![]() |
Re: *All* ntl Cap Discussion (part 4)
Cant argue with the point that ntl appears not to be outperforming telewest, telewest and ntl both have saturated ports at linx, but the difference is I sort of expect it from telewest since they are uncapped and I dont expect it from ntl. I have heard of no saturated ports for any of the adsl isp's.
|
Re: *all* ntl Cap Discussion (part 4)
Quote:
|
Re: *All* ntl Cap Discussion (part 4)
Quote:
capped or uncapped is not relevant as number of users is what causes it not whether they are capped, there is no difference to 100 capped 10meg users accessing the same point as 1000 1meg users it still has the same amount of traffic |
Re: *All* ntl Cap Discussion (part 4)
woaahhh only been away a week and its total chaos here among the allways entertaining cap thread,everyones running round without a clue whats going on or whats going to happen
!!! am I capped now arnt I capped !!! !!! ntl are going to be doing this or theyre doing that !!! the BIG QUESTION is when does the paying public get to know how they stand.Are all 1mb and 2mb going to be unlimited or not (personally I wouldnt need or expect 10mb unlimited,I dont think many people would need that) ntl dont even seem to know whats going on,youve got so many people not touched with any overuse policy then another set of users dropped to 512k and Everyones paying different prices for different packages none of us have a clue what we are on and if and how much we are capped. The people on the phone lines dont have a clue what to tell you if youve issues regarding what package you have or should have. I was 512k for about 5 weeks - phoned up and said I repeatedly over used my connection but was told I would be charged less at £17.99 than the £24.99 I had been paying.Now I'm back upto 1mb and don't have a clue what I'll be charged for December ? I was more than happy to take my punishment and use the 512k unlimited package till the footie season ended. have ntl realized what they'll be losing monthly by putting people on lower cost packages and double backed the whole idea on caps ? have the jolly public caught onto the fact that even being unlimited 512k is better than capped at 30gb-75gb per month and take up of the higher speeds not doing so well ? |
Re: *all* ntl Cap Discussion (part 4)
Quote:
|
Re: *all* ntl Cap Discussion (part 4)
Quote:
ntl stating something seems to have little to do with what they eventualy do |
Re: *All* ntl Cap Discussion (part 4)
Quote:
My other point is that the more people signing up for a services must produce revenue that can be ploughed back into infrastructure to cover bandwidth. |
Re: *All* ntl Cap Discussion (part 4)
Quote:
how much stuff is there that you want to download then ? |
Re: *all* ntl Cap Discussion (part 4)
Quote:
|
Re: *all* ntl Cap Discussion (part 4)
Quote:
|
Re: *all* ntl Cap Discussion (part 4)
Quote:
|
Re: *All* ntl Cap Discussion (part 4)
Quote:
|
Re: *all* ntl Cap Discussion (part 4)
Quote:
|
Re: *all* ntl Cap Discussion (part 4)
Quote:
|
Re: *All* ntl Cap Discussion (part 4)
I'm actually very pleased with the service I've got BB wise..Never had any major problems and the connection has been terrific most of the time.The only real complaint is the email issues but that's another thread/forum entirely.
When they do this I will actually be VERY GRATEFUL to be getting a better service than the one I started with which was 128k.Here I will be on 1MB unlimited for the same price as I was on 128k. :tu::cleader::cleader::cleader: |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 16:23. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum