggestion that bidding will not return when the following round is due.

jfman 16-05-2021 11:33

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079579)
Well, I’m certainly not disputing that. Of course a pandemic would not prevent a competitive tender. The pandemic has increased the risk factor, and bids would inevitably affect that, which is the reason for the proposal.

I don’t believe that you have any links to show that the request was for any other reason.

So you have accepted that the desire to drive profits is the primary reason for the EPL.deciding to roll over the current deals for three years?

That certainly says to me that there's no "deep pockets" streamer out there. Streaming services have had a good pandemic as worldwide stay at home orders have reduced alternatives for discretionary household expenditure. Now would be the best time for them to strike - if there was any appetite to enter the market at all.

As Amazon were presumably party to these discussions they clearly have no interest in going further than they have to date.

---------- Post added at 11:33 ---------- Previous post was at 11:33 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079588)
Because there is greater risk to revenues in the short term, which would skew the bids in a downward spiral. This is clearly a temporary situation, and any degree of certainty will not return until all restrictions are eased and things settle down again.

I am unaware of any suggestion that bidding will not return when the following round is due.

Well, on your final point it's unavoidable legally for them to not devise a competitive tender. Covid is the excuse - not the motive - for not doing so this time.

1andrew1 16-05-2021 11:38

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079588)
Because there is greater risk to revenues in the short term, which would skew the bids in a downward spiral. This is clearly a temporary situation, and any degree of certainty will not return until all restrictions are eased and things settle down again.

I am unaware of any suggestion that bidding will not return when the following round is due.

The trajectory in UK TV rights at the last auction which occurred before the pandemic was downwards as no substantial competition to BT and Sky emerged.

2016-2019
UK TV rights over £5bn
2019-2022 They fell to £4.5bn
Quote:

The rights to show Premier League games from 2019-2022 have been sold for £4.464bn - with two live packages still to be sold.

Sky Sports have won the rights to four tranches - 128 live matches - while BT Sport have one, comprising 32 games.

The Premier League's last deal, agreed in 2015 and running until 2019, was worth £5.14bn.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43002985

jfman 16-05-2021 11:41

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36079599)
The trajectory in UK TV rights at the last auction which occurred before the pandemic was downwards as no substantial competition to BT and Sky emerged.

2016-2019
UK TV rights over £5bn
2019-2022 They fell to £4.5bn

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43002985

And this is the crux of my point - they were absolutely going to fall again. Sky called it last time that there would be nobody out there to match their 2016 offer. Similarly there's nobody out there to match the 2019 offer.

BT are on record that they are trying to reduce their sports rights expenditure. The only way the rights would go up is a new entrant, or Amazon wanting to commit beyond their bargain basement rights they have just now.

If there was a genuine chance of a DAZN, Netflix, Facebook or Google bid we would be heading to auction. Spoiler: there isn't.

Raider999 16-05-2021 11:48

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079600)
And this is the crux of my point - they were absolutely going to fall again. Sky called it last time that there would be nobody out there to match their 2016 offer. Similarly there's nobody out there to match the 2019 offer.

BT are on record that they are trying to reduce their sports rights expenditure. The only way the rights would go up is a new entrant, or Amazon wanting to commit beyond their bargain basement rights they have just now.

If there was a genuine chance of a DAZN, Netflix, Facebook or Google bid we would be heading to auction. Spoiler: there isn't.


But the fact there wasn't an auction presumably means OB will carry over his usual prediction of a streamer bidding for the meaningful packages to the next auction.:D:D

denphone 16-05-2021 11:55

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Raider999 (Post 36079606)
But the fact there wasn't an auction presumably means OB will carry over his usual prediction of a streamer bidding for the meaningful packages to the next auction.:D:D

We await that next auction very keenly.;)

OLD BOY 16-05-2021 12:30

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079600)
And this is the crux of my point - they were absolutely going to fall again. Sky called it last time that there would be nobody out there to match their 2016 offer. Similarly there's nobody out there to match the 2019 offer.

BT are on record that they are trying to reduce their sports rights expenditure. The only way the rights would go up is a new entrant, or Amazon wanting to commit beyond their bargain basement rights they have just now.

If there was a genuine chance of a DAZN, Netflix, Facebook or Google bid we would be heading to auction. Spoiler: there isn't.

I am not disputing that. All I have said is that the reason for the decision not to go for an auction this time around is the uncertainty brought about by Covid.

---------- Post added at 12:30 ---------- Previous post was at 12:28 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raider999 (Post 36079606)
But the fact there wasn't an auction presumably means OB will carry over his usual prediction of a streamer bidding for the meaningful packages to the next auction.:D:D

Well, what else would you expect? If there is no auction, things remain the same.

Unforeseen events have a habit of disrupting predictions.

1andrew1 16-05-2021 12:40

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079614)
I am not disputing that. All I have said is that the reason for the decision not to go for an auction this time around is the uncertainty brought about by Covid.

What uncertainty does Covid bring to TV rights from 2022-2025?

jfman 16-05-2021 13:17

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36079620)
What uncertainty does Covid bring to TV rights from 2022-2025?

Indeed. These are the glory days of streaming.

Hugh 16-05-2021 13:40

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36079620)
What uncertainty does Covid bring to TV rights from 2022-2025?

Nothing, because apparently everything is going to be fine and we will all be back to normal by June 21st… ;)

1andrew1 16-05-2021 13:43

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36079638)
Nothing, because apparently everything is going to be fine and we will all be back to normal by June 21st… ;)

Except for viewers in the Granada region. ;)

jfman 16-05-2021 13:52

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36079639)
Except for viewers in the Granada region. ;)

And of course except for viewers in Scotland.

telegramsam 16-05-2021 15:10

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
My personal opinion is that the Premier League football rights have reached its peak and when the next auction for TV deals comes up there's going to be very little change in how much is paid. Just my opinion of course. Maybe more streamers will come on board,who knows? Would it not be possible for say Sky and Virgin to offer a football bundle? I.E access to every games regardless of who's putting it on for a single monthly payment? Sky,and presumably Virgin have Amazon and Netflix apps already so could easily add others I imagine?

OLD BOY 16-05-2021 19:33

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36079620)
What uncertainty does Covid bring to TV rights from 2022-2025?

If the Premier football clubs start going under through lack of people going through the turnstiles, I would suggest to you that this would have a significant impact for those holding TV rights, and that risk will inevitably lead to prospective bidders lowering the price they want to pay for the rights.

---------- Post added at 19:32 ---------- Previous post was at 19:31 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079634)
Indeed. These are the glory days of streaming.

Nothing to do with it.

---------- Post added at 19:33 ---------- Previous post was at 19:32 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36079638)
Nothing, because apparently everything is going to be fine and we will all be back to normal by June 21st… ;)

Do you know something we don’t, Hugh? :D

Hugh 16-05-2021 19:45

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079679)
If the Premier football clubs start going under through lack of people going through the turnstiles, I would suggest to you that this would have a significant impact for those holding TV rights, and that risk will inevitably lead to prospective bidders lowering the price they want to pay for the rights.

---------- Post added at 19:32 ---------- Previous post was at 19:31 ----------



Nothing to do with it.

---------- Post added at 19:33 ---------- Previous post was at 19:32 ----------



Do you know something we don’t, Hugh? :D

Just reminding you of one message in one thread (everything will be fine) and a different message in this thread (the uncertainty brought about by Covid.)… ;)

OLD BOY 16-05-2021 19:51

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36079683)
Just reminding you of one message in one thread (everything will be fine) and a different message in this thread (the uncertainty brought about by Covid.)… ;)

Context, dear boy, context.

1andrew1 16-05-2021 20:50

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079679)
If the Premier football clubs start going under through lack of people going through the turnstiles, I would suggest to you that this would have a significant impact for those holding TV rights, and that risk will inevitably lead to prospective bidders lowering the price they want to pay for the rights.

In this most pessimistic of scenarios, I still can't see any significant clubs folding that would lead to a reduction in the value of sports rights for the remaining clubs.

Match day revenue is not the largest income stream these days. At Manchester City, for example, it only accounts for 9% of the Club's income.

Hugh 16-05-2021 20:53

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079685)
Context, dear boy, context.

And the context, dear boy, is that they are both happening in the same time period... ;)

jfman 16-05-2021 20:56

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
I fail to see how the current “glory days of streaming” can be so readily dismissed by OB of all people!

1andrew1 16-05-2021 21:30

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079685)
Context, dear boy, context.

Old Boy you do seem to be holding contradictory views of the UK's Coronavirus recovery in two different threads. If the reason is to encourage healthy debate, that's absolutely fine, but don't expect it not to go unnoticed.

---------- Post added at 21:30 ---------- Previous post was at 21:05 ----------

As I've noted in the streaming thread, Eurosport's owner Discovery and HBO/WarnerMedia are set to combine with AT&T controlling the combined company,
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...premium-europe

OLD BOY 16-05-2021 23:31

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
My views on this are not contradictory. Personally, I am confident that this virus is close to being beaten in this country due to the vaccination programme.

However, the markets are skittish given the impact the virus has had on football this last year and markets always hate uncertainty.

---------- Post added at 23:31 ---------- Previous post was at 23:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079692)
I fail to see how the current “glory days of streaming” can be so readily dismissed by OB of all people!

Once again, you’ve missed the point by a country mile.:rolleyes:

jfman 17-05-2021 00:06

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Streamers are going from strength to strength OB. The value of the rights are in decline - even a rollover of a contract on current terms represents a decline in real terms.

If now isn’t the time to step up when will be? After all you’ve preached that they were in a position to blow Sky/BT out the water. Hanging around until the rights devalue isn’t blowing anyone out the water. It’s barely a fart in the bath.

The markets appear to confident in the companies supposedly waiting in the wings. Over the last 12 months:

Amazon share price - up.
Netflix - up.
Facebook - up.
Alphabet (Google) - up.
Apple - up.

All of these companies are cash heavy too - they wouldn’t need to be looking to third parties (loans) to finance their bids.

OLD BOY 17-05-2021 07:40

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079714)
Streamers are going from strength to strength OB. The value of the rights are in decline - even a rollover of a contract on current terms represents a decline in real terms.

I don't disagree with those two points.

---------- Post added at 07:40 ---------- Previous post was at 07:33 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079714)
If now isn’t the time to step up when will be? After all you’ve preached that they were in a position to blow Sky/BT out the water. Hanging around until the rights devalue isn’t blowing anyone out the water. It’s barely a fart in the bath.

The markets appear to confident in the companies supposedly waiting in the wings. Over the last 12 months:

Amazon share price - up.
Netflix - up.
Facebook - up.
Alphabet (Google) - up.
Apple - up.

All of these companies are cash heavy too - they wouldn’t need to be looking to third parties (loans) to finance their bids.

What's that got to do with the price of eggs? It wasn't the streamers who asked for a rollover of the existing contracts. It was the Premier League.

jfman 17-05-2021 07:48

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Rational capitalists trying to profit maximise asked for an extension, OB. They knew both that there were no other buyers, and not even a credible threat of another buyer to shake out an extra few per cent from the incumbents.

Who asked for the extension has nothing to do with the price of eggs, or course, but it all points to me being correct all along that there’s no business model whereby a streamer can spend £5bn on sports rights in the UK and recoup that with a profit.

Otherwise we would have an auction.

1andrew1 17-05-2021 10:48

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36079609)
We await that next auction very keenly.;)

Actually, I now think there's a couple of good reasons to do so.

1. In 2025, most HBO/WarnerMedia rights with Sky will expire except the joint productions. If WarnerMedia does merge with Discovery, the combined company will have an existing sports brand, Eurosport, in the fold. If HBO Max is launched in the UK in 2025, it could be tempted to do so with a beefed-up sports offering with Premier League rights.

2. By 2025, the future of BT Sport will be clearer as well. Certainly, the telcos like BT and AT&T seem to be stepping back from content and focusing on 5G and fibre. Many said VM was wrong to sell off its channels to focus on infrastructure but its actions seem to have been vindicated.

OLD BOY 17-05-2021 13:28

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079724)
Rational capitalists trying to profit maximise asked for an extension, OB. They knew both that there were no other buyers, and not even a credible threat of another buyer to shake out an extra few per cent from the incumbents.

Who asked for the extension has nothing to do with the price of eggs, or course, but it all points to me being correct all along that there’s no business model whereby a streamer can spend £5bn on sports rights in the UK and recoup that with a profit.

Otherwise we would have an auction.

In the absence of a link, I expect you think we would just take your word for that. I accept only that this is what you believe.

---------- Post added at 13:28 ---------- Previous post was at 13:25 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36079742)
Actually, I now think there's a couple of good reasons to do so.

1. In 2025, most HBO/WarnerMedia rights with Sky will expire except the joint productions. If WarnerMedia does merge with Discovery, the combined company will have an existing sports brand, Eurosport, in the fold. If HBO Max is launched in the UK in 2025, it could be tempted to do so with a beefed-up sports offering with Premier League rights.

2. By 2025, the future of BT Sport will be clearer as well. Certainly, the telcos like BT and AT&T seem to be stepping back from content and focusing on 5G and fibre. Many said VM was wrong to sell off its channels to focus on infrastructure but its actions seem to have been vindicated.

I don’t disagree, Andrew. I think Disney maybe in the running as well. I’m not so sure about Amazon now, but I wouldn’t rule them out. Maybe as others have said, Amazon will continue to go for the petit packages on offer.

jfman 17-05-2021 13:32

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
I don't need to post a link that rational capitalists seek to maximise profits OB any more than I would post a link to state that the sky is blue.

You are essentially accusing the league of gross incompetence at best and at worst their executives of criminal offences under the Companies Act. Plus accusing the Government of being engaged in said conspiracy by fast tracking an approval process without competitive tender.

All under the guise of a pandemic that, as you claim elsewhere, is essentially over.

1andrew1 17-05-2021 13:51

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079760)
In the absence of a link, I expect you think we would just take your word for that. I accept only that this is what you believe.

---------- Post added at 13:28 ---------- Previous post was at 13:25 ----------



I don’t disagree, Andrew. I think Disney maybe in the running as well. I’m not so sure about Amazon now, but I wouldn’t rule them out. Maybe as others have said, Amazon will continue to go for the petit packages on offer.

I think the future of BT Sport will help shape the offer from streamers in the UK. We could end up with three all-round streaming packages involving factualy, reality, sport, entertainment and films from Warner-Discovery, Comcast-Sky and Disney-ESPN. Or they could decide just to offer some of these content types in the UK.

OLD BOY 17-05-2021 18:38

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079766)
I don't need to post a link that rational capitalists seek to maximise profits OB any more than I would post a link to state that the sky is blue.

You are essentially accusing the league of gross incompetence at best and at worst their executives of criminal offences under the Companies Act. Plus accusing the Government of being engaged in said conspiracy by fast tracking an approval process without competitive tender.

All under the guise of a pandemic that, as you claim elsewhere, is essentially over.

Who says I dispute that capitalists seek to maximise profits? It’s the conclusions you reach that I am disputing.

I said that the reason this request for the next auction to be postponed was the coronavirus, and this is confirmed in the letter from the Premier League. I stand by that.

By the way, I agree with you that the sky is blue. No link required.

jfman 17-05-2021 18:47

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079799)
Who says I dispute that capitalists seek to maximise profits? It’s the conclusions you reach that I am disputing.

I said that the reason this request for the next auction to be postponed was the coronavirus, and this is confirmed in the letter from the Premier League. I stand by that.

By the way, I agree with you that the sky is blue. No link required.

I think you’ll find it’s the uncertainty over the value - which you had accepted earlier. Basic supply and demand tells you that had there been clear demand there would be clear additional value - and an auction.

Yet I’ve pointed to many cash heavy media companies who could “blow Sky/BT” out the water on the basis of existing assets. The key point that I’ve been trying to tell you (and you persistently ignore) is there’s no viable underlying business model that warrants that kind of outlay.

If a streamer wanted to enter the market the best time was 3 years ago when the value of the rights declined. The second best time is now.

Yet there’s no appetite.

OLD BOY 17-05-2021 19:55

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079801)
I think you’ll find it’s the uncertainty over the value - which you had accepted earlier. Basic supply and demand tells you that had there been clear demand there would be clear additional value - and an auction.
.

Yes, I do accept there is uncertainty over the value. And I think both Sky and BT may well pay less for the rights next time around..

But my post stated that the reason for the cancelled auction was the Coronavirus. ASI have said already, the Premier League used that as the basis of their proposal. Why you continue to dispute that despite the evidence there in black and white is beyond me, I’m afraid.

But of course you keep arguing that black is white, so maybe you cannot read the letter. :erm:

---------- Post added at 19:55 ---------- Previous post was at 19:50 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079801)

Yet I’ve pointed to many cash heavy media companies who could “blow Sky/BT” out the water on the basis of existing assets. The key point that I’ve been trying to tell you (and you persistently ignore) is there’s no viable underlying business model that warrants that kind of outlay.

If a streamer wanted to enter the market the best time was 3 years ago when the value of the rights declined. The second best time is now.

Yet there’s no appetite.

Perhaps, with your economist’s hat on :D you can tell me how Sky and BT can afford to buy rights to Premiership football (even before Comcast took over) but the big fella streamers cannot.

On the contrary to what you have said about entering the market, the best time to enter will be next time, when I believe there will be even less appetite by Sky and BT to fork out a small fortune for the rights. This will allow interested streamers to bid less with a good chance of success. Additionally, the broadband rollout will have advanced further by then, increasing the potential audience.

jfman 17-05-2021 19:57

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
I'm not arguing black is white, OB. You are giving a selective interpretation of events to gloss over the fact that neither the EPL nor the Government give any credibility to a new entrant for (and thus an increase in the value of) the rights. Hence permitting them to bypass the usual competition law that would apply.

A quick note from the lawyers of any "deep pockets" streamer would - very quickly - have focussed the minds of the EPL who are legally bound to act in the interests of their member clubs.

The interests of the clubs were not served by going to the market. It's glaringly obvious why to everyone except you who seemingly wants to say "if only..." for the next three years.

Quote:

Perhaps, with your economist’s hat on you can tell me how Sky and BT can afford to buy rights to Premiership football (even before Comcast took over) but the big fella streamers cannot.

On the contrary to what you have said about entering the market, the best time to enter will be next time, when I believe there will be even less appetite by Sky and BT to fork out a small fortune for the rights. This will allow interested streamers to bid less with a good chance of success. Additionally, the broadband rollout will have advanced further by then, increasing the potential audience.
There will be less appetite for Sky and BT to buy existing rights in the future at a real terms lower value than they do today?

That’s a mind blowing analysis to be honest OB.

I’ve explained to you a million times and I’m sure I’ll be here in three years time repeating the same. Sky and BT have business models for selling the rights. You, erroneously, assume rational capitalists (cash heavy as I’ve demonstrated above) will through some philanthropic endeavour run the rights as a loss leader. It’s not up to me to demonstrate they have a business model. Clearly neither they, nor the EPL themselves, believe such a model exists or they would have matched Sky’s 2016 bid in 2019 and won rights then.

OLD BOY 17-05-2021 20:36

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Basically, you don’t have an argument. You have admitted that you don’t know what these business models are, and yet you say with calm confidence that their business models couldn’t support the acquisition of these sports rights.

Sky and BT on their own did not have any problem bidding, so you cannot tell me with any credibility that the bigger pocket streamers can’t afford it.

Quit while you are behind, my friend.

jfman 17-05-2021 20:47

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079826)
Basically, you don’t have an argument. You have admitted that you don’t know what these business models are, and yet you say with calm confidence that their business models couldn’t support the acquisition of these sports rights.

I cannot analyse fictional business models that seemingly exist in your head but not in the executives of Amazon, Facebook, DAZN, Google, etc.

Quote:

Sky and BT on their own did not have any problem bidding, so you cannot tell me with any credibility that the bigger pocket streamers can’t afford it.

Quit while you are behind, my friend.
Conflating ability to afford with being able to get a return on investment undermines your arguments as you claim to understand business in a capitalist economy.

I’ve told you these organisations are cash heavy. To the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars. That is not one and the same as being willing to buy the rights without a credible business model whereby they get a return on said investment.

If the value of the rights are falling it’s clear that the market believes Sky/BT have hit as close to the optimal business model. No new entrant can invest the same and get the same return. That’s literally the purpose of a blind auction - to push all potential bidders to their limits.

Streamers - with the exception of Amazon at the bargain basement bucket - haven’t even engaged to date. I trust their judgement far more than the fiction you have developed and continue to push on the forum.

1andrew1 17-05-2021 21:37

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079815)
Yes, I do accept there is uncertainty over the value. And I think both Sky and BT may well pay less for the rights next time around..

But my post stated that the reason for the cancelled auction was the Coronavirus. ASI have said already, the Premier League used that as the basis of their proposal. Why you continue to dispute that despite the evidence there in black and white is beyond me, I’m afraid.

But of course you keep arguing that black is white, so maybe you cannot read the letter. :erm:

My view is probably similar to jfman's and is based on analysing the situation, not any insider knowledge or blog posts.

I believe the Premier League have used Coronavirus as a scapegoat to cleverly maintain the existing level of TV rights when they were at risk of being eroded. I don't believe we should just accept their reason as being gospel, however nicely worded it might be. I believe we should dig a bit deeper and look at what we know anout the market dynamics and draw independent and logical conclusions.

Uncertainty about the Premier League delivering valuable content is pretty minimal to be honest. Matchday revenue is not so important these days and with interest rates low, someone is always there to lend the key clubs money. There is no likely scenario that would see the likes of Liverpool, Man City, United, Arsenal, etc all fall into administration and out of the League. If a smaller club did, it would not significantly impact the attractiveness of the TV rights.

What is certain is that the relationship between Sky and BT is now good so there is little chance of them bidding aggressively and every chance of them seizing the opportunity to reduce what they bid three years ago. And no third player has been sniffed out or it would have dropped hints to the Premier League before the League decided to request the auction be cancelled.

Raider999 17-05-2021 21:49

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36079826)
Basically, you don’t have an argument. You have admitted that you don’t know what these business models are, and yet you say with calm confidence that their business models couldn’t support the acquisition of these sports rights.

Sky and BT on their own did not have any problem bidding, so you cannot tell me with any credibility that the bigger pocket streamers can’t afford it.

Quit while you are behind, my friend.

I think it is more of a case that streamers don't see the value in bidding high for the PL rights.

If they did then surely they would have done so - in which case the rights would have gone to tender this time, irrespective of the civil effect.

1andrew1 17-05-2021 22:26

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Raider999 (Post 36079842)
I think it is more of a case that streamers don't see the value in bidding high for the PL rights.

If they did then surely they would have done so - in which case the rights would have gone to tender this time, irrespective of the civil effect.

The streamers would certainly have advised the Premier League of their interest.

jfman 18-05-2021 05:18

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Raider999 (Post 36079842)
I think it is more of a case that streamers don't see the value in bidding high for the PL rights.

If they did then surely they would have done so - in which case the rights would have gone to tender this time, irrespective of the civil effect.

This gets lost on OB every time. They’re not charities and haven’t mounted up hundreds of billions in cash reserves by making poor investments.

The idea that anyone can just drop in £5bn and be “Sky/BT” overnight, generating the same or greater returns across their entire business is laughable. If it were that easy it’d have happened by now.

The whole purpose of the blind auction is to push everyone to their limit and be left with the last man standing. Who has considered the rest of the market and squeezed their business model to bid that little bit more.

Not a single streamer looked at what Sky paid in 2016 and matched it in 2019. There’s no evidence anyone would have in 2022, indeed the league having uncertainty indicates they believe there would be no such bid(s). The people who are literally paid to profit maximise for the league have ruled it out, Amazon have ruled it out by going along with it - but OB knows better.

jfman 18-05-2021 11:57

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Amazon have found $9bn to buy MGM.

Small change of course to the cash heavy giant. So what makes MGM a good idea but not the EPL?

Phunkenstein 18-05-2021 12:12

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36079915)
Amazon have found $9bn to buy MGM.

Small change of course to the cash heavy giant. So what makes MGM a good idea but not the EPL?

Assuming it happens, they acquire a catalogue they can exploit in perpetuity both via Prime and transactional, access to some IP ripe for exploition again…plus a share in the Bond franchise.

1andrew1 19-05-2021 18:29

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Streaming fans should look away now. ;)

It will be interesting to see the split of rights between ITV and BBC.
Quote:

PSBs retain rights to Six Nations rugby

A new deal that will keep Six Nations rugby on BBC and ITV is expected to be announced in the next few days.

It had been anticipated the annual tournament would go to pay-TV after private equity firm CVC bought a 14% stake for £365 million. Amazon, Sky Sports and BT Sport were seen as the most likely bidders.

The Daily Telegraph reported Wednesday the new deal would cost the two Public Service Broadcasters (PSBs) between £90 million currently being paid and £150 million that had been previously reported.
https://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2021...nations-rugby/

jfman 19-05-2021 18:32

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36080099)
Streaming fans should look away now. ;)

It will be interesting to see the split of rights between ITV and BBC.


https://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2021...nations-rugby/

Bezos could surely find loose change under the sofa to cover this one.

1andrew1 19-05-2021 18:45

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Phunkenstein (Post 36079919)
Assuming it happens, they acquire a catalogue they can exploit in perpetuity both via Prime and transactional, access to some IP ripe for exploition again…plus a share in the Bond franchise.

MGM's rights are also valuable internationally to a wide demographic. The Premier League has far, far less global appeal, although it's one of the most globally popular leagues.

---------- Post added at 18:45 ---------- Previous post was at 18:37 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36080101)
Bezos could surely find loose change under the sofa to cover this one.

Even Eleven Sports could afford it! ;)

OLD BOY 19-05-2021 19:49

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Raider999 (Post 36079842)
I think it is more of a case that streamers don't see the value in bidding high for the PL rights.

If they did then surely they would have done so - in which case the rights would have gone to tender this time, irrespective of the civil effect.

This is an oft quoted phrase, and it’s hilarious. Because something hasn’t happened already, it will never happen! What kind of argument is that?

This time last year, would you have said that AT&T would never join with Discovery because it would have happened already?

If the streamers see a benefit in offering the Premier League, they will do so when the time is right. They have the money to do it (more than Sky and BT had combined) and to say they can’t make a profit out of it when Sky and BT can is clearly nonsense.

In the US, Disney offers ESPN as a separate stream. To bring us into line, they may decide to offer the Premiership as one of the UK sport options.

Given that Discovery own Eurosport, who’s to say that after the AT&T merger they would not want to strengthen their sport offering in the UK on Discovery+ and offer the EPL?

And then there’s Amazon, who have been monitoring their smaller EPL rights performance with interest.

Any of these streamers, or even sport only streamers not yet big in the UK like DAZN, could enter the bidding process next time around. It’s just a matter of time before this happens and it’s incredible to see that some members are in complete denial about this.

jfman 19-05-2021 19:59

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Monkeys in space with typing Shakespeare territory here.

This time last year most (all?) of us would be predicting significant ongoing consolidation of global media companies.

Quote:

If the streamers see a benefit in offering the Premier League, they will do so when the time is right. They have the money to do it (more than Sky and BT had combined) and to say they can’t make a profit out of it when Sky and BT can is clearly nonsense.
Pray, tell OB why these rational capitalists are foregoing such an obvious profit making opportunity?

1andrew1 19-05-2021 20:20

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
The TV streaming landscape will change once Warner's contract with Sky ends and it has completed a merger with Discovery. It could be tempted to beef up its Eurosport offering to tempt customers from Sky, but I suspect this might depend on what happens to BT Sport.

jfman 19-05-2021 20:35

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36080125)
The TV streaming landscape will change once Warner's contract with Sky ends and it has completed a merger with Discovery. It could be tempted to beef up its Eurosport offering to tempt customers from Sky, but I suspect this might depend on what happens to BT Sport.

The problem is that, often ignored on the forum, the streaming market is a subset of the television market as a whole.

Someone has to make a significant move at some point or another or else Sky seamlessly move into the steaming market and plant themselves down there. If someone is waiting assuming Sky are unable to do this and waiting for them to fail (and then EPL rights collapse in value) they’d be as well watching coastal erosion and hoping to see something significant.

Someone somewhere has to square the circle of getting folk to spend £30 a month in addition to everything else they are already paying.

1andrew1 19-05-2021 22:00

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36080131)
The problem is that, often ignored on the forum, the streaming market is a subset of the television market as a whole.

Someone has to make a significant move at some point or another or else Sky seamlessly move into the steaming market and plant themselves down there. If someone is waiting assuming Sky are unable to do this and waiting for them to fail (and then EPL rights collapse in value) they’d be as well watching coastal erosion and hoping to see something significant.

Someone somewhere has to square the circle of getting folk to spend £30 a month in addition to everything else they are already paying.

Agreed. And through Now, Sky is in the streaming market anyway.

What's happening now is the emergence of a potential all-round competitor on the content front to Sky in the form of Warner Discovery. There currently isn't another provider in the UK that does this.

However, if it launches HBO Max in 2025, it will be late to the streaming show in the U although t will have the rather smaller Discovery + offering. What to do? If the price is right; which depends on BT's enthusiasm for sport; it may decide that some Premier League rights will give it a helping hand. BT may even decide to contribute BT Sport for a stake in the new Warner Discovery entity.

OLD BOY 19-05-2021 23:21

Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36080131)
The problem is that, often ignored on the forum, the streaming market is a subset of the television market as a whole.

Someone has to make a significant move at some point or another or else Sky seamlessly move into the steaming market and plant themselves down there. If someone is waiting assuming Sky are unable to do this and waiting for them to fail (and then EPL rights collapse in value) they’d be as well watching coastal erosion and hoping to see something significant.

Someone somewhere has to square the circle of getting folk to spend £30 a month in addition to everything else they are already paying.

We, what about the subscriptions football fans are currently paying to Sky Sports and BT Sports?? That was one of your easier questions to answer!

Consider that circle squared!


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:51.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum