neoapple
28-12-2005, 10:34
Ok this is really anoying me now
anyone in the bromley kent area got any slowness?
ping google.com
Pinging google.com [72.14.207.99] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=1529ms TTL=234
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=1386ms TTL=233
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=1071ms TTL=234
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=937ms TTL=233
Ping statistics for 72.14.207.99:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 937ms, Maximum = 1529ms, Average = 1230ms
1st 512K took 43188 ms = 11.9 KB/sec, approx 98 Kbps, 0.1 Mbps
2nd 512K took 50921 ms = 10.1 KB/sec, approx 83 Kbps, 0.08 Mbps
3rd 512K took 54063 ms = 9.5 KB/sec, approx 78 Kbps, 0.08 Mbps
4th 512K took 53437 ms = 9.6 KB/sec, approx 79 Kbps, 0.08 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 85 Kbps, 0.09 Mbps
anyone in the bromley kent area got any slowness?
ping google.com
Pinging google.com [72.14.207.99] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=1529ms TTL=234
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=1386ms TTL=233
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=1071ms TTL=234
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=937ms TTL=233
Ping statistics for 72.14.207.99:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 937ms, Maximum = 1529ms, Average = 1230ms
1st 512K took 43188 ms = 11.9 KB/sec, approx 98 Kbps, 0.1 Mbps
2nd 512K took 50921 ms = 10.1 KB/sec, approx 83 Kbps, 0.08 Mbps
3rd 512K took 54063 ms = 9.5 KB/sec, approx 78 Kbps, 0.08 Mbps
4th 512K took 53437 ms = 9.6 KB/sec, approx 79 Kbps, 0.08 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 85 Kbps, 0.09 Mbps