Thread: Cricket The General Cricket Thread
View Single Post
Old 15-08-2005, 03:29   #188
homealone
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Cricket

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
Quote:
Originally Posted by gazzae
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
Nope, IIRC it's either one or the other, not both.
Quote:
13. Runs resulting from a No ball †“ how scored
Ah, I see what you're getting at, but it's not quite the same thing.

With the no ball going to the boundary, there are two *separate* events, ie firstly the one run for a no ball is "instantly" awarded, then, subsequently, if it goes to the boundary *another* four runs are added.

Whilst this totals five, of course, it's actually one extra plus four extras, not an automatic award of five immediately.

Here's the Lord's cricket site with the full laws of the game: http://www.lords.org/laws-and-spirit/laws-of-cricket/
__________________

Anyway, back to the game:

Full credit to the Aussies for surviving this (well, yesterday!) evening, although they were a) a little lucky and b) pushing their luck with a risk of an (optional!) five penalty runs for delay of play!

399 to win, not impossible, but can England get 10 wickets???
was Bell 'guilty' of scoring too slowly, - should freddie have been put in to tickle the scoreboard ....