Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   U.S Election 2016 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33702280)

nomadking 09-11-2016 10:10

Re: US Election 2016
 
The Left are going to have an absolute meltdown.:D

Pierre 09-11-2016 10:12

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868669)
I am worried what happens with NATO. Europe needs to step up now as Trump is ambivalent if not outright hostile to the organisation which really has helped keep the peace in Europe.

What, we were all told it was the EU that kept the peace in Europe?

Trump has been consistent about NATO, and I agree with him, that other NATO nations need to pay their fair share. That's all.

Jimmy-J 09-11-2016 10:15

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35868688)
The Left are going to have an absolute meltdown.:D

Protests have already started.

Scary 09-11-2016 10:24

Re: US Election 2016
 
1 Attachment(s)
i thought this was funny

heero_yuy 09-11-2016 10:41

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmy-J (Post 35868690)
Protests have already started.

Democrats complaining about the result of democracy, who'd have thought it. :D

It's also not without precedent that Trump could get to the Whitehouse and yet lose the popular vote:

Quote:

In 1800, 1824, 1976 and most recently in 2000, the Electoral College System has elected a different president to the popular vote.

Al Gore won the nationwide vote by half a million votes in 2000 but was four Electoral College votes short of the presidency.

George W Bush won in Florida by just 537 votes, meaning he had more Electoral College votes and seized the White House.
Electoral college

nomadking 09-11-2016 10:49

Re: US Election 2016
 
In terms of votes, Trump is around 500,000 ahead so far.

Damien 09-11-2016 10:55

Re: US Election 2016
 
Let's wait and see what happens when California comes in. I think he looks to lose the popular vote but it doesn't matter anyway. This is their system and both parties know it.

heero_yuy 09-11-2016 11:08

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35868693)
In terms of votes, Trump is around 500,000 ahead so far.

Which could raise another issue:

Quote:


Whether Donald Trump is entitled to California's 55 Electoral College votes would be called into question if Trump wins the state's popular vote, a Trump-supporting third party and election law experts are warning.

It's an unusual situation and everyone seems to agree there's a potential problem, but they disagree on the severity and likely resolution if Trump defies polls and wins the state.

Officials in California, the biggest prize in the Electoral College, which officially selects U.S. presidents, begin mailing absentee ballots this week, and the California secretary of state's office has not clarified what will happen if Trump does prevail.

The problem arises from the fact that Trump is nominated by both the Republican Party and the state branch of the American Independent Party, and the two parties did not agree on a joint slate of electors, Just two names overlap on lists submitted earlier this week, bringing the total number of Trump electors to 108.
U.S.News link

nomadking 09-11-2016 11:09

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868694)
Let's wait and see what happens when California comes in. I think he looks to lose the popular vote but it doesn't matter anyway. This is their system and both parties know it.

Perhaps they should introduce drugs testing before voting,
Quote:

Voters in California, Nevada and Massachusetts have endorsed the recreational use of marijuana in state-wide polls.
The votes, which took place alongside the presidential election, legalise the growth and consumption of cannabis for those over 21 years old.

Damien 09-11-2016 11:29

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35868697)
Which could raise another issue:



U.S.News link

California has already been called for Clinton. He won't win the popular vote there.

---------- Post added at 10:29 ---------- Previous post was at 10:14 ----------

Dear god. Is Trump going to have an audience with the Queen on his state visit?

Chris 09-11-2016 11:48

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868699)
California has already been called for Clinton. He won't win the popular vote there.

---------- Post added at 10:29 ---------- Previous post was at 10:14 ----------

Dear god. Is Trump going to have an audience with the Queen on his state visit?

Visiting heads of state always meet the queen when on state visits. That's kind of the point.

Damien 09-11-2016 12:03

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35868705)
Visiting heads of state always meet the queen when on state visits. That's kind of the point.

Yeah I sorta knew it. Just don't like the image in my head.

Chris 09-11-2016 12:20

Re: US Election 2016
 
Ah. Are you worried he might try to ... Er ... grab her majesty? :erm:

---------- Post added at 11:20 ---------- Previous post was at 11:19 ----------

So, it's now 6.20am on the east coast and America is starting to wake up. The next few hours of vox pops are going to be interesting.

Kursk 09-11-2016 12:35

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868669)
Congrats to Mick first off.

Mick: 1
Sneering know-it-alls: 0

Damien 09-11-2016 12:40

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35868710)
So, it's now 6.20am on the east coast and America is starting to wake up. The next few hours of vox pops are going to be interesting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWdfRRtAs3o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4m-lNi61Rk

Meanwhile Clinton takes the lead in the Popular vote according to CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/election/results

64% of California in. I.E Pretty divided nation.

---------- Post added at 11:40 ---------- Previous post was at 11:40 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35868713)
Mick: 1
Sneering know-it-alls: 0

Classy as always Kursk.

denphone 09-11-2016 12:47

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35868713)
Mick: 1
Sneering know-it-alls: 0

Congratulations on Mick for his spot on prediction but for you.:upyours:

Kursk 09-11-2016 12:50

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868714)
Classy as always Kursk.

Oh come on, he's been berated for weeks. You got it wrong, again; have the magnanimity to admit it.

Thank goodness Mick is an admin and can speak his mind with impunity.

Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35868718)
Congratulations on Mick for his spot on prediction but for you.:upyours:

No personal attacks please. If you can't stand the heat (and we all know you can't) stay out of the kitchen.

Damien 09-11-2016 12:53

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35868719)
Oh come on, he's been berated for weeks. You got it wrong, again; have the magnanimity to admit it.

I did. In the quote you posted. You responded by getting personal which isn't something I did with Mick or other people I disagree with.

And yes people get elections wrong. This was a close election, Clinton is even on track to win more votes or at least close to it. A few shifts in a few places that we're having a different discussion today.

MalteseFalcon 09-11-2016 12:58

Re: US Election 2016
 
I also called a Trump win if you remember a long time ago. Honestly, I thought over the last week that he had lost the election though. I told a manager at work that there was no way America would vote for a female president and I was right.

denphone 09-11-2016 13:06

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35868719)
Oh come on, he's been berated for weeks. You got it wrong, again; have the magnanimity to admit it.

Thank goodness Mick is an admin and can speak his mind with impunity.



No personal attacks please. If you can't stand the heat (and we all know you can't) stay out of the kitchen.

Its not a personal attack at all as you seem to like to give it out to many posters on this forum but sadly you cannot seem to take it as l used something from the smilie list which is allowed on this forum from what l know to show what l thought of your sneering know it comment as that was pretty uncalled for in my opinion.

Kursk 09-11-2016 13:08

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868722)
And yes people get elections wrong.

It's not the 'getting it wrong' that matters; it's the 'I am so right' before the event :D

Remoaners: 0
Democrats: 0

Brexiteers: 1
Republicans: 1

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarkC1984 (Post 35868723)
I also called a Trump win if you remember a long time ago. Honestly, I thought over the last week that he had lost the election though. I told a manager at work that there was no way America would vote for a female president and I was right.

Careful, you'll get a reputation as a swivel-eyed loony conspiracy theorist with racist tendencies and a low level of education. You are right though :)

nomadking 09-11-2016 13:15

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35868728)
Careful, you'll get a reputation as a swivel-eyed loony conspiracy theorist with racist tendencies and a low level of education. You are right though :)

Isn't that a description that applies to the States that voted for Clinton?

Mr K 09-11-2016 13:27

Re: US Election 2016
 
Have to hand it to Mick, he obviously knows the US very well. Don't think I realised how much Clinton was hated. If only Sanders had got the ticket then who knows ?

As for the outcome, God help us, and i don't even believe in God, but he's worth a shot !

Kursk 09-11-2016 13:28

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35868730)
Isn't that a description that applies to the States that voted for Clinton?

Only an expert can answer that question; one will be along soon :D.

Damien 09-11-2016 14:20

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35868730)
Isn't that a description that applies to the States that voted for Clinton?

You can find exit polls here : http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...xit-polls.html

Gavin78 09-11-2016 14:30

Re: US Election 2016
 
He's all pre-election talk I wouldn't worry about it

MalteseFalcon 09-11-2016 14:34

Re: US Election 2016
 
I've been called worse at work so that wouldn't actually bother me.

I wonder just how many people in America think elections work like this girl did?

https://notalwaysright.com/big-bother/5677

Damien 09-11-2016 14:44

Re: US Election 2016
 
What annoys me most is that the pound has barely recovered against the dollar

---------- Post added at 13:44 ---------- Previous post was at 13:43 ----------

Anyway only three years until the start of the Democratic primaries! If we're still here by then

heero_yuy 09-11-2016 15:12

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gavin78 (Post 35868754)
He's all pre-election talk I wouldn't worry about it

Similar things were being said about Reagan when he was first elected:

Quote:

Steven Hayward, author of “The Age of Reagan,” recalls the rhetoric:

Democratic Rep. William Clay of Missouri charged that Reagan was “trying to replace the Bill of Rights with fascist precepts lifted verbatim from Mein Kampf.” The Los Angeles Times cartoonist Paul Conrad drew a panel depicting Reagan plotting a fascist putsch in a darkened Munich beer hall. Harry Stein (later a conservative convert) wrote in Esquire that the voters who supported Reagan were like the “good Germans” in “Hitler’s Germany.”...John Roth, a Holocaust scholar at Claremont College, wrote: “I could not help remembering how 40 years ago economic turmoil had conspired with Nazi nationalism and militarism—all intensified by Germany’s defeat in World War I​—to send the world reeling into catastrophe. . . . It is not entirely mistaken to contemplate our postelection state with fear and trembling.”
Source

Didn't come to pass then either. Any plans he has have to be ratified by Congress and the Senate. They tend to have a moderating effect as Obama found out.

thenry 09-11-2016 15:57

Re: US Election 2016
 
Talking of Obama. Does this mean he's gone down as the worst President?

https://youtu.be/XvgnOqcCYCM

Out the horses mouth :confused:

heero_yuy 09-11-2016 16:10

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35868771)
Talking of Obama. Does this mean he's gone down as the worst President?

https://youtu.be/XvgnOqcCYCM

Out the horses mouth :confused:

Here's one list:

Quote:

The time period was also taken into account (Franklin Pierce supported slavery, that makes him much worse on a moral level by our standards today than Jimmy Carter, who is ranked as “worse” than him). We looked at the morality/practicality of the Presidents’ positions through the national zeitgeist at the time in question. However, this does not mean that we can’t judge the long term consequences of their choices, as we do below.

Worst:
10. Warren G Harding
9. Richard Nixon
8. Lyndon B. Johnson
7. Ulysses S. Grant
6. Franklin Pierce
5. Jimmy Carter
4. Barack Obama
3. Woodrow Wilson
2.Andrew Jackson
1. James Buchanan
Best and worst plus reasons.

Julian 09-11-2016 16:27

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35868764)
Similar things were being said about Reagan when he was first elected:



Source

Didn't come to pass then either. Any plans he has have to be ratified by Congress and the Senate. They tend to have a moderating effect as Obama found out.

No, no that can't be.

It's the end of the world, we need divine intervention, no one is safe etc etc etc etc ad nauseum...... :rolleyes:

martyh 09-11-2016 16:36

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35868710)
Ah. Are you worried he might try to ... Er ... grab her majesty? :erm:[COLOR="Silver"]

[.

Well you know Trump can't help kissing beautiful




Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35868735)
Have to hand it to Mick, he obviously knows the US very well. Don't think I realised how much Clinton was hated. If only Sanders had got the ticket then who knows ?

As for the outcome, God help us, and i don't even believe in God, but he's worth a shot !

I think what's happening is that the electorate everywhere are fed up of the usual politics and politicians and they are taking every opportunity to vent their frustration and damn the consequences.

Aren't there some big elections in France and Germany next year :erm:

RizzyKing 09-11-2016 16:38

Re: US Election 2016
 
Trump won for pretty much the same reason brexit won the majority of people are fed up with the establishment and the political process that never seems to work for them but only for the richer people. It is ironic in this case that a billionaire was chosen to express that dissatisfaction but most viewed him as outside the establishment but would have the knowledge to make the system better for the majority. Whether that is how it will work only time will tell, i would say he was helped a lot by gun owners they were the only consistent group throughout this election from day one they supported trump and despised clinton convinced that if she got in more bans and restrictions would quickly follow 70 million gun owners are not a good thing to alienate.

Only heard a couple of clinton supporters talking so far but was struck by the rhetoric being used to describe those who voted for trump very similar almost exact terminology that was used to describe brexit voters. Never paid much attention to all these NWO nutjobs out there but given how the same group acts when they lose maybe there is a global movement lol.

Wonder how worried merkel is about next year with the way things are going :erm:.

martyh 09-11-2016 16:39

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35868764)
Similar things were being said about Reagan when he was first elected:



Source

Didn't come to pass then either. Any plans he has have to be ratified by Congress and the Senate. They tend to have a moderating effect as Obama found out.

Oh i don't know wasn't the only thing that stopped Star Wars and the resulting armageddon the limitations on technology at the time .

RizzyKing 09-11-2016 16:45

Re: US Election 2016
 
Listen to the tinfoil brigade Marty and star wars delivered more then it was meant too and is affecting us all everyday lol.

Damien 09-11-2016 16:51

Re: US Election 2016
 
I think the connections between Trump and Reagan are very tenuous. They seem to be simply they were both entertainers before President but Reagan was also a governor, had already been active in politics and Trump is largely being judged by his own words. As far as Republicanism goes they're very different, almost opposites.

Trump doesn't appear to be a standard conservative to me.

We'll have to see what he is like now. We don't know too much of what he would do. How much he was playing to base and what, if anything, he really believes. He doesn't appear to be going into the job with a clear sense of purpose or an agenda.

RichardCoulter 09-11-2016 17:16

Re: US Election 2016
 
Muslims living in Britain have been contacting an agony aunt saying that they are worried following the election of Trump :confused:

RizzyKing 09-11-2016 17:47

Re: US Election 2016
 
Sadly there are no shortage of victims in the UK and elsewhere who take any chance to be a victim, unless they were planning to emigrate to the US that might be a bit harder soon.

martyh 09-11-2016 17:57

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Canada's immigration website has crashed as Americans watched Donald Trump take the lead and then win the US election.

Searches for "move to Canada" and "immigrate to Canada" spiked on Tuesday night as election returns started favouring the Republican nominee.

The website for Citizenship and Immigration Canada was down at the same time, and has suffered several outages since.
http://news.sky.com/story/canada-imm...ctory-10650893

Don't know whether to believe this or not

Damien 09-11-2016 18:28

Re: US Election 2016
 
Pretty classy speeches from Obama and Clinton (and Trump last night). We were worried about a breakdown in the transfer of power so good to see people attempting a smooth transition.

Hom3r 09-11-2016 18:36

Re: US Election 2016
 
This is just a though and not what I wish or hope.

He's dropping Obamacare within an hour of entering office, so if any Republicans suffer from no health care to thing tough poop.

He's also is ending gun free zone, so what would the irony be if a anti trump person shot him in a former.

Oh yeah, to the 60% of women who vote don't plan on having an abortion, as Trump is anti abortion.

As the saying goes "Reap what you Sow".

Mick 09-11-2016 20:58

Re: US Election 2016
 
Thank you Damien and others, for a thoroughly enjoyable discussion on the US Election 2016. Got heated at times but that's what makes it interesting when people support the opposing side of the campaigns.

I stuck to my judgement that Trump would win the Presidency and I stuck to my view despite it being the minority view.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35868816)
This is just a though and not what I wish or hope.

He's dropping Obamacare within an hour of entering office, so if any Republicans suffer from no health care to thing tough poop.

I don't think you understand what Obamacare is, I did post a reply to what it was pages back. He wants to repeal it and replace it with cheaper health care, nothing wrong with that policy as it has got very expensive since it's inception. I don't think you would like it if you suddenly had to find £800 extra a month, this is what many Americans are having to contend with at the moment as they receive their new bills for $900+ extra on top of what they paid before.

Quote:

He's also is ending gun free zone, so what would the irony be if a anti trump person shot him in a former.
Gun free zone? There is no such thing. The 2nd Amendment has existed and majority of the American people cherish it. He is Pro NRA supporter, so he will not be changing anything in regards to it. Hillary wanted to bring in controls to it and ban certain guns, like automatic rifles and rapid fire guns. I actually agreed with Clintons stance, nobody needs to own a stockpile of ammunition or require guns that would do a small Army.

Quote:

Oh yeah, to the 60% of women who vote don't plan on having an abortion, as Trump is anti abortion.
Abortion issue he had was that he disagreed with women having abortions right up to the moment the baby was born except if there was a risk to the mother. He is not completely against ALL Abortions, despite changing his stance 3 times on the issue. He was saying in a tv interview that he felt women should be punished for having abortions, but has gone back on that and appears to support a 20 week limit. Over here there is the 24 week limit and then abortion is no longer a legal option unless there is a health risk to the mother.

adzii_nufc 09-11-2016 21:10

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35868853)
Thank you Damien and others, for a thoroughly enjoyable discussion on the US Election 2016. Got heated at times but that's what makes it interesting when people support the opposing side of the campaigns.

I stuck to my judgement that Trump would win the Presidency and I stuck to my view despite it being the minority view.



I don't think you understand what Obamacare is, I did post a reply to what it was pages back. He wants to repeal it and replace it with cheaper health care, nothing wrong with that policy as it has got very expensive since it's inception. I don't think you would like it if you suddenly had to find £800 extra a month, this is what many Americans are having to contend with at the moment as they receive their new bills for $900+ extra on top of what they paid before.



Gun free zone? There is no such thing. The 2nd Amendment has existed and majority of the American people cherish it. He is Pro NRA supporter, so he will not be changing anything in regards to it. Hillary wanted to bring in controls to it and ban certain guns, like automatic rifles and rapid fire guns. I actually agreed with Clintons stance, nobody needs to own a stockpile of ammunition or require guns that would do a small Army.



Abortion issue he had was that he disagreed with women having abortions right up to the moment the baby was born except if there was a risk to the mother. He is not completely against ALL Abortions, despite changing his stance 3 times on the issue. He was saying in a tv interview that he felt women should be punished for having abortions, but has gone back on that and appears to support a 20 week limit. Over here there is the 24 week limit and then abortion is no longer a legal option unless there is a health risk to the mother.

Great post. There seems to be a myth that Obamacare is somewhat comparable to the NHS. I was also under the impression that Republicans voted against it and it would be likely a republican candidate would be anti-obamacare.

TheDaddy 09-11-2016 21:43

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35868853)
Thank you Damien and others, for a thoroughly enjoyable discussion on the US Election 2016. Got heated at times but that's what makes it interesting when people support the opposing side of the campaigns.

I stuck to my judgement that Trump would win the Presidency and I stuck to my view despite it being the minority view.



I don't think you understand what Obamacare is, I did post a reply to what it was pages back. He wants to repeal it and replace it with cheaper health care, nothing wrong with that policy as it has got very expensive since it's inception. I don't think you would like it if you suddenly had to find £800 extra a month, this is what many Americans are having to contend with at the moment as they receive their new bills for $900+ extra on top of what they paid before.



Gun free zone? There is no such thing. The 2nd Amendment has existed and majority of the American people cherish it. He is Pro NRA supporter, so he will not be changing anything in regards to it. Hillary wanted to bring in controls to it and ban certain guns, like automatic rifles and rapid fire guns. I actually agreed with Clintons stance, nobody needs to own a stockpile of ammunition or require guns that would do a small Army.



Abortion issue he had was that he disagreed with women having abortions right up to the moment the baby was born except if there was a risk to the mother. He is not completely against ALL Abortions, despite changing his stance 3 times on the issue. He was saying in a tv interview that he felt women should be punished for having abortions, but has gone back on that and appears to support a 20 week limit. Over here there is the 24 week limit and then abortion is no longer a legal option unless there is a health risk to the mother.

Iirc the gun free zone is in and around schools.

I said and knew he'd win also, there is a world wide movement of ordinary people that have seen the standard of living drop consistently since the start of the millenia whilst the people at the top get richer at their expense, any flavour of politician elected has only maintained the status quo so it shouldn't come as a surprise that the people turn to someone else. The next election to reflect this imo will be the Italian referendum

Damien 09-11-2016 21:44

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35868853)
Thank you Damien and others, for a thoroughly enjoyable discussion on the US Election 2016.

:tu: I think we managed to stay on topic :D

Frankly it's up to them now. I'm not sure on the maths but apparently 2018 will largely be the Democrats defending senate seats whilst the various ways the districts are drawn up means they are unlikely to get a majority in the house for the foreseeable future. Trump has at least 3/4 years with a Republican House and Senate. He'll be relatively free to do what he wants.

My bigger concern is what impacts us and that is foreign policy. He wants to tear up the Iran deal and replace it with a better one, but that deal took years and many nations. What will he replace it with? With will happen about Eastern Europe? If Putin asks for the removal of some NATO defences will he comply? And so on.

The other side is maybe he moderates? He is a bit of a wild card but he was never especially policy focused in debates or in interviews. The first clue we'll get is who he appoints to his cabinet.

I still deeply dislike the man. I think he fails the standards of decency. How he talks about women, minorities and other groups makes me fearful he is now the most powerful man in the world but we don't need to revisit all that again :D

Paul 09-11-2016 21:45

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35868853)
Gun free zone? There is no such thing.

Actually, there is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun-Fr...es_Act_of_1990

Quite controversial, as it affects people who just happen to live near a school.

Damien 09-11-2016 21:54

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35868861)
I said and knew he'd win also, there is a world wide movement of ordinary people that have seen the standard of living drop consistently since the start of the millenia whilst the people at the top get richer at their expense, any flavour of politician elected has only maintained the status quo so it shouldn't come as a surprise that the people turn to someone else.

One aspect to remember about this rebellion of the people thing is that it's clearly a split. Brexit was close whilst Clinton actually won more votes. This is division within nations between their people. As for it being about the rich, Trump still won that demographic it's just he also cut into the democrats appeal to lower income voters as well.

Quote:

The next election to reflect this imo will be the Italian referendum
Le Pen in France is what I imagine everyone is watching now. Juppé is well ahead in polling. It couldn't possibly happen....could it?

RizzyKing 09-11-2016 22:37

Re: US Election 2016
 
One thing is for sure the old political establishment better wake up and change or this won't be the last time elections give a surprise.

TheDaddy 09-11-2016 22:37

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868867)
One aspect to remember about this rebellion of the people thing is that it's clearly a split. Brexit was close whilst Clinton actually won more votes. This is division within nations between their people. As for it being about the rich, Trump still won that demographic it's just he also cut into the democrats appeal to lower income voters as well.



Le Pen in France is what I imagine everyone is watching now. Juppé is well ahead in polling. It couldn't possibly happen....could it?

A vote for clinton was a vote for more of the same, trump might be loaded but no one could say he's part of the establishment

Damien 09-11-2016 22:53

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35868871)
A vote for clinton was a vote for more of the same, trump might be loaded but no one could say he's part of the establishment

Not as much as Clinton certainly but he is loaded, always on the outskirts of politics by donating to them, endorsing them, inviting the Clinton's to his wedding and attending the White House Correspondent Dinners etc. I would classify someone who is very wealthy, well connected and has many TV shows as part of the establishment too. I think we overuse that word anyway.

Still it my point is more is to reflect how divided the vote was yesterday. Like Brexit we say it's the people vs the establishment but it appears to only be half of them and then another half who want something else. It's the people vs the people.

Jimmy-J 09-11-2016 23:00

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35868871)
A vote for clinton was a vote for more of the same, trump might be loaded but no one could say he's part of the establishment

He'll be a puppet just like the rest were. Everyone who voted for him will be calling him rotten in a few months.

adzii_nufc 10-11-2016 01:21

Re: US Election 2016
 
I'm optimistic we might see relations with Russia improve from a western standpoint. I know its always a pain in the arse to actually achieve but it's something I want to happen. I want Russia to be an active part of our world, not the current situation of two countries consistently whinging at each other and then having Russia pull off some sketchy business.

Great thread though, still more to come but the main course is done with. Mick put up a hell of a fightand came out on top that was entertaining to scroll through over the past weeks. Damien was consistently updating the thread and providing insightful info for those of us who hadn't grasped the way the vote could go and how and explaining many other things.

TheDaddy 10-11-2016 02:58

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868874)
Not as much as Clinton certainly but he is loaded, always on the outskirts of politics by donating to them, endorsing them, inviting the Clinton's to his wedding and attending the White House Correspondent Dinners etc. I would classify someone who is very wealthy, well connected and has many TV shows as part of the establishment too. I think we overuse that word anyway.

Still it my point is more is to reflect how divided the vote was yesterday. Like Brexit we say it's the people vs the establishment but it appears to only be half of them and then another half who want something else. It's the people vs the people.

If the people were listened to there wouldn't even be extreme candidates to vote for

Dude111 10-11-2016 07:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick
The voting system in America is laughable, it really is. Maybe when Trump says the system is rigged, it appears to really be the case.

It was rigged as always!!

She had the most pop votes but he won.............. Totally disgusting.....

Pierre 10-11-2016 07:54

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868867)
Brexit was close whilst Clinton actually won more votes.

A 100,000 or so last I saw, which out of a voting total of around 135million is not really a margin at all. I'd call it a tie.

---------- Post added at 06:54 ---------- Previous post was at 06:50 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dude111 (Post 35868897)
It was rigged as always!!

She had the most pop votes but he won.............. Totally disgusting.....

Yeah just as bad as UKIP getting around the same number of votes as the SNP, they get 20 odd seats and UKIP gets 1.

The system is the system, no good complaining about it.

martyh 10-11-2016 08:09

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35868900)
A 100,000 or so last I saw, which out of a voting total of around 135million is not really a margin at all. I'd call it a tie.

---------- Post added at 06:54 ---------- Previous post was at 06:50 ----------



Yeah just as bad as UKIP getting around the same number of votes as the SNP, they get 20 odd seats and UKIP gets 1.

The system is the system, no good complaining about it.

Seems to be plenty of demonstrations going on against Trump from (presumably) Clinton supporters who only a few days ago where all saying that Trump should accept the result as democracy at work instead of refusing to accept it

papa smurf 10-11-2016 08:17

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35868902)
Seems to be plenty of demonstrations going on against Trump from (presumably) Clinton supporters who only a few days ago where all saying that Trump should accept the result as democracy at work instead of refusing to accept it

sounds familiar .

heero_yuy 10-11-2016 10:10

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868867)


Le Pen in France is what I imagine everyone is watching now. Juppé is well ahead in polling. It couldn't possibly happen....could it?

Yes! We all know how reliable that is these days...:erm:

Damien 10-11-2016 10:14

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35868900)
A 100,000 or so last I saw, which out of a voting total of around 135million is not really a margin at all. I'd call it a tie.

Oh yeah. My point isn't that she morally won the election but that we shouldn't make sweeping statements about the electorate when it's very divided. This election was decided by a minority of votes in a few swing states, had there been only a minor difference in turnout/votes in those states and Clinton won we equally couldn't have pretended Trump was outright rejected.

figgyburn 10-11-2016 10:20

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35868902)
Seems to be plenty of demonstrations going on against Trump from (presumably) Clinton supporters who only a few days ago where all saying that Trump should accept the result as democracy at work instead of refusing to accept it

Seen this mob on tv this morning.Social justice warriors also known as rent-a- mob.Same mob that were on the streets protesting at the police shootings,at climate change demos,g8 meetings etc.we have the same morons here.God help the future generations if these clowns were to run the show.

heero_yuy 10-11-2016 10:26

Re: US Election 2016
 
This bit of commentary in my red top made me laugh this morning:

Quote:


THE American luvvies are in a right old strop, bless them.

The stars of Hollywood and the music industry turned out to support Clinton.

The likes of druggie Robert Downey Jnr, Scarlett Johansson and Mark Ruffalo made emotive videos demanding nobody should vote for the horrible, nasty, Donald Trump. Nobody took any notice, did they, Robert. No notice at all.

Meanwhile, more than 20 luvvies said they would actually leave the country if Trump won. The ghastly Amy Schumer, for example, said she’d move to Spain. While Neve Campbell, Chloe Sevigny and Lena Dunham said they’d head for Canada. Good, off you go, get those bags packed!

And have we seen the last of Katie Hopkins over here? She said that if Trump won she’d move to the USA. Oh, you’d need a heart of stone not to laugh your head off.
Linky

Same over here with all those EU loving luvvies. They just don't get it.

:rofl:

Mick 10-11-2016 12:24

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by figgyburn (Post 35868919)
Seen this mob on tv this morning.Social justice warriors also known as rent-a- mob.Same mob that were on the streets protesting at the police shootings,at climate change demos,g8 meetings etc.we have the same morons here.God help the future generations if these clowns were to run the show.

Protests are not a surprise, they would have happened if Hillary won too. But there is no doubt in my mind that some are organised and some of today's rowdy youth are just joining the bandwagon.

But to smash up peoples property and burn stuff is a step too far. Let them have their protests but attacking other people and their property is not the answer it won't change anything.

Damien 10-11-2016 12:41

Re: US Election 2016
 
Yeah protests are fine. That is also part of democracy. It would be different if Clinton or senior Democrats refused to accept the result but they're not. Clinton conceded quickly, give a gracious speech, Obama invited him to the White House as per tradition and both give statements about unifying behind the next President.

They can protest and work to defeat him at a local level, at the mid-terms in two years and try and make him a one-term President. Some protesters can say 'not my President' but I imagine the inauguration will go ahead anyway.....

Mick 10-11-2016 12:57

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868930)
Yeah protests are fine. That is also part of democracy. It would be different if Clinton or senior Democrats refused to accept the result but they're not. Clinton conceded quickly, give a gracious speech, Obama invited him to the White House as per tradition and both give statements about unifying behind the next President.

I mean some of the protesters are saying 'not my President' but that isn't a thing. He will be. However they can protest and work to defeat him at a local level, at the mid-terms in two years and try and make him a one-term President.

Agreed but some are making calls for his assassination and this is just ridiculous and dangerous, all because of the refusal to accept the democratic result.

---------- Post added at 11:57 ---------- Previous post was at 11:53 ----------

For those who missed Clinton's concession speech,




It was gracious, like Trump Victory speech was earlier that day. (Need to scroll to 6 minutes in for Hillary if you don't want to see Tim Kaine speech)

Jimmy-J 10-11-2016 13:23

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868930)
Yeah protests are fine. That is also part of democracy. It would be different if Clinton or senior Democrats refused to accept the result but they're not. Clinton conceded quickly, give a gracious speech, Obama invited him to the White House as per tradition and both give statements about unifying behind the next President.

They can protest and work to defeat him at a local level, at the mid-terms in two years and try and make him a one-term President. Some protesters can say 'not my President' but I imagine the inauguration will go ahead anyway.....

I imagine there'll be massive protests on that day.

Hugh 10-11-2016 13:50

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868930)
Yeah protests are fine. That is also part of democracy. It would be different if Clinton or senior Democrats refused to accept the result but they're not. Clinton conceded quickly, give a gracious speech, Obama invited him to the White House as per tradition and both give statements about unifying behind the next President.

They can protest and work to defeat him at a local level, at the mid-terms in two years and try and make him a one-term President. Some protesters can say 'not my President' but I imagine the inauguration will go ahead anyway.....

To be fair, Americans have form on this if they don't agree with who is elected, including some broadcasters...


http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...-my-president/


http://www.cbsnews.com/news/column-o...-my-president/


https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rc...wBviOwFXOf8AMg


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...ashington.html


The election is over, the people have spoken, they now need to make it work for everyone.

Osem 10-11-2016 15:04

Re: US Election 2016
 
Wow, it all happens while I'm away... :)

I think the same thing happened there as in the UK with the mainstream media and pundits not really believing that there's as much frustration and anger outside of their cosseted little world as there evidently is. I don't think they really listen to people but tend to write off those who dare to have a different view on life as a mad, prejudiced, minority who don't matter. As a result of this delusional behaviour there's now a phenomenon known as GBBE - Gordon Brown Bigot Effect - and we've seen it in action with UKIP/Brexit and now we're seeing it in action again in the US. This is what happens when growing swathes of the electorate turn away from those who either disregard their views or cynically promise what they know they have no intention of delivering, backed up by the plethora of vastly rich holier than thou 'celebrities' who've done rather well out of the status quo.

Anyway, lets see how many of those who shouted out how they'd leave the US if Trump was elected will actually do so. I wonder if they'll outnumber their high profile UK 'Remainer' counterparts who're so ashamed and are no doubt heading off to live in the politically stable and moderate EU Utopia in droves as I write... :rolleyes:

nomadking 10-11-2016 15:33

Re: US Election 2016
 
People are fed up with their concerns not being addressed and that they are simply dismissed as an -ist of one sort or another. The high number of female and minority voters for Trump demonstrate that it wasn't the Trump voters that were an -ist. All the anti-Trump whingers saying that groups X, Y, and Z wouldn't vote for Trump just went to show that it was groups X, Y, and Z that were -ist. Eg Women would vote for Clinton simply because she's a woman, Mexicans wouldn't vote for Trump because of what he had said, Puerto Ricans wouldn't vote for him because he questioned Puerto Rico getting US money.

Mr K 10-11-2016 15:52

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35868946)
Anyway, lets see how many of those who shouted out how they'd leave the US if Trump was elected will actually do so.

Paul Daniels, Frank Bruno, Andrew Lloyd Webber, Jim Davison all promised to leave the UK if Labour won the '97 election. None of them did it, which outraged those who it convinced to vote Labour!

Anyway let's hope Trump didn't mean 90% of what he spouted. Has the wall started yet (good news for brickies)? Is Hillary in chains? Will all Muslims be banned from entry ?

Only consolation is not living there.

thenry 10-11-2016 16:49

Re: US Election 2016
 
And there's the disconnect. He has to mean what he says as that is what got him elected no?

denphone 10-11-2016 17:00

Re: US Election 2016
 
Nothing wrong with peaceful protests but sadly there are always some who are always very keen to hijack these protests and damage people properties which is totally unacceptable.

Mr K 10-11-2016 17:33

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35868956)
And there's the disconnect. He has to mean what he says as that is what got him elected no?

I honestly think it was inspite of his policies/gaffs he got elected. The main attraction being that he isn't Hilary or part of the Washington establishment. One Republican last night looked quite embarrased when questioned about some of the policies. He said the wall was probably a 'metaphorical' wall, not a real one ! Be hilarious if he really does mean it, 2000 miles long with machine gun towers and maybe a luxury hotel built in :D It'll make the Berlin wall look pathetic.

figgyburn 10-11-2016 17:34

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35868946)
Wow, it all happens while I'm away... :)

I think the same thing happened there as in the UK with the mainstream media and pundits not really believing that there's as much frustration and anger outside of their cosseted little world as there evidently is. I don't think they really listen to people but tend to write off those who dare to have a different view on life as a mad, prejudiced, minority who don't matter. As a result of this delusional behaviour there's now a phenomenon known as GBBE - Gordon Brown Bigot Effect - and we've seen it in action with UKIP/Brexit and now we're seeing it in action again in the US. This is what happens when growing swathes of the electorate turn away from those who either disregard their views or cynically promise what they know they have no intention of delivering, backed up by the plethora of vastly rich holier than thou 'celebrities' who've done rather well out of the status quo.

Anyway, lets see how many of those who shouted out how they'd leave the US if Trump was elected will actually do so. I wonder if they'll outnumber their high profile UK 'Remainer' counterparts who're so ashamed and are no doubt heading off to live in the politically stable and moderate EU Utopia in droves as I write... :rolleyes:

Same luvvies who said they would take in "refugees" to their notting hill mansions.how's that pledge going?

papa smurf 10-11-2016 17:37

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by figgyburn (Post 35868967)
Same luvvies who said they would take in "refugees" to their notting hill mansions.how's that pledge going?

they are ideas people ;)

thenry 10-11-2016 17:51

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35868965)
I honestly think it was inspite of his policies/gaffs he got elected. The main attraction being that he isn't Hilary or part of the Washington establishment. One Republican last night looked quite embarrased when questioned about some of the policies. He said the wall was probably a 'metaphorical' wall, not a real one ! Be hilarious if he really does mean it, 2000 miles long with machine gun towers and maybe a luxury hotel built in :D It'll make the Berlin wall look pathetic.

I disagree. HC wasn't elected because they want change agreed but then you have to look at change and it is what he was saying that is change. An invisible wall won't go down well. I reckon his wall is major as Obamacare is or was or ever will be.

Hugh 10-11-2016 17:54

Re: US Election 2016
 
On the bright side, Katie Hopkins said she would move to the USA if Trump won.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...-usa-if-trump/

Raise the average IQ in both countries if she does... :D

thenry 10-11-2016 17:57

Re: US Election 2016
 
Another tele venture for her.

martyh 10-11-2016 18:32

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35868975)
Another tele venture for her.

Rumour is she is taking over the Apprentice......

nomadking 10-11-2016 18:40

Re: US Election 2016
 
While some of Trump's suggested answers may seem extreme, he did at least show that he was concerned about the underlying issues and was prepared to address them. Voters may not believe he will carry out the things literally, but he will do something and not just ignore it.

thenry 10-11-2016 19:08

Re: US Election 2016
 
Will the house approve patching or repairing the disconnect?

Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35868982)
Rumour is she is taking over the Apprentice......

Lol

Damien 10-11-2016 19:37

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35868984)
While some of Trump's suggested answers may seem extreme, he did at least show that he was concerned about the underlying issues and was prepared to address them. Voters may not believe he will carry out the things literally, but he will do something and not just ignore it.

If he does. He has a Republican congress so no excuses if he doesn't.

Hugh 10-11-2016 19:41

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35868984)
While some of Trump's suggested answers may seem extreme, he did at least show that he was concerned about the underlying issues and was prepared to address them. Voters may not believe he will carry out the things literally, but he will do something and not just ignore it.

Were they aspirations, rather than promises? ;)

nomadking 10-11-2016 20:09

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35868992)
If he does. He has a Republican congress so no excuses if he doesn't.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35868993)
Were they aspirations, rather than promises? ;)

My point is that the voters didn't care whether he is actually going to carry out a specific policy, only that he does something about those issues. A sort of hyperbole, where you exaggerate something in order to demonstrate your strength of feeling. Clinton's approach was to simply say that there wasn't a problem in the first place and so wasn't going to do anything.

Hugh 10-11-2016 20:42

Re: US Election 2016
 
I think you may find some of the Tea Party will care very much...

Osem 10-11-2016 20:49

Re: US Election 2016
 
I just love the way the media are doing their best to exaggerate all that 'serious unrest' going on over in the US. All this fuss about the huge reaction to Trump's victory and what we actually have is a relatively few thousands on the march amongst a population of 325,000,000 or so? Big deal! When we start talking millions out on the streets protesting against Trump they may have a point but right now the profits of doom seem to have got it wrong again but it's not for the want of trying to find trouble to fill their pages and airtime with.

Likewise, despite our country having quite clearly become a truly hateful and xenophobic place to be, I'm still awaiting the mass exodus of petrified EU migrants and self righteous attention seeking hypocrites to start in the UK. Odd that eh? :shrug:

Mick 10-11-2016 21:49

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35869002)
I just love the way the media is exaggerating all the trouble going on over in the US. All this fuss about the reaction to Trump's victory and we have a relatively few thousands on the march amongst a population of 325,000,000 or so? Big deal! When we start talking millions out on the streets they may have a point but right now the profits of doom seem to have got it wrong again but it's not for the want of trying to find trouble to fill the pages and airtime with.

I also found it staggering how suddenly now that Trump wins the Electoral College Vote, but not the popular vote, there is something suddenly wrong with the whole democratic process in the US. Seen lots and and lots of typical BS regarding this, being spouted on Facebook by those in America who voted for Hillary.

I doubt they would have said the same thing if Hillary won via ECV and Donald won the popular vote.

---------- Post added at 20:49 ---------- Previous post was at 20:03 ----------

Just found this that explains why ECV exists and works...

http://www.chicksontheright.com/wp-c...36926813_n.jpg

Damien 10-11-2016 21:53

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35869006)
I also found it staggering how suddenly now that Trump wins the Electoral College Vote, but not the popular vote, there is something suddenly wrong with the whole democratic process in the US. Seen lots and and lots of typical BS regarding this, being spouted on Facebook by those in America who voted for Hillary.

I doubt they would have said the same thing if Hillary won via ECV and Donald won the popular vote.

The Electoral College/Popular Vote question isn't new. Many do not like the Electoral college not only because of situations like this but also because it renders so many votes worthless. 40 out of 50 states go offline from the Presidential campaign because they're not contested. It's the safe seat argument on steroids.

The counter-argument you can make to your friends on Facebook is this would be a very different election if it was decided on Popular vote. The campaigns would be different, the messages different and the voters' behaviour would be different.

As for the hypocrisy angle. Yes I imagine they wouldn't be saying it, they would be saying what I just said above. However Clinton didn't mention the popular vote in her concession speech nor Obama in his speech. Given Trump spent half the election saying it was rigged I can't imagine him being quiet had he lost the election but won the popular vote.

---------- Post added at 20:53 ---------- Previous post was at 20:50 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35869002)
Likewise, despite our country having quite clearly become a truly hateful and xenophobic place to be, I'm still awaiting the mass exodus of petrified EU migrants and self righteous attention seeking hypocrites to start in the UK. Odd that eh? :shrug:

I think the best people to judge how migrants feel in the UK are the migrants themselves. We're not really the best judges of that. Leaving is a big step to take and people will endure a lot to avoid leaving their homes, jobs and lives as they know it. The fact they haven't left doesn't mean they're not concerned.

pip08456 10-11-2016 22:31

Re: US Election 2016
 
1 Attachment(s)
Even Trump knew about the Electoral College vote and he was right. Nevertheless American politics is what it is and he won via that system. Perhaps he now has the balls to change it?

Mr K 10-11-2016 22:39

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35869019)
Even Trump knew about the Electoral College vote and he was right. Nevertheless American politics is what it is and he won via that system. Perhaps he now has the balls to change it?

It isn't that different in this country with the election of MPs. If you're in a constituency where you party is third, your vote is effectively meaningless/wasted. We had a chance to change it in the PR referendum early in the coalition Govt., however the 2 big parties clubbed together to convince us that each persons vote being equal was a terrible idea.

Mick 10-11-2016 22:39

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35869019)
Even Trump knew about the Electoral College vote and he was right. Nevertheless American politics is what it is and he won via that system. Perhaps he now has the balls to change it?

But why is he right ? If you see my image in the last post, it explains in simple terms how ECV works, what's wrong with that ?

If they went by the Popular vote, Democrats would win all the time, as they would always get the vote in Safe Democrat zones, California and all of the West Coast, New York, Miami etc etc. Rural areas would see voting a waste of time.

Arthurgray50@blu 10-11-2016 22:56

Re: US Election 2016
 
The worst thing about this election is the fact Trump won. I stayed up nearly night. I had to be at work at 5.30m. I was shattered.

You cannot have a bigot man being in charge of the most powerful man in the world. He has No experience in politics, and American Politics at that.

I can see, and l have said before. He will get double secret service with him. And he wont be able to do 'walkabouts' like Obama did.

The riots, and demos in the US. Is being done against Trump for many reasons. If he brings out the 'acts' that he plans. He will tear the US to pieces. Like The Tories are doing to the UK.

He will tear up Obamacare. And will bring out Health care that the poor wont be able to pay for.

When l spoke with my line manager today. He said that most Ambulances that turn up in the US. Are private health care vehicles that are run by Health Insurance companies.

I believe that someone will try and destroy him, within six months of his Presidency.

An don't forget, he is to appear in Court in December. Can you imagine, Court December and probably Impeachment during the first couple of Months.

Hilary Clinton should have won the election. But Giuliani called the rioters Cry Babies. Why, they were standing up for there rights.

Ramrod 10-11-2016 22:56

Re: US Election 2016
 
It seems that the racist violence is kicking off :(
‘Die Whites Die’: Anti-Trump Rioters Vandalize NOLA Monuments
‘You Voted Trump!’ Man Viciously Beaten in Chicago After Election
......but not the way that the libtard press has been predicting :dozey:

Mick 10-11-2016 23:06

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod (Post 35869024)
It seems that the racist violence is kicking off :(
‘Die Whites Die’: Anti-Trump Rioters Vandalize NOLA Monuments
‘You Voted Trump!’ Man Viciously Beaten in Chicago After Election
......but not the way that the libtard press has been predicting :dozey:

Seems like after 24 hours or so they have forgot the message from the Hillary Camp....

"Love Trumps Hate...." :rolleyes:

Hugh 10-11-2016 23:07

Re: US Election 2016
 
There are asshats across the political spectrum - they are all morons..

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7410166.html

pip08456 10-11-2016 23:17

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35869021)
It isn't that different in this country with the election of MPs. If you're in a constituency where you party is third, your vote is effectively meaningless/wasted. We had a chance to change it in the PR referendum early in the coalition Govt., however the 2 big parties clubbed together to convince us that each persons vote being equal was a terrible idea.

Yes but Trump is alledgedly anti establishment. Who knows?

Damien 10-11-2016 23:25

Re: US Election 2016
 
Trump is the establishment now, if he wasn't before. You don't get rid of the establishment you just change who it consists of.

However I find the idea that a billionaire with a chain of hotels, a private jet, a TV show and many political connections is not the establishment further evidence that the term has lost all meaning. It's just that politicians have always done well by donning the cloak of the maverick against the establishment.

Mick 10-11-2016 23:33

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35869023)

I can see, and l have said before. He will get double secret service with him. And he wont be able to do 'walkabouts' like Obama did.

ALL Presidents get Secret Service Protection. He also has his own security.

Quote:

The riots, and demos in the US. Is being done against Trump for many reasons. If he brings out the 'acts' that he plans. He will tear the US to pieces. Like The Tories are doing to the UK.
It is already divided Arthur.

Quote:

He will tear up Obamacare. And will bring out Health care that the poor wont be able to pay for.
Poor get help towards the cost of it but again Obamacare costs are increasing now. He wants to replace it and make it cheaper.

Quote:

When l spoke with my line manager today. He said that most Ambulances that turn up in the US. Are private health care vehicles that are run by Health Insurance companies.
That's how they work in America. There is no Free healthcare. Health care is run by private companies. They don't have a National Free Health service like we do. In America, if you call an ambulance and you accept a ride to the hospital, you do get billed for it later on.

Quote:

I believe that someone will try and destroy him, within six months of his Presidency.
Change the record Arthur, it is getting old. :zzz:

Quote:

An don't forget, he is to appear in Court in December. Can you imagine, Court December and probably Impeachment during the first couple of Months.
Actually he is not - the Plaintiff 'Jane Doe', dropped the lawsuit, again and it wasn't actually a Court hearing as such, it was a 'Status Conference' for the judge to decide on merit to take the case forward to a Court case or settlement. It is important to note that anyone can raise a Lawsuit against someone. Innocent until proven guilty Arthur. You should know that.

However there is news that, he may be called to Testify at a Trump University Fraud Trial.

Quote:

Hilary Clinton should have won the election. But Giuliani called the rioters Cry Babies. Why, they were standing up for there rights.
I am all for legitimate and quiet peaceful protest, but burning flags and people properties etc etc is a tad pathetic.

Ramrod 10-11-2016 23:38

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35869027)
There are asshats across the political spectrum - they are all morons..

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7410166.html

Indeed :(

Damien 10-11-2016 23:38

Re: US Election 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35869035)
However there is news that, he may be called to Testify at a Trump University Fraud Trial.

Yah he is actually the defendant with the case set for this month: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/1...versity-231082 it's a civil case though so I don't think it has any implications legally? If he loses it's just a massive payout I think....


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:47.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum