Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   [Update] Cyclist convicted of "wanton and furious driving" (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33705272)

Ignitionnet 11-10-2017 17:02

Re: [Update] Cyclist convicted of "wanton and furious driving"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35919833)
Something just has to be done. I suggest cyclists have the same rules applied to them as those of mobility scooter drivers (who cause fatalities and accidents all the time).

So, just like mobility scooters which are always on the pavement causing mayhem, cyclists should have no licence, no MOT, no 'road tax', no registration plate and no insurance.

+1.

007stuart 11-10-2017 19:33

Re: [Update] Cyclist convicted of "wanton and furious driving"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35919833)
Something just has to be done. I suggest cyclists have the same rules applied to them as those of mobility scooter drivers (who cause fatalities and accidents all the time).

So, just like mobility scooters which are always on the pavement causing mayhem, cyclists should have no licence, no MOT, no 'road tax', no registration plate and no insurance.

Thank you so much for bringing this shocking revelation the forum's attention!! A quick google brought this page up :
http://www.factoryoutletscooters.co....lity-scooters/

It's clear that something must be done with these reckless individuals!!

First cement lorries, now mobility scooters I can't wait to see what examples you bring up next.

Osem 12-10-2017 11:10

Re: [Update] Cyclist convicted of "wanton and furious driving"
 
I see the way forward - we ban all pedestrians and car/van/lorry/milk float/mobility scooter drivers from the streets so that cyclists can roam free and only kill and injure themselves. I dare say that some of them will still find a way to blame other people though... :spin:

007stuart 12-10-2017 14:15

Re: [Update] Cyclist convicted of "wanton and furious driving"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35919923)
I see the way forward - we ban all pedestrians and car/van/lorry/milk float/mobility scooter drivers from the streets so that cyclists can roam free and only kill and injure themselves. I dare say that some of them will still find a way to blame other people though... :spin:

It's the only sensible option.

Osem 12-10-2017 15:34

Re: [Update] Cyclist convicted of "wanton and furious driving"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 007stuart (Post 35919938)
It's the only sensible option.

Yes, well cyclists are never to blame as we all know. Four year olds walking in pedestrian zones really ought to know better as should their parents. His head was probably full of all sorts of childish theme park nonsense and he wasn't paying full attention to road safety when that innocent cyclist hit him. Poor innocent young man on the bike, I dare say he's been traumatised by this and won't ever be able to cycle in a pedestrian zone again without feeling threatened by all those people walking around causing a hazard... :rolleyes:

Kursk 13-10-2017 02:02

Re: [Update] Cyclist convicted of "wanton and furious driving"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 007stuart (Post 35919870)
Thank you so much......

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35919923)
I see the way forward.........

Quote:

Originally Posted by 007stuart (Post 35919938)
It's the only sensible option.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35919951)
Yes, well cyclists are never to blame......

No, let me guess - Cannon and Ball? No, Eric and Ernie? No, aah, I know for sure, Dick and Dom :D

007stuart 13-10-2017 14:06

Re: [Update] Cyclist convicted of "wanton and furious driving"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35920018)
No, let me guess - Cannon and Ball? No, Eric and Ernie? No, aah, I know for sure, Dick and Dom :D

No need to guess with you Billy no Mates

Uncle Peter 14-10-2017 19:23

Re: [Update] Cyclist convicted of "wanton and furious driving"
 
Congratulations to the fat, Chris Froome wannabe cycling across the new Mersey Gateway bridge this morning. Apart from the fact that it's a motorway regulation road all the way across, all of the approach roads are too. It's this element of the lycra fraternity and the fixie hipsters who need a good kicking and locking up.

Sirius 14-10-2017 22:31

Re: [Update] Cyclist convicted of "wanton and furious driving"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Peter (Post 35920181)
Congratulations to the fat, Chris Froome wannabe cycling across the new Mersey Gateway bridge this morning. Apart from the fact that it's a motorway regulation road all the way across, all of the approach roads are too. It's this element of the lycra fraternity and the fixie hipsters who need a good kicking and locking up.

He's a cyclist, Laws of the road don't apply to him. ;)

Osem 14-10-2017 23:49

Re: [Update] Cyclist convicted of "wanton and furious driving"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35920202)
He's a cyclist, Laws of the road don't apply to him. ;)

Yep, they're always the victims aren't they. Must be great to be so perfect... :rolleyes:

Kursk 15-10-2017 00:55

Re: [Update] Cyclist convicted of "wanton and furious driving"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Peter (Post 35920181)
Congratulations to the fat, Chris Froome wannabe cycling across the new Mersey Gateway bridge this morning. Apart from the fact that it's a motorway regulation road all the way across, all of the approach roads are too. It's this element of the lycra fraternity and the fixie hipsters who need a good kicking and locking up.

Oh do calm down Uncle Peter, you probably couldn't kick your way out of a wet Liverpool Echo :rolleyes:

Now, as far as I can tell one of the main objectives of the project was to encourage the increased use of cycling and walking - did this not come about? If not, why not as the project is government (taxpayer) funded and cyclists/pedestrians pay taxes you know.

papa smurf 15-10-2017 09:30

Re: [Update] Cyclist convicted of "wanton and furious driving"
 
[QUOTE=Kursk;35920209]Oh do calm down Uncle Peter, you probably couldn't kick your way out of a wet Liverpool Echo :rolleyes:

Now, as far as I can tell one of the main objectives of the project was to encourage the increased use of cycling and walking - did this not come about? If not, why not as the project is government (taxpayer) funded and cyclists/pedestrians pay taxes you know.[/QUOTE]

yes them lycra fairy suits don't come cheap

Uncle Peter 15-10-2017 11:54

Re: [Update] Cyclist convicted of "wanton and furious driving"
 
The old bridge is closed for refurbishment but still open for cycle and foot traffic. While it’s now a relatively safe and traffic free route over the river the roads it connects to, like most of the roads in this country are not suitable enough for cars and cycles to co-exist safely.

Kursk 16-10-2017 03:05

Re: [Update] Cyclist convicted of "wanton and furious driving"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35920216)
yes them lycra fairy suits don't come cheap

A cost easily saved by wearing the wife's tights instead.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Peter (Post 35920223)
The old bridge is closed for refurbishment but still open for cycle and foot traffic. While it’s now a relatively safe and traffic free route over the river the roads it connects to, like most of the roads in this country are not suitable enough for cars and cycles to co-exist safely.

So, despite it being a stated 'main objective' to encourage increased cycling and walking, there is no provision to achieve this within the constructed new bridge?

Don't you think that it might have been an idea to incorporate a cycle/walk way so that everyone who has contributed toward the cost of the project could enjoy the same benefits as motorists?

I hope local cyclists regularly disrupt traffic flow by way of protest :p:.

papa smurf 16-10-2017 10:56

Re: [Update] Cyclist convicted of "wanton and furious driving"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35920305)
A cost easily saved by wearing the wife's tights instead.

So, despite it being a stated 'main objective' to encourage increased cycling and walking, there is no provision to achieve this within the constructed new bridge?

Don't you think that it might have been an idea to incorporate a cycle/walk way so that everyone who has contributed toward the cost of the project could enjoy the same benefits as motorists?

I hope local cyclists regularly disrupt traffic flow by way of protest :p:.






sounds like a Bull Bar moment


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:41.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum