View Full Version : How bad can it get? 20MB to this...?
novacrsh
29-10-2007, 20:10
20 MB line :
even with traffic shapping surely :
Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:08:58 GMT
Test 1: 1024K took 15872 ms = 64.5 KB/sec, approx 531 Kbps, 0.52 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 25777 ms = 39.7 KB/sec, approx 327 Kbps, 0.32 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 18617 ms = 55 KB/sec, approx 453 Kbps, 0.44 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 44805 ms = 45.7 KB/sec, approx 377 Kbps, 0.37 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 422 Kbps, 0.41 Mbps
WTF is going on?
It breaks my heart after everything VM have offered.
ultimate
29-10-2007, 20:17
Mine is pathetic too, thats why I am searching for other ISP, I already got my BT line reinstated.
novacrsh
29-10-2007, 20:17
Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:14:36 GMT
Test 1: 1024K took 22132 ms = 46.3 KB/sec, approx 382 Kbps, 0.37 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 27940 ms = 36.7 KB/sec, approx 302 Kbps, 0.29 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 21802 ms = 47 KB/sec, approx 387 Kbps, 0.38 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 44454 ms = 46.1 KB/sec, approx 380 Kbps, 0.37 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 363 Kbps, 0.35 Mbps
To repeat this test from the source server click here.
can anyone tell me if im a victim of traffic shapeing?
bigdavep
29-10-2007, 20:23
Dont think It's traffic shaping tbh. You shouldn't be shaped that low...
Have you checked your modem signal levles??
ultimate
29-10-2007, 20:32
For me, this pathetic speed comes on from 6pm to 11pm, and week ends, (I do not do any downloading), so there is nothing wrong with the equipment. Someone at VM flicks a switch to slow us all down for god knows what reason, and its been like that for the last 3 weeks and for a lot of people.
If all the heavy users are being shaped after 4pm, i would also like to know why its so crap between approx 5pm to about midnight for everyone else?
Checked with a few users i know around my area so i know its not just me. ;)
For me, this pathetic speed comes on from 6pm to 11pm, and week ends, (I do not do any downloading), so there is nothing wrong with the equipment. Someone at VM flicks a switch to slow us all down for god knows what reason, and its been like that for the last 3 weeks and for a lot of people.
Your not the only one. Me and plenty of others are having the same problem.
same here in stoke and its the same everyday no matter what ive downloaded .
if shaped on 20 meg it should be 5 meg not just over 1 meg.
Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:58:03 UTC
Test 1: 1024K took 5703 ms = 179.6 KB/sec, approx 1480 Kbps, 1.45 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 8984 ms = 114 KB/sec, approx 939 Kbps, 0.92 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 6079 ms = 168.4 KB/sec, approx 1388 Kbps, 1.36 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 11515 ms = 177.9 KB/sec, approx 1466 Kbps, 1.43 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 1318 Kbps, 1.29 Mbps
To repeat this test from the source server click here (http://homepage.ntlworld.com/paul.marsden/newspeedtest.html?1193687918546).
---------- Post added at 20:00 ---------- Previous post was at 20:00 ----------
one other thing are we all on the same ubr im on baggaley
Berealwith
29-10-2007, 21:01
My post is up Preston same to..........I really want friday to come
one other thing are any of you other guys on the bagguley ubr same as me
stewart28
29-10-2007, 21:18
I live just outside Glasgow and on 20mb i get this:
Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:17:03 UTC
Test 1: 1024K took 1 ms = 1024000 KB/sec, approx 8437760 Kbps, 8240 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 1 ms = 1024000 KB/sec, approx 8437760 Kbps, 8240 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 672 ms = 1523.8 KB/sec, approx 12556 Kbps, 12.26 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 1 ms = 2048000 KB/sec, approx 16875520 Kbps, 16480 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 8440899 Kbps, 8243.06 Mbps
;)
Berealwith
29-10-2007, 21:30
Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:28:10 UTC
Test 1: 1024K took 2193 ms = 466.9 KB/sec, approx 3847 Kbps, 3.76 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 3558 ms = 287.8 KB/sec, approx 2371 Kbps, 2.32 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 3243 ms = 315.8 KB/sec, approx 2602 Kbps, 2.54 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 3813 ms = 537.1 KB/sec, approx 4426 Kbps, 4.32 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 3312 Kbps, 3.24 Mbps
this is mine area Preston
novacrsh
29-10-2007, 21:36
Dont think It's traffic shaping tbh. You shouldn't be shaped that low...
Have you checked your modem signal levles??
what should the signal levels be?
---------- Post added at 20:36 ---------- Previous post was at 20:34 ----------
Downstream Lock : Locked
Downstream Channel Id : 1
Downstream Frequency : 402750000 Hz
Downstream Modulation : QAM256
Downstream Symbol Rate : 5360.537 Ksym/sec
Downstream Interleave Depth : taps32Increment4
Downstream Receive Power Level : -1.7 dBmV
Downstream SNR : 40.1 dB
of any value??????
Upstream: Around 40, nothing higher than 48
Downstream: -15 to +15, but generally virgins limits are tighter
Your SNR should be higher than 30 too.
UPDATE:
Yours look OK so far, whats you upstream?
novacrsh
29-10-2007, 21:39
upstream :
Upstream Lock : Locked
Upstream Channel ID : 3
Upstream Frequency : 34000000 Hz
Upstream Modulation : QPSK
Upstream Symbol Rate : 2560 Ksym/sec
Upstream transmit Power Level : 41.0 dBmV
Upstream Mini-Slot Size : 2
Your upstream is okay too. I suspect maybe oversubscription, or maybe a router.
If you dont have a router, post in virginmedia.support.broadband.cable (newsgroup). See customer zone for instructions on how to use newsgroups.
novacrsh
29-10-2007, 21:43
oversubscription?? whats that? i do have a router but not had problems until recently - any ideas - thanks for your help so far!
Total rubbish
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2007/10/6.png (http://www.speedtest.net)
Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:49:36 GMT
Test 1: 1024K took 2937 ms = 348.7 KB/sec, approx 2873 Kbps, 2.81 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 2375 ms = 431.2 KB/sec, approx 3553 Kbps, 3.47 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 2235 ms = 458.2 KB/sec, approx 3776 Kbps, 3.69 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 4515 ms = 453.6 KB/sec, approx 3738 Kbps, 3.65 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 3485 Kbps, 3.41 Mbps
Oversubscription is when the master router (UBR) that services your area has too many customers, and it cant cope with it.
As for your router, if your running 20megs, and cant get good speeds, it might be because your router is not up to processing the data. Test without the router, see if you get any higher, if not, you will need a new router.
one other thing are any of you other guys on the bagguley ubr same as me
Yep. :(
jrhnewark
30-10-2007, 00:59
Just posted to the VM broadband newsgroup with this:
Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:53:56 UTC
1st 128K took 267 ms = 490906 Bytes/sec = approx 4084 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 274 ms = 478365 Bytes/sec = approx 3980 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 365 ms = 359101 Bytes/sec = approx 2988 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 397 ms = 330156 Bytes/sec = approx 2747 kbits/sec
I'm rather hoping someone might look into it. Seems VM staff do read it!
Milliesdad
30-10-2007, 14:32
Not sure where you're based Novacrsh but I'm in Bath and my speeds were particularly appalling yesterday evening. Seemed alright, well about as good as it gets, this morning.
This what I get in Newport - Wales
Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:55:20 UTC
Test 1: 1024K took 468 ms = 2188 KB/sec, approx 18029 Kbps, 17.61 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 422 ms = 2426.5 KB/sec, approx 19994 Kbps, 19.53 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 610 ms = 1678.7 KB/sec, approx 13832 Kbps, 13.51 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 1656 ms = 1236.7 KB/sec, approx 10190 Kbps, 9.95 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 15511 Kbps, 15.15 Mbps
To repeat this test from the source server click here.
in Cardiff here with crap speeds too. Been like this for about a week now :(
Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:28:09 GMT
Test 1: 1024K took 12330 ms = 83 KB/sec, approx 684 Kbps, 0.67 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 14841 ms = 69 KB/sec, approx 569 Kbps, 0.56 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 7077 ms = 144.7 KB/sec, approx 1192 Kbps, 1.16 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 20226 ms = 101.3 KB/sec, approx 835 Kbps, 0.82 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 820 Kbps, 0.8 Mbps
Which test is the best? I am getting this from thinkbroadband java test.
Speed Test Results
Date 30/10/07 18:33:32
Speed Down 10200.48 Kbps ( 10 Mbps )
Speed Up 676.56 Kbps ( 0.7 Mbps )
Port 8095
Server speedtest1.adslguide.org.uk
Hi All.
Not sure if this will help but I found this article when I was getting slow speeds:
http://www.virginmedia.com/help/20mb-broadband-optimisation.ph
No one on tech support there told me about it. I had been receiving sub 4mb for over 2 months. Found the doc above, followed the steps and my speed climbed to 18-19mb. been like that for a month now.
ultimate
31-10-2007, 14:25
i get a broken link from your post
http://www.virginmedia.com/help/20mb-broadband-optimisation.php
---
my speed seems to fluctuate between 3mb to 7mb ?
My 20Mb connection was crap in the evening a few months back despite being told by "knowledgeable" Indian staff that there was nothing wrong. I had a big moan then and it miraculously sorted itself.
For the last 2 weeks it's been dodgy again, getting steadily worse. Called the rip-off number only to be told there was nothing wrong, and trying to blame my poor speeds on my router (BS). I don't call getting <400kbs on a 20Mb connection "nothing wrong". As soon as it gets near midnight, the speeds go up to normal levels (15-19Mb) without any intervention on my part, so that rules out anything my end being the issue.
Speeds drop, pings rise soon after 4pm, and then around midnight they return to normal, what does that say? :mad:
I really have just about had enough, and if it's not sorted when the engineer comes out next Monday (5th Nov), then VM can kiss my ass goodbye. :shocked:
I'm tired of being fobbed off with lame excuses while being charged a premium price for £ shop tat. :td:
As much as I'd hate to lose the extra speed when it does work, it's looking increasingly likely that I'm gonna have to go on ADSL and be lucky to get 2Mb, but hopefully at least I'll get that speed consistently :erm:
I've attached my last load of speed tests at various time.
what did you use to record those speedtests?
My 20Mb connection was crap in the evening a few months back despite being told by "knowledgeable" Indian staff that there was nothing wrong. I had a big moan then and it miraculously sorted itself.
For the last 2 weeks it's been dodgy again, getting steadily worse. Called the rip-off number only to be told there was nothing wrong, and trying to blame my poor speeds on my router (BS). I don't call getting <400kbs on a 20Mb connection "nothing wrong". As soon as it gets near midnight, the speeds go up to normal levels (15-19Mb) without any intervention on my part, so that rules out anything my end being the issue.
Speeds drop, pings rise soon after 4pm, and then around midnight they return to normal, what does that say? :mad:
I really have just about had enough, and if it's not sorted when the engineer comes out next Monday (5th Nov), then VM can kiss my ass goodbye. :shocked:
I'm tired of being fobbed off with lame excuses while being charged a premium price for £ shop tat. :td:
As much as I'd hate to lose the extra speed when it does work, it's looking increasingly likely that I'm gonna have to go on ADSL and be lucky to get 2Mb, but hopefully at least I'll get that speed consistently :erm:
I've attached my last load of speed tests at various time.
www.speedtest.net (http://www.speedtest.net) using either Sittingbourne (nearest to me) or London servers. I can use other sites etc. which give me similar results.
My modem info shows the relevant items to be within spec (those the engineers have told me in the past).
How do you view modem info?
www.speedtest.net (http://www.speedtest.net) using either Sittingbourne (nearest to me) or London servers. I can use other sites etc. which give me similar results.
My modem info shows the relevant items to be within spec (those the engineers have told me in the past).
By using http://root:root@192.168.100.1/
It's strange it's only down to certain areas, shirley they could sort out the worse areas in some way or another. Saying that I've never got less than 20mb at all times where I am (cambs). I suppose I should count myself lucky after reading the troubles that a lot are having.
Could be worse, a mate of mine on BT 8mb adsl in the Ascot area max out at about 100k/sec. :confused:
n0c0ntr0l
31-10-2007, 19:03
It's strange it's only down to certain areas, shirley they could sort out the worse areas in some way or another. Saying that I've never got less than 20mb at all times where I am (cambs). I suppose I should count myself lucky after reading the troubles that a lot are having.
Could be worse, a mate of mine on BT 8mb adsl in the Ascot area max out at about 100k/sec. :confused:
I'm 1 mile from ascot and am getting 56k speeds atm.
I'm 1 mile from ascot and am getting 56k speeds atm.
It is the area obviously then, what package are you on? As I was going to suggest VM to my friend.
n0c0ntr0l
31-10-2007, 19:54
8Mbit package. But my problems have been reoccurent, but they are going to dissappear, now that I have complained.
Same boat as you guys, was getting 20mb a few months ago now this
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2007/10/1.png (http://www.speedtest.net)
Utter crap,
Could be worse, a mate of mine on BT 8mb adsl in the Ascot area max out at about 100k/sec. :confused:
Yeah but I'm paying for a "premium" tier service, not an "up to the xxMb" lower tier product :dozey:
8Mbit package. But my problems have been reoccurent, but they are going to dissappear, now that I have complained.
i really hope they do,and please keep us informed but my gut feeling is you have a old line and thats as good as it gets. adsl on a bad line can be notoriously bad, i had mine changed but only because it was a ex-collegue who did the inspection
stewart28
01-11-2007, 14:28
how do i find out my modem configuration as in previous posts.
Tonight it's extremely crap :mad:
Sun, 04 Nov 2007 18:23:26 GMT
Test 1: 1024K took 26134 ms = 39.2 KB/sec, approx 323 Kbps, 0.32 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 18256 ms = 56.1 KB/sec, approx 462 Kbps, 0.45 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 30689 ms = 33.4 KB/sec, approx 275 Kbps, 0.27 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 59130 ms = 34.6 KB/sec, approx 285 Kbps, 0.28 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 336 Kbps, 0.33 Mbps
I'm just so f*&ked off with this *****e :td:
Just to show it's consistently crap, another 15 mins later after full reboot of modem, router & PC
Sun, 04 Nov 2007 18:38:12 GMT
Test 1: 1024K took 27404 ms = 37.4 KB/sec, approx 308 Kbps, 0.3 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 32932 ms = 31.1 KB/sec, approx 256 Kbps, 0.25 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 33085 ms = 31 KB/sec, approx 255 Kbps, 0.25 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 50013 ms = 40.9 KB/sec, approx 337 Kbps, 0.33 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 289 Kbps, 0.28 Mbps
Still crap...
Sun, 04 Nov 2007 20:04:45 GMT
Test 1: 1024K took 35195 ms = 29.1 KB/sec, approx 240 Kbps, 0.23 Mbps
Test 2: 1024K took 19592 ms = 52.3 KB/sec, approx 431 Kbps, 0.42 Mbps
Test 3: 1024K took 54947 ms = 18.6 KB/sec, approx 153 Kbps, 0.15 Mbps
Test 4: 2048K took 58607 ms = 34.9 KB/sec, approx 288 Kbps, 0.28 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 278 Kbps, 0.27 Mbps
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.