Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Updated: Boris resigns as party leader (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33710650)

Hugh 24-01-2022 18:41

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
https://www.itv.com/news/2022-01-24/...ws-understands

Quote:

Boris Johnson had birthday bash during lockdown, ITV News understands

ITV News understands Boris Johnson had a birthday party during the first lockdown in 2020 despite the rules forbidding social gatherings indoors at the time.

It's alleged that the prime minister's wife, Carrie Johnson, helped organise a surprise get-together for him on the afternoon of 19 June just after 2pm.

Up to 30 people are said to have attended the event in the Cabinet Room after Boris Johnson returned from an official visit to a school in Hertfordshire.

ITV News understands that the interior designer, Lulu Lytle - who was not a member of No 10 staff - also attended the gathering. At the time Ms Lytle was renovating Boris Johnson’s flat in Downing Street, which has been the subject of a separate controversy.

ITV News also understands that on the evening of 19 June 2020, family friends were hosted upstairs in the prime minister’s residence in an apparent further breach of the rules. Number 10 have denied this, claiming the prime minister only hosted a small number of family members outside.

At the afternoon event, Carrie Johnson and Lulu Lytle are believed to have presented the prime minister with a cake whilst his wife led staff in a chorus of happy birthday.

Those assembled are understood to have eaten picnic food from M&S, with the gathering lasting for around 20-30 minutes. Downing St say the prime minister only attended for less than 10 minutes.

In June 2020 social gatherings indoors were still forbidden under lockdown laws.

Mr K 24-01-2022 18:43

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36110886)

Well Happy Birthday Bozza, an early retirement as a present? ;)

Dave42 24-01-2022 18:52

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36110886)

but he didn't know it was a party :rofl:

1andrew1 24-01-2022 19:06

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Interesting - Johnson refused eight times today in a TV interview to say whether a £12bn national insurance hike would go ahead as planned in April.

TheDaddy 24-01-2022 19:17

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36110881)
Being a Single white male, if the roles had been reversed, and I was sacked for my non-religious beliefs, This wouldn't even be a news story.

But lately, it seems non-whites can complain about anything and get heard (Even if it is called for)

You do know white people can be Muslim don't you and to right they get heard if it's called for

mrmistoffelees 24-01-2022 19:46

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36110755)
Nah, had enough of all this crap making the news, and if you want to bring other things than 'political and/or racist' orientated stuff into the discussion you're welcome to throw slurs about with cute abandon . . . I aint listening :p:

I didn’t bring anything into it… your comment was all encompassing

OLD BOY 24-01-2022 19:48

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110891)
but he didn't know it was a party :rofl:

Probably because it wasn’t. :rolleyes:

Hugh 24-01-2022 19:50

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110903)
Probably because it wasn’t. :rolleyes:

I came here to post this, but you beat me to it… :D

“It was on his birthday, there was birthday cake, M&S snacks, his partner got people together in a room to sing ‘happy birthday’ and eat snacks, but OB says let’s wait until Sue Gray’s report to find out if it was a birthday party”

OLD BOY 24-01-2022 19:53

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110893)
Interesting - Johnson refused eight times today in a TV interview to say whether a £12bn national insurance hike would go ahead as planned in April.

So what do you want him to do? The increase is the plan, but people are reacting against it. Would you prefer him to ignore those disagreements and press ahead or take time to consider the arguments and alternatives?

Whichever way he bends, it will never satisfy you.

---------- Post added at 19:53 ---------- Previous post was at 19:51 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36110904)
I came here to post this, but you beat me to it… :D

“It was on his birthday, there was birthday cake, M&S snacks, his partner got people together in a room to sing ‘happy birthday’ and eat snacks, but OB says let’s wait until Sue Gray’s report to find out if it was a birthday party”

So what I’d they interrupted a meeting to do this? These people were his work colleagues and of course his wife. The whole thing is nonsense.

Dave42 24-01-2022 20:05

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110903)
Probably because it wasn’t. :rolleyes:

what a surprise defending the underfendable again OB

Damien 24-01-2022 20:11

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
If it was only this party and Boris Johnson is lying about how long he is in there and that he didn't invite people to his flat afterwards - and Johnson lies all the time remember - then this one isn't as bad. Of course this isn't the only time, it happened time and time again.

Mr K 24-01-2022 20:28

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36110908)
If it was only this party and Boris Johnson is lying about how long he is in there and that he didn't invite people to his flat afterwards - and Johnson lies all the time remember - then this one isn't as bad. Of course this isn't the only time, it happened time and time again.

He' s been sacked for lying many times, he will be again, shortly.

Spare him no tears, he has a few pennies in the bank, and he ' got Brexit done' ( by lying) , making the rest of us poorer, which is the main thing..... Jolly japes for the old chap, onto the next jolly wheeze !

Damien 24-01-2022 20:34

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
I said before with the Friday Drinks (although that was a bit too much still) that if it's a bunch of people already working stopping for a quick cake/drink/food then I really don't think that's as big a moral failing as hosting an actual party with invites sent out.

The Christmas Party they had in 2020 and the May 2020 'bring your own Booze' parties are the real problem ones. The one on the eve of the Prince Philip funeral was poor as well. Wine Fridays wouldn't have been as bad if they hadn't gone to such effort to get a wine fridge and smuggle in wine in a suitcase because they knew it was dodgy.

Carth 24-01-2022 20:35

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Thank God that Gordon Brown saw fit to get rid of the UK gold reserves so Boris couldn't get his hands on them.


Not that it matters, I'm just adding to the drivel on here :D

Hugh 24-01-2022 21:53

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110905)
So what do you want him to do? The increase is the plan, but people are reacting against it. Would you prefer him to ignore those disagreements and press ahead or take time to consider the arguments and alternatives?

Whichever way he bends, it will never satisfy you.

---------- Post added at 19:53 ---------- Previous post was at 19:51 ----------



So what I’d they interrupted a meeting to do this? These people were his work colleagues and of course his wife. The whole thing is nonsense.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...7&d=1643060960

They didn’t "interrupt a meeting", they held the "meeting"* in the Cabinet Office to surprise him. As the article stated
Quote:

Carrie Johnson helped organise a surprise get-together for him
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1643062212

*or "work birthday", as you’d probably call it…

Hugh 24-01-2022 22:03

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Loved Lulu Lytle’s comment
Quote:

Lulu was present in Downing Street on 19 June working on the refurbishment. Lulu was not invited to any birthday celebrations for the prime minister as a guest. Lulu entered the cabinet room briefly as requested, while waiting to speak with the prime minister.
So, uninvited, she wandered down unescorted three flights of stairs from decorating the flat at Number 11 Downing Street, walked along the corridors between No. 11 and No. 10, then gained access to the one of the most secure rooms in the country, the Cabinet Room, as requested?

So she wasn’t invited, just requested…

1andrew1 24-01-2022 22:47

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
Letter to a 7-year-old from Johnson.

Quote:

Josephine sets a great example to us all by postponing her birthday party until we have sent coronavirus packing.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...0&d=1643064428

https://twitter.com/BorisJohnson/sta...217475/photo/1

Paul 24-01-2022 23:12

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Anything new here :zzz:

1andrew1 24-01-2022 23:20

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36110924)
Anything new here :zzz:

The party leader can have his cake and eat it. Many doubted this.

ianch99 25-01-2022 00:09

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Please, can everyone stop posting for a while? I am waiting on OB's posts and I don't want to miss any. Seriously, this is better than binge watching Netflix!


and, good night!

mrmistoffelees 25-01-2022 10:02

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Scotland Yard poised to announce it will launch a criminal investigation into eight out of seventeen reported 'Downing St parties' so says Cresida Dick, reported by The Telegraph.

Dame Cresida obviously been hitting up Boris for guidance on how to perform majestic U turns.

Hugh 25-01-2022 10:17

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36110947)
Scotland Yard poised to announce it will launch a criminal investigation into eight out of seventeen reported 'Downing St parties' so says Cresida Dick, reported by The Telegraph.

Dame Cresida obviously been hitting up Boris for guidance on how to perform majestic U turns.

Does this mean Sue Gray will have to suspend/not publish her inquiry, as it could prejudice the police investigation?

Handy…

mrmistoffelees 25-01-2022 10:28

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36110948)
Does this mean Sue Gray will have to suspend/not publish her inquiry, as it could prejudice the police investigation?

Handy…


Could this be 'living with' the enquiry? perhaps?

1andrew1 25-01-2022 10:28

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36110947)
Scotland Yard poised to announce it will launch a criminal investigation into eight out of seventeen reported 'Downing St parties' so says Cresida Dick, reported by The Telegraph.

Dame Cresida obviously been hitting up Boris for guidance on how to perform majestic U turns.

Evening Standard reports the following.

Quote:

Met Police to probe Downing St parties


The Metropolitan Police will investigate several alleged parties held in Downing Street during lockdown, Cressida Dick has confirmed.

The Met Police commissioner said the force would launch a probe into the gatherings held while all indoor mixing was banned.

She would not specify how many alleged parties would be investigated, stressing the force “would not give a running commentary” on their probe.

Ms Dick told City Hall’s Police and Crime Committee: “As a result of the information provided by the Cabinet Office inquiry team and my officers’ own assessment, I can confirm the Met is now investigating a number of Downing Street parties.”
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/poli...=1#post-359103

Sephiroth 25-01-2022 10:29

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36110948)
Does this mean Sue Gray will have to suspend/not publish her inquiry, as it could prejudice the police investigation?

Handy…

Excellent (for a change).

Damien 25-01-2022 10:38

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
I wonder if Gray has discovered something else that warranted referring to the police? The line that they're in contact with the Met Police could be taken either way.

Halcyon 25-01-2022 10:40

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
I find it alarming that there are people that still defend Boris and in fact defend the whole Conservative party.
With the latest birthday celebrations news it more than ever important that Boris leaves. Immediately.


And I really think we could do with a genrral election. This country would run a lot better on a co-alition government in my opinion.
Neither the Conservatives or labour have got it right at the moment.

1andrew1 25-01-2022 10:43

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Ooops. Mystic Old Boy strikes again!

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110829)
You only have a few days to wait - I’m sure you can contain yourself until then.

Quote:

Sue Gray report will not be published this week, Sky News understands

A source close to the Cabinet Office investigation has said we will not be getting the report this week.

It had been hoped the investigation would conclude over the next few days.

It's not clear whether the timescale has been pushed back due to the Met Police announcing its own investigation.
https://news.sky.com/story/politics-...ghani-12514080

Hugh 25-01-2022 10:53

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
From the Times

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/p...ties-f2tvj9vq6

Quote:

The Metropolitan Police has announced a criminal investigation into alleged “serious and flagrant” breaches of coronavirus restrictions in Downing Street and Whitehall.

In a move that heaps pressure on the prime minister, Dame Cressida Dick, the Met commissioner, said that detectives were investigating a “number of events” over the past two years without specifying. She said the No 10 investigation had been opened as a result of information from the Cabinet Office and on the assessment of detectives.
Sue Gray works in the Cabinet Office…

Quote:

Announcing the investigations, Dick told the London Assembly that the force would occasionally retrospectively examine the “most serious flagrant type of breach”.

This is considered appropriate at Downing Street for three main reasons, Dick said: there was evidence that those involved knew, or ought to have known, that what they were doing was an offence; not investigating would “sufficiently undermine” the legitimacy of the law, and there was “little ambiguity of absence of any reasonable defence”.

1andrew1 25-01-2022 10:55

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Sue Gray report will not be published until criminal investigation has concluded, Sky News understands
https://news.sky.com/story/politics-...ghani-12514080

Damien 25-01-2022 10:59

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Yeah, it's gonna help him get past it. Now they can say 'police investigation' and the worst of the anger will have gone by then.

Julian 25-01-2022 11:06

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Are we soon to see a new record for "Taken into Considerations " come sentencing time? :D

papa smurf 25-01-2022 11:15

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
looks like downing street staff could get fixed penalty fines if found guilty, meanwhile Sue Gray report not happening.

heero_yuy 25-01-2022 11:20

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36110960)
Yeah, it's gonna help him get past it. Now they can say 'police investigation' and the worst of the anger will have gone by then.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...2&d=1643109552
:D

Attachment 29582

Halcyon 25-01-2022 11:20

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36110963)
looks like downing street staff could get fixed penalty fines if found guilty, meanwhile Sue Gray report not happening.


No doubt it will be brushed under the carpet.

That carpet certainly must have a lot of things underneath it by now!

1andrew1 25-01-2022 11:25

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36110960)
Yeah, it's gonna help him get past it. Now they can say 'police investigation' and the worst of the anger will have gone by then.

I wonder if Cummings has anticipated this course of events and will react accordingly? Maybe time for some leaks on those PPE contracts?

papa smurf 25-01-2022 11:31

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
This will work to Bojo's advantage if he is deemed to have broken no laws.

1andrew1 25-01-2022 11:38

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36110969)
This will work to Bojo's advantage if he is deemed to have broken no laws.

It will work to his advantage, period. As Damien has explained, the new repost from Ministers will be "Wait until he police report is published." By the time it's published people's anger will have reduced and we'll be focused on something else like fuel bills and inflation.

GrimUpNorth 25-01-2022 11:39

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36110969)
This will work to Bojo's advantage if he is deemed to have broken no laws.

If Bozza doesn't get his collar felt then no need to release the report, I can see it coming. As the Met allowed it to go on under their watch they need to be seen to be doing someone or something and that someone will be a junior none of us have ever heard of (who will already be in place to take the fall in return for a nice civil service career in another department).

