Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
Firstly, the first paragraph says: ‘Channel 4 has said it no longer sees its future in traditional television channels, in a decision that could spell the end for some documentaries and other programmes that do not attract younger online audiences.’ You say the channel is a public service broadcaster. So what? Not only can they provide free streaming services through Freeview, but the government is looking to sell off the channel. Additionally, they are also reviewing whether ‘public service broadcasting’ is relevant today, and if so, what it should embrace. I accept completely that the channel is not closing down tomorrow, but the process might not take as long as I originally envisaged. ---------- Post added at 14:14 ---------- Previous post was at 14:12 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
There's nothing to indicate that they will close linear channels or cease broadcasting on digital terrestrial or other platforms.
A streaming future and linear broadcasting aren't mutually exclusive. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Ian Katz ... isn’t he the one who tried to send a direct message to a colleague about “boring, snoring Rachel Reeves” when he was editor of Newsnight, but actually tweeted it to the entire Twattersphere?
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
Elsewhere, I see that Entertainment One is pulling its films off a streaming service, Amazon, in favour of a contract with satellite and streamer Sky. https://www.cityam.com/sky-beefs-up-...one-film-deal/ |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
I’m not sure how that slight change of wording makes any difference, frankly. However, sorry for my inadvertent misquote. ---------- Post added at 17:30 ---------- Previous post was at 17:28 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
It’s also important to note it’s not a quote of an individual at C4 it was the journalist who wrote it.
Context is important here because at each iteration what has actually been said is being stretched further. I don’t think anyone sees their future as primarily in broadcast, scheduled, over the air transmission. However it’s a leap to go from a focus on streaming or on demand content to closing down altogether. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
I'll defo check the system on Monday though incase anything about ch4 has come through whilst we've all been off work. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
I have not seen Channel 4’s 20-year-deal, but I dare say that if you read the small print, there will be no problem in closing down the channels and transferring the content to their streaming service. They will have been pretty incompetent not to have foreseen this. ---------- Post added at 23:01 ---------- Previous post was at 22:51 ---------- Quote:
Happy to consider any reasoned arguments. I am happy to debate whether TV channels will actually disappear altogether, which is a reasonable point to make, but surely, that is the point we should be debating. I appreciate that when losing an argument, this can be difficult. But this is a debating forum.... |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
The reporter clearly isn't reporting what was said - hence they did not use quotation marks or attribute a quote to that end. They are offering their own input/analysis and no such law suit, on such an uncontroversial topic, would be considered a reasonable or proportionate response.
"The future" being streaming doesn't equate to the end of linear broadcasting entirely. Nobody, at any point, on the forum has contested that the way people are consuming content is changing or that as companies chase revenues/profits they will have to shift their content delivery in a way that suits these habits. That doesn't equate to the end of linear, scheduled broadcasting over DTT, cable or satellite (or even IPTV - I'm completely agnostic on the technology). You know this already. I wouldn't consider myself losing any such argument - I've set the extremely low bar throughout where if a single linear channel exists in 2035 I'm proven right. With Amazon and Netflix testing a linear channel I think there's life in them for a good while yet. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
Have you thought of standing for the US Presidency? ;) |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
That is all that’s required.This is a forum. Oh, sorry, you know that, you are a moderator. God help us all! |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
You don’t have to explain yourself, but I do - God (other deities are available) help us... |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
However, whatever! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:47. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.