Quote:
Originally Posted by passingbat
. He seems, along with Investigative reporter Sara Carter and John Solomon from The Hill and a few others, got some very interesting evidence together. that needs to be exposed and investigated further.
|
Mr Mueller seems to be gathering a lot of evidence too, on the Donald, who is going to be in the dock very soon. Shame Hannity ( and friends) couldn't have exposed the numpty first, instead of their politically motivated fiction. The outfall from Donald is going to result in the Republicans losing power for a long time, so it would have been in his interest.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018...sights-donald/
Quote:
This week it emerged that Mr Trump is set to be called for interview by Mr Mueller, the special counsel investigating Russian election meddling.
It has triggered a flurry of activity in the White House, whose legal team is exploring whether answers can be provided in writing, and a tepid response from the man himself.
“We'll see what happens”, Mr Trump said, rowing back on a “100 per cent” promise last year to be interviewed if asked. He added it was “unlikely” to happen.
However reports suggest otherwise. Mr Mueller is expected to call for the US president to give testimony under oath within weeks, according to US media.
Two interview topics will be at the top of the list: obstruction of justice claims and the Trump campaign’s links to Russia.
Mr Trump’s firing of James Comey, the FBI director leading the Russian investigation, is key to the former; his advisers’ interactions with Kremlin figures the focus of the latter.
The dangers are clear - it was Bill Clinton’s misleading testimony to a federal grand jury, not simply his affair with Monica Lewinsky, which triggered impeachment proceedings.
|