Pierre 25-01-2022 11:41

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36110969)
This will work to Bojo's advantage if he is deemed to have broken no laws.

you would have to look at the COVID Act (whatever it's called) said at the time. As there was "guidance" and "law" at the time. One legally mandated and one not, and the two were regularly conflated.

I certainly can't be arsed to look back but I'm sure skilled lawyers will be able to prove Boris did nothing illegal as the legislation was brought in on the hoof, not debated and was poorly written (as I recall)

So no comment until the police investigation is over (probably in about 3 months) by which time it may have all kicked off in Ukraine and no one will care.

Mick 25-01-2022 11:49

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36110969)
This will work to Bojo's advantage if he is deemed to have broken no laws.

Even if he has, Fixed penalty notices issued for offences under coronavirus legislation are non-recordable, so whether an FPN is paid or contested, it will not be recorded on the Police National Computer. Local records may be held by the relevant force.

The media at the moment going on about criminality at No. 10, but as there will be no criminal record, any FPN, issued and paid by the recipient, it won’t be criminal, unless the fine isn’t paid, when anyone pays a fine, they are releasing themselves from criminal liability and subsequent prosecution.

Hugh 25-01-2022 11:54

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
It’s also about ethics and leading by example.

If those who set the guidance and laws, and who were on the TV all time telling everyone to follow the guidance and laws, and also chastising in the media those who didn’t follow the guidelines and laws, are seen to be blatantly and repeatedly breaking the guidelines and laws with no comeback, when others did at often great personal emotional cost, why should anyone bother in the future?

Pierre 25-01-2022 11:58

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36110976)
why should anyone bother in the future?

Which is actually one good thing to come out of it, as I don't think we'll ever see another lockdown now for that very reason. Every cloud and all that.

Mick 25-01-2022 12:02

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
I think the majority of the country don’t give a shit. The rules were unnecessary anyway, 17,372 people died of Covid, not with and yeah people do unfortunately die of Pneumonia, we certainly don’t lockdown the country and the economy to prevent the spread of Pneumonia. The first lockdown, may be the first few weeks worked but by week 4, 5 and 6 people were getting fed up being locked up, effectively under house arrest.

Mr K 25-01-2022 12:06

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36110979)
I think the majority of the country don’t give a shit. The rules were unnecessary anyway, 17,372 people died of Covid, not with and yeah people do unfortunately die of Pneumonia, we certainly don’t lockdown the country and the economy to prevent the spread of Pneumonia. The first lockdown, may be the first few weeks worked but by week 4, 5 and 6 people were getting fed up being locked up, effectively under house arrest.

I think they give a shit that's there's a lying, hypocritical, clown failing to run the country, and he is just having a laugh at our expense.

1andrew1 25-01-2022 12:14

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36110982)
I think they give a shit that's there's a lying, hypocritical, clown failing to run the country, and he is just having a laugh at our expense.

Agreed. If some people want to be walked over, so be it. But the majority of the country have now seen Johnson for what he is. If you vote for a clown, should you really be surprised that he turns up to parties?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36110975)
Even if he has, Fixed penalty notices issued for offences under coronavirus legislation are non-recordable, so whether an FPN is paid or contested, it will not be recorded on the Police National Computer. Local records may be held by the relevant force.

The media at the moment going on about criminality at No. 10, but as there will be no criminal record, any FPN, issued and paid by the recipient, it won’t be criminal, unless the fine isn’t paid, when anyone pays a fine, they are releasing themselves from criminal liability and subsequent prosecution.

Don't know why you're going on about the fines. It's lying to Parliament that is the potential issue.

Hugh 25-01-2022 12:16

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...3&d=1643112883

It was just ten minutes with a cake…
it was just a few staff in the garden….
it was just a childcare bubble….
it was just wine and cheese…
it was just a Christmas quiz…
it was just a leaving party

it was just…

it was just…

it was just not what nearly everyone else was doing…

Paul 25-01-2022 12:22

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36110982)
I think they give a shit that's there's a lying, hypocritical, clown failing to run the country, and he is just having a laugh at our expense.

Some do, and some dont. :sleep:

Mick 25-01-2022 12:32

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36110982)
I think they give a shit that's there's a lying, hypocritical, clown failing to run the country, and he is just having a laugh at our expense.

I’m laughing at you..

But seriously….Yawn. Change the record. We know you Remainiacs don’t like him, I think I’ve said, he is not my favourite and I actually voted in the last poll that he should resign. But now, I really really don’t care.

---------- Post added at 12:30 ---------- Previous post was at 12:28 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36110987)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...3&d=1643112883

It was just ten minutes with a cake…
it was just a few staff in the garden….
it was just a childcare bubble….
it was just wine and cheese…
it was just a Christmas quiz…
it was just a leaving party

it was just…

it was just…

it was just not what nearly everyone else was doing…

Nearly everyone else?

Utter rubbish, most people broke lockdown rules and that’s a fact.

---------- Post added at 12:32 ---------- Previous post was at 12:30 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110983)
Agreed. If some people want to be walked over, so be it. But the majority of the country have now seen Johnson for what he is. If you vote for a clown, should you really be surprised that he turns up to parties?


Don't know why you're going on about the fines. It's lying to Parliament that is the potential issue.

Because breaking Covid laws is not criminal.

P.S Politicians lie all the time. (Didn’t you know?) :rolleyes:

Carth 25-01-2022 12:37

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36110990)
Some do, and some dont. :sleep:

More likely to be some do and most don't.

Lots of crap going on in the UK that people are more 'concerned' about, but those things aren't dragged up by the media every 5 minutes.

pip08456 25-01-2022 12:48

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Oh dear, is Boris in trouble?

Quote:

Scotland Yard on Tuesday announced a criminal investigation into gatherings in Downing Street, throwing Boris Johnson’s leadership into fresh crisis.

In a bombshell intervention in the “partygate” storm, Met Police Commissioner Cressida Dick said there were grounds to suspect “serious and flagrant” breaches of the law.

She added that her officers were “investigating a number of events that took place at Downing Street and in Whitehall in the past two years in relation to potential breaches of Covid-19 regulations”.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/lond...k-b978615.html

1andrew1 25-01-2022 12:55

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36110998)
More likely to be some do and most don't.

Lots of crap going on in the UK that people are more 'concerned' about, but those things aren't dragged up by the media every 5 minutes.

If there are new developments, those stories are reported eg Ukraine, fuel bills, Covid restrictions etc.

There have been new developments with No 10 and its 17 parties for the last few weeks. If someone leaks a new revelation to ITV or The Telegraph, they won't sit on their hands as you may prefer but they'll crack on and publish it. If there were no parties, there would be nothing to publish.

Mick 25-01-2022 13:04

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36111000)

Again, “criminal investigation”, it’s lazy journalism. Or to make the story more sensational.

Yes, Cressida Dick stated an investigation has been opened, she didn’t go so far as to say it’s criminal, because it isn’t. Under Coronavirus legislation, breaches are not regarded as criminal, and breachers don’t get a criminal record.

Mad Max 25-01-2022 13:09

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36111002)
If there are new developments, those stories are reported eg Ukraine, fuel bills, Covid restrictions etc.

There have been new developments with No 10 and its 17 parties for the last few weeks. If someone leaks a new revelation to ITV or The Telegraph, they won't sit on their hands as you may prefer but they'll crack on and publish it. If there were no parties, there would be nothing to publish.

Change the record for god's sake, it's a witch hunt, apart from the loony left remainers, I don't think most people give a toss tbh.

1andrew1 25-01-2022 13:13

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36111004)
Change the record for god's sake, it's a witch hunt, apart from the loony left remainers, I don't think most people give a toss tbh.

Source?

Mad Max 25-01-2022 13:14

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36111005)
Source?

My mates.:D

Hugh 25-01-2022 13:14

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
2 Attachment(s)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...4&d=1643115989

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1643115989

Hugh 25-01-2022 13:21

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36111004)
Change the record for god's sake, it's a witch hunt, apart from the loony left remainers, I don't think most people give a toss tbh.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36111005)
Source?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36111006)
My mates.:D

Pretty sure 3 people ≠ "most people"… ;)

OLD BOY 25-01-2022 13:39

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110971)
It will work to his advantage, period. As Damien has explained, the new repost from Ministers will be "Wait until he police report is published." By the time it's published people's anger will have reduced and we'll be focused on something else like fuel bills and inflation.

Those arguing for the police to become involved have shot themselves in the foot. You've got to laugh!

There is no way that Boris will be prosecuted or fined as it is pretty clear from what we know that there is insufficient evidence to do so, and so this is even better than the Gray report.

:D:D:D

papa smurf 25-01-2022 13:39

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Boris Johnson is willing to be interviewed by police investigating events in Downing Street and Whitehall for potential breaches of coronavirus regulations but does not believe he has broken the law, Downing Street has said.

https://news.sky.com/story/met-launc...vents-12524866

OLD BOY 25-01-2022 13:41

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110967)
I wonder if Cummings has anticipated this course of events and will react accordingly? Maybe time for some leaks on those PPE contracts?

Some people like to believe the discredited Cummings when it suits them, Andrew.

Sephiroth 25-01-2022 13:44

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 

As Downing Street is his home, he might be able to play that card if no evidence can be found that Boris organised any of the parties.

His PPS may become the fall guy for the May party and take the big fine and the attendees may then be hit with the small fine (then watch some hell break loose).

The accusation that he lied to Parliament won't go away and nor will public revulsion for some.

papa smurf 25-01-2022 13:47

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36111016)
Some people like to believe the discredited Cummings when it suits them, Andrew.

Cummings is leading them by the nose.

OLD BOY 25-01-2022 13:53

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36111017)

As Downing Street is his home, he might be able to play that card if no evidence can be found that Boris organised any of the parties.

His PPS may become the fall guy for the May party and take the big fine and the attendees may then be hit with the small fine (then watch some hell break loose).

The accusation that he lied to Parliament won't go away and nor will public revulsion for some.

Nothing to do with the fact that it's his home, and in any case there were limits on the number of people you could see in your home.

The police may conclude that events were different from what some people imagine, which will show the the PM did not lie to Parliament.

This whole issue relates to whether these 'parties' were such, or whether they were work events, and also whether Boris Johnson was aware of the breaches of regulations.

People are confusing allegations with facts and so I'm relieved to hear the police are now involved to shut the people up who are baying for blood.

---------- Post added at 13:53 ---------- Previous post was at 13:49 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36111018)
Cummings is leading them by the nose.

The Boris-haters cannot see how they are being manipulated by the very person who was the victim of their hate not long ago.

1andrew1 25-01-2022 13:54

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36111016)
Some people like to believe the discredited Cummings when it suits them, Andrew.

If he's got the evidence it doesn't matter what people think of him.

daveeb 25-01-2022 13:54

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110983)
Agreed. If some people want to be walked over, so be it. But the majority of the country have now seen Johnson for what he is. If you vote for a clown, should you really be surprised that he turns up to parties?


Don't know why you're going on about the fines. It's lying to Parliament that is the potential issue.


It's like the episode of Yes Prime Minister that was too fanciful to broadcast. The met investigation could well be the get out of jail free card that Bojo was praying for.

1andrew1 25-01-2022 14:13

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by daveeb (Post 36111023)
It's like the episode of Yes Prime Minister that was too fanciful to broadcast. The met investigation could well be the get out of jail free card that Bojo was praying for.

He certainly seemed a bit perkier at PMQs last Wednesday than he had done in that Beth Rigby interview just the day before. Maybe his lawyers had said the Met investigation was highly likely which would buy him more time.

However, Peston bad thinks it's net bad for the Conservatives. I suspect it's net bad for the Conservatives but net good for Johnson. Here's an extract from Peston
Quote:

My judgement, and those of senior Tories, is that it is net bad.

Because it is straightforwardly a terrible look for a prime minister to be at the centre of a police investigation.
Some will say it gives the PM more time to prepare his excuses for whenever the Met reaches its conclusions and Gray publishes, and gives him more time to lobby his anxious MPs that this is not the time to throw him out.

But the Gray report will be what it is, whenever it is published. And those close to the investigation tell me that although she will not pass explicit judgement on whether the PM has lied to public and Parliament, breaching the ministerial code - and will not do so because that is not her remit - neutral readers of what she eventually publishes would struggle to reach any other conclusion.

Apart from anything else, the Met would not be investigating if there were not prima facie evidence, established by Gray, that the rules were broken.

This is not lost on Tory MPs. It is causing them grave concern.

https://www.itv.com/news/2022-01-25/...-boris-johnson

---------- Post added at 14:13 ---------- Previous post was at 14:07 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36111017)

As Downing Street is his home, he might be able to play that card if no evidence can be found that Boris organised any of the parties.

His PPS may become the fall guy for the May party and take the big fine and the attendees may then be hit with the small fine (then watch some hell break loose).

The accusation that he lied to Parliament won't go away and nor will public revulsion for some.

Peston seems quite clear.
Quote:

And those close to the [Sue Gray] investigation tell me that although she will not pass explicit judgement on whether the PM has lied to public and Parliament, breaching the ministerial code - and will not do so because that is not her remit - neutral readers of what she eventually publishes would struggle to reach any other conclusion.

Damien 25-01-2022 14:31

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
https://twitter.com/jessicaelgot/sta...72416711045123

The Met Police have no objection to the report being published. Looks like the Government is simply deciding it can wait.

1andrew1 25-01-2022 14:48

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36111031)
https://twitter.com/jessicaelgot/sta...72416711045123

The Met Police have no objection to the report being published. Looks like the Government is simply deciding it can wait.

Hopefully it will get raised in PMQs.

But maybe the fact that Johnson didn't tell his ministerial colleagues about the Met investigation at this morning's meeting might be a juicier question to pose.

papa smurf 25-01-2022 14:52

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36111032)
Hopefully it will get raised in PMQs.

But maybe the fact that Johnson didn't tell his ministerial colleagues about the Met investigation at this morning's meeting might be a juicier question to pose.

I'm sure sir wet flannel pizza party will ask all the wrong questions.

1andrew1 25-01-2022 16:04

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36111035)
I'm sure sir wet flannel pizza party will ask all the wrong questions.

What do you think the right questions the Opposition should be asking the PM tomorrow are?

BenMcr 25-01-2022 16:06

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36111005)
Source?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36111006)
My mates.:D

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36111010)
Pretty sure 3 people ≠ "most people"… ;)

62% of a 3559 people survey think the PM should resign

https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics.../01/25/961e4/1

A majority for that view across all survey demographics except just Conservative voters.

papa smurf 25-01-2022 16:06

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36111044)
What do you think the right questions the Opposition should be asking the PM tomorrow are?

What are we doing about the Russia situation.

Are our gas supplies under threat

1andrew1 25-01-2022 16:16

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36111046)
What are we doing about the Russia situation.

Are our gas supplies under threat

The first one is unlikely to be needed as the PM will give a statement to the house. I suggest the second is likely but if Johnson swerves questions about publishing the Grey report then Starmer may run out of questions.

papa smurf 25-01-2022 16:26

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36111048)
The first one is unlikely to be needed as the PM will give a statement to the house. I suggest the second is likely but if Johnson swerves questions about publishing the Grey report then Starmer may run out of questions.

The other matter is now in the hands of the police it would be improper to comment on it.

BenMcr 25-01-2022 16:33

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36111049)
The other matter is now in the hands of the police it would be improper to comment on it.

The key thing that can happen and is being pushed for is to ensure that the full Sue Gray report is released and not an executive summary controlled by the PM.

The Met has already said they have no issue in that happening - even if then questions of any illegality has to be reserved for the Met inquiries.

1andrew1 25-01-2022 16:34

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36111049)
The other matter is now in the hands of the police it would be improper to comment on it.

The Police are happy for the report to be published so to ask why the government is holding it up is a logical question.

papa smurf 25-01-2022 16:48

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36111051)
The Police are happy for the report to be published so to ask why the government is holding it up is a logical question.

The police inquiry must take president over the internal one, It would be wrong to undermine the police report with it.

BenMcr 25-01-2022 16:58

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36111054)
The police inquiry must take president over the internal one, It would be wrong to undermine the police report with it.

If the Police thought it would undermine the inquiry they would have said so and request it not be released.

OLD BOY 25-01-2022 16:59

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36111049)
The other matter is now in the hands of the police it would be improper to comment on it.

That’s right, and any further questions from Starmer can be answered with a simple ‘Inrefer the art Hon gentleman to my previous answer. Should be done and dusted in no time!

papa smurf 25-01-2022 17:01

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36111056)
If the Police thought it would undermine the inquiry they would have said so and request it not be released.

And what if the two enquiries come to different conclusions, which one do we accept.

OLD BOY 25-01-2022 17:07

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36111051)
The Police are happy for the report to be published so to ask why the government is holding it up is a logical question.

The PM is not holding up the inquiry. The date of publication of the findings of fact is up to the investigation team.

Due to the drip, drip tactics of Cummings and other wreckers, the inquiry might not now be completed for some weeks.

It’s time for these people to put up or shut up.

1andrew1 25-01-2022 17:08

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36111056)
If the Police thought it would undermine the inquiry they would have said so and request it not be released.

Exactly.

OLD BOY 25-01-2022 17:09

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36111059)
And what if the two enquiries come to different conclusions, which one do we accept.

The Gray report is looking to establish the facts, whereas the police are looking at whether any laws were broken.

BenMcr 25-01-2022 17:10

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36111060)
The PM is not holding up the inquiry. The date of publication of the findings of fact is up to the investigation team.

Due to the drip, drip tactics of Cummings and other wreckers, the inquiry might not now be completed for some weeks.

It’s time for these people to put up or shut up.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politi...eport-26046517

Quote:

Full Sue Gray report could be published TOMORROW despite police probe in chaotic U-turn

Damien 25-01-2022 17:44

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
https://twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/sta...29913387933697

Quote:

Sky News understands that officials have handed over to investigators photos of parties in Downing Street which include images of Boris Johnson

Sue Gray was given the pictures of people close together with wine bottles.

Carth 25-01-2022 17:46

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Fully expecting lots of tears and shouts of 'cover up' when the police report comes out as "nothing to see here, move along" ;)

Mick 25-01-2022 17:53

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Sue Gray report going to tell us what we already know. That there were more than a few parties in Downing Street.

Got news for the Remainiacs. If Boris has to go. It’s not going to stop Brexit or reverse it, as the silly old prick, Michael Heseltine alluded to this morning on Sky News. :rolleyes:

Carth 25-01-2022 17:58

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36111072)
Sue Gray report going to tell us what we already know. That there were more than a few parties in Downing Street.

Got news for the Remainiacs. If Boris has to go. It’s not going to stop Brexit or reverse it, as the silly old prick, Michael Heseltine alluded to this morning on Sky News. :rolleyes:

Not heard of that nutter for a while, honestly thought he was dead. Just goes to show how far down Sky News will go to get views/comments that reflect their position :D

BenMcr 25-01-2022 17:59

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36111072)
Got news for the Remainiacs. If Boris has to go. It’s not going to stop Brexit or reverse it, as the silly old prick, Michael Heseltine alluded to this morning on Sky News. :rolleyes:

I can't see that being a widely shared view about trying to reverse Brexit. You can't stop something that's done either.

Also how can you have 'Remainiacs' when we've left?

Dave42 25-01-2022 18:00

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36111072)
Sue Gray report going to tell us what we already know. That there were more than a few parties in Downing Street.

Got news for the Remainiacs. If Boris has to go. It’s not going to stop Brexit or reverse it, as the silly old prick, Michael Heseltine alluded to this morning on Sky News. :rolleyes:

it not about Brexit at all it about him making rules for everyone and none for him and all his lies about it he thinks he above the law

Carth 25-01-2022 18:02

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36111077)
it not about Brexit at all it about him making rules for everyone and none for him and all his lies about it he thinks he above the law

welcome to the world of Politics and Big Business :p:

1andrew1 25-01-2022 18:07

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36111076)
I can't see that being a widely shared view about trying to reverse Brexit. You can't stop something that's done either.

Also how can you have 'Remainiacs' when we've left?

Spot on Ben. No large UK political party has rejoin in their manifesto.

It's interesting that on this forum, Leave voters like Chris and Seph are at the head of the queue in demanding Johnson does the decent thing and resign, in order to increase the Conservatives' electoral chances in 2024.

Dave42 25-01-2022 18:07

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36111078)
welcome to the world of Politics and Big Business :p:

it not big Business that gonna remove him it his own MP's

Carth 25-01-2022 18:12

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36111080)
it not big Business that gonna remove him it his own MP's

I was simply pointing out that Politicians and Businesses are well known to tell lies, and often get away with it

Dave42 25-01-2022 18:17

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Sky News
@SkyNews
Downing Street is preparing the ground for Boris Johnson to make a statement on the Sue Gray report on Wednesday, Sky News understands.

Sky's
@joncraig
says the report is yet to be received by Number 10
https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1486039741720051716

Mick 25-01-2022 18:20

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36111076)
I can't see that being a widely shared view about trying to reverse Brexit. You can't stop something that's done either.

Also how can you have 'Remainiacs' when we've left?

Good question.

In my view - A Remainiac is someone like Heseltine, Lord Adonis who think Brexit is reversible when and if Boris resigns. They have pretty much said so.

TheDaddy 25-01-2022 18:26

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36111076)
I can't see that being a widely shared view about trying to reverse Brexit. You can't stop something that's done either.

Also how can you have 'Remainiacs' when we've left?

We're all remainers now, as in we remain outside the eu

Speaking of unpopular views Mark Jennkison said earlier "the Labour Party was in cahoots to bring down the democratically elected PM" :spin: what a berk, his constituents deserve better

---------- Post added at 18:26 ---------- Previous post was at 18:24 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36111079)
Spot on Ben. No large UK political party has rejoin in their manifesto.

They'd be mental to go near it full stop

1andrew1 25-01-2022 18:27

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Do people think that when Johnson resigns, he will also resign as an MP or will he remain as an MP until the 2024 election?

Dave42 25-01-2022 18:28

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36111087)
Do people think that when Johnson resigns, he will also resign as an MP or will he remain as an MP until the 2024 election?

i think he resign as a MP as well but we will see


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:32.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum