![]() |
Re: Streaming services news, offers and general chit chat
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Streaming services news, offers and general chit chat
So they are basically making you pay more for what you had before.;)
So if the same is implemented here we will be looking at £109.99 for the annual sub with no ads and £10.99 a month for the monthly sub with no ads. This streaming world is starting to get really expensive. |
Re: Streaming services news, offers and general chit chat
Quote:
Don't forget that two years ago it was £4.99 per month.... Robbing bar stewards |
Re: Streaming services news, offers and general chit chat
Quote:
|
Re: Streaming services news, offers and general chit chat
So let me get this straight. The £7.99 package will have ads and the ad free is £10.99? so instead of introducing a ad supported cheap version they are simply creating a new more expensive tier and adding ads to what is available now? if that is the case then that is atrocious
I think if they do that in the UK then people will vote with their feet or at best stay on ad supported. It is a time of cost cutting not splashing out |
Re: Streaming services news, offers and general chit chat
Quote:
|
Re: Streaming services news, offers and general chit chat
Quote:
|
Re: Streaming services news, offers and general chit chat
Just surprised , that people here are surprised that this is happening.
|
Re: Streaming services news, offers and general chit chat
Quote:
|
Re: Streaming services news, offers and general chit chat
Quote:
|
Re: Streaming services news, offers and general chit chat
14% of HBO Max staff - about 70 people will laid off today
https://deadline.com/2022/08/hbo-max...al-1235091596/ |
Re: Streaming services news, offers and general chit chat
Quote:
Through Virgin and Now. It’s also irrelevant to the point at hand. Costs are going up across the market regardless of how the content is delivered. Pay more and get less. Not the future we were promised at all. |
Re: Streaming services news, offers and general chit chat
Quote:
I have already addressed your point about paying twice. I was right when I said you don’t take in the replies to the points you make. |
Re: Streaming services news, offers and general chit chat
Quote:
We clearly get less. The further splintering of rights by studio across different platforms means we can no longer enjoy from the traditional incumbents using economies of scale to bring us more content. Indeed, even Channel 4 and Five would previously have had a decent offering of US content slipping down to them now being retained by studio run streaming services. You yourself have post countless times this to be the case, and a lowering of quality of what is left over for what you deem “linear” channels in a poorly defined way. Who pays for that? Philanthropic studios? No, the mugs. The end user. |
Re: Streaming services news, offers and general chit chat
Quote:
I don’t know what rocks your boat, but the pay TV listings are much worse than they ever were before and I find myself recording less and less. Go into the streamers and you get a fantastic choice to watch any time. It is true that there are fewer shows available on the pay TV channels as well as most of the terrestrials these days, but I still believe that the streamers offer much better value than the pay-tv channels. Netflix on its own has more choice, and you can jump between the streamers too because you are not hooked into a contract. You could have all you need through a Freeview box and just one streamer, which you could change from time to time. As you know, I am not talking about sport, which is a different matter altogether. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:37. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum